Amid UN
Bribery Case Charge, UN
Tells ICP It Gave Lorenzo UN email, Ng
Help by Sur Stonewalled
By Matthew
Russell Lee, Photo,
Video
UNITED NATIONS,
July 26 –In the UN bribery
case of Ng Lap Seng on July 25
the government and defense
traded summations, neither
taking on the ongoing
corruption of the UN.
Prosecutor Janis Echenberg
portrayed the UN as something
of a victim of Ng Lap Seng,
presenting at face value the
claims of the UN Development
Program's Simon Hannaford that
the UN has standards. This is
belied not only by UNDP's own
history, but also the UN Task
Force Report which admits that
UN lacks common ethical
standards. Since the UN
refused to tell the US
Attorney who it interviewed
for the report, the US knows
better. But it is focused only
on Ng Lap Seng. On July 26
Inner City Press asked UN
Spokesman Farhan Haq about
evidence that current UN
official Meena Sur helped with
Ng's conference center plan.
Haq said UN will await outcome
of trial. But this, the
expanding showing of UN
corruption, will of course not
be ruled on. Meanwhile after
repeated Inner City Press
questions, this from the UN's
Miguel Mourato Gordo: "Dear
Mr. Lee, In response to your
e-mail, please note that it is
the Organization's practice to
facilitate email accounts to
members of the Office of the
PGA as requested by the PGA.
This is similar to outfitting
the Office with other tools
required to operate such as a
phone, a desk, a chair, etc.
According to our records, Mr.
Lorenzo was outfitted with a
UN email account." Inner City
Press has asked: "Thanks. But
since Lorenzo was not listed
as part of Ashe's team and was
during the whole year the
Deputy Permanent
Representative of the
Dominican Republic to the UN,
did DGACM do no due diligence
at all? Allowing Lorenzo who
has pleaded guilty to present
himself to the public as a UN
staff member, part of a UN
delegation to Macau? Please
answer asap - on deadline
(charge being read this
afternoon in trial.)" We'll
have more on this. Ng's lawyer
Tai Park staked his defense on
discrediting government
witness Francis Lorenzo, not
difficult given his guilty
plea and testimony. But Park
presented the UN has a victim
too, even Yiping Zhou who was
so corrupt even the UN was
glad how quickly he left after
the indictment. This is why
the UN is not reformed - this,
and the UN's censorship of
critical Press coverage,
restrictions continued by
“new” Secretary General
Antonio Guterres. We'll have
more on this. In the defense's
summation in the UN bribery
trial of Ng Lap Seng, along
with a withering attack on the
credibility of government
witness Francis Lorenzo came
more evidence of UN
corruption. Lorenzo got
assistance with Ng's $3
billion Macau convention
center plan not only from
Yiping Zhou and Ion Botnaru,
both gone from the UN, but
also Meena Sur, still at the
UN. When Ng's wire transfers
for Lorenzo to Terra Trading
in the Dominican Republic were
questioned, Lorenzo got El
Salvador's then Permanent
Representative Carlos Garcia
to write "To Whom It May
Concern" in support of the
scheme. Inner City Press has
asked about the group(s)
Garcia continued to squire
into the UN, long after
Lorenzo was arrested. The UN
remains corrupt; its response
to coverage is to evict and
censor, not to reform. On July
25 between the charging
conference and summations,
Inner City Press rushed up to
the UN to the noon briefing
and asked questions that were
dodged, in Kafka-esque
fashion. From the UN transcript:
Inner City Press: Today is
the… the… the charge
conference, and the issues
that have come up involve
whether Francis Lorenzo was an
agent of the UN. That’s
why I guess I just want to ask
you once again because it’s
coming to a head down
there. You’ve said
somehow to ask… maybe I
misunderstood you when you
said ask the President of the
General Assembly how Mr.
Lorenzo… about a UN email
address. I can’t really
ask Mr. [John] Ashe… who
should I ask?
Deputy Spokesman: Ask… I
mean, there’s an office of the
President of the General
Assembly…
Inner
City
Press: I
did. They told me it’s
DGACM (Department of General
Assembly and Conference
Management). That’s why
I’m asking you.
Deputy Spokesman: I
mean, it would have been a
decision taken by the
President of the General
Assembly. They’ll need
to provide you details about
that.
Inner
City
Press: Was
he an agent of the UN?
[inaudible] Given that he’s
not a special adviser… he had
a business card saying he’s a
special adviser to the
President of the Assembly, the
General Assembly.
Deputy Spokesman: He had
no UN employment, certainly
none that I’m aware of.
His employment was with his
Mission. ...
NOTE: In court
again on July 25 Lorenzo was
depicted as employed by the
UN, part ofa UN
Delegation to Macau, with
Paulette Bethel and Frances
Fuller. Is the UN covering up?
It continued:
Inner
City
Press:
I wanted to ask you… the…
first of all, thank your
office for saying that Frances
Fuller had separated from
service. I wanted to ask
you, going… introduced in the
court is the attendance list
of the Macau conference in
August of 2015. So I
wanted to ask you, there…
there… one… one… I believe
he’s still a UN official, Mr.
Navid Hanif, was in
attendance. And I wanted
to know, is this something
that the UN has ever asked in
what capacity it took
place? I know that Mr.
[Ian] Botnaru was there.
He’s no longer at the
UN. He was listed in
attendance as an Ambassador of
Moldova, which he wasn’t at
the time. What
follow-through has been made
by the UN regarding that
conference and still high
officials that were
there? Were they
interviewed as to why they
were there? Why was he
there?
Deputy Spokesman: I
don’t have any details to
share about the ongoing court
case.
Inner
City Press:
It’s not about the court
case. I’m talking about
the UN.
Deputy Spokesman: It’s
actually about information
that’s coming up in the court
case. So I wouldn’t
comment on it as the process
is under way. Yes,
Masood? ...
Inner City Press: This will
not be about the court
case. This will be about
UN’s own task force report
which was… which… which states
there are no formal agreed
common principles of ethical
conduct for financial
disclosure measures for the
president and the personnel of
his office. And I wanted
to know, in the months that
António Guterres has been
Secretary-General, can you
list any reforms whatsoever
made both of this portion of
the task force report but also
of the lapses and loopholes
into the system shown by the
John Ashe, Ng Lap Seng case?
Deputy Spokesman: There
are a series of reforms that
the Secretary-General will be
announcing, including
management reforms and
others. You’ll know
about those in due
course. Have a good
afternoon, everyone.
We'll have
more on this. The prosecution
earlier on July 25 showed
photographs of the "UN
delegation" to Macau in 2014,
including John Ashe and his
then-assistant Frances Fuller
- and his chief of staff
Paulette Bethel. Bethel was
never charged by the US
Attorney, and many wonder why.
The prosecution presented Ion
Botnaru and even Yiping Zhou
of the UN Office of South
South Cooperation as merely
doing what "ambassadors"
wanted - without asking what
Zhou and Botnaru got out of
it. Botnaru attended the
August 2015 Macau meeting,
while still a UN official,
listed as Ambassador of
Moldova. Also UNexplored:
among the South South News
consultants cut off along with
Ashe's wife Anilla Cherian
were another Moldova Permanent
Representative to the UN,
Alexandru Cujba and Bruce
Niswander. Why weren't they
interviewed or more? While the
prosecution ended with slides
of the six counts, from
Section 666 and the FCPA
including Antiguan and
Dominican law, many questions
about the UN's own corruption
remain. Will they be answered
or addressed in the defense's
summation? The issue has
arisen whether government
witness Francis Lorenzo, who
has pleaded guilty, was a "UN
agent." On July 25 just before
summations began in the case,
Inner City Press rushed from
the courthouse to the UN noon
briefing and asked Secretary
General Antonio Guterres'
spokesman Farhan Haq if
Lorenzo was a UN agent. Haq
said he was only a diplomat of
his country, the Dominican
Republic. But why then did
Lorenzo has a UN.org email
address, and a business card
listing him as a Special
Adviser to the President of
the General Assembly? Is the
UN, in essence, trying to help
Ng be found not guilty? We'll
have more on this. Haq also
refused to answer Inner City
Press' question about still UN
official Navid Harif's role in
Ng's Macau event, saying
that's in court - a dodge; Haq
could not name a single reform
implemented in Guterres' more
than six months on these
topics, saying only that
proposals will be announced in
"due course." When? Throughout
the morning of July 26 Ng's
lawyers raised objections to
the 70-page charge sheet,
citing the First Amendment -
ironic since the UN has none -
and the specifics of whether
former President of the
General Assembly John Ashe and
Francis Lorenzo can or must be
found to be agents of the UN.
As to Lorenzo, the UN has
refused to answer Inner City
Press' question about
Lorenzo's business card
listing him, with a UN.org
email address, as a Special
Adviser to the President of
the General Assembly. We'll
have more on this - the
summations scheduled to being
at 11 am have been pushed
back. The judge has said if
deliberations go into next
week, there may be only 11
jurors remaining. A record, as
they say, is being built.
Watch this site. On July 24
after re-direct examination
about payments to and from
Ng's South South News (the
latter including to entities
like the UN Correspondents
Association), the defense
presented a redacted copy of
the UN Task Force Report and
rested its case. With the
record, other than summations
and the 70-page charge, now
closed it is time to review
who, for example, attended
Ng's and John Ashe's shadowy
August 2015 event in Macau, in
furtherance of the $3 billion
UN conference center / casino
plan. Significant, now the day
before the UN Security Council
meeting on Burundi where the
UN said there's a risk of
genocide then did nothing
about it, there was the
representative of Burundi's
Pierre Nkurunziza, Albert
Shingiro. On what basis did he
attend? What is his and his
government's comment on the
corruption trial? There was
then UN official Ion Botnaru,
never held accountable.
Tellingly, he was listed as
attending as Ambassador of
Moldova, a variation on the UN
giving actual Dominican
Republic Deputy Permanent
Representative Francis Lorenzo
a UN.org email address then
telling Inner City Press to
ask the dead John Ashe about
it. There was current UN
official Navid Hanif, also
never held accountable. There
was a vice president of the UN
Correspondents Association,
who even on July 24 retained a
double-wide UN office next to
the one the UN evicted Inner
City Press from for covering
the Ng scandal, and came down
to ask canned questions for
state media (like the Egyptian
state media the UN is trying
to give Inner City Press'
office to). There was
Bangladesh Ambassador Momen,
who we are told was given a
"heads-up" just before the
indictments in October 2015
and left the US two days
later. Who gave that heads-up?
Why? These and other questions
Inner City Press will continue
on, still restricted 18 months
later by the still corrupt UN.
Watch this site. On July 24,
Ng's defense lawyers read into
the record quotes from the UN
Task Force Report, for example
that "the Task Force found
that there are no formal,
agreed common principles of
ethical conduct or financial
disclosure measures for the
President and the personnel of
the Office." Also that "The
Task Force observed that there
is a lack of common standards
of conduct
expected of Presidents,
specifically with regard to
the manner in which they
conduct themselves as
President-elect and when
carrying out their
presidential functions during
their term of office." Ng Lap
Seng may be found not guilty
on the grounds that the UN is
this corrupt. A charge
conference and summations are
set for July 25; the charge is
said to already be 70 pages in
length. The UN refused to
cooperate about its own Task
Force Report, not saying who
was interviewed; the bribery
defendant used the UN's own
works to argue that the UN has
no common ethical standards.
The U should be ashamed but
won't even tell Inner City
Press, there every day, if it
has anyone monitoring the
trial. On July 21 arguments
began about "UN documents"
that Ng's defense lawyers want
to introduce into evidence.
This followed the July 20
testimony of the one-time
assistance of former President
of the UN General Assembly Frances
Fuller, of whom Inner
City Press asked UN spokesman
Farhan Haq in August 2016,
here. On July 24, Inner
City Press asked Haq again
about Fuller, and how Francis
Lorenzo got a UN.org email. UN
transcript here:
Inner City Press: Last week
you said when I asked you why
it was that in the Ng Lap Seng
case, Francis Lorenzo who has
plead guilty to the UN bribery
had an UN email address and
you said to ask the Office of
the President of the General
Assembly, so I did. They
cannot obviously answer it
because it was two presidents
ago. But, they did say
that the DGACM [Department of
General Assembly and
Conference Management], ICT
[information and communication
technology] focal point is the
one that gives out UN email
addresses, so I want to
reiterate… they can't answer
it so it seems like unless the
DGACM have a separate
spokesperson, can you get an
answer from them if Mr.
Francis Lorenzo had a UN email
address? And if so, why
he did, given that he is not
listed among the team, there
is still a web page online
showing that?
Deputy Spokesman:
Regarding the why, that would
be a question for the previous
president of the General
Assembly. It's not a
decision that was taken by us
and it's not something I can
speak to. Regarding… you
will have a question after
this. I also have the
following statement
attributable to the Deputy
Spokesman for
Secretary-General on
Pakistan. The
Secretary-General strongly
condemns the terrorist attack
in Lahore, Pakistan, today and
calls for those responsible to
be brought to justice.
The Secretary-General extends
his condolences to the
families of the victims and
wishes full recovery to those
injured. He supports the
efforts of the Government of
Pakistan to fight terrorism
and violent extremism, with
full respect for international
human rights norms and
obligations. Yeah?
Question: Okay, because
you say, John Ashe, may he
rest in peace, has expired,
but does DGACM, if the PGA
[President of the General
Assembly] today, after the
scandal, after the
indictments, were to ask… just
provides names, would they
automatically hand out these
email addresses, or is there
some standards within the
Secretariat as to how to
respond to such requests?
Deputy Spokesman:
Regarding that, if someone is
hired on as an adviser, you
know, in the UN, they are
entitled to a UN email
address, so they would process
that. I believe that
someone has to vouch for the
credentials of who are the
staff who have entitlement to
a UN email address.
Question: But, who does
the vouching, the PGA's office
or the Secretariat?
Because he was never pictured
on that, essentially an
unlisted…
Deputy Spokesman: That
would have to be a decision
taken by the President of the
General Assembly.
Question: There is no
reform of that?
Deputy Spokesman: It's
not something that I can speak
to. I don't speak for
the President of the General
Assembly.
Question: The other
question is this, in
testifying in the case is
Frances Fuller, who was the
personal assistant to John
Ashe — paid UN staff —
attended a conference in Macau
and other trips in
Macau. And I wanted to
know I asked you about her
before because after John Ashe
left, she worked for Catherine
Pollard and then for
ex-Secretary-General Ban
Ki-moon. So, I wanted to
know, one, does she still work
in the system? And two,
what… did the UN's lawyers Mr.
Gitlin or others speak with
her before she
testified? And she
claimed she didn't remember
any of these trips to Macau
and yet there were photographs
of them, so I wanted to get I
guess get your response to a
person who stayed on post-Mr.
Ashe, testifying in the case
and saying I don't remember
anything, I have no
recollection, et cetera?
Deputy Spokesman: I'll
check to see whether she is
with the UN still.
Later the UN sent Inner City
Press this: "Frances Fuller no
longer works for the UN (she
separated on 14 September
2016)." So why can't or won't
the UN provide an answer about
Francis Lorenzo's UN.org
email? It appears that Fuller
is now "Project Manager at
Sologistics
New York, New York,
Environmental Services," after
working for Ban Ki-moon for
one year and five months.
Fuller in court claimed she
couldn't remember the details
of the Macau trip. Inner City
Press questions why the
government has not called or
pursued Ashe's chief of staff,
who did not keep up diplomatic
immunity despite slick
efforts. Specifically, why
didn't the US Attorney's
office call or pursue Paulette
A. Bethel, who as Ashe's chief
of staff knew infinitely more
about the payments than did
Frances Fuller? As Inner City
Press exclusively reported,
there was questions of
Bethel's immunity as a
(former) Bermuda diplomat. Did
that hold the US Attorney
back? Or was it an attempt to
protect the UN itself, given
that Bethel continued at a
night level there? We'll have
more on this. Ng's defense
lawyers have been arguing
among other things that Ng's
payment of money and obtaining
a General Assembly resolution
with his company's name in it
(and a photo with Ban Ki-moon
at the UN Correspondents
Association ball, we might
add) is just the way things
are done at the UN. On July 21
reference was made, on the
documents, to the UN's "Mr.
Gitner." Inner City Press has
previously asked the UN about
Gitner, with the Spokesman
saying he'd never heard of
him. From the UN transcript:
Inner City Press: the UN
produced approximately 61
documents to Mr. Ng's defence
team. It is clear that
there are additional requested
materials that have not yet
been produced, and Mr. Ng's
defence team is in discussions
with the UN counsel, Daniel
Gitner, Esquire, to facilitate
such production". So I
know I've asked you before
whether the UN would
cooperate. You said, if
ordered by the
authorities. So I have
a… I wanted to ask, one, have
the authorities ordered the UN
to produce? Number two,
since you have produced, can
you give some idea of what
type of documents? I've
asked you before about… he
asked for a slew of documents
including…
Spokesman: I'm not privy
to the details or discussions
between lawyers. As I
said, we, as in just about any
criminal case, we will
cooperate with the authorities
as required.
Inner City Press: Is
Daniel Gitner an OLA [Office
of Legal Affairs] lawyer or an
outside counsel?
Spokesman: I have no
clue… I have never heard of
Daniel Gitner. Doesn't
mean that person doesn't…
Inner City Press: Okay.
Can you get something back…?
Spokesman: If I have
anything more, I will share it
with you.
This
spokesman Stephane Dujarric
never did come back with
information. He, along with
the UN Correspondents
Association, evicted Inner
City Press from the UN Press
Briefing Room and the UN,
where is it still restricted
for pursuing this UN
corruption case. Earlier on
July 21 the bookkeeper of Ng's
South South News Ms Jianqing
Zhu testified that former
President of the General
Assembly John Ashe's wife was
paid $6,000 a month; the memo
on the check as "Antigua -
wife." The records shown in
court showed South South News
payment to UN staff members
and UN contractors - the UN is
covering this up, with its
usually collaborators. At noon
on July 21 Inner City Press
rushed to the UN on 42nd
Street and asked the UN
spokesman Farhan Haq if the UN
would act on the information
in the South South News
payment records. Haq cited, as
if it were responsive, the
brief testimony of Simon
Hannaford of UNDP. Video here,
from 20:13. The UN is in
denial, UNreformed. On July 20
Ms. Zhu testified how she
transferred Ng's funds to pay
for salary, clothes, luggage
and rent for Vivian Wang and
Francis Lorenzo, who had a
UN.org email address. When she
testified that South South
News got a "good deal" by
buying two Mercedes rather
that just one, jury members
burst out laughing. The day
ended with the prosecution
walking her through spread
sheets of payment for "UN
events," on which we'll have
more. After the jury was
excused for the day, there was
discussion of a jury charge
that it is not uncommon for
witnesses to be spoken with by
the parties, that they can be
weight but doesn't have to be
by the jury. Inner City Press'
Periscope videos here
and here
and here;
Inner City Press had to run
back to the UN to get its
computer before 7 pm under the
censorship order imposed by
the UN Department of Public
Information after Inner City
Press sought to cover a
meeting, in the UN Press
Briefing Room, of the UN
Correspondents Association
which took Ng's South South
News' money for full page ads
then provided the venue for
Ng's photos with Ban Ki-moon.
On July 19 the FBI agent who
arrested Ng and his accountant
Jeffrey Yin began to testify.
He brought into evidence
before an increasingly bemused
jury long videos of Ng's
proposed development in Macau,
which had a larger residential
component than the "Geneva of
Asia" conference center which
served as its rationale. It
was described as a shopping
center on reclaimed land, with
"gaming" - which should have
disqualified it under UN
system rules, but didn't. The
UN is corrupt and for sale,
this trial is making clear. In
Ng's black Samsonite suitcase
were the promotional
materials, a series of DVDs
screened by "Ms. Rao"
(phonetic) as translations
were handed out to the jury.
South South News payroll
information came into
evidence, with John Ashe's
wife (widow) now listed, along
with Juan Paulino and others.
Also on July 19 the
prosecution showed the jury
wire transfers of $200,000
labeled "Lorenzo Wires" for
government witness Francis
Lorenzo, via one Luis Guerra
of "Terra Trading in the
Dominican Republic, as well as
one of Lorenzo's UN.org
business cards, found in the
possession of Ng's accountant
Jeffrey Yin, who like Lorenzo
has pleaded guilty. On July 20
Inner City Press asked UN
Spokesman Farhan Haq about
Francis Lorenzo having a
un.org email address while
serving as the Deputy
Permanent Representative of
the Dominican Republic (and
head of South South News). Haq
refused to answer, transcript
here,
telling Inner City Press to
ask the office of the
President of the General
Assembly. So Inner City Press
has, cc-ing Haq: "First,
please confirm or deny that
Lorenzo had a un.org email
address as a “Special Adviser
to the PGA” as reflected on
the business card confiscated
by the FBI. Second, please
state what the rules are for
getting a UN.org email
address, where the complete
list is available so that the
public is not defrauded, and
how the Office of the PGA
distributes un.org email
addresses to non UN staff.
There may be more questions
but these are on deadline." Of
course, Haq evading the
question by saying to ask it
to the Office of the current
President of the General
Assembly seemed and seems like
an evasion; that office's
Daniel Thomas has now
explained that such un.org
email addresses after given
out through the ICT focal
point of the Department of
General Assembly and
Conference Management - the
same DGACM which added Ng's
Sun Kian Ip Group to a GA
resolution. The UN's repeated
attempts to distance itself
from the corruption being
documented in the Federal
courthouse in lower Manhattan
are, it is becoming clear,
merely evasions. Also entered
into evidence were videos and
photographs of then UN
Secretary General Ban Ki-moon
with Lorenzo and others,
similar to those arranged
at the Cipriani's ball of the
UN Correspondents Association,
which accepted payment for
full page ads from Ng's and
Lorenzo's South South News. Here is
Inner City Press' Periscope
video after leaving the
courthouse (which does not
allow cameras or phones to
come in), here
the rushed re-entry into the
UN, with UN
Security in view. We'll
have more on this. On July 17
the defense argued to get into
evidence videos including one
of a visit to South South News
and a number of UN Ambassadors
by the Dominican Republic's
then-President Leonel
Fernandez Reyna. Video here.
South South News was a bribery
conduit, its funds used for
gambling in Las Vegas and
Atlantic City while the UN's
Department of Public
Information let SSN's content
into UNTV archives and let Ng
fundees have impermissible
events in the UN. On July 18,
Inner City Press asked UN
Deputy Spokesman Farhan Haq,
UN transcript here:
Inner City Press: yesterday,
down in court in the Ng Lap
Seng/John Ashe case, a number
of things came out... Given
what's been revealed in the
case about South-South News
connection to a bribery
scheme, maybe you'll answer it
from the podium or if you
could, I would just ask you,
not just as to the Office of
South-South Cooperation, but,
as to UNTV, a division of the
Department of Public
Information, to determine
whether an agreement was ever
reached and what their
statement is about this
South-South News material
still in UNTV archives.
Deputy Spokesman: Well,
first of all, I don't have any
comment on the ongoing trial,
and I wouldn't have that as
that proceeds. Regarding
South-South News, last year,
it ceased to have its
accreditation as a media
outlet at the UN, and there's
no arrangements with
South-South News, which is not
accredited.
Inner City Press: But, my
question is, if you go today
to UNTV, just plug in the
name, you'll find this
material that went in.
The question is, given the way
in which this bribery scheme
penetrated the UN, what steps
have been taken? Was an
agreement ever reached? It's a
simple yes-or-no
question. Was an
agreement ever reached during
the time frame — has nothing
to do with the guilt or
innocence of Ng Lap Seng —
between South-South News and
the Department of Public
Information?
Deputy Spokesman: Like I
said, I don't have any comment
on the information that comes
out in the trial. What I
can say, clearly, there is no
agreement with South-South
News, which is not accredited
as a media outlet at the UN.
Inner City Press: Right, but
that's not the question.
The question is: was
there an agreement?
Deputy Spokesman: That's
where we stand with them
now. And, as for details
in the trial, that will come
out as part of the trial
process.
Inner City Press: Right, but
whether he's exonerated or
not, the UN has cited
immunity, and so that's why
I'm asking you just a factual
question.
Deputy Spokesman: That
the information we have.
You know, if you're asking me
about South-South News'
status, that's what it
is. It does not have
accreditation, and it does not
have a contract with
UNTV. Have a good
afternoon, everyone.
Ng
as it turns out had a
resolution to dissolve South
South News in October 2012,
then apparently cut his
funding to it by one-third.
The defense wants to introduce
a video taking Macau in August
2015, with Ng translated -
badly - by a "Stanley" from
Sun Kian Ip Group, but the
government opposes it. Just
then, Inner City Press had to
leave due to UN censorship.
Before that, South South News
was shown to have been
simultaneously "in partnership
with the UN" and paying for
the Las Vegas gambling of
Francis Lorenzo and Vivian
Wang. South South News also
paid for full page ads with
the UN Correspondents
Association, which provided
the venue for photos of Ng
with UN officials including
Ban Ki-moon. But in December
2012, Ng's lawyers showed,
South South News was nearly
out of business until Lorenzo
flew to China and presented Ng
with a business plan about
partnering with the UN.
Somehow the UN is arguing it
is not implicated in the
trial. The day was ending with
arguments about the
admissibility of videos from
the August 2015 Macau event
attended by UN and UNCA
officials. But Inner City
Press has to leave
mid-argument, due to the UN
still restricting it to
entrance only until 7 pm for
having sought to cover an UNCA
event held in the UN Press
Briefing Room, to see if
UNCA's acceptance of funds
from South South News would be
discussed. Despite
obfuscations, information has
emerged that not only did Ng's
South South News place at
least 17 videos in UNTV
articles, but its links with
the UN and DPI were more
extensive. Watch this site. Ng
makes the argument that
Francis Lorenzo, who has
pleaded guilty, was in fact
"open and notorious" even as
the UN Department of Public
Information put his material
in their archives, and the UN
Correspondents Association
took his and Ng's money for
full page ads, providing a
venue for Ng's photos with
then Secretary General Ban
Ki-moon. Ng's lawyers' most
recent letter says, "Lorenzo
was open and notorious about
his role as an officer of
South-South News (including
receiving checks directly from
South-South News into his bank
account), which strongly
suggests that he did not
believe the payments he
received in that capacity were
bribes." Of course, Lorenzo
also funneled the payments
through the bank accounts of
his sister and other
relatives. On July 13 a UN
witness, for which the UN only
partially waived its claimed
immunity, testified that Ng
Lap Seng as a gambling casino
magnate should have been
excluded from any business
with the UN Development
Program, or all review of
dealing with him "escalated"
to then Administrator Helen
Clark. The witness, Simon
Hannaford of UNDP, was walked
through UNDP documents about
due diligence and yes, the UN
Global Compact. But Ng Lap
Seng gave money to UNDP's
Office of South South
Cooperation, for the Macau
event that had UN Secretariat
(and UN Correspondents
Association) attendance. So
who has been held accountable?
Inner City Press rushed from
the courthouse and to the UN
noon briefing, through the
tourist entrance since the UN
Department of Public
Information and the Spokesman
Stephane Dujarric had it
evicted and still restricted.
But when Inner City Press
asked Dujarric simple
questions, such as about the
scope of the waiver the UN
gave for Hannaford's testimony
and who has been held
accountable for taking Ng's
money, Dujarric refused to
answer a single question.
Dujarric claimed that OSSC,
which has not held any press
conference, is accessible and
transparent. False. So on July
14, Inner City Press asked
again, specifically about
accountability at the
Department of General Assembly
and Conference Management,
where a GA resolution was
changed to include Ng Lap
Seng's company's name, and the
Department of Public
Information. Video
here. This time Dujarric
said that "the audit" shows
that there was an "issue of
judgment," not malfeasance at
DPI. Well, here
is the audit. And, while at
DPI Dujarric was in charge of
UNTV when, mysteriously, video
of Ng' South South News got
incorporated into UNTV
archives. We'll have more on
this. Watch this site. On July
12 government witness Francis
Lorenzo described how he named
the "bribery conduit" South
South News, and the origins of
the MDG / South South Awards
which came to include UN
officials from Cristina
Gallach through Susana
Malcorra to Sigrid Kaag, as
well as Ban Ki-moon. While
Lorenzo repeatedly claimed to
not remember e-mails he had
sent and received, he bragged
of meeting Forest Cao and Ng
Lap Seng and traveling to Las
Vegas, Nevada, all supposedly
in order to combat poverty. He
said he had fun choosing bands
for the award shows, even
claiming he did it on behalf
of the Dominican Republic. Ng
Lap Seng's defense lawyer Tai
Park analogized Ng to Ted
Turner of the UN Foundation.
Troublingly, the government
appears poises to present the
UN, via a lawyer whom UN
Spokesman Stephane Dujarric
when Inner City Press asked at
the UN noon briefing on July
12 declined to even confirm,
as a rule-based place that Ng
abused. But wasn't it the
Department of Public
Information's Cristina Gallach
who allowed Ng and his proxies
to buy events? Didn't the UN
defend the other corruption
groups named in court on July
12? We'll have more on this.
As Inner City Press first
reported on July 11 it then
emerged that the US Government
will be putting on a UN
witness, Simon Hannaford. He
is the chief legal officer of
the UN Development Program,
which played a role in the
dubious faux UN conference
held in Macau, and failed to
oversee the UN Office of South
South Cooperation. But
what about the
UN
Secretariat,
which doctored
a General
Assembly
document to
include the
name of Ng's
company? We'll
have more on
this - and
this: an email
was cited in
court on July
11 in which
Bangladesh's
then-Ambassador
Abulkalam
Abdul Momen
conspired with
Francis
Lorenzo on how
to insert a
paragraph from
the Macau
meeting into a
Group of 77
and China
resolution in
the General
Assembly. Back
in 2015, Inner
City Press
tweeted a photo
of Lorenzo,
John Ashe,
Monem and
still Dominica
Prime Minister
Skerrit, the
lone head of
state at the
Macau meeting.
While
reference was
made on July
11 to Antigua
selling
passports for
money, the
program of
Dominica -
though which
Ng, who later
glowered at
Inner City
Press - netted
one of his
five passports
was not
brought up.
Should the
prosecution
expand the
case, to this
and to target
the UNreformed
UN more
directly? In
court on July
11 the name of
Forest Cao was
repeatedly
cited. He
recruited for
South South
News and when
he died in
2014 South
South News,
through John
Ashe's then
spokesperson,
issued a
memorial video
inside the UN,
here.
In this video,
Forest Cao is
shown not only
with Sri
Lanka's
Mahinda
Rajapaksa but
also
Rajapaksa's UN
Ambassador
(and former UN
legal
official)
Palitha
Kohona, who rented
an apartment
from UN
Correspondents
Association
president
Giampaolo
Pioli. For
reporting
that, Pioli
vowed to use
the UN
Department of
Public
Information -
which also did
business with
Ng Lap Seng -
to get Inner
City Press out
of the UN.
This Pioli accomplished,
with ex-DPI
now UN
Spokesman
Stephane
Dujarric in
2016, when
Inner City
Press sought
to cover an
UNCA event in
the UN Press
Briefing Room
to see if and
how Ng Lap
Seng's and
UNCA member
South South
News' exposure
for corruption
was discussed.
We'll have
more on this.
On July 11
Inner City
Press attended
the
proceedings as
former
Dominican
Republic
Deputy
Ambassador and
South South
News chief
Francis
Lorenzo
testified for
the
Government,
then got
cross-examined.
For the
Government,
Lorenzo
identified his
e-mails with
then
Bangaldesh
Ambassador
Monem, to
insert pro-Ng
paragraphs
adopted at a
faux UN event
in Macau into
a Group of 77
and China
draft for the
UN General
Assembly.
Under cross
examination he
repeatedly
said he
couldn't
remember,
about other
people's
including
relatives'
bank accounts
he used to
evade taxes.
During this
phase Ng Lap
Seng, the
Macau based
businessman
who used South
South News to
buy his way
into the UN,
through the UN
Department of
Public
Information,
looked pleased. But when Inner
City Press, which the UN
evicted and restricts for its
coverage of the corruption,
took his photo leaving court
back to his house arrest, he
glowered. More on this soon -
and on uncoming UN aspects of
the case. The UN seemed to
have no one in the courtroom
on July 11, but the US Mission
to the UN's Legal Advisor was
there listening. More on this
soon, too. Jury selection ran
from June 26 through June 28
(Periscope here),
on July 11
former
Dominican
Republic
Deputy
Ambassador and
South South
News chief
Francis
Lorenzo
started to
describe the
corruption at
the United
Nations.
Now on July 11 the prosecution
has opposed Ng's lawyers using
videos including that "contain
statements that Lorenzo made
about the defendant, including
statements about the
defendant’s character."
At the UN, Inner
City Press on July 11 asked UN
Spokesman Stephane Dujarric
about the South South News
videos that made their way
into UN Television's own
archives. Dujarric, who was
responsible for UNTV during
the time
frame, declined to
explain, and also again
refused to explain why the UN
refused to share with the
Department of Justice the list
of people interviewed for the
partial-admissible UN Task
Force Report. We'll have more
on this. In court on July 10,
U.S. Judge Vernon Broderick
allowed prosecutors to ask
Lorenzo about his romantic
relationship with Julia Vivi
Wang, who Lorenzo said held
the purse strings for
defendant Ng Lap Seng's media
organization, South-South
News.
The Law360 report
quotes Lorenzo that he was
single at the time he had a
casual relationship with the
married Wang in 2011 and 2012,
adding
that "Ng allegedly paid
Lorenzo to draft and get the
UN General Assembly in 2012 to
adopt a document related to
the center, later revising it
to list Ng's company in 2013."
One key UN fact: the GA
document was "revised" by an
official in the UN
Secretariat, as a fraudulent
"technical" revision, and no
one has yet been identified or
held accountable. Lorenzo was
making $72,000 a year from his
country, when Ng Lap Seng
started paying him $20,000 a
month and put him in charge of
South South News despite,
Lorenzo testified, having
never done journalism in his
life. (The UN Department of
Public Information, with
now-spokesman Stephane
Duajrric in charge of
television, put Ng's and
Lorenzo's South South News'
content in the UNTV archives;
Dujarric repeatedly refused to
explain to Inner City Press
how this happened.) Lorenzo
described how UN General
Assembly President John Ashe,
since mysteriously killed by
his own barbell, became part
of the push for Ng's company
Sun Kian Ip Group to procure
UN Secretariat documents to
build a multi-billion dollar
convention center in Macau.
Ng's lawyers, who are
preparing to cross-examine
Lorenzo, have said they may
use in his defense some UN
documents which they have not
yet specified. The prosecution
has argued "defense counsel
stated, 'We also have another
document that is from the UN
that we are going to introduce
which is the secretary
delegation members list.” (Tr.
138.) In addition, when
sharing proposed opening
slides, the Government learned
that the defendant had printed
out or downloaded two excerpts
from UNOSSC websites that have
never been produced or
identified to the Government,
but that the defendant
asserted he intends to
introduce at trial. The
Government does not have a
copy of the pertinent
webpages, nor does it know
whether the website from which
they came is currently
available or whether, in any
event, the excerpts fairly and
accurately capture the
website." Inner City Press
which has covered this inside
the UN (and been thrown out by
the UN for seeking to cover,
in the UN Press Briefing Room,
an event by a group funded by
Ng's South South News, which
will now host Secretary
General Antonio Guterres'
deputy Amina J. Mohammed)
notes that the Office of South
South Cooperation has refused
to hold a press conference. On
July 6, Inner City Press asked
UN holdover Spokesman Stephane
Dujarric about, video here, UN
transcript here:
Inner City Press: I want to
ask you about the Ng Lap Seng
case. It's obviously
continuing, but there are now…
it has emerged in… in court
filings that the defendant, Ng
Lap Seng, charged with bribery
in the UN, intends to
introduce certain UN
documents, including past
versions of the Office of
South-South Cooperation's
website in his defense.
And so the prosecution, the
Department of Justice has
asked him to disclose
that. He says he's not
going to disclose it
yet. What I wanted to
ask you as it turns out, we
never did get a press
conference by the Office of
South-South Cooperation.
Can you now get a statement
from them on changes they've
made to the website since the
case broke and why they made
them? Because it
becomes… it's not a question
of… it's a UN question about
an unresolved, never…?
Spokesman: I mean…
listen, I think… I think the
Office has responded to your
questions and you're welcome
to ask them again.
Inner City Press: Are you
sure?
Spokesman: Yes.
But it's
not true: OSSC never held the
long promises press
conference. Earlier, two
filings revealed that the UN
refused to provide information
to the US Government for its
prosecution, contrary to the
UN's repeated statements to
Inner City Press that the UN
was cooperating. Now in
opening statements, Ng's
lawyer Tai Park said of Ng's
$20,000 a month payments to
Francis Lorenzo to run "South
South News" (while serving as
the Dominican Republic's
Deputy Permanent
Representative), "It's called
wages, ladies and gentlemen,
not bribes." Wages for what?
As Inner City Press has
reported, the UN Department of
Public Information kept South
South News with full not
restricted access long after
the indictment, and South
South News-ers have returned
to the UN. (This week there
was a murky event in the UN
which strongly echoed Ng Lap
Seng's capture of DPI
including a one-man painting
exhibition in the UN lobby for
which DPI did no due
diligence, only evicted and
restricts the Press which
reported on it). Of Lorenzo,
Prosecutor Douglas Zolkind
said Ng began sending Lorenzo
an extra $30,000 a month in
late 2012 "for the express
purpose of obtaining UN
approval for the conference
center." This involved getting
the UN Secretariat to doctor a
General Assembly resolution
AFTER it was rubber stamped,
and more. Watch this site. The
prosecution's June 5 letter
criticized the UN Task Force
Report as self-serving. On
June 28 Inner City Press asked
UN Spokesman Stephane Dujarric
to defend the UN Report. From
the UN transcript: Inner City
Press: I wanted to ask you
again about this Ng Lap Seng
case as it moves up.
I've looked more closely in
the court file, and this is
something I'd ask you to
respond to because it's not
regarding guilt or
innocence. They're
looking at that the US
Government says of the UN task
force report on weaknesses in
funding of the PGA [President
of the General Assembly]
office that the report was
prepared only by an ad hoc
committee without any
identifiable special skills or
expertise, and it was
motivated by a concern for the
reputation of the entity that
ordered it rather than to
determine facts regardless of
the impact on the entity's
representation. Do you
think this UN report, which
will be introduced, at least
in part in the trial, is it
something the UN stands behind
as an objective report, or was
it, as the Government seems to
say, an exercise in…?
Spokesman: Look, I'm not
going to go… I'm not
going to argue what a party to
this trial has to say.
The report was conduct… was
ordered following the
revelations regarding the
former PGA. It was put…
it was conducted in order to
see how the operations of the
Office of the President of the
General Assembly could be
improved. As… you know,
as well as I do, the Office of
the President of the General
Assembly is one that is
independent from the
Secretary-General and over one
he has no authority.
Inner City Press: But it's not
just a party. It's the
prosecution that you've said
that you're cooperating or
have cooperated with. I
mean…
Spokesman: I'm not going
to comment on what… but I just
stated our position regarding
the report.
The US
Attorney's June 25 letter
states, in footnote 1, that
"the UN declined to identify
to the Government all
individuals who were
interviewed in connection with
the preparation of the
Report." This Report is the UN
Task Force Report, which Ng is
trying to use to show that the
UN had so few rules that his
payments, including through
South South News, weren't
bribes but contributions. The
UN should now answer for its
refusal to cooperate in the
prosecution of bribery within
the UN. On June 27 Inner City
Press asked Stephane Dujarric,
the spokesman for new
Secretary General Antonio
Guterres as for his two
predecessors, but he refused
to explain. Video here.
UN transcript here:
Inner City Press: Now that the
UN bribery case
regarding Ng Lap Seng has
begun — and it began yesterday
in lower Manhattan — there's a
filing dated 25 June.
This is a quote: "The UN
declined to identify to the
Government all individuals who
were interviewed in connection
with the preparation of the
report called the UN Task
Force Report." And
this is being used by Ng Lap
Seng to say he didn't bribe
anyone because everyone bribes
everyone at the UN, basically,
is his defence. And so,
now, portions of the UN Task
Force Report are not going to
be produced to the jury
because the Justice Department
says the UN declined to
identify, i.e., didn't
cooperate. I know I've
asked you before about and
you've said that the UN is
fully cooperating with the
authorities, and this is a
statement in the letter by the
Government to the court saying
that that's not the
case. How do you explain
it? On what basis did
the UN not provide this
information as requested by
the Government?
Spokesman: We've
cooperated extensively to
facilitate the proper course
of justice in this case.
The proceedings are ongoing,
and I'm not going to make any
comments while these
proceedings are ongoing.
Inner City Press: Do you
see why it seems
contradictory?
Spokesman: You asked
what you asked, and I said
what I said.
On June 26,
prospective jurors were
summoned one by one up to
speak to the judge, alongside
Ng Lap Seng's lawyers and the
prosecution. (White noise was
turned on so they would not be
overheard). Ng Lap Seng
himself sat at the defense
table, as he had sat at the UN
Correspondents Association
fundraiser where he bought
access to Ban Ki-moon. In the
courtroom on June 26, Inner
City Press was spoken to by
claimed Ng relatives, saying
that Ng did nothing that
others don't also do in the
UN, pay money for access.
That's true. During a break,
US Marshals accompanied Ng up
to the fifth floor bathroom.
In the vending machines, 12
ounce sodas sold for a dollar.
On the first floor, an
ostensibly recycling garbage
can had metal, plastic and
garbage all going into the
same bag, similar to the UN's
fraud, now being exposed.
Watch this site. Former South
South News chief and diplomat
Francis Lorenzo has been
described in a Superseding
Information as an "agent" of
the UN, making it more
difficult for the UN to dodge,
despite it attempts to hinder
Press coverage of the
connections. Now in the run up
to the trial, the judge has
ruled on "evidence or argument
concerning payments
made to the Antiguan
Ambassador by those other than
by Defendant Ng and/or the
media company." The media
company is South South News -
and in a new low, one of its
main UN representatives has in
June 2017 reappeared HIRED in
the UN, at the UN Security
Council no less. The UN is
entirely corrupt. Meanwhile
defendant Ng Lap Seng is
trying to keep out of the
upcoming trial his financial
involvement with relatives of
Jesse Jackson Jr (which again
calls into question how the UN
Department of Public
Information didn't do even
Google "due diligence," then
evicted and restricts Inner
City Press which asked DPI).
Ng's filing quotes the
government that "Mr. Ng made a
loan to a UNOSSC employee who
sought funding from Mr. Ng in
order to pursue graduate
studies." What has the UN done
about any of this, beyond
evicting and restricting the
Press which is covering the
story? On May 3, Inner City
Press asked UN holdover
spokesman Stephane Dujarric,
who not only didn't answer but
also rebuffed a question about
the UN in the DR Congo, UN
transcript here:
Inner City Press: John Ashe
case and DRC [Democratic
Republic of the Congo[.
There are two new filings in
the John Ashe case, and I
wanted to ask you about, in
particular, one of them is a
superseding indictment of
Francis Lorenzo, and it
describes him in paragraph 3
as an agent of an
organization, to wit, the UN
did corruptly solicit and
demand, etcetera. But I
guess what I’m wondering is,
now, if the US Attorney is
describing Mr. Francis Lorenzo
as an agent of the UN, does
this change the way the UN is
looking at the case?
Spokesman: We’re looking
at the case. I’m not
aware that Mr. Lorenzo is an
agent of the UN. But,
again, we’re looking at the
case. And, when we have
something more to say, we’ll
let you know.
Inner City Press: And another
filing at the same time says
that… that Ng Lap Seng
provided money to and
educational loans to a staff
member of the Office of
South-South Cooperation.
That’s not something I ever
saw…
Spokesman: Okay.
I… I… we have… obviously,
we’re following the
case. I don’t have
anything to say while the
proceedings are ongoing.
Thank you. I’m going to
get Mr. Takasu.
Lorenzo
has now expanded his guilty
plea to admit paying bribes to
now deceased President of the
UN General Assembly John Ashe,
and soliciting bribes from Ng.
Lorenzo will testify against
Ng, whose motion to dismiss
the case has been denied. But
the UN is still in denial. On
April 28 Inner City Press
asked the UN's holdover
spokesman Stephane Dujarric,
UN transcript here:
Inner City Press: Francis
Lorenzo, the former head of
South-South News and former
Deputy Permanent
Representative of the
Dominican Republic to the UN
has expanded his guilty plea
to a clear and clean admission
of having bribed former PGA
[President of the General
Assembly], may he rest in
peace, John Ashe, and he's
going to testify against Ng
Lap Seng. It gives rise…
this now seems to be
previously just tax
charges. Now he's
saying, on the record… taking
responsibility, saying he knew
it was wrong at the time that
he did it. So, my
question is: As the
case… as the case gets more
pointedly in terms of what
took place inside the United
Nations walls… and yesterday I
saw the former DGACM
[Department of General
Assembly and Conference
Management] individual, now
retired, who I believe… it
seems from the audit is the
one that changed the
document. What is the
ramification? Was
anything ever done for that
changed document, and what is
exactly OLA [Office of Legal
Affairs] doing now that
there's admission not just of
tax charges or evasion, of
bribery…?
Spokesman: First of all,
the alleged bribery you're
referring to does not involve
a staff member of the
UN. There were audits
done, and the situation was
looked at very carefully in
the past two years, if my
memory is correct. We
continue, obviously, to follow
the developments in the case,
and if we need to act upon
anything that is revealed by
the time the case is done, we
shall do so.
Inner
City
Press: But,
I guess the goal of the
bribery was to obtain a UN
document saying that Macau
Conference Center was needed,
and that document was obtained
from DGACM. So, are you
saying that somehow the
actual… the ultimate act that
they wanted was done without
any…?
Spokesman: That's not
what I'm saying.
Inner City Press: But, what
was done? I saw the guy
walking around. Was
there any repercussion of any
individual named in the audit?
Spokesman: As I said, as
more information comes to
light, we'll act upon it.
Right. The
corruption into which the UN
sank during the tenure of
Secretary General Ban Ki-moon,
whose head of the Department
of Public Information Cristina
Gallach did no due diligence
as Ng bought illegal events in
the UN and even the UN's
slavery memorial, and DPI's
censorship of and threats
against the Press which
reports on the Ng and South
South News case has yet to be
addressed or even stopped.
This has been raised to the
top of the Secretariat. Ng's
associate Jeff Yin has also
pleaded guilty to working to
violate UN tax laws with South
South News. The UN Department
of Public Information evicted
and still restricts Inner City
Press for seeking to cover UN
links to South South News;
this month DPI has refused to
explain the basis. On April 12
when Inner City Press about
the UN's holdover spokesman
Stephane Dujarric about the
guilty plea, he said SSN is
"no longer" at the UN, as if
that resolved it. It doesn't,
and that has been raised. Video here; from the UN
transcript: Inner City
Press: question about this Ng
Lap Seng, previously John
Ashe, case. There’s been
now a guilty plea by John
Ashe’s lone remaining
co-defendant, Jeffrey
Yin. And in his guilty
plea, he states that
South-South News intentionally
paid him in cash in order to
evade US tax laws.
That’s what he’s pled guilty
to. Given the supposed inquiry
by the UN, what’s the
response? It’s not a
matter of waiting until the
end of the case. This is
a…
Spokesman: My
understanding is South-South
News is no longer accredited
as a news organization to the
UN.
Under
Dujarric, South South News
content was included in UN TV
webcast and archives; Dujarric
threw Inner City Press out of
the UN Press Briefing Room for
seeking to cover South South
News payees in the UN, and
worked on the UN misleading
memo to the US Senate Foreign
Relations Committee, Paragraph
9 and 10, here.
Ng is set
for trial, but now an
adjournment has been granted to
May. The letter motion by Ng Lap
Seng's lawyers cites a need to
review "many thousands of pages
of banking records, emails and
other documents related to Jeff
Yin, Mr.
Ng, Vivian Wang, SKI, and SSN,
among others. We are still
awaiting production of
voluminous
documents, including information
contained in DVDs and CDs seized
from Vivian Wang’s
residence, tax information for a
number of alleged
co-conspirators, South South
News
documents, phone records, and
additional Ashe emails." So is
the UN even checking out these
new records, to reform itself?
It seems not. On April 7 Inner
City Press asked UN Spokesman
Stephane Dujarric, UN transcript
here
***
Feedback:
Editorial [at] innercitypress.com
Past
(and future?) UN Office: S-303, UN, NY 10017 USA
For now: Box 20047,
Dag Hammarskjold Station NY NY 10017
Reporter's mobile (and weekends):
718-716-3540
Other,
earlier Inner City Press are listed here, and some are available in
the ProQuest service, and now on Lexis-Nexis.
Copyright
2006-2017 Inner City Press, Inc. To request reprint or other
permission, e-contact Editorial [at] innercitypress.com
for
|