UNITED NATIONS
GATE, June
6
– Inner City Press
on July 5 was banned
from entering the
UN, the day after it
filed a criminal
complaint against UN
Security for
physically removing
it from covering the
meeting about the UN
Secretary General
Antonio Guterres'
$6.7 billion
peacekeeping budget,
as witnessed and
essentially cheered
on by senior UN
official Christian
Saunders, tearing
its reporter's
shirt, painfully and
intentionally
twisting his arm and
slamming shut and
damaging his laptop.
On August 17,
Guterres' Global
Communicator Alison
Smale issued a
letter banning Inner
City Press from the
UN - for life. With
no due process. She
and Guterres have
put the UN in the US
Press Freedom
Tracker, here.
Smale said,
again, that the UN
would answer Press
questions to the
Spokesman Stephane
Dujarric and his
Office;
Dujarric said
the same on
camera.
On June 6
three
hours before the
UN noon
briefing three
days after
Dujarric when
asked for
Guterres'
comment on Tiananmen
Square 30
years anniversary said
"No, I have no
particular
comment on
that," Vine
video here,
Inner City
Press submitted 906
questions,
including why
it continues
to be
lawlessly banned
from entering
to ask
questions in
person:
"There
are more than
500+
questions
UNanswered.
And Monday
Sept 17,
Tuesday Sept
18, Wed Sept
19 and
Thurs and Fri
Sept 21, that
whole week, no
questions
answered. Nor
Sept 25, nor
28th - nor
October 2 nor
3. While
appreciating
and using what
was belatedly
sent on
May 20
about sexual
exploitation
allegations
and on March
28 in partial
request to
Inner City
Press'
questions
about the UN
bribery
sentence of
Patrick Ho of
CEFC and
CEFC's 2018
attempt to buy
the oil
company of
Gulbenkian
Foundation
which paid the
SG, no answers
on Dec 17 or
18 or 19 or 20
or 21 -
another FIVE
days in a row,
even as SG's
direct
conflicts of
interest and
failure to
disclose
emerge, and a
newest low. No
answers on
January 30 nor
31 nor
February 1 nor
4 nor 5 nor 6
nor 7 nor 11
nor 12 nor 13
nor 14 nor 15
nor 18 nor 19
nor 20 nor 21
nor 22 nor 25
nor 26 nor 27
nor March 1 -
27 (!) And now April 1, 3-30 (one
answer
in the
entire month -
corrupt), and
now May
1-13, 15-17,
21-31,
June
3, many
questions.
No answers at
all during
those four
days of the US
v Ho trial
showing
corruption in
the UN says it
all. This ban
is just
censorship -
and Inner City
Press must be
allowed back
into the noon
briefing to
ask its
questions in
person and
follow up on
them.
June
6-1: On
Cameroon, as
Inner City
Press asked on
the morning of
June 5 (a day
on which the
deputy
spokesman
while not
responding on
Cameroon did
respond, at
least
partially, to
a DC-based
correspondent),
what is the
SG's response,
after
receiving
Biya's golden
statue and
multiple
meetings with
Tommo Monthe
only about his
the
chairmanship
of the UN
Budget
Committee, on
NRC now saying
NRC: "Cameroon
tops the
Norwegian
Refugee
Council’s
annual list of
the world’s
most neglected
displacement
crises
launched
today.
“The
international
community is
asleep at the
wheel when it
comes to the
crisis in
Cameroon.
Brutal
killings,
burned-down
villages and
massive
displacement
have been met
with deafening
silence...
Still there
has been no
major
mediation
efforts, no
large relief
programmes,
minimal media
interest and
too little
pressure on
parties to
stop attacking
civilians. The
annual list of
neglected
displacement
crises is
based on three
criteria: lack
of funding,
lack of media
attention and
political
neglect.
Cameroon
scored high on
all
three"?
June
6-2: On UN
impunity and
having brought
cholera to
Haiti, what is
the SG's
comment and
action for UN
accountability,
if any, now
that a cert
petition has
been filed to
put the UN's
impunity in
Haiti before
the U.S.
Supreme
Court?
June
6-3: On China,
human rights
and the SG,
what is the
SG's response
to reports
that China has
announced
former Hong
Kong police
chief Andy
Tsang
Wai-hung’s
nomination for
the top post
at the United
Nations
organisation
fighting drug
crimes - Mr
Tsang's
nomination
could also be
controversial
for his
management of
the Occupy
protests,
during which
tear gas was
used on
pro-democracy
demonstrators.
That shone a
spotlight on
government
efforts to
clamp down on
activists in
the former
British
colony, with
the gatherings
of mostly
students
dubbed the
"Umbrella
Movement"
after they
used umbrellas
to shield
themselves
from the
pepper
spray.
Concerns over
the autonomy
of Hong Kong's
judicial
system have
increased, as
the
Beijing-backed
government
seeks an
extradition
bill that
critics say
could be used
to target
dissidents
living in the
city.
That
legislation
may have
helped drive a
record turnout
of more than
180,000 on
Tuesday night
for Hong
Kong's annual
vigil to
remember the
Chinese
military's
crackdown in
Tiananmen
Square. Police
put the number
of attendees
at 37,000. The
nomination is
China’s first
attempt to
fill a top
position at a
major
international
organisation
since it
detained Meng
Hongwei, then
the head of
the global
policing body
Interpol, last
year. It
was understood
UN Secretary
General
Antonio
Guterres would
select a
successor in a
few months to
replace the
current
executive
director, Yury
Fedotov of
Russia, who
had been in
office since
2010"?
June
6-4: Also on
China and Hong
Kong, what is
the SG's
response and
action if any
on the
proposed
revisions to
two laws
concerning
extradition?
Under existing
legislation,
the Hong Kong
government can
only extradite
people to
countries with
which it has
standing
extradition
agreements, or
to other
countries on a
case-by-case
basis. Changes
to these
arrangements
must be
ordered by the
Hong Kong
chief
executive, who
is handpicked
by the Chinese
government. In
February 2019,
the Hong Kong
Security
Bureau
proposed
changes to the
Fugitive
Offenders
Ordinance and
the Mutual
Legal
Assistance in
Criminal
Matters
Ordinance,
which would
expand the
case-by-case
extradition
arrangement to
mainland
China.
Criminal
suspects in
China’s legal
system are at
risk of
torture or
other
ill-treatment
and unfair
trials.
June
6-5: Also on
China, and
press freedom,
what is the
SG's response
and action if
any one report
that the
Chinese
Communist
Party (CCP)
and its
proxies have
sought to
increase their
influence over
media channels
abroad. The
approaches
include
“promoting the
CCP’s
narratives,
suppressing
critical
viewpoints,
and managing
content
delivery
systems.”
These actions,
the report
argues, have
undermined
democratic
governance,
intervened in
Chinese
diaspora
communities,
and created a
base for
“political
meddling"?
June
6-6: On Sri
Lanka, what is
the SG's
comment and
action if any
on that Muslim
government
officials,
including all
ministers and
two governors,
resigned
yesterday from
their posts
following
mounting
pressure from
senior
Buddhist
clergy and
politicians.
Three
ministers and
five junior
ministers
resigned from
their cabinet
positions
saying they
had done so as
a result of
the "hate
culture"
against
Muslims in
government at
present.
"We will
continue to
serve the
government as
backbenchers
until we feel
confident to
serve again -
once the hate
culture and
culture of
impunity is
removed from
our country,"
Rauf Hakeem,
the former
minister of
city planning
said.His
comments came
as the Muslim
Minister
Rishad
Bathiudeen,
and the
governors of
the Western
Province,
Azath Salley,
and Eastern
Province, M L
A M Hizbullah
were forced to
resign?
June
6-8: On press
freedom and
Australia,
what is the
SG's comment
and action if
any on that
Australian
federal police
raided the
offices of
national
broadcaster
ABC in Sydney
this morning
(June 5) with
search
warrants in
relation to
its 2017
series, The
Afghan Files,
which used
leaked defense
department
documents to
expose
unlawful
killings by
the country’s
military in
Afghanistan?
Specifically,
what now is
the SG's
response to
Acting Federal
Police
Commissioner
Neil Gaughan
defended the
raids, which
attracted
local and
international
condemnation,
arguing it was
necessary to
show that
authorities
took leaks of
classified
information
seriously, to
reassure other
countries it
was safe to
share
intelligence
with
Australian
agencies.
Acting AFP
Commissioner
Neil Gaughan
has defended
the police's
handling of
raids into
media
organisations.
Alex
Ellinghausen
"If we don't
take it
seriously, it
closes down an
avenue of
people
providing the
Australian
intelligence
and law
enforcement
agencies very
sensitive
information
which
ultimately
does save
lives." He
said he could
not rule out
News Corp
journalist
Annika
Smethurst or
ABC reporters
Dan Oakes and
Sam Clark
facing charges
for publishing
national
security
secrets? In
the UN, what
has the
accountability
been for Lt
Ronald E.
Dobbins and
those those
refused on
camera to give
their names?
What is each
of yours -
particularly
the SG's -
response to
the letter
written and
sent by
Burundi
activist
Manisha
Lievin? To the
April 15
letter to the
SG, DSG and
USG Smale for
which receipt
has not even
been
acknowledged,
other than a
single lawless
line from
MALU: "Your
media
accreditation
request, with
reference no:
M66561081, has
been
declined"?
This is a
formal request
for the UN's
explanation of
grounds for
this denied,
and since
SGcentral, the
SG's chief of
staff and
Deputy SG and
USG Smale
haven't even
confirmed
receipt of the
April 15
letter much
less
responded, for
reconsideration.
AGAIN,
immediately
explain how it
is legitimate
to ban from
enter into the
UN the media
that has been
asking about
these and
other
questions,
with no
hearing or
appeal.
June
4-2: On China,
as Inner City
Press
repeatedly
asked before
the
Spokesman's
"no particular
comment"
conclusion to
the June 3
noon briefing,
on Tiananmen
Square
massacre's 30
anniversary,
what is the
SG's comment
and action if
any on that
today
"Hundreds of
uniformed and
plainclothes
police
monitored the
square and its
surroundings,
conducting
spot ID checks
and inspecting
car trunks.
Rights groups
said
authorities
had rounded up
dissidents in
the run-up to
the
anniversary
and had
detained, put
under house
arrest, or
threatened
dozens of
activists in
recent
weeks.
While no
public events
to mark the
anniversary
will be
tolerated in
mainland
China,
demonstrators
gathered in
Hong Kong, a
former British
colony that
returned to
Chinese rule
in 1997.
There will
also be events
in self-ruled
and democratic
Taiwan, which
China claims
as its
own.
June
4-3: On UN
sexual abuse
and
exploitation,
AGAIN as
requested on
the morning of
June 3
immediately
disclose what
IS the new
"allegation of
SEA" which the
UN on the
morning of
June 3
announced by
e-mail.
Clicking
through to the
UN website,
the previously
announced case
against South
Africa
peacekeeper is
no longer at
the top of the
page, and it
is unclear
what the new
allegation is.
This lack of
clarity is
unacceptable.
May
15-3: On the
Public
Financial
Disclosures
for 2017
belatedly
published over
the weekend of
April 27-28,
please state
why Mohammed
Ibn Chambas,
like the
Executive
Secretary of
the UN
Biodiversity
Convention,
Cristiana
Paşca-Palmer,
UNICEF's
Henriette
Fore, with
documented
links to
ExxonMobil and
others, USG
Mark Lowcock
(undisclosed
while the
Secretariat's
speaker at the
UNSC Arria on
Cameroon),
UNCTAD's
Mukhisa
Kituyi, UN
Women's
Phumzile
Mlambo-Ngcuka,
UNOG chief
Michael
Moller, UNDP
chief Achim
Steiner,
Heidi Mendoza,
Adama Dieng,
UN Security
chief Peter
Drennan,
Rosemary
DiCarlo and
Nicholas
Haysum, is not
even on the
list. OIOS
chief
Inga-Britt
Ahlenius
reported - why
not Mendoza?
Where IS
Mendoza? Isn't
it a bad
practice for
the UN's head
(anti)
genocide
definition
official to
conceal from
the public
even cursory
financial
disclosure?
Did DiCarlo
decline to
make any
public
disclosure
despite being
the UN's top
political
officer? What
is the even
plausible
applicability
of this line
from SG
Guterres' web
page: "Please
note that
given the
multi-cultural
environment of
the UN and the
often security
sensitive
locations
where UN staff
are either
working or
come from,
full public
disclosure may
not always be
a viable or
sensible
option for
certain staff
members"? Why
has Guterres
changed the
previous
system in a
which a
"choosing not
to disclose"
statement was
upload and
listed, to one
which helps
conceal who
reports and
who does
not?
Again, state
why
considering
the UN bribery
conviction of
Patrick Ho of
CEFC, and
CEFC's attempt
to purchase
the oil
company of
Gulbenkian
Foundation
which paid Mr.
Guterres in
2016 was
omitted from
his online
public
financial
disclosure
covering 2016,
and why
Guterres has
not even
started an
audit of CEFC
in the
UN.