UN Belatedly Admits It Still Gets
Satyam Services Through ICC, Cover-Up Alleged
Byline: Matthew Russell Lee of
Inner City Press at the UN: News Analysis
UNITED
NATIONS, March 5 -- The UN
on Thursday acknowledged that it still receives services from Satyam,
the
so-called Indian Enron, through the UN-affiliated International
Computing
Center. On
Tuesday, UN Associate Spokesman Farhan Haq responded to Inner City
Press' question on this point with a statement that "we
were informed by our Procurement Division that Satyam was suspended in
January... A communication has been sent to the UN procurement system
(including peacekeeping missions) and the procurement extranet site is
now
updated."
Inner City Press asked Haq if the UN Procurement
Division covered the
UN-affiliated ICC, and Haq indicated that it did. He then called Inner
City
Press' questions "obnoxious." Later on Tuesday, a more senior UN
official told Inner City Press that the UN does, in fact, continue to
receive
services from Satyam through the ICC, which is not covered by the UN
Procurement Division. After more inquiries, on Thursday Haq's Office
sent Inner
City Press the following:
Subj:
your question on computing/Satyam
From:
unspokesperson-donotreply [at] un.org
To:
Inner City Press
Sent:
3/5/2009 11:12:15 A.M. Eastern Standard Time
We
have received further information concerning links with Satyam,
concerning the
International Computing Centre (ICC), whose procurement activities are
done
independently of the UN Secretariat.
The
UN Secretariat has several projects underway with the International
Computing
Centre (ICC) that involve Satyam. Satyam is engaged as a sub-contractor
of ICC.
The Secretariat does not have any direct contract with Satyam for these
projects. In light of recent developments concerning Satyam, we asked
ICC to
find a replacement for Satyam as soon as possible.
While we will continue to cover if and when this
replacement actually
happens, the series of events, including the inaccurate answer that was
only
corrected after questioning deemed "obnoxious," has led two
well-placed sources with intimate knowledge of the UN system's
procurement
activities to call this either a Spokesperson's Office cover-up, or
intentionally incorrect answers by the UN Procurement Division.
The question
arises, and is being pursued, who in the UN Procurement Division gave
the
incorrect information about the ICC and Satyam, and on whose orders.
Watch this site.
Back in January, the UN told
Inner City Press that "Satyam has been suspended from the UN
Secretariat
vendor database. The information has been communicated to the UN
procurement
system and the UN Global Marketplace. Ongoing contracts with Satyam are
currently under assessment."
At
the noon
briefing on March 3, Inner City Press asked Ms. Okabe, does the UN
receive
computer services through the International Computing Center from
Satyam, the
so-called Indian Enron? Ms. Okabe said that while she didn't "have the
guidance" with her, an answer had been sent to Inner City Press earlier
in
the day. Video here,
from Minute 12:59.
UN's Ban and computers: Satyam through the
UN's ICC not shown
Haq's March 3 response to Inner City Press'
questions about the
UN-affiliated ICC and Satyam also stated
UNDP's
most recent contract with Satyam was signed in December 2007 for
consulting
work on its information systems. The contract went through the normal
competitive process. This contract was set to expire after one year
(November
30 2008). In October of 2008, media
articles appeared on irregularities in Satyam's work with the World
Bank. UNDP approached the World Bank
and Satyam
proactively to find out the details of the alleged irregularities. As a result of these conversations, UNDP took
a decision not to renew Satyam's contract and began to evaluate the
phase out
while minimizing the risks to our information systems.
UNDP currently has 11 Satyam technical
consultants working on its information systems.
UNDP
does not manage the UN Global Marketplace (UNGM), it is managed by
UNOPS. We are in the process of having the
misleading or erroneous information contained on IAPWG's site removed
as it
unfortunately creates this perception. UNDP
can flag vendors in the UNGM should it experience problems and is
currently in
the process of doing so. It is worth
noting that UNDP's review of the published World Bank list of barred
vendors
did not turn up Satyam's name, in spite of such references in the media
to
Satyam having been debarred.
In
light of the most recent information regarding Satyam, UNDP, like many
other
companies and organizations, will not be continuing its business with
them and
is currently looking for a replacement.
So while UNDP like the ICC has been asked to is
"currently looking
for a replacement," sources raise the following additional questions:
what
is the visa status of the Satyam employees currently working for UNDP
(and the
UN and ICC)? Does UNDP (and the ICC) pay individuals for their
services, or pay
Satyam? Developing...
Click here for Inner City
Press' Feb 26 UN debate esp. here
on Darfur
Click
here
for Feb.
12 debate on Sri Lanka http://bloggingheads.tv/diavlogs/17772?in=11:33&out=32:56
Click here for Inner City Press' Jan.
16, 2009 debate about Gaza
Click here for Inner City Press'
review-of-2008 UN Top Ten debate
Click here for Inner
City Press' December 24 debate on UN budget, Niger
Click here from Inner City Press'
December 12 debate on UN double standards
Click here for Inner
City Press' November 25 debate on Somalia, politics
Click here for Inner City
Press Nov. 7 debate on the war in Congo
Watch this site, and this Oct. 2 debate, on
UN, bailout, MDGs
and this October 17 debate, on
Security Council and Obama and the UN.
* * *
These
reports are
usually also available through Google
News and on Lexis-Nexis.
Click
here
for a Reuters
AlertNet piece by this correspondent
about Uganda's Lord's Resistance Army. Click
here
for an earlier Reuters AlertNet piece about the Somali
National
Reconciliation Congress, and the UN's $200,000 contribution from an
undefined trust fund. Video
Analysis here
Feedback: Editorial
[at] innercitypress.com
UN Office: S-453A, UN, NY 10017
USA
Tel: 212-963-1439
Reporter's mobile (and
weekends):
718-716-3540
Other,
earlier Inner City Press are listed here, and some are available
in the ProQuest service, and now on Lexis-Nexis.
Copyright
2006-08 Inner City Press, Inc. To request
reprint or other permission, e-contact Editorial [at]
innercitypress.com -
|