As UN Bans
Inner City Press E-Asks Spox Dujarric of Sex
Abuse Mauritania UN Briber Lorenzo
OneCoin Cameroon Honduras Fleming Bans
Press 800+ UNanswered
UNITED NATIONS
GATE, Nov 8
– Inner City Press
on 5 July
2018 was
banned from entering
the UN, the day
after it filed a
criminal complaint
against UN Security
for physically
removing it from
covering the meeting
about the UN
Secretary General
Antonio Guterres'
$6.7 billion
peacekeeping budget,
as witnessed and
essentially cheered
on by senior UN
official Christian
Saunders, tearing
its reporter's
shirt, painfully and
intentionally
twisting his arm and
slamming shut and
damaging his laptop.
On August 17,
Guterres' Department
of Global Communication
issued a letter
banning Inner City
Press from the UN -
for life. With no
due process.
Guterres has
put the UN in the US
Press Freedom
Tracker, here.
Smale said,
again, that the UN
would answer Press
questions to the
Spokesman Stephane
Dujarric and his
Office;
Dujarric said
the same on
camera.
On November 8 four
hours
before a
noon briefing by long
gone Spokesman
Stephane "French
Whine"
Dujarric
literally
during
the sentencing
of UN briber
Francis
Lorenzo on
which he
refused to
answer, after
the July 26
noon briefing
had no
questions at all,
video here,
Inner
City Press submitted 1339
questions,
including why
it continues
to be
lawlessly banned
from entering
to ask
questions in
person:
"There
are more than
800+
questions
UNanswered.
And Monday
Sept 17,
Tuesday Sept
18, Wed Sept
19 and
Thurs and Fri
Sept 21, that
whole week, no
questions
answered. Nor
Sept 25, nor
28th - nor
October 2 nor
3. While
appreciating
and using what
was belatedly
sent on Sept 6
(while you
still withhold
if-asked
information
about Cameroon
child rape(s)
in DRC),
and on March
28 in partial
request to
Inner City
Press'
questions
about the UN
bribery
sentence of
Patrick Ho of
CEFC and
CEFC's 2018
attempt to buy
the oil
company of
Gulbenkian
Foundation
which paid the
SG, no answers
on Dec 17 or
18 or 19 or 20
or 21 -
another FIVE
days in a row,
even as SG's
direct
conflicts of
interest and
failure to
disclose
emerge, and a
newest low. No
answers on
January 30 nor
31 nor
February 1 nor
4 nor 5 nor 6
nor 7 nor 11
nor 12 nor 13
nor 14 nor 15
nor 18 nor 19
nor 20 nor 21
nor 22 nor 25
nor 26 nor 27
nor March 1 -
27 (!) And now April 1, 3-30 (one
answer
in the
entire month -
corrupt), and
now May
1-13, 15-17,
21-31,
June
3-28,
and July 1-2,
8-31 and August
1-5,
8-30,
Sept 3-5, 9-30
and now
October 1-3,
7-14,
16-31 and
Nov 1-7
many
questions.
No answers at
all during
those four
days of the US
v Ho trial
showing
corruption in
the UN says it
all. This ban
is just
censorship -
and Inner City
Press must be
allowed back
into the noon
briefing to
ask its
questions in
person and
follow up on
them.
November
8-1: Now that
UN Human
Rights' Rupert
Colville has
said on the
record that
Mauritania has
no law against
rape, please
immediately
explain why
the UN has
deployed
"peacekeepers"
from
Mauritania to
commit sexual
abuse of
victims in CAR
with the only
punishment
being
repatriation
to a country
without a law
against rape?
And how this
irresponsible
deployment by
Guterres and
Lacroix is not
itself a
crime? And
why, unlike
even Ban
Ki-moon,
Guterres and
each of you
have refused
to even
provide the
if-asked
information
about the SEA
abuses to
Inner City
Press you have
banned 493
days from the
UN?
November
8-2: Now that
Michael
Bloomberg has
moved to run
for US
President or
Democratic
Party
nomination,
why has he not
been removed
or recused
from his UN
system post?
When will this
happen? What
are your
rules?
November
8-3: On
Honduras, on
which you have
refused to
answer Inner
City Press'
questions
about
Guterres' 4
person panel
sent to the
country - no
read out - and
his meeting
with
presumptively
narco-funded
president JOH,
now comment on
this, from
Insight Crime:
"Security
camera footage
[warning:
graphic
material] of
the incident
shows what
appears to be
a
pre-meditated
ambush. Meza
is talking to
two prison
officials as a
hooded guard
goes to open a
red sliding
door. Once
open, six
inmates storm
in, with one
immediately
firing a
pistol at
Meza’s head.
The drug
trafficker
collapses as
the
gun-wielding
prisoner keeps
firing and the
other convicts
ward off the
guards with
blades.
Honduran
prison
authorities
initially
attributed the
murder to an
inmate brawl,
whereas the
government
laid the blame
on other drug
traffickers.
Meza’s lawyer,
Carlos
Chajtur, said
he believes
the video of
the killing
suggests a
“plot by the
penitentiary
authorities
and maybe
higher level
authorities."
November
8-4:
Also explain
why the UN
Human Rights
office in
Honduras does
not answer
Press
questions or
even respond
to requests,
while spending
the public's
money.
November
8-5: Again,
given the
increase about
of fraud with
which the UN
is surrounded
/ involved in
under SG
Guterres, now
belatedly
answer this
Inner City
Press question
now that
UN-linked
World Sports
Alliance Saint
Clair has been
formally
indicted in
the SDNY, and
belatedly
comment on the
global
implications
of the related
OneCoin fraud
being shown in
SDNY trial:
"October 24-1:
On corruption
and the UN,
please
immediate
disclose all
UN connections
of the "World
Sports
Alliance" with
offices at 845
UN Plaza and a
website
replete with
UN-like
symbols whose
Asa St Clair
was presented
last night in
SDNY
Magistrates
Court and
detained on
wire fraud
charges for a
fraudulent
crypto-currency.
Also please
now on UN Day
response to
the use of the
UN for a
fraudulent
coin sale by
Carlos Garcia,
shown in SDNY
to be money
launderer for
UN
bribes.
November 8-6:
With UN briber
Francis
Lorenzo set to
be sentenced
today, what is
the UN's
comment on the
lack of reform
since, current
PGA not even
disclosing who
pays for his
trips, and
Lorenzo (and
UN) crony
Carlos Garcia
selling
fraudulent
coins with UN
imagery? On
deadline.
[Not answered: corrupt]
September
4-8:
Immediately
explain the
single lawless
line from MALU
on 30 August
2019:
"Greetings
Matthew Lee
from Inner
City Press,
Your media
accreditation
request, with
reference no:
M5413398, has
been declined
for the
following
reason: Media
accreditation
was withdrawn
on 17 August
2018." This is
a formal
request for
the UN's
explanation of
grounds for
this denial.
And a demand
for answer to
these
questions,
which MALU has
declined to
answer:
Who made the
decision?
Where is the
list of those
accredited by
[MALU]?
What and to
whom is the
process of
appeal?
September
3-19: On press
freedom and
Cameroon, on
which you
refused to
answer on
August 13
despite saying
the office was
staffed and
answering, now
more specific:
what is the
SG's comment
and action if
any, post
golden statue,
to that Paul
Atanga Nji,
territorial
administration
minister, says
Cameroon's
journalists
are becoming
highly
unpatriotic.
"They have one
main
objective,
just to
sabotage
government
action, to
promote
secessionist
tendencies,"
said Nji. "I
urge them to
be
responsible.
Those who do
not want to
respect the
laws will be
booked as
being
recalcitrant
and will be
treated as
such"... Now
that the US
Court of
Appeals for
the Second
Circuit has
ruled against
public
officials
blocking
critics on
Twitter even
if the
official
claims their
account is
private [and AOC
unblocking Dov
Hikind],
what is the
justification
for UNSG
Spokesperson
Stephane
Dujarric, with
the UN flag in
his profile
photo and
Guterres
promoting
content,
blocking Inner
City Press?
What is SG
Guterres'
response /
reaction to UN
DSS and
Guterres'
actions on
Inner City
Press being
listed in the
U.S. Press
Freedom
Tracker, here.
In the UN,
what has the
accountability
been for Lt
Ronald E.
Dobbins and
those those
refused on
camera to give
their names?
What is each
of yours -
particularly
the SG's -
response to
the letter
written and
sent by
Burundi
activist
Manisha
Lievin?
Immediately
explain the
single lawless
line from MALU
on 30 August
2019:
"Greetings
Matthew Lee
from Inner
City Press,
Your media
accreditation
request, with
reference no:
M5413398, has
been declined
for the
following
reason: Media
accreditation
was withdrawn
on 17 August
2018." This is
a formal
request for
the UN's
explanation of
grounds for
this denied,
and since
SGcentral, the
SG's chief of
staff and
Deputy SG and
USG Fleming
have not even
responded...
AGAIN,
immediately
explain how it
is legitimate
to ban from
enter into the
UN the media
that has been
asking about
these and
other
questions,
with no
hearing or
appeal - and
respond that
Inner City
Press on
August 24
applied like
100s or 1000s
of others to
cover the
upcoming UNGA
high level
week,
including now
formally
offering to
answer any
quesions the
UN / DSS might
have, having
been vetted
and accredited
elsewhere
since, as both
USG DSS
Michaud and
MALU have
formally been
timely
informed --
and how it is
possible that
a media that
closely covers
and uncovers
the UN could
be denied
entry, other
than (SG)
censorship.
May
15-3: On the
Public
Financial
Disclosures
for 2017
belatedly
published over
the weekend of
April 27-28,
please state
why Mohammed
Ibn Chambas,
like the
Executive
Secretary of
the UN
Biodiversity
Convention,
Cristiana
Paşca-Palmer,
UNICEF's
Henriette
Fore, with
documented
links to
ExxonMobil and
others, USG
Mark Lowcock
(undisclosed
while the
Secretariat's
speaker at the
UNSC Arria on
Cameroon),
UNCTAD's
Mukhisa
Kituyi, UN
Women's
Phumzile
Mlambo-Ngcuka,
UNOG chief
Michael
Moller, UNDP
chief Achim
Steiner,
Heidi Mendoza,
Adama Dieng,
UN Security
chief Peter
Drennan,
Rosemary
DiCarlo and
Nicholas
Haysum, is not
even on the
list. OIOS
chief
Inga-Britt
Ahlenius
reported - why
not Mendoza?
Where IS
Mendoza? Isn't
it a bad
practice for
the UN's head
(anti)
genocide
definition
official to
conceal from
the public
even cursory
financial
disclosure?
Did DiCarlo
decline to
make any
public
disclosure
despite being
the UN's top
political
officer? What
is the even
plausible
applicability
of this line
from SG
Guterres' web
page: "Please
note that
given the
multi-cultural
environment of
the UN and the
often security
sensitive
locations
where UN staff
are either
working or
come from,
full public
disclosure may
not always be
a viable or
sensible
option for
certain staff
members"? Why
has Guterres
changed the
previous
system in a
which a
"choosing not
to disclose"
statement was
upload and
listed, to one
which helps
conceal who
reports and
who does
not?
Again, state
why
considering
the UN bribery
conviction of
Patrick Ho of
CEFC, and
CEFC's attempt
to purchase
the oil
company of
Gulbenkian
Foundation
which paid Mr.
Guterres in
2016 was
omitted from
his online
public
financial
disclosure
covering 2016,
and why
Guterres has
not even
started an
audit of CEFC
in the
UN.