SMH
on WIPO's Gurry's North Korean
Cyanide Work, Silent on
Guterres' Silence &
Censorship
By Matthew
Russell Lee
UNITED NATIONS,
August 7 – The UN system's
mistreatment of whistleblowers
goes beyond the UN
Secretariat's firing of Anders
Kompass after he went public
with sexual abuse of children
in the Central African
Republic by peacekeepers, and
outright censorship in 2016.
At the World
Intellectual Property
Organization, Director General
Francis Gurry abused his power
after a detailed charge of
misconduct filed by then
Deputy Director General James
Pooley. Whistleblower Miranda
Brown has yet to be
reinstated. A long story in
the Sidney Morning Herald
denials Gurry's drive to take
his employees' DNA and glosses
over, somewhat, his work on
North Korea's cyanide patent
and the sequence of comment on
it. But given all this against
Gurry, there is another
glaring omission: where is
Antonio Guterres? While the
answer this fortnight is "on
vacation," bigger picture
where are the reforms Guterres
was supposed to bring to the
UN system, of which WIPO is a
part, with Gurry on the UN
Chief Executives Board? How
has Guterres down nothing
about Gurry's abuse of criminal
defamation law against the
critical press, while Guterres'
holdover head of "Global
Communications" Maher Nasser
glosses over retaliation against
investigative Inner City Press
in UN Headquarters. Here
is the SMH - shaking my head -
article. We'll have more on
this.
On January
6, Inner City Press asked the
UN about reports it would be
issuing a revised
whistleblower policy, and
about criticism of it. See
below.
The policy was
announced on January 23, the
first full day of the Trump
Administration in the US,
where already legislation
calls for cutting
contributions to the UN if it
does not protect
whistleblowers. Will this,
which still apparently denies
access to the UN Dispute
Tribunal, be enough?
Inner City Press
asked UN holdover spokesman
Stephane Dujarric on January
23, video here, UN
transcript here:
Inner City Press:
now that you've announced
this… the whistle-blower
policy, I wanted to ask you a
couple of things. As I'm
sure you know, the Government
Accountability Project in
[Washington], D.C., had
criticized this policy in
December 2016, and I wanted to
know, has… can you highlight
any changes? Basically,
they were saying that, in the
past, they… they are saying
it's weakening, the current
one, which says, if you allege
a violation of a rule, you're
protected. And now you
have to allege, according to
them in December, substantial
harm to the UN's reputation
and that that harm will be…
Has been resolved?
Spokesman: I think what
they… the criticism was aimed
at a draft that they
obtained. I will leave
it for them to speak. I
hope they and all concerned
Member States will read
through the policy. And
if they have any comments, we
obviously would welcome
them. But, I think no…
it's… it would be difficult to
argue that this new policy
weakens the whistle-blower
protection system. In
fact, it strengthens it, and
it keeps alive the broad
parameters under which… under
which staff members are able
to file complaints with the
Ethics Office.
Inner City Press: What
are António Guterres' views of
what happened with Mr.
[Anders] Kompass? This
was a high-profile
whistle-blower case known to
many Member States and
commented on newspapers all
over the world. Does he
believe that… would this new
protection… would this new
policy have in any way
protected Anders Kompass from
being fired and thrown out of
his office?
Spokesman: I think it's…
Mr. Kompass' case was examined
thoroughly by the… by the
independent panel. I
really don't have anything to…
you know, I… it's… I don't
think it would be… it would
not be possible for me to
hypothetically plug back in
what he may have done or may
not have done into a policy
that's just been enacted.
Inner City Press: And
can you just… I'd asked you
over the weekend, but can you
somehow, in a succinct way,
clarify what the Ethics Office
said about the Women's March
on Saturday? They sent
out an e-mail at 5 p.m.… 6
p.m. on Friday that saying
participation in political
events may be contrary to the
UN Charter. Was this
meant to tell staff not to go?
Spokesman: I think the
message from the Ethics Office
was meant as a reminder to
international civil servants
as to their code of
conduct. It was not
meant to prevent participation
in the march.
***
Feedback:
Editorial [at] innercitypress.com
UN Office: S-303,
UN, NY 10017 USA
Reporter's mobile (and weekends):
718-716-3540
Other,
earlier Inner City Press are listed here, and some are available in
the ProQuest service, and now on Lexis-Nexis.
Copyright
2006-2015 Inner City Press, Inc. To request reprint or other
permission, e-contact Editorial [at] innercitypress.com
for
|
,
