UNITED NATIONS
GATE, May 10
– Inner City Press on
July 5 was banned from
entering the UN, the day
after it filed a
criminal complaint
against UN Security for
physically removing it
from covering the
meeting about the UN
Secretary General
Antonio Guterres' $6.7
billion peacekeeping
budget, as witnessed and
essentially cheered on
by senior UN official
Christian Saunders,
tearing its reporter's
shirt, painfully and
intentionally twisting
his arm and slamming
shut and damaging his
laptop. On August 17,
Guterres' Global
Communicator Alison
Smale issued a letter
banning Inner City Press
from the UN - for life.
With no due process. She
and Guterres have put
the UN in the US Press
Freedom Tracker, here.
Smale said,
again, that the UN would
answer Press questions
to the Spokesman
Stephane Dujarric and
his Office; Dujarric said the
same on
camera.
On May
10
more than three
hours
before a
UN
noon briefing in
which Dujarric's
Deputy Farhan Haq
was on for a mere
16 minutes, Inner
City Press submitted 816
questions, including why
it continues to be
lawlessly banned
from entering to ask
questions in person:
"There are more
than 500+
questions UNanswered.
And Monday Sept 17,
Tuesday Sept 18, Wed
Sept 19 and Thurs
and Fri Sept 21, that
whole week, no questions
answered. Nor Sept 25,
nor 28th - nor October 2
nor 3. While
appreciating and using
what was belatedly sent
on May 8 about sexual
exploitation
allegations and on March
28 in partial request to
Inner City Press'
questions about the UN
bribery sentence of
Patrick Ho of CEFC and
CEFC's 2018 attempt to
buy the oil company of
Gulbenkian Foundation
which paid the SG, no
answers on Dec 17 or 18
or 19 or 20 or 21 -
another FIVE days in a
row, even as SG's direct
conflicts of interest
and failure to disclose
emerge, and a newest
low. No answers on
January 30 nor 31 nor
February 1 nor 4 nor 5
nor 6 nor 7 nor 11 nor
12 nor 13 nor 14 nor 15
nor 18 nor 19 nor 20 nor
21 nor 22 nor 25 nor 26
nor 27 nor March 1 - 27
(!) And
now April
1, 3-30 (one
answer
in the
entire month -
corrupt), and
now May
1-9.
No answers at all during
those four days of the
US v Ho trial showing
corruption in the UN
says it all. This ban is
just censorship - and
Inner City Press must be
allowed back into the
noon briefing to ask its
questions in person and
follow up on
them.
May
10-1: On UN sexual abuse
and exploitation, AGAIN
please immediately
provide all if-asked
further information
about the allegations
allegations put online
April 17 regarding
Burundi and South Africa
peacekeepers and still
the Cameroon troops'
rape allegations you
have not provide any
further information on -
and now the four cases
put online on May 9,four
more sexual misconduct
cases, declaring three
"unsubstanted" including
the alleged rape of a
child in Guinea Bissau
by a UN civilians whose
nationality the UN
declined to disclose.
The fourth involves a UN
person from DRC, but the
position in the MONUSCO
mission is undisclosed.
For all cases, when did
the UN find out? What is
the impact on the
victim? What is the UN
doing, other than
covering up?
May
10-2: On Cameroon, ONCE
AGAIN, what is SG
Guterres comment on the
recent government
torture and murders
there and please
immediately state
whether any member of
the Secretariat,
including SCAD, has been
informed an any upcoming
UNSC meeting or informal
consultations about
Cameroon, separately who
if anyone would brief,
and the SG's position,
particularly in light of
the Cameroon government
memo about their July
2018 meeting with SG
Guterres.
May
10-3: On South Sudan,
what is the SG's comment
and action if any on
that Salva Kiir said on
Wednesday that the
formation of a unity
government should be
delayed by at least a
year, despite a May 12
deadline in a September
peace agreement that
ended the civil
war?
May
10-4: On the Public
Financial Disclosures
for 2017 belatedly
published over the
weekend of April 27-28,
please state why
UNCTAD's Mukhisa Kituyi,
like UN Women's Phumzile
Mlambo-Ngcuka, UNOG
chief Michael Moller,
UNDP chief Achim
Steiner, USG Mark
Lowcock, Heidi
Mendoza, Adama Dieng, UN
Security chief Peter
Drennan, Rosemary
DiCarlo and Nicholas
Haysum, is not even on
the list. OIOS chief
Inga-Britt Ahlenius
reported - why not
Mendoza? Where IS
Mendoza? Isn't it a bad
practice for the UN's
head (anti) genocide
definition official to
conceal from the public
even cursory financial
disclosure? Did DiCarlo
decline to make any
public disclosure
despite being the UN's
top political officer?
What is the even
plausible applicability
of this line from SG
Guterres' web page:
"Please note that given
the multi-cultural
environment of the UN
and the often security
sensitive locations
where UN staff are
either working or come
from, full public
disclosure may not
always be a viable or
sensible option for
certain staff members"?
Why has Guterres changed
the previous system in a
which a "choosing not to
disclose" statement was
upload and listed, to
one which helps conceal
who reports and who does
not? Again, state
why considering the UN
bribery conviction of
Patrick Ho of CEFC, and
CEFC's attempt to
purchase the oil company
of Gulbenkian Foundation
which paid Mr. Guterres
in 2016 was omitted from
his online public
financial disclosure
covering 2016, and why
Guterres has not even
started an audit of CEFC
in the
UN.
May
10-5: On Kenya, what is
the SG's comment and
action if any on that
Boniface Mwangi
asserts, "I was arrested
by four @DCI_Kenya
officers from my house.
They knew l was home
because my phone was on
and they could track my
movements. Upon arrival
at Central Police
Station l was told "some
people" are planning a
revolution and l might
have some information. l
know nothing"?
May
10-6: On press freedom
and Nepal, what is the
SG's comment and action
if any on that new
provisions to the Media
Council Act will further
tighten the state’s
creeping control over
the media. Nepal’s
Ministry of
Communication and
Information Technology
registered the Bill to
Amend and Integrate the
Media Council Act that
would have far-reaching
implications for the
national media... Under
it media houses can be
fined up to Rs1 million
for publishing content
in violation of media
code of ethics. Under
section 18, any media
outlet, publishers,
editors and/or
journalists can be
penalised up to Rs1
million for publishing
content found to tarnish
the dignity or
reputation of an
individual? What is each
of yours - particularly
the SG's - response to
the letter written and
sent by Burundi activist
Manisha Lievin? To the
April 15 letter to the
SG, DSG and USG Smale
for which receipt has
not even been
acknowledged, other than
a single lawless line
from MALU: "Your media
accreditation request,
with reference no:
M66561081, has been
declined"? This is a
formal request for the
UN's explanation of
grounds for this denied,
and since SGcentral, the
SG's chief of staff and
Deputy SG and USG Smale
haven't even confirmed
receipt of the April 15
letter much less
responded, for
reconsideration. AGAIN,
immediately explain how
it is legitimate to ban
from enter into the UN
the media that has been
asking about these and
other questions, with no
hearing or appeal.
May
9-7: Given the findings
about UNAIDS under
Michel Sidibe, what is
the SG's comment and
view on him being named
the minister of health
of Mali, where the UN
has a mission?
May
6-3: On Fiji, in the run
up to SG Guterres' visit
there, what is his
comment and action if
any on that more than
thirty union members
were in police custody
overnight including the
national secretary of
the Fiji Trades Union
Congress, Felix
Anthony?
May
3-6: On press freedom
and the African
continent, beyond what
SG Guterres has remained
silent on in Cameroon,
what are his belated
comments and actions if
any on, for example,
that two journalists
from the Comores,
Abdallah Abdou Hassane
and Oubeidillah
Mchangama, working for
critical news outlet
FCFK, were arrested and
are facing multiple
charges including
defamation, disturbing
public order, incitement
to violence, offence
against the head of
state, insulting the
magistrate, and forgery?
Two popular bloggers in
Mauritania, Abderrahmane
Weddady and Sheikh Ould
Jiddou were detained for
republishing and
commenting on a story
that had made the
headlines in various
international media
outlets. In
Harare, Lovejoy
Mutongwiza, a reporter
with 263Chat, was taking
pictures of a joint
operation by the ZRP
working with the Harare
municipal police to
arrest vendors operating
in the vicinity of the
263Chat offices. Lovejoy
reports that he was
pursued into the media
outlet's offices, after
which officers of the
Zimbabwe Republic Police
(ZRP) intentionally shot
three teargas canisters
into the offices, one of
which hit Mutongwiza,
and then barricaded the
doors, preventing staff
from escaping. Misa
Zimbabwe has condemned
the police actions?
May
2-1: On Indonesia, what
is the SG's comment and
action if any on the
human rights lawyers
taking the Indonesian
police to court on
behalf of West Papuans,
in an unprecedented
civil case over what she
claims is the illegal
takeover of an activist
group’s headquarters?
May
1-1: Please immediately
state to WHOM in the
Chinese government
Antonio Guterres claims
to have raised that
government's abuse of
the Uighurs, given that
the claim Guterres
raised the issue to Xi
has had to be retracted
- although this false
information remains
online in many places
including TIME and the
South China Morning
Post, and state what if
anything the UN is doing
to having this false
information about
Guterres and Xi
corrected /
clarified.
April
30-2: On Cameroon, along
with the many unanswered
Inner City Press
questions, please state
whether as before DSG
Amina J Mohammed and
chef de cabinet Viotti
will be attending the La
Republique du Cameroun
National Day, if so what
they will say given
Biya's ongoing
killings.
April
4-2: On UN bribery and
censorship, what now is
the SG's comment and
response to the April 3
article in Serbia about
CEFC which Mr Guterres
has refused to audit -
and about his refusal to
answer, and censorship
of Press "Guteres had
and had his own
financial link with the
CEFC, through the
Gulbenkian Foundation.
On the orders of
Guteres, on June 22 and
July 3, 2018, the
security came to me, and
I was banned from
reporting from the UN.
In fact, Gutereš took
advantage of his
security from the UN to
distance me from his
speech at the Park East
Synagogue, and recently
physically stopped me
while he entered the
mosque in 96th
Street" and now this
- "Patrick
Ho, a businessman who
was sentenced to three
years in prison for his
role in the world's
corrupting affair,
claims investigative
journalist Matthew
Russell Li in the
documentary "Hong Kong
Connection, Patrick Ho's
List." Li, in a
documentary broadcast on
the Hong Kong
Radio-Television portal,
revealed Jeremic's role
in this affair, a tens
of millions of dollars,
as well as his private
dilutes, which he made
while serving as the
chairman of the United
Nations General
Assembly. -
Jeremic's testimony at
the Ho trial was
problematic because he
turned out to be working
for "CEFC Energy" (a
Chinese conglomerate led
by Ho, prim. Aut.) While
serving as the chairman
of the UN General
Assembly. He took their
money, exchanged e-mails
with them ... He did
many things. It is
surprising to me that
the focus of the
prosecution was at Ho.
The prosecutors used his
testimony to show how Ho
established a
relationship, and in
fact what Jeremic was
doing might be worse for
the public - Li
said.
Investigative reporters
also uncovered the flows
of money flowing to
Jeremic's accounts. Hoov
CEFC paid Jeremic as a
consultant a total of $
5.3 million. It turns
out that some companies
that paid this money are
completely phantom,
because they do not
exist at the registered
addresses at all."
As always, what is the
process of appealing or
getting a hearing on the
now 274 day ban amid
this questions, or
process to reapply which
was denied summarily on
2 January 2019? How is
this not
censorship?) and
the translated 22 minute
documentary about
Patrick Ho and CEFC's
bribes through the UN
including Mr. Guterres'
refusal to answer Inner
City Press' question on
it on 5 December 2018,
and that Inner City
Press for allegedly not
complying with interview
"rules" has been
disqualified from
reporting within the
UN? Again,
the sentencing
memorandum includes
quotes from his e-mails
regarding aiming to
violate sanctions and
deal in arms not only to
Chad but also South
Sudan, Libya &
Qatar. What is the SG's
comment and action?
Again, why has no audit
even been begun of CEFC,
at least like the one
Mr. Guterres'
predecessor did of Ng
Lap Seng's Sun Kian Ip
Foundation? Why did Mr
Guterres omit payments
from Gulbenkian
Foundation, which sought
to sell its oil company
Partex to CEFC China
Energy, from his public
financial disclosure
covering 2016?
,
