UNITED NATIONS
GATE, May 28
– Inner City Press
on July 5 was banned
from entering the
UN, the day after it
filed a criminal
complaint against UN
Security for
physically removing
it from covering the
meeting about the UN
Secretary General
Antonio Guterres'
$6.7 billion
peacekeeping budget,
as witnessed and
essentially cheered
on by senior UN
official Christian
Saunders, tearing
its reporter's
shirt, painfully and
intentionally
twisting his arm and
slamming shut and
damaging his laptop.
On August 17,
Guterres' Global
Communicator Alison
Smale issued a
letter banning Inner
City Press from the
UN - for life. With
no due process. She
and Guterres have
put the UN in the US
Press Freedom
Tracker, here.
Smale said,
again, that the UN
would answer Press
questions to the
Spokesman Stephane
Dujarric and his
Office;
Dujarric said
the same on
camera.
On May 28
more than two
hours before the
UN noon
briefing,
Inner City
Press submitted
877
questions,
including why
it continues
to be
lawlessly banned
from entering
to ask
questions in
person:
"There
are more than
500+
questions
UNanswered.
And Monday
Sept 17,
Tuesday Sept
18, Wed Sept
19 and
Thurs and Fri
Sept 21, that
whole week, no
questions
answered. Nor
Sept 25, nor
28th - nor
October 2 nor
3. While
appreciating
and using what
was belatedly
sent on
May 20
about sexual
exploitation
allegations
and on March
28 in partial
request to
Inner City
Press'
questions
about the UN
bribery
sentence of
Patrick Ho of
CEFC and
CEFC's 2018
attempt to buy
the oil
company of
Gulbenkian
Foundation
which paid the
SG, no answers
on Dec 17 or
18 or 19 or 20
or 21 -
another FIVE
days in a row,
even as SG's
direct
conflicts of
interest and
failure to
disclose
emerge, and a
newest low. No
answers on
January 30 nor
31 nor
February 1 nor
4 nor 5 nor 6
nor 7 nor 11
nor 12 nor 13
nor 14 nor 15
nor 18 nor 19
nor 20 nor 21
nor 22 nor 25
nor 26 nor 27
nor March 1 -
27 (!) And now April 1, 3-30 (one
answer
in the
entire month -
corrupt), and
now May
1-13, 15-17,
21-24,
many
questions.
No answers at
all during
those four
days of the US
v Ho trial
showing
corruption in
the UN says it
all. This ban
is just
censorship -
and Inner City
Press must be
allowed back
into the noon
briefing to
ask its
questions in
person and
follow up on
them.
May 28-1:
On Zimbabwe,
what is the
SG's belated
comment and
action if any
on that
Zimbabwean
authorities
have now
arrested two
more activists
who attended
an overseas
training
workshop on
non-violent
protests.
The latest
arrests bring
to seven the
number of
those in
custody.
In a
statement, the
non-governmental
organisation
called the
arrests a
witch
hunt.
Stabile Dewah
(35) and Rita
Nyamupinga
(61) were
arrested on
Monday at
Robert Mugabe
International
Airport.
They're in
trouble for
attending a
workshop on
non-violent
protest
tactics held
earlier this
month in the
Maldives. Five
other
activists who
attended the
same workshop
were arrested
last week and
charged with
subversion.
May 28-2:
On
today's UN
system's
failure to
protect
whistleblowers,
what is the
SG's comment
and action if
any on that
decision from
Geneva in Emma
Reilly's case
that "In the
present case,
any
determination
made by the
Tribunal in
relation to
the
application in
Case No.
UNDT/GVA/2017/052
as to the
lawfulness of
the press
release, if
the
application is
found
receivable,
would not be
determinative
of the issue
as to whether
the High
Commissioner
abused his
authority in
publishing the
press release,
as the
Applicant
alleges in her
complaint. 56.
Finally, the
letter of 11
January 2018
appears to be
an ex post
facto
justification
for the delay
in processing
the
Applicant’s
complaint,
following the
filing of her
request for
management
evaluation.
This letter
came almost
ten months
after the
Applicant
submitted her
complaint and
six months
after she
filed her
application
before the
Tribunal in
Case No.
UNDT/GVA/2017/052.
It is also
noted that the
Respondent has
vehemently
challenged the
receivability
ratione
materiae of
the
application in
Case No.
UNDT/GVA/2017/052
insofar as it
concerns the
press release,
arguing that
this does not
constitute an
administrative
decision. It
is
contradictory
for the
Secretary-General
to argue, on
the one hand,
that the
Tribunal has
no
jurisdiction
to examine the
Applicant’s
application in
Case No.
UNDT/GVA/2017/052
and, on the
other hand, to
defer the
consideration
of her
complaint on
the basis of
awaiting the
outcome of an
allegedly
irreceivable
application?
May
28-3: On
Cameroon,
AGAIN, what is
the SG's
comment and
action if any
on that on May
15, Paul
Biya's
soldiers
burned over 70
homes in
Mankon,
Bamenda.
Soldiers
dragged one
man from his
house,
shooting him
dead in the
street. They
killed Nwacha
Christopher
Neba, a
41-year-old
mechanic, and
burned down
scores of
private homes
and shops
across Alachu,
Matsam, and
Muwatsu. On
May 17, the
governor of
the North-West
region
established a
bogus
commission to
identify
victims from
the “incident”
in Mankon and
evaluate their
needs, the
humanitarian
situation, and
the material
damage and
property
destroyed. The
commission is
scheduled to
submit its
report by May
24. Again,
answer Inner
City Press's
many many
UNanswered
questions,
including on
this:
alternate
Member of
Parliament
Essomba
Bengono just
after the UNSC
meeting said
on TV, "Do you
know how many
times God had
to wipe out
the human race
to constitute
a
people?"
May
28-4: On
Microsoft and
banned Inner
City Press'
exclusive (Q
below) on this
ad for
Microsoft
using the UN?
"Jean-Philippe
Courtois,
executive
vice-president
and president
of Microsoft
global sales,
marketing and
operations,
provided a
compelling
vision with
his opening
keynote at the
historical
United Nations
ITU AI for
Good Global
Summit (AI4G),
hosted May
28-31 2019 at
UN ITU HQ
Geneva.
The AI for
Good Global
Summit is the
only AI summit
bringing
together
governments,
industry,
academia,
media, and all
37 United
Agencies, ACM
(number one in
computing
science) and
XPRIZE (leader
in global
challenge
prizes) as
partners. In
its third
iteration,
Microsoft
contributed as
the first
platinum
sponsor,
opening
keynote, daily
workshops /
educational
sessions and
demonstrations."
Again, March
18-6: What is
the SG's
comment and
action on
this, copied
to Inner City
Press, on a "
possible FCPA
violation may
have occurred
between
Microsoft
Corporation
and the United
Nations:
The name of
the company
and/or person
who offered,
paid, promised
to pay, or
authorized the
payment of a
bribe:
Microsoft
Corporation
(MSFT) The
nature of the
bribe: Cash or
thought a
financial
services
company
The name and
title of the
official who
received or
was the
intended
recipient of
the bribe:
Erzen ILIJAZI
and Amat
Gaye
Office of
Information
and
Communications
Technology
(OICT)
Chief
Strategic
Information
and
Communications
Technology
Management
Service
Chief Regional
Technology
Center of
Americas
United
Nations
The public
international
organization
for whom the
bribe
recipient or
intended bribe
recipient
works: United
Nations
Headquarters
405 East 42nd
Street,
New York, NY,
10017,
USA."
May
28-5: On press
freedom and
Nigeria what
are the
comments and
actions if any
of the SG and
DSG Amina J.
Mohammed on
that To be
permitted to
report on the
country’s
National
Assembly, the
highest
law-making
authority,
journalists
will now have
to prove that
their media
outlet has a
daily
circulation of
40,000 copies
or online
media 5,000
daily views?
Journalists
will also have
to show they
have two
years’
experience
covering the
assembly on a
temporary
basis, be
members of the
Nigerian
journalists’
union, and fit
other criteria
listed by the
assembly’s
director of
information,
Emmanuel
Rawlings
Agada.
Sign up to the
Media
Briefing: news
for the
news-makers
Read more The
new rules, due
to take effect
on 11 June,
are
“primitive,
undemocratic
and blatantly
anti-press and
anti-people”,
the Nigerian
Guild of
Editors said
in a
statement...
What is each
of yours -
particularly
the SG's -
response to
the letter
written and
sent by
Burundi
activist
Manisha
Lievin? To the
April 15
letter to the
SG, DSG and
USG Smale for
which receipt
has not even
been
acknowledged,
other than a
single lawless
line from
MALU: "Your
media
accreditation
request, with
reference no:
M66561081, has
been
declined"?
This is a
formal request
for the UN's
explanation of
grounds for
this denied,
and since
SGcentral, the
SG's chief of
staff and
Deputy SG and
USG Smale
haven't even
confirmed
receipt of the
April 15
letter much
less
responded, for
reconsideration.
AGAIN,
immediately
explain how it
is legitimate
to ban from
enter into the
UN the media
that has been
asking about
these and
other
questions,
with no
hearing or
appeal.
May
24-2: On
China, what is
the SG's
comment and
action if any
- including in
light of his
still
undisclosed
connection to
CEFC China
Energy through
its bid for
Gulbenkian
Foundation's
oil company,
on that
Developed and
sold by the
China
Electronics
Technology
Corporation, a
state-run
defense
manufacturer,
the system in
Kashgar is on
the cutting
edge of what
has become a
flourishing
new market for
technology
that the
government can
use to monitor
and subdue
millions of
Uighurs and
members of
other Muslim
ethnic groups
in
Xinjiang?
May
24-4: As the
SG heads to
Vienna, please
immediately
state his
position on
the many UN
sexual
harassment
issues at
UNOV, on which
banned Inner
City Press has
previously
asked you
(without response)
and reported
on e-mails
leaked it it
for example:
"Mr Zabaar
said the Metoo
Movement is in
conflict with
the UN code of
conduct" and
"Ms Kuleshnyk
compared the
name of the
Club with an
hypothetical
Club named
Osama Bin
Laden." A
cover letter
recites that "
Mr Guterres
had a staff
meeting in the
VIC on May 14,
2018, and
Monica
publicly asked
him for his
support in a
question. Mr
Guterres
reserved his
reply." What
is the SG's
position? And
provide in
writing
updates on and
read-out from
this most
recent
trip.
May
24-4a:
Separately,
state today
whether the SG
is stopping
over in Lisbon
either on his
way to UNOV or
thereafter,
and if so at
what cost to
the public,
including
security
costs.
May
16-2: On
Sudan, what is
the SG's
comment and
action if any
that the new
interim vice
president,
Mohamed Hamdan
“Hemeti”
Dagolo, was in
charge of the
janjaweed
militias in
Darfur?
May
15-3: On the
Public
Financial
Disclosures
for 2017
belatedly
published over
the weekend of
April 27-28,
please state
why Mohammed
Ibn Chambas,
like the
Executive
Secretary of
the UN
Biodiversity
Convention,
Cristiana
Paşca-Palmer,
UNICEF's
Henriette
Fore, with
documented
links to
ExxonMobil and
others, USG
Mark Lowcock
(undisclosed
while the
Secretariat's
speaker at the
UNSC Arria on
Cameroon),
UNCTAD's
Mukhisa
Kituyi, UN
Women's
Phumzile
Mlambo-Ngcuka,
UNOG chief
Michael
Moller, UNDP
chief Achim
Steiner,
Heidi Mendoza,
Adama Dieng,
UN Security
chief Peter
Drennan,
Rosemary
DiCarlo and
Nicholas
Haysum, is not
even on the
list. OIOS
chief
Inga-Britt
Ahlenius
reported - why
not Mendoza?
Where IS
Mendoza? Isn't
it a bad
practice for
the UN's head
(anti)
genocide
definition
official to
conceal from
the public
even cursory
financial
disclosure?
Did DiCarlo
decline to
make any
public
disclosure
despite being
the UN's top
political
officer? What
is the even
plausible
applicability
of this line
from SG
Guterres' web
page: "Please
note that
given the
multi-cultural
environment of
the UN and the
often security
sensitive
locations
where UN staff
are either
working or
come from,
full public
disclosure may
not always be
a viable or
sensible
option for
certain staff
members"? Why
has Guterres
changed the
previous
system in a
which a
"choosing not
to disclose"
statement was
upload and
listed, to one
which helps
conceal who
reports and
who does
not?
Again, state
why
considering
the UN bribery
conviction of
Patrick Ho of
CEFC, and
CEFC's attempt
to purchase
the oil
company of
Gulbenkian
Foundation
which paid Mr.
Guterres in
2016 was
omitted from
his online
public
financial
disclosure
covering 2016,
and why
Guterres has
not even
started an
audit of CEFC
in the
UN.