After UN Evicted ICP, Spox Dujarric
Wanted To Control NYT Article Too, Entrenched
Corruption
By Matthew
Russell Lee, Series,
Video, Reply
UNITED NATIONS,
March 31 – Weeks after
the UN evicted
and
restricted me,
what
would a New
York Times
article
change? Deputy
Secretary
Jan Eliasson,
who'd
previously
written back
if only to
say, you have
to deal with
Cristina
[Gallach],
didn't answer.
I got an
automatic, it
seemed,
confirmation
of receipt by
the SG's
office, and
nothing from
Mulet.
At the
Security
Council
stakeout there
was silence
from the
insiders, some
whispered talk
from the
outsiders, two
of whom I'd
helped get
their offices
in the UN.
Down in the
basement, some
staff members
gave the
thumbs up.
“For once
people hear
how it is
here,” one of
them said,
“how Ban is.”
Over in the
46th Street
library active
citizen Dan
Purcell said
he loved it,
he'd like to
help more,
he'd try to
re-synch audio
from the
eviction
video. An
Ambassador
asked me to
sign his copy
of the New
York Times, la
lutta continua.
But what would
it change?
It was
the UN that
wanted
changes. Corey
called me and
said Ban
Ki-moon's (and
before that,
Kofi Annan's)
spokesman
Stephane
Dujarric
wanted a
correction,
that I didn't
just get in on
day passes but
had a
non-resident
pass until
June 22.
I told Corey,
fine, but then
I want some
changes too.
When did they
ever call the
NYPD on me, as
the story
said? How did
I arrive
“uninvited” in
the UN Press
Briefing Room,
if in fact the
meeting was
announced by
squawk over
the public
address system
by Dujarric's
office? And, I
told him, I
ran for
president of the United
Nations
Correspondents
Association
in 2009, on
platform of
bloggers' and
new media
rights. After
that I was
still elected
first vice
president. The
story made it
seem I quit
right after I
ran.
Whatever,
Corey said.
The UN is
really pushing
for its
correction.
So I am
for mine, I
said.
I left
the UN focus
booth and got
one of the Media
Accreditation
staffers
or minders
to escort me
to the
stakeout area
in front of
ECOSOC. The
tall Caribbean
guard was
there and
immediately
came over.
“Here we got
again,” he
said. “Why do
you have to be
here? What
makes you so
special?”
Read
the New York
Times, I told
him. The
spokesman says
that if escort
I can get
where I need--
I don't
read the New
York Times,
the guard
said, I read
the UN Times.
“So you
know the UN
killed 10,000
people in
Haiti then,
right?”
“Why do
you have to go
there?”
“You
said you read
the UN Times.
That's what
the UN did,” I
told him. We
went round and
round as
diplomats
walked by,
some of them
widening their
berth. Maybe
the article
wouldn't help.
If
nothing else,
the article
made me feel I
didn't have to
explain
anymore, or
feel that if I
didn't explain
my plight to
some mid level
diplomat I was
screwing
myself. I was
identified as
thrown out.
Some long-ago
acquaintances
called to ask
if I was OK.
My friend
David said the
story didn't
include the
diplomats he'd
met who liked
and read my
work. That, it
did not. A
Lebanese
journalist I
knew, from
London, called
it an
“establishment
hatchet job.”
Still, I told
myself, at
least this
stage was
over. But what
was the next
stage?
***
Feedback:
Editorial [at] innercitypress.com
Past
(and future?) UN Office: S-303, UN, NY 10017 USA
For now: Box 20047,
Dag Hammarskjold Station NY NY 10017
Reporter's mobile (and weekends):
718-716-3540
Other,
earlier Inner City Press are listed here, and some are available in
the ProQuest service, and now on Lexis-Nexis.
Copyright
2006-2017 Inner City Press, Inc. To request reprint or other
permission, e-contact Editorial [at] innercitypress.com
for
|