UNITED NATIONS
GATE, July 18
– Inner City Press
on July 5 was banned
from entering the
UN, the day after it
filed a criminal
complaint against UN
Security for
physically removing
it from covering the
meeting about the UN
Secretary General
Antonio Guterres'
$6.7 billion
peacekeeping budget,
as witnessed and
essentially cheered
on by senior UN
official Christian
Saunders, tearing
its reporter's
shirt, painfully and
intentionally
twisting his arm and
slamming shut and
damaging his laptop.
On August 17,
Guterres' Global
Communicator Alison
Smale issued a
letter banning Inner
City Press from the
UN - for life. With
no due process. She
and Guterres have
put the UN in the US
Press Freedom
Tracker, here.
Smale said,
again, that the UN
would answer Press
questions to the
Spokesman Stephane
Dujarric and his
Office;
Dujarric said
the same on
camera.
On July 18
three
hours before the
UN noon
briefing by Deputy Farhan
Haq -
Dujarric is
away on
vacation for
the whole
month of July
--
Inner
City Press submitted 1046
questions,
including why
it continues
to be
lawlessly banned
from entering
to ask
questions in
person:
"There
are more than
700+
questions
UNanswered.
And Monday
Sept 17,
Tuesday Sept
18, Wed Sept
19 and
Thurs and Fri
Sept 21, that
whole week, no
questions
answered. Nor
Sept 25, nor
28th - nor
October 2 nor
3. While
appreciating
and using what
was belatedly
sent on
May 20
about sexual
exploitation
allegations
and on March
28 in partial
request to
Inner City
Press'
questions
about the UN
bribery
sentence of
Patrick Ho of
CEFC and
CEFC's 2018
attempt to buy
the oil
company of
Gulbenkian
Foundation
which paid the
SG, no answers
on Dec 17 or
18 or 19 or 20
or 21 -
another FIVE
days in a row,
even as SG's
direct
conflicts of
interest and
failure to
disclose
emerge, and a
newest low. No
answers on
January 30 nor
31 nor
February 1 nor
4 nor 5 nor 6
nor 7 nor 11
nor 12 nor 13
nor 14 nor 15
nor 18 nor 19
nor 20 nor 21
nor 22 nor 25
nor 26 nor 27
nor March 1 -
27 (!) And now April 1, 3-30 (one
answer
in the
entire month -
corrupt), and
now May
1-13, 15-17,
21-31,
June
3-28,
and July 1-2,
8-17
many
questions.
No answers at
all during
those four
days of the US
v Ho trial
showing
corruption in
the UN says it
all. This ban
is just
censorship -
and Inner City
Press must be
allowed back
into the noon
briefing to
ask its
questions in
person and
follow up on
them.
July
18-1: On
Ethiopia, what
is the SG's
comment and
action if any
on that
residents of
the southern
Ethiopian city
of Hawassa,
where there
has been
tension over
the
declaration of
a new regional
state, have
heard shots
being
fired?
Earlier this
week,
activists from
the Sidama
people said
they would
declare the
new state on
Thursday - a
year to the
day after the
idea of a
referendum on
the new state
was approved
by the
authorities.
The
referendum,
which should
have been held
within 12
months, has
been delayed.
In one area of
Hawassa,
Alamura,
security
forces have
fired tear gas
to disperse
youths,
witnesses
say. An
eye witness
told me he saw
about 50
youths with
rocks.
The mobile
internet
connection has
now been shut
down.
July
18-2: On
sexual
harassment and
the Colin
Stewart
question Inner
City Press
asked Guterres
and you in
writing
including a
week ago
(July11-2)
without any
answer at all,
what now is
the SG's
response and
action if any
on this report
crediting
Inner City
Press and also
reporting on
Fabrizio
Hochschild, here:
"The case
involving
Stewart, which
has been
exposed by
Inner City
Press, is
based on
allegations
against the
Canadian
former
politician who
was political
director of
the Addis
Ababa UN
office, which
is believed to
involve a
number of
young
Ethiopian
staff members.
Stewart, 58,
was working
there between
2011 and 2016.
In December
2017, Guterres
announced that
Stewart would
head the UN
mission in
Western
Sahara.
Guterres is,
according to
Inner City
Press - which
his own
officials have
banned from
entering the
UN’s New York
building for a
year for
exposing the
corruption -
as being torn
between
re-opening the
cases against
Stewart or
sweeping them
under the
carpet and
extending his
contract with
MINURSO.
The agency
blasts
Guterres as
culpable of
“doublespeak,
harassment and
hypocrisy” as
its
journalists
believe that
he plans to go
ahead with the
cover-up,
which is in
line with his
usual response
to similar
scandals
involving
allegations of
sexual
misconduct. In
the New York
headquarters
of the UN
itself, the
Portuguese UN
chief actually
promoted a
Chilean
official who
was also
charged with
sexual
misconduct, to
the
prestigious
job of
“special
advisor” to
Guterres
himself.
Matthew R Lee,
Editor of the
news Inner
City Press,
was recently
roughed up by
UN security
guards and was
banned from
re-entering
the building
(despite
working from
it for 10
years) simply
for asking
tough
questions and
exposing the
Stewart case –
which he
insists is
backed up by
witnesses in
Addis Ababa...
July
18-3: On UN
and SG
corruption,
because you
have entirely
refused to
answer Inner
City Press'
questions
(other than
with rough-up
and ban),
please
immediately
provide and
UN's and SG's
response to
this report
published and
re-published
today: Inner
City Press
"says that the
Guterres wants
to make an
example of the
journalist who
has pointed
the finger at
him and
accused him of
being
involved,
still to this
day, with the
Lisbon-based
Gulbenkian
Foundation,
which was
paying him
until his
appointment as
UN chief in
January
2017.
Lee,
remarkably,
claims that
unlike
previous UN
chiefs whose
families were
tarnished by
corruption,
Guterres has
taken this
trend to the
next
level.
“Under Antonio
Guterres,
things have
gotten
exponentially
worse,” he
says. “I think
it is because
some of the
corruption is
personal to
Guterres,
whereas with
Ban Ki-moon
[and Kofi
Annan] it was
about
relatives. Ban
had a nephew
who used the
UN to make
money - but
Guterres took
money from the
Lisbon-based
Gulbenkian
Foundation,”
he
explains.
The Portuguese
organisation,
although
appearing to
be
philanthropic,
also has
massive
investments
around the
world and its
move in
February 2018
to sell its
energy firm
Partex to the
Chinese would
incriminate
Guterres,
because former
Hong Kong
minister
Patrick Ho –
who was jailed
for three
years for
bribing
African
officials at
the UN – was
believed to be
the chief
‘negotiator’
of the
deal.
Although the
deal didn’t
come off, any
link made by
mainstream
media between
Ho’s
involvement
and Gulbenkian
would be
deeply
embarrassing
for the UN
chief and
would probably
lead to his
resignation.
“Guterres took
money from the
Lisbon-based
Gulbenkian
Foundation,
including in
2016 for which
he omitted the
Gulbenkian
payments from
his financial
disclosure
form covering
2016,” claims
Lee. “This is
significant
because
Gulbenkian
sought to sell
its oil
company Partex
Oil to CEFC
China Energy,
whose Patrick
Ho was
convicted of
UN bribery
[including of
Uganda's
Foreign
Minister
Kutesa] in the
SDNY Federal
Court,” says
Lee."
July
18-4: On press
freedom and
Nigeria, what
are the
comment and
actions of SG
Guterres and,
separately,
DSG Amina J
Mohammed on
that "In May
2019,
Nigeria’s
security
agents once
again detained
and charged
journalist
Jones Abiri
for crimes of
sabotage,
terrorism and
cybercrimes
that they say
he committed
in
2016.
The government
has targeted
Abiri as the
publisher and
editor-in-chief
of the Weekly
Source, a
daily in the
oil-rich state
of Bayelsa in
Nigeria’s
Niger Delta
region.
His travails
at the hands
of security
agents
represent the
height of
Nigeria’s
state
repression of
free speech
and press
freedom.
Nigerian
leaders have
consistently
activated
various laws
to target
critics and
journalists
such as
Abiri"... Now
that the US
Court of
Appeals for
the Second
Circuit has
ruled against
public
officials
blocking
critics on
Twitter even
if the
official
claims their
account is
private, what
is the
justification
for UNSG
Spokesperson
Stephane
Dujarric, with
the UN flag in
his profile
photo and
Guterres
promoting
content,
blocking Inner
City Press?
What is SG
Guterres'
response /
reaction to UN
DSS and
Guterres'
actions on
Inner City
Press being listed
in the U.S.
Press Freedom
Tracker.
In the UN,
what has the
accountability
been for Lt
Ronald E.
Dobbins and
those those
refused on
camera to give
their names?
What is each
of yours -
particularly
the SG's -
response to
the letter
written and
sent by
Burundi
activist
Manisha
Lievin? To the
April 15
letter to the
SG, DSG and
USG Smale for
which receipt
has not even
been
acknowledged,
other than a
single lawless
line from
MALU: "Your
media
accreditation
request, with
reference no:
M66561081, has
been
declined"?
This is a
formal request
for the UN's
explanation of
grounds for
this denied,
and since
SGcentral, the
SG's chief of
staff and
Deputy SG and
USG Smale
haven't even
confirmed
receipt of the
April 15
letter much
less
responded, for
reconsideration.
AGAIN,
immediately
explain how it
is legitimate
to ban from
enter into the
UN the media
that has been
asking about
these and
other
questions,
with no
hearing or
appeal.
June
14-5: Since
the SG claimed
publicly that
the mansion he
lives in
"cannot" be
sold, please
immediately
provide any
and all
documents with
such a
restriction,
and separately
explain why
the concept of
cy pres or
reformation of
donor intent
has not been
explored.
Separately,
Boutros
Boutros Galli
wrote in his
book that the
building was
given by
Arthur
Houghton
through the
United Nations
Association of
the USA. What
actual
inquires, with
UNA-USA or any
successor to
Houghton or
Corning Glass,
has Guterres
made?
June
11-1: On
Cameroon, what
is the SG's
comment and
action if any
on this report
from Chinese
state media:
"YAOUNDE, June
10 (Xinhua) --
Cameroon's
House Speaker
of National
Assembly
Cavaye Yeguie
Djibril on
Monday
denounced
foreign
interference
in the
country's
internal
affairs which
he referred to
as
"conspiracy."
"Cameroon has
become an
object of
conspiracy
intended to
destabilize
the country.
To justify
their
interference
in internal
affairs, the
conspirators
pretend to
denounce it."
Again, how
many offices /
desk does the
Secretariat
give to
Chinese state
media inside
the UN?
May
15-3: On the
Public
Financial
Disclosures
for 2017
belatedly
published over
the weekend of
April 27-28,
please state
why Mohammed
Ibn Chambas,
like the
Executive
Secretary of
the UN
Biodiversity
Convention,
Cristiana
Paşca-Palmer,
UNICEF's
Henriette
Fore, with
documented
links to
ExxonMobil and
others, USG
Mark Lowcock
(undisclosed
while the
Secretariat's
speaker at the
UNSC Arria on
Cameroon),
UNCTAD's
Mukhisa
Kituyi, UN
Women's
Phumzile
Mlambo-Ngcuka,
UNOG chief
Michael
Moller, UNDP
chief Achim
Steiner,
Heidi Mendoza,
Adama Dieng,
UN Security
chief Peter
Drennan,
Rosemary
DiCarlo and
Nicholas
Haysum, is not
even on the
list. OIOS
chief
Inga-Britt
Ahlenius
reported - why
not Mendoza?
Where IS
Mendoza? Isn't
it a bad
practice for
the UN's head
(anti)
genocide
definition
official to
conceal from
the public
even cursory
financial
disclosure?
Did DiCarlo
decline to
make any
public
disclosure
despite being
the UN's top
political
officer? What
is the even
plausible
applicability
of this line
from SG
Guterres' web
page: "Please
note that
given the
multi-cultural
environment of
the UN and the
often security
sensitive
locations
where UN staff
are either
working or
come from,
full public
disclosure may
not always be
a viable or
sensible
option for
certain staff
members"? Why
has Guterres
changed the
previous
system in a
which a
"choosing not
to disclose"
statement was
upload and
listed, to one
which helps
conceal who
reports and
who does
not?
Again, state
why
considering
the UN bribery
conviction of
Patrick Ho of
CEFC, and
CEFC's attempt
to purchase
the oil
company of
Gulbenkian
Foundation
which paid Mr.
Guterres in
2016 was
omitted from
his online
public
financial
disclosure
covering 2016,
and why
Guterres has
not even
started an
audit of CEFC
in the
UN.