At UN,
Ban Toasts US
Power's
Spouse Sunstein's
Book, "Closed
Meeting"
By
Matthew
Russell Lee
UNITED
NATIONS, July 22
-- UN
Secretary
General Ban
Ki-moon issues
a daily
schedule,
purporting to
be
transparent.
But when Inner
City Press
witnessed
Ban's personal
podium being
set up on July
22, there was
nothing on
Ban's
schedule,
after his
meeting with
Boris Johnson.
Who would Ban
be toasting,
that couldn't
be listed in
his public
schedule?
Well, this
“updated”
notice was
provided to
Inner City
Press by a
disgusted
recipient:
"TODAY,
Friday, July
22nd at 5:30
pm, with Dr.
Cass Sunstein,
Robert
Walmsley
University
Professor at
Harvard Law
School, who
will discuss
his new best
seller The
World
According To
Star Wars, in
the UNCA room
** UN
Secretary-General
Ban Ki-moon,
will attend at
5:30 pm to
welcome the
author and
will make
remarks. The
event is open
to all
diplomats, UN
officials and
UN
correspondents.
The
presentation
and the
discussion
will be
followed by a
small
reception."
But
after Sunstein
went in, Tweeted
photo here
- there were
both US
Mission and UN
guards left
outside - a
sign went up,
Closed
Meeting. Tweeted
photo here.
Last
time we're
aware of Ban
Ki-moon
speaking about
the book of a
UN spouse was
for the wife
of former
President of
the General
Assembly John
Ashe, video
here, subsequently
indicted for
UN bribery and
then killed by
his own
barbell, rest
in peace.
Why was
this not on
Ban's
schedule? Here
was Ban's
Friday
schedule,
showing only
Boris Johnson.
Before
Sunstein's
arrival, Ban's
online
schedule had
already
switched to
Monday,
showing only
his Cyprus
envoy,
here. And
his
spokeperson's
office
squawked "Cass
Sunstein" and
Star Wars
without
mentioning
that Ban would
be and speak
at the event.
To add
to or abet the
lack of
transparency,
the person in
UNCA who is
given the
Resident
Correspondent
pass taken
from Inner
City Press,
while asking
no question,
said to not
photograph.
Not photograph
the set up of
a Ban power
play left of
his schedule?
When
US Ambassador
Samantha Power
came to the UN
Security
Council
stakeout back
on May 26, she
took questions
on Syria,
Lebanon,
Ukraine and
the Committee
to Protect
Journalists -
but none on
Africa, which
makes up 70%
of the
Security
Council's
agenda. (Inner
City Press
tried at the
end, “Question
on Burundi?
Does the US
think the
Arusha talks
are inclusive
enough?” but
to no avail.)
The CPJ
question was
about the UN's
NGO Committee
voting “No” on
CPJ, after a
question and
answer period
that Inner
City Press
covered (and
Periscoped) back
then.
Power
indicated that
the US will be
bringing CPJ
to a vote in
the full
Economic and
Social
Council, as it
has on other
NGOs which
Inner City
Press has
covered, not
without
success.
Now
the vote is
set for July
25, according
to CPJ.
On July
22, CPJ gushed
about the
US Department
of Defense's changed
Law of War
Manual, on an
issue
("unprivileged
belligerents")
that only
Inner City
Press asked
Ban Ki-moon's
UN about,
on September
1, 2015.
(Ban,
typically, had
nothing to
say.)
CPJ has
said, "The new
language is a
seismic shift
for the U.S.
military.
This
affirmation of
journalists'
right to
report armed
conflicts
freely and
from all sides
is especially
welcome at a
time when
governments,
militias, and
insurgent
forces around
the world are
routinely
flouting the
laws of war."
Like US-made
cluster bombs
in Yemen?
But there is
another irony
here. CPJ has
criticized the
Egyptian state
media Akhbar
Elyom - which
the UN has
selected to
take over the
shared office
space it
revoked in
retaliation
from Inner
City Press for
seeking to
cover an event
in the UN
Press Briefing
Room on
January 29,
which Inner
City Press saw
and sees as
related to the
UN's expanding
Ng Lap Seng
bribery
scandal.
After the UN
ousted Inner
City Press on
February 19,
the Government
Accountability
Project wrote
to the US
Mission urging
it to counter
this
retaliation. Letter
here.
Inner City
Press tried to
ask about the
letter, to
Power here
and then at
the State
Department briefing in Washington (it did ask,
here.)
After the UN
threatened to
evict Inner
City Press'
investigative
files (and
before it did
so, on April
16), GAP wrote
to Ban Ki-moon
urging him to
call off this
retaliation. Letter here.
The
revocation of
Inner City
Press' long
time shared
office has
left it unable
to cover
events like
the July 20
High Level
Political
Forum,
click here for
that.
After the UN,
having through
channels
indicted it
would the
office space
empty until
Inner City
Press served
out its four
month
purgatory,
moved to give
the office to
Egypt's Akhbar
Elyom, a media
CPJ has
criticized,
Inner City
Press
re-raised it
to CPJ.
Until
now, it is
UNclear what
CPJ's inquiry
has been.
It
seems CPJ only
spoke with
UNCA, the
United Nations
Correspondents
Association
with which CPJ
partners and
whose
president
screened the
Sri Lankan
government's
war crimes
denial film,
without check
with
then-board
member Inner
City Press,
after this
president
served as the
Sri Lankan
ambassador's
landlord. Click
here for that.
It was
UNCA's January
29 event in
the UN Press
Briefing Room
which Inner
City Press has
been evicted
from the UN
for seeking to
cover, on the
issue of UNCA
connections to
the Ng Lap
Seng UN
bribery case..
The
UN's Special
Rapporteur on
Freedom of
Expression
submitted a
formal letter
to UN Under
Secretary
General
Cristina
Gallach, here.
Two months
later, Gallach
sent a
response,
here,
falsely
claiming an
"altercation"
in the UN
Press Briefing
Room on
January 29,
disproved by
video, in an
incident she
never once
spoke to Inner
City Press
about the
incident
before ousting
it.
So does
CPJ stand for
the right to
freedom of
expression and
of the Press
in the UN?
We
further note
that this same
UNCA set out
this notice to
its members,
provided to
Inner City
Press by a
whistleblowing
and disgusted
member:
"The UN
Correspondents
Association
will host its
first event
with Dr. Cass
Sunstein,
Robert
Walmsley
University
Professor at
Harvard Law
School, to
discuss his
new best
seller The
World
According To
Star Wars,
TOMORROW,
Friday, July
22nd at 5:30pm
in the UNCA
room S-310.
The event will
be moderated
by our
colleague Ali
Barada (UNCA
Vice
President),
and will be
followed by a
Q&A and
discussion
with the
audience.
We count on
your
attendance."
For
ten years as
Inner City
Press covered
the UN in ever
greater
detail,
showing
Secretary
General Ban
Ki-moon's
Herve Ladsous'
inept
overseeing and
cover up of sexual abuse and
exploitation
by peacekeepers,
disparate
treatment in
Mali,
dalliance with
genocide
in Sri Lanka
and
prospectively
Burundi, impunity
for cholera
deaths in
Haiti
and
until now for UN
lead poisoning
in Kosovo
and
cravenly
pro-Saudi position
on Yemen amid
the
airstrikes,
it was never
thrown out of
the UN.
Now it
has been, and
even as groups
like the
Government
Accountability
Project tell
Ban to reverse
the eviction
and give Inner
City Press
back its long
time office
and Resident
Correspondent
pass, Ban's UN
tellingly move
to award Inner
City Press'
office to
Egypt state
media
Al-Akhbar /
Akhbar
Elyoum.
Tweeted
photograph
here.
On May
19, a sign for
"Al Akhbar
Yom" went up
on Inner City
Press' office
- Inner City
Press has
STILL never
seen the
correspondent
being given
the stolen
office. The UN
says Resident
Correspondents
must be at the
UN three days
a week, but
Inner City
Press has
never seen
this person,
much less
asking a
question in
the UN noon
briefing.
This is
the journalism
that Ban
Ki-moon and
his Cristina
Gallach want
and reward. By
taking away
Inner City
Press' office,
it is now
required to
have a minder
and is told to
not ask
diplomats
questions.
This is
censorship.
Akhbar
Elyom has been
used to finger
for
imprisonment
non-state
journalists in
Egypt. For
example, in
July 2015
Aboubakr
Khallaf, the
founder and
head of the
independent
Electronic
Media
Syndicate
(EMS), “was
arrested after
a news article
was published
by the
government-owned
daily Akhbar
Elyoum.” (Article
in Arabic
here.)
According
to CPJ,
Khallaf's EMS
“trains and
supports
journalists
who work
online in
Egypt. The
syndicate
operates
independently
from the
state-recognized
Egyptian
Journalists
Syndicate...
The
local press
freedom group Journalists
Against
Torture and the
local Association
for Freedom of
Thought and
Expression (AFTE)
said Khallaf
was also
accused of 'taking
pictures and
displaying
artistic works
without a
license,'
among other
allegations. A
1998 executive
order states
that
individuals
conducting
audio and
audiovisual
work must have
a license from
the Ministry
of Culture.
According to
AFTE, the
accusation is
in connection
with Khallaf
photographing
the funeral of
Hisham
Barakat,
Egypt's
prosecutor
general who
was
assassinated
late last
month."
There
are many
echoes of this
in Ban's UN: as
simply one
example Ban's
Under
Secretary
General for
Public
Information
Cristina
Gallach
telling Inner
City Press it
takes
photographs of
things
that "are not
newsworthy."
There are
more, and more
examples of
Akbar Elyom.
Only
when it
questioned
Ban's and its
PR official
Cristina Gallach's
roles in
the John Ashe,
Ng Lap Seng
and Francis
Lorenzo UN
bribery
scandal did
Gallach order
Inner City
Press ousted
then evicted,
and now try to
give its
office to an
Egyptian media
which rarely
or never asked
questions. Ban
Ki-moon claimed
“That is not
my decision,”
but that is
not true.
The New York
Times on May
14 covered
the story. But
they did
not in their
long process
report, because it
happened at
the end, that
Ban Ki-moon
and Gallach are
moving to give
Inner City
Press' long
time office to
Egyptian state
media, Al
Akhbar /
Akhbar El-Yom
/ Akher Saa,
to a
correspondent
Sanaa Youssef
who most even
on the UN
press floor
have never
seen.
Her
"in" seems to
be that she
was a previous
president of
the UN
Correspondents
Association,
now become the
UN's
Censorship
Alliance. As
one respected
usual UN
interlocutor
put it, "it
would be a
hugely
negative
symbolic step
for Egyptian
state media to
replace Inner
City Press in
the UN."
A
longtime UN
correspondent
who spotted
her moving in
on Inner City
Press' office
noted she had
not been seen
before; the
name was
confirmed by
UN Media
Accreditation
and Liaison
Unit, which
refused to
provide the
waiting list
or describe
the rationale.
But
this is Ban's
and Gallach's
UN (click
here for a
Spanish take
on Gallach's
tenure.)
We are
beginning to
report this
now because it
has proven
nearly
impossible to
reach Al
Akhbar /
Akhbar Al Yom
- the
telephone
numbers listed
online are
disconnected,
or private
homes; the
correspondent
at UNCA
address has
been
unresponsive.
The
absurdity of
this has been
directly
raised to Ban
Ki-moon, his
Deputy and
Chief of Staff
with enough
time to stop
it. We'll see.
For now
from
the NYT we
note this
quote: “It’s
not exactly
the same
access,’’ Mr.
Dujarric said,
“but if he has
an issue,
there is a
staff of media
liaisons to
help him
resolve the
problem and
get where he
needs to go.”
This is false.
As Inner City
Press has
raised to Ban
Ki-moon, "even
when
begrudgingly
accompanied by
a staff member
of your
Spokesperson's
office, UN
Security
refused to
allow me
through the
turnstile onto
the second
floor of
Conference
Building. I
have been told
not to ask
questions of
diplomats,
just after you
came out of
ECOSOC and
even with a
MALU minder /
escort with
me, a UN
Security
official stood
directly in
front of me,
apparently so
I couldn't
even try to
ask you a
question. This
is
censorship."
We await
response.
UN
Correspondents
Association
boss Giampaolo
Pioli dissembled,
but at least
on the record.
(He rented
one of his
Manhattan
apartments to
Palitha Kohona
then granted
Kohona's
request, as
Sri Lanka's
Ambassador, to
screen his
government's
war crimes
denial film in
the UN. Then
Pioli told
Inner City
Press to take
its story
about it off
the Internet
or be thrown
out of the UN,
which Gallach
and Ban did:
UN Censorship
Alliance.)
In any
event, who is
a rarely
present boss
of an ostensible
Correspondents
Association
(morphing into
the UN's
Censorship
Alliance) to
lobby for the
ouster of an
investigative
journalist so
that his
office can be
handed to a
never present
former UNCA
president - a
representative
of state owned
media who
never asks
questions?
This too has
been raised
and we await
response.
What's
next? Is it
acceptable for
the UN to
throw out a
critical
journalist
writing four
to eight
stories a day,
while leaving
in people who
write little,
and ask
nothing? Watch
this site.
Audio
hereBan,
when asked,
said “that is
not my
decision.” But
he heard about
the ouster and
eviction in
advance and
ok-ed it.
On
April 16, the
acting chief
of Gallach's
“Media
Accreditation
and Liaison
Unit Tal Mekel
oversaw the
eviction of
Inner City
Press' office,
leaving five
boxes of its
files out on
First Avenue.
Video
here.
Some in
Ban's team
indicated to
Inner City
Press its
office would
be left empty
until its four
month
“purgatory” or
punishment-for-reporting
period was
over.
That
was a lie: on
May 13, after
Inner City
Press asked
more questions
about Ban's
engagements
with John Ashe
and Francis
Lorenzo -
president of
South South
News which
paid UNCA and
still has a UN
office - Inner
City Press was
informed that
its long time
office is
being given
out --
apparently, to
a former
President of
UNCA.
When Inner
City Press
asked to see
the supposed
waiting list,
this was
refused by
Mekel. It is
apparently
entirely up to
Gallach - or
UNCA - who is
given UN
office space,
without which
one cannot
access the UN
Conference
Building's
second floor,
see below.
On
May 13 as the
UN Security
Council began
a meeting
about Lebanon,
the glass
doors to enter
the Council
were locked.
Apparenlty the
UN can't
afford one
guard for a
Security
Council
meeting, but
won't provide
information
requested by
the Press
about Ban
Ki-moon's
endless and
largely
fruitless
travel.
Inner City
Press, which
covers the UN
corruption
scandal and
was ousted
then evicted
by an official
implicated in
the scandal,
Cristina
Gallach -- see
OIOS
audit
Paragraphs 37
to 40 and
20(b) --
with Ban
Ki-moon's full
knowledge, was
unable to get
to the
Security
Council
stakeout. Its
pass, cut by
Gallach, won't
open the
turnstile at
the other end
of the
stakeout. This
week a guard
there even
refused to
allow Inner
City Press
through to a
stakeout with
a staffer of
the
Spokesperson's
office.
Gallach, at
least
according to
some paid to
tweet for the
UN, is in
Washington. So
Inner City
Press
undertook to
document the
restrictions
and
censorship.
Another UN
system
spokesperson
tried to
undermine it,
as did UN
Security. They
claimed
everything is
fine, even as
Security
Council
Ambassadors
asked them how
can it be that
the door is
locked (and
Press
excluded).
Some Security
write-up
began, sure to
omit all of
this. Watch
this site -
and see below.
While
many try to
insulate
today's UN
from the open
corruption of
the recent
past of
President of
the General
Assembly John
Ashe, and of
Francis
Lorenzo who
has pleaded
guilty, there
is continuity
to this UN
scandal. This
includes a
revival of the
Ng
Lap Seng's old
"South South
News" team,
with El
Salvador
ex-Ambassador
Carlos Garcia
and others,
even as those
investigating
this UN
corruption are
evicted and
restricted,
and those
covering it up
are rewarded.
Inner
City Press has
repeatedly
asked Ban
Ki-moon's
spokesman
Stephane
Dujarric about
Ban's
appearance at
an event
sponsored by
the Francis
Lorenzo
registered
group Global
Governance for
the UN
Sustainable
Development
Goals. Q&A
videos
here and
here.
Dujarric
tried to
answer about
another group,
then said
Lorenzo's
connection to
the group
isn't clear. Q&A video here.
Well, now
Inner City
Press can
report that
the "Global
Governance for
the UN
Sustainable
Development
Goals"
event Ban
attended was
with indicted
John Ashe, his
wife Anilla
Cherian's book
launch. Video
here.
It
featured
speeches by
Ban and by
Francis
Lorenzo, who
in his speech
named both
GG-UNSDG and
Global
National
Competitiveness
Cooperation
Organization
for the UN,
which
sponsored the
DPI-NGO
conference
last year at
which Under
Secretary
General
Cristina
Gallach spoke.
Q&A
video here.
How did this
not show up in
the UN's audit
of l'affaire
John Ashe and
Ng Lap Seng?
How did this
book launch
event get
inserted into
UNTV archives,
run by
Gallach's DPI?
On the video,
Ban and then
Mrs. Ban are
thanked by
Ashe and then
Anilla
Cherian. The
indictment
details how
over
$1,000,000 was
withdrawn from
the PGA
Accounts and
transferred to
the personal
accounts of
Ashe and of
Anilla
Cherian;
no-show jobs
are also
described.
Then there is
the speech of
Francis
Lorenzo, how
Anilla Cherian
showed Ban the
book even
before Ashe.
The UN has
been trying to
downplay or
conceal Ban
Ki-moon's
contacts with
Lorenzo, most
recently
saying it's
unclear how
Lorenzo is
connected to a
group that he,
Lorenzo,
register, and
another one he
founded. Those
obfuscations
cannot stand;
separately,
the
retaliation is
more and more
clear. We'll
have more on
this.