UN
Tells NYT Ban's
Minders For
ICP Are OK,
Censorship
Alliance
By
Matthew
Russell Lee
UNITED
NATIONS, May 15
-- For
ten years as
Inner City
Press covered
the UN in ever
greater
detail,
showing
Secretary
General Ban
Ki-moon's
Herve Ladsous'
inept
overseeing and
cover up of sexual abuse and
exploitation
by peacekeepers,
dalliance
with genocide
in Sri Lanka
and
prospectively
Burundi,
and
impunity for cholera
deaths in
Haiti
, it was never
thrown out of
the UN.
Only
when it
questioned
Ban's and its
PR official
Cristina Gallach's
role in
the John Ashe,
Ng Lap Seng
and Francis
Lorenzo UN
bribery
scandal did
Gallach order
Inner City
Press ousted
then evicted,
and now try to
give its
office to an
Egyptian media
which rarely
or never asked
questions. Ban
Ki-moon claimed
“That is not
my decision,”
but that is
not true.
The New York
Times on May
14 covered
the story. For now
we note this
quote: “It’s
not exactly
the same
access,’’ Mr.
Dujarric said,
“but if he has
an issue,
there is a
staff of media
liaisons to
help him
resolve the
problem and
get where he
needs to go.”
This is false.
As Inner City
Press has
raised to Ban
Ki-moon, "even
when
begrudgingly
accompanied by
a staff member
of your
Spokesperson's
office, UN
Security
refused to
allow me
through the
turnstile onto
the second
floor of
Conference
Building. I
have been told
not to ask
questions of
diplomats,
just after you
came out of
ECOSOC and
even with a
MALU minder /
escort with
me, a UN
Security
official stood
directly in
front of me,
apparently so
I couldn't
even try to
ask you a
question. This
is
censorship."
We await
response.
UN
Correspondents
Association
boss Giampaolo
Pioli lied,
but at least
on the record.
(He rented
one of his
Manhattan
apartments to
Palitha Kohona
then granted
Kohona's
request, as
Sri Lanka's
Ambassador, to
screen his
government's
war crimes
denial film in
the UN. Then
Pioli told
Inner City
Press to take
its story
about it off
the Internet
or be thrown
out of the UN,
which Gallach
and Ban did:
UN Censorship
Alliance.)
In any
event, who is
a rarely
present boss
of an ostensible
Correspondents
Association
(morphing into
the UN's
Censorship
Alliance) to
lobby for the
ouster of an
investigative
journalist so
that his
office can be
handed to a
never present
former UNCA
president - a
representative
of state owned
media who
never asks
questions?
This too has
been raised
and we await
response.
What's
next? Is it
acceptable for
the UN to
throw out a
critical
journalist
writing four
to eight
stories a day,
while leaving
in people who
write little,
and ask
nothing? Is
Ban Ki-moon
killing the
UN? Watch this
site.
The
UN is now both
corrupt -- a
half a dozen
indictments
and counting,
Secretary
General Ban
Ki-moon
cavorting with
the indicted
and his team
covering it up
-- retaliatory
and badly run.
Now the
UN is
moving
to give away
Inner City
Press' long
time office as
retaliation
for its
seeking to
cover the
bribery and
corruption scandal,
including
trying to
cover a
meeting in the
UN Press
Briefing Room
of the UN
Correspondents
Association
(UNCA), a
group which
took money
from the
indicteds'
company, Ban
Ki-moon's
“Communications”
chief Cristina
Gallach threw
Inner City
Press out of
the UN on
February 19.
So to
whom does the
UN seek to
give Inner
City Press'
office away? A
former UNCA
President, who
it seems has
not asked any
question, much
less a
critical
question, in
the UN Press
Briefing Room
or stakeout in
quite some
time.
Inner
City Press has
in the past
defended
correspondents
when the UN
sought late in
their careers
to move them
along, and is
treading
lightly for
now: perhaps
this former
UNCA President
didn't know
the history
here.
(The
current UNCA
website
doesn't even
list its past
Presidents,
perhaps
wisely: it
seems to be a
Year Zero
operation.)
But
what is the
UN's rationale
of giving away
the office of
a working,
critical
journalist to
a former UNCA
president who
asks even
fewer
questions than
the current
UNCA
president?
It's
called
retaliation,
or some say,
human shields.
Who is
responsible?
Audio
hereBan,
when asked,
said “that is
not my
decision.” But
he heard about
the ouster and
eviction in
advance and
ok-ed it.
On
April 16, the
acting chief
of Gallach's
“Media
Accreditation
and Liaison
Unit Tal Mekel
oversaw the
eviction of
Inner City
Press' office,
leaving five
boxes of its
files out on
First Avenue.
Video
here.
Some in
Ban's team
indicated to
Inner City
Press its
office would
be left empty
until its four
month
“purgatory” or
punishment-for-reporting
period was
over.
That
was a lie: on
May 13, after
Inner City
Press asked
more questions
about Ban's
engagements
with John Ashe
and Francis
Lorenzo -
president of
South South
News which
paid UNCA and
still has a UN
office - Inner
City Press was
informed that
its long time
office is
being given
out --
apparently, to
a former
President of
UNCA.
When Inner
City Press
asked to see
the supposed
waiting list,
this was
refused by
Mekel. It is
apparently
entirely up to
Gallach - or
UNCA - who is
given UN
office space,
without which
one cannot
access the UN
Conference
Building's
second floor,
see below.
On
May 13 as the
UN Security
Council began
a meeting
about Lebanon,
the glass
doors to enter
the Council
were locked.
Apparenlty the
UN can't
afford one
guard for a
Security
Council
meeting, but
won't provide
information
requested by
the Press
about Ban
Ki-moon's
endless and
largely
fruitless
travel.
Inner City
Press, which
covers the UN
corruption
scandal and
was ousted
then evicted
by an official
implicated in
the scandal,
Cristina
Gallach -- see
OIOS
audit
Paragraphs 37
to 40 and
20(b) --
with Ban
Ki-moon's full
knowledge, was
unable to get
to the
Security
Council
stakeout. Its
pass, cut by
Gallach, won't
open the
turnstile at
the other end
of the
stakeout. This
week a guard
there even
refused to
allow Inner
City Press
through to a
stakeout with
a staffer of
the
Spokesperson's
office.
Gallach, at
least
according to
some paid to
tweet for the
UN, is in
Washington. So
Inner City
Press
undertook to
document the
restrictions
and
censorship.
Another UN
system
spokesperson
tried to
undermine it,
as did UN
Security. They
claimed
everything is
fine, even as
Security
Council
Ambassadors
asked them how
can it be that
the door is
locked (and
Press
excluded).
Some Security
write-up
began, sure to
omit all of
this. Watch
this site -
and see below.
While
many try to
insulate
today's UN
from the open
corruption of
the recent
past of
President of
the General
Assembly John
Ashe, and of
Francis
Lorenzo who
has pleaded
guilty, there
is continuity
to this UN
scandal. This
includes a
revival of the
Ng
Lap Seng's old
"South South
News" team,
with El
Salvador
ex-Ambassador
Carlos Garcia
and others,
even as those
investigating
this UN
corruption are
evicted and
restricted,
and those
covering it up
are rewarded.
Inner
City Press has
repeatedly
asked Ban
Ki-moon's
spokesman
Stephane
Dujarric about
Ban's
appearance at
an event
sponsored by
the Francis
Lorenzo
registered
group Global
Governance for
the UN
Sustainable
Development
Goals. Q&A
videos
here and
here.
Dujarric
tried to
answer about
another group,
then said
Lorenzo's
connection to
the group
isn't clear. Q&A video here.
Well, now
Inner City
Press can
report that
the "Global
Governance for
the UN
Sustainable
Development
Goals"
event Ban
attended was
with indicted
John Ashe, his
wife Anilla
Cherian's book
launch. Video
here.
It
featured
speeches by
Ban and by
Francis
Lorenzo, who
in his speech
named both
GG-UNSDG and
Global
National
Competitiveness
Cooperation
Organization
for the UN,
which
sponsored the
DPI-NGO
conference
last year at
which Under
Secretary
General
Cristina
Gallach spoke.
Q&A
video here.
How did this
not show up in
the UN's audit
of l'affaire
John Ashe and
Ng Lap Seng?
How did this
book launch
event get
inserted into
UNTV archives,
run by
Gallach's DPI?
On the video,
Ban and then
Mrs. Ban are
thanked by
Ashe and then
Anilla
Cherian. The
indictment
details how
over
$1,000,000 was
withdrawn from
the PGA
Accounts and
transferred to
the personal
accounts of
Ashe and of
Anilla
Cherian;
no-show jobs
are also
described.
Then there is
the speech of
Francis
Lorenzo, how
Anilla Cherian
showed Ban the
book even
before Ashe.
The UN has
been trying to
downplay or
conceal Ban
Ki-moon's
contacts with
Lorenzo, most
recently
saying it's
unclear how
Lorenzo is
connected to a
group that he,
Lorenzo,
register, and
another one he
founded. Those
obfuscations
cannot stand;
separately,
the
retaliation is
more and more
clear. We'll
have more on
this.
As
UN officials
including
Cristina
Gallach, whose involvement
in the scandal
is detailed in
the UN's own Office
of Internal
Oversight
Services audit
at Paragraphs
37 to 40 and
20(b)
have
moved to
evict
Inner City
Press
from the UN
premises (video
here, Courthouse
News article
here)
and
restrict its
access, Inner
City Press has
been made
aware of a
revival of the
South South
News model, in
organizations
which
retains ties
to indicted Ng Lap
Seng.
And Gallach's
Department of
Public
Information
continues
partnering
with these
organizations,
even as DPI
falls apart on
Gallach's
watch. The
last NGO
Conference at
the UN,
sponsored by
South Korea
among others,
had as a
sponsor and
speaker the
"Global
National
Competitiveness
Cooperation
Organization
for the UN,"
one of four
Sponsors of
indicted
Francis
Lorenzo's
Global
Governance for
the UN
SDGs.
Gallach even
spoke at the
event.