In UN Staff Union, Charges of Coup d'Etat in
Meetings Closed to Press
Byline: Matthew Russell Lee of Inner City Press at
the UN: News Muse
UNITED NATIONS,
April 7, updated April 13 --
The current leadership
of the UN Staff Union is being accused of irregularities and of
“erroneously
excluding” candidates, by a group of purported reformers who, alongside
their
call for transparency and free and fair elections, held a meeting
closed to the
Press on Tuesday.
All this
takes place while moves are afoot to reduce for
example the number of sick days and leave days for staff members with
temporary
contracts, and while the physical
safety of staff members is increasingly in
question.
While
throughout 2007 and 2008 the Staff Union
meetings were open, now UN Security officers are used to bar the media
from
entering. The result is not only a lack of transparency, but also the
covering
up of mistreatment of staff members. The meeting prior to Tuesday
involved the death of
staff member Jesmel Navoa who had a stroke in the UN's third
sub-basement; it took an hour for an ambulance to arrive on scene
to attend him,
and he died the next day in the hospital.
The Staff
Union passed a resolution on the matter,
but excluded two media organizations from the meeting, and delayed four
days in
releasing the resolution, which had been modified and watered down
after the
closed-door vote. Ironically, that resolution called for the issuance
of a
release to the press. But why would the media cover this meeting they
were
excluded from, which was summarized five days day? A television network
which
had been eager to cover this UN staff safety issue ultimately did not,
on these grounds -- on which, also, this article starts with press
exclusion.
Tuesday's meeting involved another
draft
resolution, a copy of which a staff member disagreeing with the
exclusion of
the Press emerged and provided. In it, concern is expressed "about the
irregularities
surrounding the conduct of the election of the 43rd Staff Council...
leaving 22
units of the organization with no staff representative and another 9
units with
questionable representation." It calls for “free and fair elections...
Bulletins to be widely circulated on i-Seek and throughout the
Secretariat [and
to] ensure that a weekly bulletin is issued to the staff providing an
update”
-- all this in a closed meeting not attended by the vast majority of
staff at
UN Headquarters.
Inner
City Press arrived at the ECOSOC Chamber to
cover the meeting at 1:15. In an abundance of caution, Inner City Press
told
the UN Security Officer in front of the door that it wished to cover
the
meeting as me dia. The Officer went in, then came out to say that one
Fred Doulton
said "no." The First Vice President of the Union Tom Ginivan arrived,
and
repeated as he had the previous time that the Press would be allowed
in. But
the Security Officer asked for clarification.
A
representative of the UN's
Media Accreditation and Liaison Unit came, and finally summoned the
supervisor
of the Unit. After stating that if the president of the Union said the
meeting
was open, it would be open,
he emerged from the ECOSOC Chamber to say that Fred
Doulton, now described as the chairman, had ruled that the meeting was
closed.
He added that it was not really
a UN meeting, despite the use of UN Security to
exclude the press. ("That's just a [security] post," he said of the
officers' presence.)
Perhaps the insurgents didn't want their
deliberations to be seen. But it was a meeting at which they sought to
have
appointed a Caretaker-Administrator of the UN Staff Union. It was, more
than
one staff member called it, an attempted coup. Only at the UN could
such a
meeting be said to have nothing to do with the UN.
Elections at UN - in General Assembly, Staff
Union elections not shown
Earlier the same day, the UN couldn't
even call the military chasing out
Madagascar's elected president a coup d'etat. Inside its own
headquarters, it
apparently has no written rules on what meetings and events can or
cannot be
covered by the press. The UN still has no freedom of information
procedure,
promised by previous Under Secretary General for Management Alicia
Barcena. And
when a coup is plotted right inside the UN the meeting is closed,
arbitrarily,
and UN Security is used to exclude the media.
After the
meeting broke up, multiple interviews with both sides and the middle
gleaned
that because far fewer than 300 staff members were in attendance, no
vote was
held on the resolution. One of the insurgent, Mampela Mpela, reportedly
threatened to organize a "recall" drive against DPI unit
representative Maha Fayek. Ms. Fayek said that none of the
communications she
has receive from those in her unit have asked for a new election; she
offered
to show her e-mails in this regard. That,
would be transparency.
The
president
of the union after the meeting made clear to MALU its position that the
Press should have been
allowed; the response was that the president should have said so at the
time. All of this is a diversion: there
are moves afoot to, for example, reduce sick days and leave days for
those with
temporary contracts, there is very little participation by staff
members in
these changes. We will continue to follow these issues.
In this case, everyone could and should do
better, including this publication and page. Here's hoping.
Update of April 13: After the
publication of the article above, more
information became available. Some was provided by those we'd called
insurgents
-- they prefer “petitioners” -- and some by sources high in the ether
that is
the UN system. First, a clarification: while undoubtedly the Press was
excluded
from the April 7 meeting, all are now fingering Fred Doulton. Even the
petitioners say they had nothing to do with it, and would have
preferred the
meeting open.
(Mr. Doulton, by the
way, wrote that "Over
the years, experiences such as these have helped me evolve. I have
learned that
there is always a better way to do things, and that people matter more
than
States, organizations, and belief systems." Maybe returning these
meetings
to open status is a better way to do things....)
Second, the
petitioners wish it to be known that
they are "not in it for personal gain," only out of feeling for the
long history of the Union. Mpela, for example, is grateful for what she
calls
the staff union's intervention to keep her out of jail in 1983. She
will retire
in mere months.
Third, the
petitioners also contest the statute
that's being used. It was enacted with less than 200 people. All they
want,
they say, is an election. They contest one staff representative's
statement
that there is hardly a groundswell for this.
We
delayed
a few days in running this update as we are making inquiries into why
the
petitioners were not able to put notice of their meeting on the UN's
i-Seek
system. We will have more on this.
Click here
for a new YouTube video, mostly UN Headquarters footage, about civilian
deaths
in Sri Lanka.
Click here for Inner City
Press' March 27 UN debate
Click here for Inner City
Press March 12 UN (and AIG
bailout) debate
Click here for Inner City
Press' Feb 26 UN debate
Click
here
for Feb.
12 debate on Sri Lanka http://bloggingheads.tv/diavlogs/17772?in=11:33&out=32:56
Click here for Inner City Press' Jan.
16, 2009 debate about Gaza
Click here for Inner City Press'
review-of-2008 UN Top Ten debate
Click here for Inner
City Press' December 24 debate on UN budget, Niger
Click here from Inner City Press'
December 12 debate on UN double standards
Click here for Inner
City Press' November 25 debate on Somalia, politics
and this October 17 debate, on
Security Council and Obama and the UN.
* * *
These
reports are
usually also available through Google
News and on Lexis-Nexis.
Click here
for a Reuters
AlertNet piece by this correspondent
about Uganda's Lord's Resistance Army. Click
here
for an earlier Reuters AlertNet piece about the Somali
National
Reconciliation Congress, and the UN's $200,000 contribution from an
undefined trust fund. Video
Analysis here
Feedback: Editorial
[at] innercitypress.com
UN
Office: S-453A, UN, NY 10017
USA
Tel: 212-963-1439
Reporter's
mobile (and
weekends):
718-716-3540
Other,
earlier Inner City Press are listed here, and some are available
in the ProQuest service, and now on Lexis-Nexis.
Copyright
2006-08 Inner City Press, Inc. To request
reprint or other permission, e-contact Editorial [at]
innercitypress.com -
|