In
UN, Refusals to Answer Press
on Public Pay, Picks for Top
Jobs, UNFPA Edition, USG CT
By Matthew
Russell Lee
UNITED NATIONS,
February 6 – How are senior positions
filled, with public funds, in
the United Nations?
Transparency is still lacking.
Inner City Press has repeated
asked, for example, when the
top jobs in UN Peacekeeping
and the Department of Political
Affairs are going to be
advertised, without answer.
(As exclusively
reported, DPA's Jeffrey
Feltman has been extended to
July 4, so that his 5-year UN
pension vests - again, UNtransparent.)
A day ago,
Inner City Press asked this
question to three separate
spokespeople of UNFPA, the UN
Population Fund, a self-described
global organization:
"This is a Press
request on deadline for
confirmation or denial that
Monica Ferro is being named
chief of the Geneva Office of
UNFPA, Job ID: 4756, and for
any comment."
No answer.
The lead spokesman of UNFPA in
New York has dodged Inner City
Press' questions for years,
see this
example. So to increase
UN openness, we've posed this
question. Also of related interest,
the lack of transparency
surrounding the "Under
Secretary General for Counter-Terrorism"
position. Watch this site.
There is today's
UN a form of caste system, or
like the old British show
"Upstairs, Downstairs."
Lower
level UN staff are told that
only the Secretary General can
speak -- witness this gag
order sent out after Inner
City Press published
whistleblowers' account of
their bosses wining and dining
outside brokers.
But
political and politicized
bureaucrats like Cristina
Gallach of the Department of
Public Information are allowed
to, for example, promote
Samantha Power's election
night party, while the head of
the UN's Sustainable Energy
for All tweets about successes
"despite Trump."
If they
can speak, why can't other UN
staff including
whistleblowers? Why has there
as yet been no accountability
for Cristina Gallach, listed
in the UN's
audit of the Ng Lap Seng
bribery case, and who in
the midst of that evicted and
restricts Inner City Press without
any due process or
appeal?
Why was
the former head of SE4ALL
reportedly paid 600,000 Euros
a year? The UN needs reform
and accountability. Now, not
March 31.
Arrogant and incompetent, this
is a double whammy
characteristic of a number of
parts of the UN system, crying
out to be radically reformed
or entirely disbanded. This is
true not only of the UN
Department of Public
Information under Cristina
Gallach (see below), but also
of such entities as "SE4ALL"
or Sustainable Energy for All.
This
entity, set up under now
discredited Secretary
General Ban Ki-moon as a
vehicle for Kandeh Yumkella to
run for president in Sierra
Leone, still says it plans an
event in New York in April
2017.
Meanwhile
Rachel Kyte its director and
"representative of the
Secretary General" -- that is,
speaking for Antonio Guterres
as least as of February 2 --
is tweeting things like this:
"Glad to see
leqdership [sic] from
@marossefcovic EU to lead
fight on climate change
despite Trump."
Who is
PAYING for this? We'll have
more on this.
Kyte was
re-tweeting Hillary Clinton in
November (and shouting out
#PantsSuitNation, both
here), just as DPI's
Cristina Gallach promoted
Samantha Power's election
night party. This happens
while lower level UN staff are
threatened for telling Inner
City Press about UN
corruption,
here.
Antonio
Guterres surely as his views.
But he is trying to navigate a
relationship with the UN's
largest funders, while
incompetents like Gallach, and
devil-may-cares like Kyte, do
whatever they want with no
consequences. Gallach evicted
and restricts Inner City Press
with no
due process, no appeal.
She must go. Now.
While in some places the UN is
doing good work, the worst of
the organization is
exemplified in its Department
of Public Information,
particularly as regards
planning to mislead the public
in 2017 about such issues has
peacekeepers' rapes and
bringing deadly cholera to
Haiti.
See UN
Plan, exclusively put
online here.
UN
Peacekeeping needs radical
reform, and UN DPI under
Cristina Gallach needs to be
disbanded.
Gallach
produced a propaganda plan for
2017, which multiple outraged
UN sources leaked to Inner
City Press. Gallach's "2017
Communications Guidance"
has a paragraph on cholera in
Haiti which does not mention
that the UN brought the
disease to the island. Page 9.
While
barely a million dollars,
nearly all of it blood money
from Ban Ki-moon's South
Korea, has been raised,
Gallach tells her propaganda
troops to "promote the UN's
efforts to combat the disease
harnessing.. social media
tools."
This is
propaganda.
Likewise on
sexual exploitation and abuse
by peacekeepers, Gallach's
rah-rah implies that the
corner has been turned. Page
5. While the UN's billion
dollar DR Congo mission is a
mere footnote, the UN's failed
envoy on Yemen is portrayed as
successful on Page 6. The
section on the Middle East ,
and pages 10 and 14-15, are
designed to trigger budget
cuts.
UN's
"2017 Communications Guidance,"
Here, Is Propaganda Plan of Cristina
Gallach, Who Should Be Fired by
Matthew
Russell Lee on Scribd
It is
Gallach who should be fired.
As the UN
remains unreformed after Ban
Ki-moon's ten years ended with
corruption, long asked about
by the Press, exposed, budget
cuts are coming.
In
Washington executive orders
are being prepared to cut up
to 40% of the US'
contributions to the UN, and
to fully cut funding to
entities blamed for violation
of human rights.
Inner City
Press has put that draft
EO online here.
One
obvious question is whether
the total denial of due
process for whistleblowers -
already part of US law - and
investigative press which covers
UN corruption
constitutes such a violation.
For
example, the UN Department of
Public Information under
Cristina Gallach in early 2016
threw
Inner City Press out of the
UN, dumping its
investigative files onto First
Avenue, without a single
hearing or opportunity to be
heard, and no
appeal since.
All this for
seeking to cover an event in
the UN Press Briefing Room
which was nowhere listed as
closed, and leaving as soon as
a single UN Security officer
said the Spokesman, Stephane
Dujarric, wanted Inner City
Press out.
Gallach had a
conflict of interest, having
been asked
by Inner City Press about her
own links with
Macau-based businessman Ng Lap
Seng, facing trial (like Ban
Ki-moon's nephew and brother)
on bribery charges.
There are no
rules, only the one-person
fiat rule of an official
dumped on Ban's UN by Spain,
where she had previously
managed, at most, seven people
as spokesperson to Javier
Solana. Nothing has been done;
eleven months later Gallach
still requires Inner City
Press to have "minders"
to cover the UN Security
Council.
The cuts,
and a new US Ambassador, are
coming. Six days after a
confirmation hearing in which
she called for accountability
at the UN, including for
peacekeepers' abuses, Nikki
Haley on January 24 was
confirmed to replace Samantha
Power as US Ambassador to the
UN.
This came
after at least two business
days of no
photos replacing those
of President Barack Obama and
Vice President Joe Biden at
the US Mission to the UN.
On January
24, Inner City Press asked
former UN official, now
Swedish foreign minister
Margot Wallstrom about Haley's
call to defund countries whose
peacekeepers abuse. Tweeted
video here. There are
reforms needed at the UN.
Back on
January 18 before Haley spoke
as nominee for US Ambassador
to the UN, Senator Bob Corker
said he sometimes wondered if
just-left Secretary General
Ban Ki-moon had a pulse.
In fact,
Ban was quite active in
helping his own relatives at
the UN, promoting his son in
law to the top UN job in
Kenya, his brother mining in
Myanmar with a "UN
delegation," indicted nephew
using Ban's name to sell real
estate.
When Haley
began, she said the UN has a
"checkered history." That's
being diplomatic. Consider a
head of Peacekeeping who has
linked rapes to R&R, video
here.
Consider a
head of the UN "Department of
Public Information" who did no
due diligence over indicted UN
briber Ng Lap Seng - then
evicted and still restricts
the Press which asked here
about it. Audit
here, Para 37-40, 20b; NYT
here.
In
response to questions, Haley
praised the UN peacekeeping
mission in Sierra Leone,
questioned the one in South
Sudan and that country's
government. She noted that
countries make money off their
peacekeepers. The case in
point, we note, is Burundi, here.
***
Feedback:
Editorial [at] innercitypress.com
UN Office: S-303,
UN, NY 10017 USA
Reporter's mobile (and weekends):
718-716-3540
Other,
earlier Inner City Press are listed here, and some are available in
the ProQuest service, and now on Lexis-Nexis.
Copyright
2006-2015 Inner City Press, Inc. To request reprint or other
permission, e-contact Editorial [at] innercitypress.com
for
|