As
UN
Says Silva
"Not
Participating"
in SAG, Press
Coverage "Not
Permitted"
By
Matthew
Russell Lee,
Exclusive
UNITED
NATIONS,
April 10 --
After UN
Secretary
General Ban
Ki-moon
repeatedly
declined to
opine on or
oppose the
appointment to
his
Senior
Advisory Group
on
Peacekeeping
(SAG) of Sri
Lankan General
Shavendra
Silva, whose
58th Division
is depicted in
Ban's own
Panel
of Experts
report as
engaged in war
crimes, the
SAG chair
Louise
Frechette
herself ruled
Silva
inappropriate.
On April
9, Sri
Lanka
Permanent
Representative
Palitha
Kohona
told Inner
City Press
that
the only
reason Silva
did not attend
is that "he's
not here, Mr.
Silva is out
of the country...
Two points,
one is, it's
illegal, this
is
inconsistent
with the
resolution.
The chair has
no
right to say I
don't like
your face.
Second, the
chair can't
tell the
Asia Group who
to send. This
is insulting
and
humiliating to
the
Asians."
It
seems obvious
in this
context that
to
journalistically
cover this
issue requires
going to
observe if
Silva attends
or does not
attend the UN
SAG
meetings.
But earlier
this month the
SAG's
"organizers,"
Inner City
Press was
told, "did not
give their
permission for
press
coverage."
Ban's UN
Secretariat,
citing a
meeting with
the
UN
Correspondents'
Association,
said that the
Press cannot
go try to
see if Silva
attends the
meetings,
at least not
without a
minder.
This
followed
Inner City
Press going on
April 2 to see
if Silva would
attend the
SAG meeting,
which was held
in the UN
rented
building at
380 Madison
Avenue.
Several
members of the
SAG spoke with
Inner City
Press, but
again, Ban's
Secretariat
claims that
"the
organizers"
don't
want this --
without
identifying
who the
organizers
are.
Inner
City Press
wrote to the
spokesman of
UN
Peacekeeping
asking
"on
the
Senior
Advisory Group
on
Peacekeeping
Operations,
you circulated
Ms.
Frechette's
statement but
said she
doesn't have a
spokesperson,
does she now
or please ask
and get answer
to: what is
Shavendra
Silva's
current status
with the SAG?
Was the Asia
Group
represented
at April 2-3
SAG meetings?
I've been told
SAG
'organizers'
do not
give their
permission for
press coverage
-- is
Frechette that
organizer? Who
are the
organizers,
and why do
they seek in
inhibit
press
coverage? On
deadline."
The
next day, not
having any
response to or
support on
this, Inner
City Press put
the
questions to
Ban's
spokesman:
(video
here)
Inner
City
Press: ...If I
can just get a
confirmation
from the UN
system that he
didn’t attend.
I am told
by the Sri
Lankans that
the only
reason he
didn’t attend
is that he
was out of
town. What
bothered me
the most I
heard from
Media
Accreditation
here that the
organizers did
not give
permission for
press coverage
of the
meeting... I
would like to
know what the
position is.
Spokesperson
Martin
Nesirky :
Well, I think
there is a
difference
between
covering it
and seeking
access to a
building
without being
accompanied by
an official
from the Media
and
Accreditation
Liaison
Unit, which is
standard
procedure. And
as I
understand it,
MALU, the
Unit in
question, has
made it very
clear what the
rules are, but
also
their
readiness to
help you to be
able to have
access to
parts of the
UN premises
that are off
campus, if you
wish, to be
able to cover
an
event. So,
that’s the
technical part
of it. On the
other bits,
let me find
out.
Inner
City Press: I
hate to say
this, but
[garbled by UN
- the word
"minders"
was used]
This
is typical.
The spokesman
cuts off a
question about
the
Secretariat's
own
performance by
claiming that
there are
other
questions --
only, there
aren't any
other
questions. The
UN transcript
intentionally
garbles
the questions,
and cuts out
words like
"minder."
Compare to video,
here.
Nevertheless,
after
the above
exchange, UN
Peacekeeping's
spokesman
replied with
this:
Dear
Matthew,
In response to
your question
about the
Senior
Advisory
Group, I have
the following
information -
I am following
this up to
facilitate
your query but
I am not the
spokesperson
for this
advisory
group which is
not part of
DPKO. The
Senior
Advisory Group
(SAG)
does not have
a spokesperson
or media
officer. I am
advised that
the
SAG is
continuing its
assessment of
troop cost
reimbursement
issues.
Once the Group
has finished
this
assessment, I
understand
that it
will deliver
its report to
the General
Assembly
through the
Secretary-General,
as mandated in
its founding
resolution. I
am
advised that
General Silva
is not
participating
in the Group,
and
that the
Chair's
previous
statement on
this matter
stands. There
are
nineteen other
SAG members,
including
several from
the
Asia-Pacific
region. I am
continuing to
follow up on
your other
questions.
It's
appreciated.
The other
questions
concern, among
other things,
the UN's
seeming use
of
mercenaries...
Footnote:
there
has been no
help from the
Correspondents'
Association.
To the
contrary,
an officer
of the
Association on
April 9
emailed other
members of the
Executive
Committee --
of which Inner
City Press is
an elected
member
-- seeking to
exclude Inner
City Press
from future
meetings, all
without
sending a copy
to Inner City
Press, amid without
apparent irony
references to
journalistic
ethics.
When
confronted,
the officer
said "there
was no
meeting, do
your
homework."
Indeed. The
issue is not
as claimed
describing any
purportedly
confidential
Correspondents'
Association
meeting --
with MALU, one
that the
officer in
question
didn't even
take the time
to attend --
but rather
that the
current
Ban-era
Association,
supposed to be
supporting
journalists to
be able to
physically
cover the UN,
in fact
seeks to
engage in
censorship,
then to censor
any reports of
its own
actions, and
to exhort in
its own
meetings "more
positive
coverage of
the UN."
While
a diversion,
we can have
more on
this. Watch
this site.