As UN Bans
Inner City Press E-Asks Spox Dujarric of
Somalia Airport UN Rape Babies Sri Lanka
Silva SG MIA Fleming Cameroon Live Sentences
SG Censors 700+ UNanswered
UNITED NATIONS
GATE, August
20
– Inner City Press
on July 5 was banned
from entering the
UN, the day after it
filed a criminal
complaint against UN
Security for
physically removing
it from covering the
meeting about the UN
Secretary General
Antonio Guterres'
$6.7 billion
peacekeeping budget,
as witnessed and
essentially cheered
on by senior UN
official Christian
Saunders, tearing
its reporter's
shirt, painfully and
intentionally
twisting his arm and
slamming shut and
damaging his laptop.
On August 17,
Guterres' Global
Communicator Alison
Smale issued a
letter banning Inner
City Press from the
UN - for life. With
no due process. She
and Guterres have
put the UN in the US
Press Freedom
Tracker, here.
Smale said,
again, that the UN
would answer Press
questions to the
Spokesman Stephane
Dujarric and his
Office;
Dujarric said
the same on
camera.
On August
20
more
than three
hours before a
noon
briefing by spokesman
Stephane Dujarric, who
still did not
answer a UN
child rape
question formally
submitted the day
before,
after the July 26
noon briefing
had no
questions at all,
video here,
Inner
City Press submitted 1139
questions,
including why
it continues
to be
lawlessly banned
from entering
to ask
questions in
person:
"There
are more than
700+
questions
UNanswered.
And Monday
Sept 17,
Tuesday Sept
18, Wed Sept
19 and
Thurs and Fri
Sept 21, that
whole week, no
questions
answered. Nor
Sept 25, nor
28th - nor
October 2 nor
3. While
appreciating
and using what
was belatedly
sent on
August 7
and on March
28 in partial
request to
Inner City
Press'
questions
about the UN
bribery
sentence of
Patrick Ho of
CEFC and
CEFC's 2018
attempt to buy
the oil
company of
Gulbenkian
Foundation
which paid the
SG, no answers
on Dec 17 or
18 or 19 or 20
or 21 -
another FIVE
days in a row,
even as SG's
direct
conflicts of
interest and
failure to
disclose
emerge, and a
newest low. No
answers on
January 30 nor
31 nor
February 1 nor
4 nor 5 nor 6
nor 7 nor 11
nor 12 nor 13
nor 14 nor 15
nor 18 nor 19
nor 20 nor 21
nor 22 nor 25
nor 26 nor 27
nor March 1 -
27 (!) And now April 1, 3-30 (one
answer
in the
entire month -
corrupt), and
now May
1-13, 15-17,
21-31,
June
3-28,
and July 1-2,
8-31 and August
1-5,
8-19
many
questions.
No answers at
all during
those four
days of the US
v Ho trial
showing
corruption in
the UN says it
all. This ban
is just
censorship -
and Inner City
Press must be
allowed back
into the noon
briefing to
ask its
questions in
person and
follow up on
them.
August
20-1: On
Cameroon,
after you
refused
yesterday to
answer in any
way banned
Inner City
Press'
question about
Paul Biya's
military
"trial" of
Ayuk Tabe and
others, what
now is the
SG's comment
and action if
any on the
LIFE SENTENCES
now handed
out?
August
20-2: On UN
child rapes -
alleged - what
is Guterres'
answer, which
you refused to
provide after
banned Inner
City Press
asked you and
others in
writing on the
morning of
August 19 that
you
"immediately
provide all
if-asked and
additional
information
about the new
allegation of
SEA announced
at 11:01 am
today, of
child rape by
a Cameroonian
"peacekeeper"
in DR Congo,
and a separate
child rape and
also sexual
exploitation
by Gabonese
peacekeers in
CAR, as well
as the
previously
unanswned
question about
exploitation
by Tanzanian
peacekeeper -
and also why
previously
published
charges are no
longer in the
data to which
UN
Peacekeeping
Conduct and
Discipline
points,
including what
if being done
for these
victims and
any steps
taken to avoid
this constant
repetition of
abuse despite
the SG's
ostensible
commitments.
Again, are new
allegations
being buried
elsewhere on
the data page?
Inner City
Press is
asking in
writing
because banned
from the noon
briefings and
any follow up
questions, now
for more than
a year. Today
as before none
of Inner City
Press' written
questions,
including on
Cameroon, have
been answered.
This is a
request that
you
immediately
confirm
receipt of
these
questions."
August
20-3: On
Somalia /
Jubbaland,
what is the
SG's comment
and action if
any on that an
Ethiopian
plane was
denied
permission to
land in
southern
Somalia?
Tension is
high in
Kismayo, the
capital of
Somalia's
Jubbaland
province,
where
controversial
regional
elections were
supposed to be
held on
Thursday.
The UN and
government,
backed by
Ethiopia, want
them
postponed.
While the
regional
authorities,
backed by
Kenya, want
them to go
ahead.
Both Ethiopia
and Kenya are
part of the
more than
20,000-strong
African Union
(AU) force in
the
country.
August
20-4: On the
UN Pension
Fund, what is
the SG's
response to
the critique
that Less than
half of
beneficiaries
are paid on
time,
sometimes not
at
all
We have been
pushing hard
for newly
retiring staff
and other
beneficiaries
to be paid on
time. Two
years ago we
highlighted
the fact that
some had to
wait more than
nine months to
receive their
first pension
payment. The
Fund now
claims mission
accomplished
and that 80
percent are
paid within 15
business days.
Our own
analysis of
the data shows
the true
percentage at
around 40
percent, which
is a long way
off the mark.
At the same
time,
logistical
reasons mean
that the
much-vaunted
15 business
day target can
still mean a
wait of two or
more months.
In this
context you
should know
that many
occupational
pension funds,
including in
developing
countries make
the first
pension
payment as
soon as and
sometimes
before a staff
member
retires.
Further, it
would appear
from our
estimates that
around 4,000
beneficiaries
have not been
paid at all,
with the funds
owed to them
at risk of
being
forfeited as
deadlines
pass. The Fund
terms these
cases
“unactionable”
saying they
haven’t
received the
correct
paperwork.
Besides the
regrettable
terminology,
we haven’t
seen evidence,
nor has OIOS,
that the Fund
has tried to
obtain that
paperwork
despite it
receiving an
annual $10.5
million
payment from
the United
Nations
to do so.
Proposals by
staff unions
to help find
beneficiaries
whose
paperwork is
missing, many
in developing
countries,
have been met
with
indifference.
To this end we
made proposals
to pay
advances to
newly retiring
staff when not
all paperwork
has been
received, and
to help find
former staff
whose money is
at risk of
being
forfeited. The
Board
regrettably
rejected both
proposals.
Running costs
are on a sharp
rise amidst an
unwise
restructuring
The Board
approved a
budget that
would see the
Fund’s running
costs per
participant
rise by 12
percent a
year, albeit
with no link
to
commensurate
improvements
in
performance."
August
20-5: In Sri
Lanka, again
as Inner City
Press asked
you yesterday,
and not
answered by
Bachelet, what
is response of
UN
Peacekeeping
to that
accused war
criminal
Shavendra
Silva has been
named Army
Commander.
What is the
SG's comment
and action?
Earlier this
year, prior to
this second
promotion,
banned Inner
City Press
asked you:
"January 29-3:
On Sri Lanka,
given the
newly
assembled
evidence
regarding
Shavendra
Silva,
formerly UN
Peacekeeping
adviser now
Sri Lanka Army
Chief of
Staff, how can
the SG and USG
Lacroix
continue to
deploy Silva's
troops as
peacekeepers?
What vetting
is taking
place? What is
the SG's and
USG's comment
and action on
this
individual as
chief of staff
of an army the
UN has been
taking troops
from?" With no
answer, now
this. Has the
SG's silence
encouraged
further
promotion of a
war criminal
in an army
from which he
and USG
Lacroix take
and deploy
"peacekeepers"?
What
now?
August
20-6:
Regarding UN
Peacekeeping
(rape) babies,
in Haiti,
please
immediately
provide the
UN's
explanation
and response
to that the UN
appears
unwilling to
share key
evidence in
its
possession,
including the
names and
identifying
information of
the defendants
– making
service and
eventual
enforcement of
judgment in
the cases near
impossible –
or shared the
results of UN
internal
investigations
into the
women’s cases.
No explanation
has been
provided for
this
failure."
August
20-7: In light
of the death
of Jeffrey
Epstein,
accused of sex
trafficking
along with
Ghislaine
Maxwell who
was allowed to
promote her
now closed
charity in the
UN Press
Briefing Room,
as Inner City
Press asked
without any UN
response on
July 22,
please
immediately
disclose all
UN
interactions
with his
Ghislaine
Maxwell's
TerraMar
Project and
relatedly,
with Paolo
Zampolli.
August
20-8: Given
that the SG's
public
schedules for
August 2,
August 5,
August 6,
August 7,
August 8,
August 9,
August 13,
August 14,
August 15,
August 16 and
now August 19
were entirely
blank, not
even "all
appointments
internal" as
before but
just blank,
given that
Poland's
Foreign
Minister was
not able to
meet with the
SG on August
3, nor
Pakistan PR
Maleeha Lodhi
on August 7
(tweeting "As
the SG is
away"), please
immediately
state where
the UNSG is,
now and for
the past two
and a half
three weeks,
and at what
cost to the
public. Please
confirm the
(US)
announcement
that Guterres
will return to
meet Secretary
Pompeo on
August 20.
Additionally,
since public
officials from
Trump to de
Blasio to
Corey Johnson
all disclose
where they
are, and given
the UN system
travel
scandals at
UNRWA, UN
Women and
previously
UNEP, explain
why Mr.
Guterres' lack
of
transparency
is not part of
the problem.
Given the
Secretariat's
communication
failures,
state when
exactly Ms.
Fleming takes
over from
Alison Smale,
whether Ms.
Fleming is
still has
stated on her
profile at
UNHCR (Chief
Communications
@Refugees as
of August 7)
and if she is
answering
some/any of
her e-mail
there. She is
being written
to there was a
second time
today, well
before the
Sept 5
deadline for
UN "approval"
to cover UNGA
week.
August
20-9: On press
freedom and
Cameroon, on
which you
refused to
answer on
August 13
despite saying
the office was
staffed and
answering, now
more specific:
what is the
SG's comment
and action if
any, post
golden statue,
to that Paul
Atanga Nji,
territorial
administration
minister, says
Cameroon's
journalists
are becoming
highly
unpatriotic.
"They have one
main
objective,
just to
sabotage
government
action, to
promote
secessionist
tendencies,"
said Nji. "I
urge them to
be
responsible.
Those who do
not want to
respect the
laws will be
booked as
being
recalcitrant
and will be
treated as
such" ... Now
that the US
Court of
Appeals for
the Second
Circuit has
ruled against
public
officials
blocking
critics on
Twitter even
if the
official
claims their
account is
private, what
is the
justification
for UNSG
Spokesperson
Stephane
Dujarric, with
the UN flag in
his profile
photo and
Guterres
promoting
content,
blocking Inner
City Press?
What is SG
Guterres'
response /
reaction to UN
DSS and
Guterres'
actions on
Inner City
Press being listed
in the U.S.
Press Freedom
Tracker.
In the UN,
what has the
accountability
been for Lt
Ronald E.
Dobbins and
those those
refused on
camera to give
their names?
What is each
of yours -
particularly
the SG's -
response to
the letter
written and
sent by
Burundi
activist
Manisha
Lievin? To the
April 15
letter to the
SG, DSG and
USG Smale for
which receipt
has not even
been
acknowledged,
other than a
single lawless
line from
MALU: "Your
media
accreditation
request, with
reference no:
M66561081, has
been
declined"?
This is a
formal request
for the UN's
explanation of
grounds for
this denied,
and since
SGcentral, the
SG's chief of
staff and
Deputy SG and
USG Smale
haven't even
confirmed
receipt of the
April 15
letter much
less
responded, for
reconsideration.
AGAIN,
immediately
explain how it
is legitimate
to ban from
enter into the
UN the media
that has been
asking about
these and
other
questions,
with no
hearing or
appeal.
June
14-5: Since
the SG claimed
publicly that
the mansion he
lives in
"cannot" be
sold, please
immediately
provide any
and all
documents with
such a
restriction,
and separately
explain why
the concept of
cy pres or
reformation of
donor intent
has not been
explored.
Separately,
Boutros
Boutros Galli
wrote in his
book that the
building was
given by
Arthur
Houghton
through the
United Nations
Association of
the USA. What
actual
inquires, with
UNA-USA or any
successor to
Houghton or
Corning Glass,
has Guterres
made?
June
11-1: On
Cameroon, what
is the SG's
comment and
action if any
on this report
from Chinese
state media:
"YAOUNDE, June
10 (Xinhua) --
Cameroon's
House Speaker
of National
Assembly
Cavaye Yeguie
Djibril on
Monday
denounced
foreign
interference
in the
country's
internal
affairs which
he referred to
as
"conspiracy."
"Cameroon has
become an
object of
conspiracy
intended to
destabilize
the country.
To justify
their
interference
in internal
affairs, the
conspirators
pretend to
denounce it."
Again, how
many offices /
desk does the
Secretariat
give to
Chinese state
media inside
the UN?
May
15-3: On the
Public
Financial
Disclosures
for 2017
belatedly
published over
the weekend of
April 27-28,
please state
why Mohammed
Ibn Chambas,
like the
Executive
Secretary of
the UN
Biodiversity
Convention,
Cristiana
Paşca-Palmer,
UNICEF's
Henriette
Fore, with
documented
links to
ExxonMobil and
others, USG
Mark Lowcock
(undisclosed
while the
Secretariat's
speaker at the
UNSC Arria on
Cameroon),
UNCTAD's
Mukhisa
Kituyi, UN
Women's
Phumzile
Mlambo-Ngcuka,
UNOG chief
Michael
Moller, UNDP
chief Achim
Steiner,
Heidi Mendoza,
Adama Dieng,
UN Security
chief Peter
Drennan,
Rosemary
DiCarlo and
Nicholas
Haysum, is not
even on the
list. OIOS
chief
Inga-Britt
Ahlenius
reported - why
not Mendoza?
Where IS
Mendoza? Isn't
it a bad
practice for
the UN's head
(anti)
genocide
definition
official to
conceal from
the public
even cursory
financial
disclosure?
Did DiCarlo
decline to
make any
public
disclosure
despite being
the UN's top
political
officer? What
is the even
plausible
applicability
of this line
from SG
Guterres' web
page: "Please
note that
given the
multi-cultural
environment of
the UN and the
often security
sensitive
locations
where UN staff
are either
working or
come from,
full public
disclosure may
not always be
a viable or
sensible
option for
certain staff
members"? Why
has Guterres
changed the
previous
system in a
which a
"choosing not
to disclose"
statement was
upload and
listed, to one
which helps
conceal who
reports and
who does
not?
Again, state
why
considering
the UN bribery
conviction of
Patrick Ho of
CEFC, and
CEFC's attempt
to purchase
the oil
company of
Gulbenkian
Foundation
which paid Mr.
Guterres in
2016 was
omitted from
his online
public
financial
disclosure
covering 2016,
and why
Guterres has
not even
started an
audit of CEFC
in the
UN.