| UNDT Told Inner City Press
To Destroy Evidence of UN Sex Abuse That Was
Leaked, Now Complains of Recording, Guterres
Cover Up
By Matthew
Russell Lee, Patreon Appeal SG
Response
BBC
- Guardian
UK - Honduras
- ESPN
UN GATE, August
21 – How corrupt and
unaccountable is today's
United Nations?
Well, in
November 2020 Inner City Press
went to attend and report on a
UN Dispute Tribunal proceeding
about a case of sexual
harassment in the UN, a
proceeding which was announced
as open to the public, as US
court cases are.
But when
Inner City Press signed in and
gave its name, it was
excluded. Later, when it
obtained and published evidenc
presented in the case, a UN
Dispute Tribunal judge ordered
it to destroy the evidence or
be banned from all future
proceedings.
This while
UN Secretary General Antonio
Guterres falsely claims to
have zero tolerance for sexual
harassment and abuse, while
himself banning Inner City
Press from UN briefings now
for 1205 days.
And Inner
City Press' timely appeal has
been "deferred" from Guterres'
kangaroo Appeals Tribunal,
until October 2022 at least,
while his Melissa Fleming
refuses to answer even a major
US law firm - this is
impunity, see below.
Now this
UN report complains, "15. During the
reporting period, the holding
of public hearings remotely
raised its own set of
difficulties. The registries
experienced difficulties in
controlling the access to the
virtual public gallery, which
is not problematic in the
physical courtroom. It is also
more difficult to control
whether the public abide by
the Tribunal’s instructions,
in particular the prohibition
of recording the hearing." No,
UN staff disgusted with
Guterres' cover ups leak.
The deferral:
"The June 2021 Synopsis file
of UNAT judgments was published.
They heard only 32 appeals,
and the last appeal number
heard in the session was 1468.
So Inner City Press'
appeal number 1502 won't be
considered at a minimum until
the late October 2021
session. The
current estimated time from
submitting an appeal to being
considered is almost one
year. Speedy
justice? The Guterres
Administration knows and
exploits this. A typical
UNDT case takes at least 18
months and then the appeals
process takes at least a
year. Hence why
the Administration appeal
every successful UNDT
judgement by a staff member,
it costs them nothing, while
it costs the staff member
plenty, as well as delaying
any justice they may end up
getting, which is usually
little. Guterres' UN is
corrupt - and cannot be
allowed to continue banning
the Press which reported on
it.
In the
case Inner City Press was
ordered to destroy evidence of
who-done-it, even the UNDT has
found Padula guilty - but has
insisted that he be
anonymized, that is, covered
up for. The shameful order is
here,
and recites for example that
the person - Padula - covered
up for
.“grabbed [AA’s]
face, held her closely, leaned
forward and attempted to kiss
her”; b. “when [AA] resisted
[the Applicant] kissing her,
[he] forced [AA’s] head down
and kissed her on the
forehead”; c. “grabbed
[BB’s] face, held her closely,
leaned forward and attempted
to kiss her”; d. “tried to
move physically close to [AA]
and [BB] while dancing,
despite their attempts to keep
[him] at a distance”; e.
“attempted to grab [CC’s]
face; when she blocked her
face with her hands, [the
Applicant] grabbed her hands
and tried to pull them apart;
when she resisted, [he] fell
on her forcefully”; and f.
“took and pulled [CC’s] hands
to try to get her to dance,
despite her resistance”.
But in
Guterres' UN they do not want
the public to know who did
this - and the Press which
exclusively published and name
and evidence is banned and its
written questions not
answered. On the morning of
February 4, 12 hours before
publishing this when no answer
was received from Guterres,
Dujarric, Fleming, Amina J.
Mohammed et al., Inner City
Press in writing asked this:
"what are SG Guterres comments
and more importantly action on
the UN Dispute Tribunal on Feb
3 confirming sexual charges
against Padula - while having
told Inner City Press to
destroy all evidence or remain
bannned, and maintaining
Padula's name sealed,
confirming the cover-up
culture under Guterres?"
The UN
claims it has to protect the
identity of Padula (and will
NOT report him to NYPD for any
criminal offense) because they
have to protect the identity
of the VICTIMS - it's like
Guterres' rationale for
covering up genocide and mass
killing, for example in
Cameroon.
Inner City
Press is even banned from
submitting questions by WebEx,
on which the International
Monetary Fund for example
answers its questions, as it
did on February 4 about the
Burma coupl. The only
difference is Guterres and his
corruption.
On December 21
Inner City
Press filed a
formal appeal
with the UN
Appeals
Tribunal, full
filing here
on
DocumentCloud.
And
now in late
January
Guterres' long
time
Portuguese
lawyer Miguel
de Serpa
Soares has
responded,
that Guterers
is not waiving
immunity,
impunity
response on
Document Cloud
here.
Impunity.
On the
morning of January 26 Inner
City Press emailed Guterres
and his spokespeople this
question: "
Given that the
UNDT order
destruction of
evidence
concerning
sexual
harassment
inside the UN,
why is SG
Guterres not
waiving
immunity?" No
answer.
We will have
more, including listing more
of those complicit in the UN's
cover up of abuse. Watch this
site.
***
Your
support means a lot. As little as $5 a month
helps keep us going and grants you access to
exclusive bonus material on our Patreon
page. Click
here to become a patron.
Feedback:
Editorial [at] innercitypress.com
SDNY Press Room 480, front cubicle
500 Pearl Street, NY NY 10007 USA
Mail: Box 20047, Dag
Hammarskjold Station NY NY 10017
Reporter's mobile (and weekends):
718-716-3540
Other, earlier Inner City Press are
listed here,
and some are available in the ProQuest
service, and now on Lexis-Nexis.
Copyright 2006-2020 Inner City
Press, Inc. To request reprint or other
permission, e-contact Editorial [at]
innercitypress.com
|
,
