After UNSG Guterres Ordered
Press To Destroy Evidence of Sex Abuse His
Appeals Tribunal Says Only Not Receivable
By Matthew
Russell Lee, Patreon Appeal SG
Response
BBC
- Guardian
UK - Honduras
- ESPN
UN GATE, Nov 7 –
How corrupt and unaccountable
is today's United Nations?
Well, while the
UN claims to be against sexual
harassment and for
accountability and press
freedom, under Secretary
General Antonio Guterres it
ordered banned Inner City
Press which reported on an
ostensibly public UN Dispute
Tribunal proceeding about
harassment to destroy the
evidence or be banned, a
second time, from all
proceedings, even virtual.
Then when
Inner City Press appealed to
the UN Appeal Tribunal, the
time to decide was extended, a
proceeding held in secret and
a one line denial issued:
"2020-1502
Matthew Russell Lee against
Secretary-General of the
United Nations Appeal not
receivable and dismissed."
No
reasoning was given, no
opportunity to be heard. Inner
City Press will be asking for
the reasoning, first from
Guterres and his spokespeople
Stephane Dujarric, Farhan Haq,
Eri Kaneko, Stephanie Tremblay
and Florencia Soto Nino, then
if necessary from the Appeals
Tribunal judges themselves.
Inner
City Press was
ordered to
destroy
evidence of
who-done-it,
even the UNDT
has found
Padula guilty
- but has
insisted that
he be
anonymized,
that is,
covered up
for. The
shameful order
is here,
and recites
for example
that the
person -
Padula -
covered up for
.“grabbed [AA’s]
face, held her closely, leaned
forward and attempted to kiss
her”; b. “when [AA] resisted
[the Applicant] kissing her,
[he] forced [AA’s] head down
and kissed her on the
forehead”; c. “grabbed
[BB’s] face, held her closely,
leaned forward and attempted
to kiss her”; d. “tried to
move physically close to [AA]
and [BB] while dancing,
despite their attempts to keep
[him] at a distance”; e.
“attempted to grab [CC’s]
face; when she blocked her
face with her hands, [the
Applicant] grabbed her hands
and tried to pull them apart;
when she resisted, [he] fell
on her forcefully”; and f.
“took and pulled [CC’s] hands
to try to get her to dance,
despite her resistance”.
But in
Guterres' UN they do not want
the public to know who did
this - and the Press which
exclusively published and name
and evidence is banned and its
written questions not
answered. On the morning of
February 4, 12 hours before
publishing this when no answer
was received from Guterres,
Dujarric, Fleming, Amina J.
Mohammed et al., Inner City
Press in writing asked this:
"what are SG Guterres comments
and more importantly action on
the UN Dispute Tribunal on Feb
3 confirming sexual charges
against Padula - while having
told Inner City Press to
destroy all evidence or remain
bannned, and maintaining
Padula's name sealed,
confirming the cover-up
culture under Guterres?"
The UN
claims it has to protect the
identity of Padula (and will
NOT report him to NYPD for any
criminal offense) because they
have to protect the identity
of the VICTIMS - it's like
Guterres' rationale for
covering up genocide and mass
killing, for example in
Cameroon.
Inner City
Press is even banned from
submitting questions by WebEx,
on which the International
Monetary Fund for example
answers its questions, as it
did on February 4 about the
Burma coup, on on November 4,
2021 about Ethiopia. The only
difference is Guterres and his
corruption.
On December 21
Inner City
Press filed a
formal appeal
with the UN
Appeals
Tribunal, full
filing here
on
DocumentCloud.
In
late January
2021 Guterres'
long time
Portuguese
lawyer Miguel
de Serpa
Soares
responded,
that Guterers
is not waiving
immunity,
impunity
response on
Document Cloud
here.
Impunity.
On the
morning of January 26 Inner
City Press emailed Guterres
and his spokespeople this
question: "
Given that the
UNDT order
destruction of
evidence
concerning
sexual
harassment
inside the UN,
why is SG
Guterres not
waiving
immunity?" No answer,
still.
Then
this:
"2020-1502
Matthew
Russell Lee
against
Secretary-General
of the United
Nations Appeal
not receivable
and
dismissed."
Inner City
Press' timely appeal was
"deferred" from Guterres'
kangaroo Appeals Tribunal,
until October 2021, while his
Melissa Fleming refuses to
answer even a major US law
firm - this is impunity, see
below.
This
UN report complained, "15. During the
reporting period, the holding
of public hearings remotely
raised its own set of
difficulties. The registries
experienced difficulties in
controlling the access to the
virtual public gallery, which
is not problematic in the
physical courtroom. It is also
more difficult to control
whether the public abide by
the Tribunal’s instructions,
in particular the prohibition
of recording the hearing." No,
UN staff disgusted with
Guterres' cover ups leak.
The deferral:
"The June 2021 Synopsis file
of UNAT judgments was published.
They heard only 32 appeals,
and the last appeal number
heard in the session was 1468.
So Inner City Press'
appeal number 1502 won't be
considered at a minimum until
the late October 2021
session. The
current estimated time from
submitting an appeal to being
considered is almost one
year. Speedy
justice? The Guterres
Administration knows and
exploits this. A typical
UNDT case takes at least 18
months and then the appeals
process takes at least a
year. Hence why
the Administration appeal
every successful UNDT
judgement by a staff member,
it costs them nothing, while
it costs the staff member
plenty, as well as delaying
any justice they may end up
getting, which is usually
little. Guterres' UN is
corrupt - and cannot be
allowed to continue banning
the Press which reported on
it.
We will have
more, including listing more
of those complicit in the UN's
cover up of abuse. Watch this
site.
***
Your
support means a lot. As little as $5 a month
helps keep us going and grants you access to
exclusive bonus material on our Patreon
page. Click
here to become a patron.
Feedback:
Editorial [at] innercitypress.com
SDNY Press Room 480, front cubicle
500 Pearl Street, NY NY 10007 USA
Mail: Box 20047, Dag
Hammarskjold Station NY NY 10017
Reporter's mobile (and weekends):
718-716-3540
Other, earlier Inner City Press are
listed here,
and some are available in the ProQuest
service, and now on Lexis-Nexis.
Copyright 2006-2020 Inner City
Press, Inc. To request reprint or other
permission, e-contact Editorial [at]
innercitypress.com
|