By
Matthew
Russell Lee
UNITED
NATIONS, May 14
-- With the UN
Correspondents
Association
through Pamela
Falk trying to
brand every UN
press
conference and
even UN
Security
Council
presidency
with the name
UNCA, it was
perhaps not
surprising
that UNCA
under her
leadership
bought Twitter
followers, as
reported May 9
and 10.
But as
questions
about how paid
to buy the
followers
grow, the
question of
who bought
them appears
to be
resolved. Just
as UNCA's
account shot
up in the last
week of April
-- only to
fall
precipitously
after being
exposed -- so
too Pam Falk's
own account
shot up in
late April.
See photo
of graph here,
showing Falk
suddenly
jumping to
over 7000
followers.
Only
yesterday,
over 400 of
these were
dropped.
Guilty
knowledge?
Compare to UNCA's
sudden leap,
here. Case
closed.
The reason
this is
pursued is
that UNCA has
become
the UN's
Censorship Alliance,
having
tried to get
the investigative
Press thrown
out of the UN,
then dragging
its feet when
asked
to speak up
for other
attacked
journalists,
and now even
trying to
dictate to UNTV
what it can
and cannot
film.
Also as
detailed
below, after
Falk
complained to
the top of the
UN Department
of Public
Information
that UN TV
camera operators
dared film
skeptical reaction
to her May 1
"press freedom"
speech, now
Falk has
uploaded the
speech with
the skepticism
edited out -
unloading it
in the name of
"UNCA
Journalists."
UNCA, already
the UN's
Censorship
Alliance, is
being taken
ever lower.
UNCA went up
to 5,500 on
May 3, 2014.
See photo
of graph which
counters
cover-up, here.
That UNCA's
middle
followers had
few to no
connections to
the UN, journalism
or
international
affairs and
little profile
information
except some
pornographic
come-ons was noted in
an article on
the evening of
May 9, here.
By May 10, the
UNCA account's
followers had
suddenly
fallen back
down below 300,
in what some
are calling a
cover up, as
Falk's UNCA
did once exposed
for lining up
for a free Samsung
television through
the UN and the
South Korean
mission. Once
exposed, it
was canceled
- and Falk's
UNCA demanded
a
"correction."
And now? There
are calls for
an explanation
of the spike
and collapse,
who paid for
it, even, was
UN wi-fi used.
Not that the
UN would
pursue, much
less fix,
that...
In order to
prop up its UN
Censorship
Alliance, the
UN gives UNCA
a big room on
the third
floor. It has
been closed
and scarcely
used for
months, as a
big screen TV
(Samsung
through the
South Korean
mission until
exposed) and
other UN work
was done. Now
Falk announces
that in four
weeks time a
toast will be
raised mid-day
then the room
will be open
10-4, for
"all"
correspondents.
If so, why
name it for
the Censorship
Alliance? To
prop it up.
On May 1, Falk
comfortable
trying to
dictate how
and who UN
Television
filmed on
World Press
Freedom
Day.
According to
multiple
sources,
Pamela Falk of
CBS complained
to the top of
the Department
of Public
Information
that UNTV
dared cut away
to a shot of a
skeptic during
her speech
claiming UNCA
protects
journalists. Video here on Inner City Press' YouTube channel (on full video on
UN website, here,
from Minute
30).
But Falk
uploaded, in
the name of
UNCA
Journalists, a
ham-handedly
edited version
of her speech
with only the
skeptical
cut-away
removed. This
is censorship;
there are
other words
for it as
well. Falk has
been pitching
the video to,
for example,
the UN Spokesman
and an account
@NelsonMandela.
Now that the
video and the
UNCA attempt
to censor that
it spawned are
known, other
critics have
come forward.
This doesn't
represent us,
said one.
Another
brought up the
surge in
Falk's UNCA
twitter
accounts low
number of
followers,
pointing out
hundreds in a
row with
little
identifying
information,
some with
pornographic
profiles,
concluding,
"they're
bought
followers."
Now, even
after the
reversal or
cover-up, the
question of
precisely how
this happened
remains, and
new questions
need
answering.
These included
"EXTREMELY
DOMINANT BBW,"
"Nudist *
Foreskin lover
#BBBH" and
"the finest of
erotic events
and vacations"
as well as
being padded
by executives
and stringers
for Falk's
CBS, like
Sharon
Hoffman, Nick
Barnets and
Luke Fredberg.
These and
hundreds of
other followers
bought by UNCA
were removed
between May 9
and May 10.
The
month started
when UNCA's
2013-14
president Pam
Falk
grandiosely
attempted to
launch a
Twitter
hashtag
promoting the
group. An UNCA
member, rather
than
obediently
tweeting the
contrived tag,
noted online
that when Falk
claimed the
"GA commends
UNCA every
year," UNTV
camera cuts to
@innercitypress
shaking head
in disbelief,
too funny.”
(The
UNTV video,
which we went
back and found
for the
reasons below
is online
here, from
Minute 30.)
As we
first diplomatically
recorded,
the UNTV
control room
got a
complaint
about their
camera angles.
This is called
attempted
censorship, as
is this
Digital
Millennium
Copyright Act
filing with
Google, here.
Now we
can report
based on
multiple
sources that
Falk herself
complained to
the top of DPI
- and that
this
complaint,
rather than
being as it
should have
been laughed
at and
rejected, was
passed on to
the control
room, trying
to dictate
even what the
camera
operators film
as cut-aways.
This is
outright
censorship:
the UN's
Censorship
Alliance's
reverse flow.
In
2012, some on
UNCA's
Executive
Board tried to
pursue the
investigative
Press for
its coverage
of UN official
Herve Ladsous
and also
separately of
France's
ambassador
Gerard Araud,
then moved
for expulsion
based on coverage
of Sri Lanka.
Now, UNCA's
president
demands that
the UN itself
change how it
films, to
censor
opposition.
Out in
the real
world, the UN
Secretariat
had no comment
on Ethiopia's
jailing
of journalists
including the
Zone 9
Bloggers,
when asked
about it by
the new Free
UN Coalition
for Access.
As we covered
on May 8, the
UN has yet to
speak on
Yemen's
deportation
of one of the
few (but more
than two)
non-Yemeni
journalists
working in the
country. The
next story is
Myanmar -
watch this
site.