Inner City Press

Inner City Press -- Investigative Reporting From the United Nations to Wall Street to the Inner City

These reports are usually available through Google News and on Lexis-Nexis

Google
  Search innercitypress.com Search WWW (censored?)

In Other Media-eg New Statesman, AJE, FP, Georgia, NYT Azerbaijan, CSM Click here to contact us     .

,



Follow us on TWITTER

Home -

These reports are usually available through Google News and on Lexis-Nexis

CONTRIBUTE

(FP Twitterati 100, 2013)

MRL on Beacon Reader

ICP on YouTube

BloggingHeads.tv
Sept 24, 2013

UN: Sri Lanka

VoA: NYCLU

FOIA Finds  

Google, Asked at UN About Censorship, Moved to Censor the Questioner, Sources Say, Blaming UN - Update - Editorial

Support this work by buying this book

Click on cover for secure site orders

also includes "Toxic Credit in the Global Inner City"
 

 

 


Community
Reinvestment

Bank Beat

Freedom of Information
 

How to Contact Us



Polisario Banned from UNTV & Quiet Room, UN Says Stakeout for "Participants"

By Matthew Russell Lee

UNITED NATIONS, November 4 -- Who decides who can speak at the UN Television stakeout outside of the Security Council, and who can go into the Quiet Room inside the Council's chambers?

Last week Inner City Press exclusively reported that the Frente Polisario, a party to the Western Sahara item on the Security Council's agenda, was told it could no longer speak at the stakeout, as it has in the past, and could not even go into the Quiet Room, previously always allowed.

  Since that report, other diplomats have approached Inner City Press with examples of other non- or not-yet states which have been allowed to speak on UNTV cameras, listed on Media Alerts prepared by the UN -- the Turkish Republic of Northern Cyprus on September 28, 2013 comes to mind.

  Others asked why the 15 countries on the Security Council would control the "UN" stakeout there, and not all 193 states.

  On November 4, Inner City Press asked Secretary General Ban Ki-moon's spokesperson Farhan Haq who controls who can speak at UN stakeouts in general, in front of the Security Council in particular, and who controls who can enter the Quiet Room.

Later one of these questions was partially answered:

Subject: Your question on stakeouts
From: UN Spokesperson [at] un.org
Date: Mon, Nov 4, 2013 at 3:26 PM
To: Matthew Russell Lee [at] innercitypress.com

We have the following information in response to your question about stakeouts:

Regarding stakeouts outside the Security Council: When the Security Council meets, a stakeout is set up outside the Security Council, and is available for participants of the Council meeting.

  First, this doesn't answer the argument that UN stakeouts ultimately must be controlled by all 193 member states.

 Second, it doesn't address Polisario's exclusion from the Quiet Room.

  Third, it doesn't define who a "participant" is. When the Council meetings about Western Sahara, and Polisario is a formal party, isn't it a participant? Three strikes and you're out? The Free UN Coalition for Access contends there must at least be transparency on this. We'll have more on this.

Addendum: so if there is a consultation about a country under sanctions, for example, that the country can't enter -- the country can't speak at the stakeout afterward, even if another country goes to speak about them? To be continued.


 

Share |

* * *

These reports are usually also available through Google News and on Lexis-Nexis.

Click here for Sept 26, 2011 New Yorker on Inner City Press at UN

Click for  BloggingHeads.tv re Libya, Sri Lanka, UN Corruption

Feedback: Editorial [at] innercitypress.com

UN Office: S-303, UN, NY 10017 USA

Reporter's mobile (and weekends): 718-716-3540

Google
  Search innercitypress.com  Search WWW (censored?)

Other, earlier Inner City Press are listed here, and some are available in the ProQuest service, and now on Lexis-Nexis.

            Copyright 2006-2013 Inner City Press, Inc. To request reprint or other permission, e-contact Editorial [at] innercitypress.com