UN
Guterres' Managers Compacts
Secret, Lacroix and Smale Not
On Finance List, Compact Irony
By Matthew
Russell Lee
UNITED NATIONS,
May 11 – The decline at the UN
of basic transparency under
Antonio Guterres has hit a new
low, with his May 10 "Senior
Managers Compact Ceremony"
being made closed press,
unlike under Ban Ki-moon.
Inner City Press covered and
photographed such ceremonies,
for example here
- but Guterres is more
secretive. (On May 11, he
banned Periscope livestream at
a photo op UNTV shot video and
audio of, here).
More devious, too: now instead
of disclosing which of his
officials have declined even
basic public financial
disclosure, their names are
simply missing from the list.
In the current (May 10) list,
where are Under Secretaries
General Alison Smale, for
example, or Jean-Pierre
Lacroix? On May 10, Inner City
Press asked Guterres'
spokesman Stephane "The
Censor" Dujarric, video here,
UN transcript here:
Inner City Press: I wanted to
ask about the compacts.
You just said… I was struck
when you said that these
compacts are new and a new
transparency. I heard
you say that word. I
think… since you were the
Spokesperson for Ban Ki-moon
as well, these ceremonies were
always open press in the
past. And so I'm
wondering, how is it
consistent with the idea of a…
of a new transparency in the
compacts that this was closed
press…
Spokesman: There was a
family photo. The
signatures of the compacts
were, in fact, done by… each
senior official did it on
their own time. This was
the first time the
Secretary-General met with
them after it had all been
done and finalized.
Inner
City
Press: And
on…
Spokesman: And I'm… go
ahead. Go ahead.
Inner
City
Press:
Okay.
So…
Spokesman: What…
Inner
City
Press: you
don't see it as inconsistent
that it used to be open and
now it's closed.
Spokesman: Your next
question, sir.
Inner City Press:
Okay. The next question
has to do with also financial
disclosure. In looking
at the financial disclosure
provided in… link at the
bottom of the
Secretary-General's page, it
seems like there's a number of
USGs that are not on the list,
one being Alison Smale of DPI,
one being Mr. Lacroix of DPKO.
And I'm just wondering, in the
past, if people weren't going
to disclose, they would say…
there would be a piece of
paper… you'd click it, and it
would say "I'm not
disclosing". That was
then changed to just their
names are not on the list.
How is one to know… does this
mean that these two
individuals have chosen not to
make even basic financial
disclosure or for some reason…
Spokesman: I'll check
it. I can't speak to it
off the top of my head.
Masood." Six hours later
Dujarric closed his office,
without providing any answer.
So Inner City Press put online
here
on Scribd, here
on Patreon, Alison Smale's
2018 Compact, largely about
propaganda, nothing about
treating the Press which
covers the UN fairly.
(Ironically, it speaks of new
media, while Guterres banned
Periscope at his photo op
which UNTV shot video and
audio of). Smale has yet to
answer detailed petitions
for fair treatment of the
Press, while awarding Inner
City Press' office to no-show
Egyptian state media Akhbar al
Yom, and a similar space to
unknown Turkish Journal. This
is censorship. We'll have more
on this - and more Compacts
and Evaluations. On May 11,
with no answer from Dujarric,
Inner City Press asked deputy
spokesman Farhan Haq, UN
transcript here:
Inner City Press: Yesterday, I
had asked Stéphane about the…
the… the compacts and also the
public financial disclosure on
the Secretary-General's
website. He said he
would look into why both… just
as an example
Under-Secretaries-General
[Jean-Pierre] Lacroix and
[Alison] Smale don't… there's…
there's no… they're not
included on the list. Do
you have an answer on that?
Deputy Spokesman: No,
no, I don't. But, the
general point is that there is
an option, a voluntary option,
to have your disclosure put on
the website. We
encourage openness among the
senior officials to do that,
but for a variety of reasons,
they may find it best not to
do that. The fact that
their names are not on the
website does not mean that
they have not made the
disclosures. Everyone
who's a senior official has
made their disclosures to our
firms.
Inner
City Press:
Right, but does it mean that
they have chosen to opt out of
the public financial
disclosure?
Deputy Spokesman: Either
that or it hasn't been
uploaded so far.
Inner City Press: And I wanted
to ask about the
compact. I'm sorry, this
is on the same topic.
Yesterday, Stéphane said these
compacts are… are
representative of
transparency, et cetera.
So, I wanted to know.
I've seen some of them, but
are they… are these compacts
meant to be available to the
public? And also, it
seems that, at least as I've
seen them, that Jan Beagle,
there is no compact, or as of
yesterday late
afternoon. Although
other
Under-Secretaries-General had
a 2018 compact, Department of
Management did not. Is
there a reason for that?
Deputy Spokesman: "I
think Stéphane said all we
have had to say about the
compacts yesterday. I
don't have anything to add."
Why aren't the compacts
public? We'll have more on
this. Three days after UN
Secretary General Antonio
Guterres had his UN Security
hinder Inner City Press from
covering his Portuguese
language garden party in the
UN, now Guterres has invented
a new restriction on
longstanding UN photo
opportunities, limited them to
undefined "photo agencies
only." Guterres' spokesman
Stephane Dujarric acknowledged
to Inner City Press in writing
that this is something new,
but has yet to explain what
the definition is, why the
restriction is being imposed
and who is behind it.
Ultimately, it is Guterres,
increasingly untransparent.
Inner City Press asked
Guterres' spokesman Dujarric
two rounds of questions about
this on May 9, ultimately with
Dujarric saying it was
"self-centered" to even ask -
this hours before Inner City
Press was banned from covering
Guterres' UNdisclosed 3:30 pm
meeting with Al Sharpton,
unlike another photographer.
From the UN's May 9 transcript,
video
here: Inner City Press:
this morning, Rosemary DiCarlo
was sworn in as the new Head
of Department of Political
Affairs (DPA). And, in
the media alert, I didn't
realize you were this closely
in… in… in charge of it, but
it says, "photo agencies
only". So, apparently… I
guess I'm wondering, this is a
change, and you've described
this as "photo agencies are
entities whose main purpose is
photo coverage".
Spokesman: That would
seem logical.
Inner
City Press:
So, does this mean that, for
example… I see it as… it seems
like you would want more
coverage rather than less up
there, but my question is, by
that definition, it seems like
wire services are not… their
primary purpose is not photo
coverage. So, is this…
I'm asking you… That's why I
need…
Spokesman: Okay. I
think the question was to
me. I'm trying to bring
some rationale in the way
photo ops are organized.
I think entities who do photo
coverage on a regular basis,
whose primary goal is to do
photo coverage, like the photo
services of the wires, will be
covered by it. There are
other photo ops where there
will be comments and speaking
will be open to a wider range.
Inner
City Press:
But my question… you said
entities, number one, so the
primary purpose… you're now
saying that entities can have
different components. Is
this directed at a smaller
media I just would like to
know… It's kind of
tumbleweeds up there.
There's nobody there.
Spokesman: It's directed
at rationalizing the process,
as I see it. Thank you.
Inner
City Press:Did
you consult with anyone before
you did this? Because
there's people that take
photographs… there are a
number of photographers at the
UN, including some that double
with UN Photo, as you may
know. Just a unilateral…
Spokesman: Everything
was consulted.
But with
whom? Inner City Press asked
later in the May 9 briefing:
Inner City Press: f you're
going to change who has access
to the 38th Floor, you need to
define "photo agency".
But I was told today that MALU
(Media Accreditation and
Liaison Unit) has been charged
with creating a list of
individuals who were allowed
to go upstairs. So, I
wanted to know… If that's the
case, I wanted to know what
your stance is…
Spokesman: Matthew,
Matthew, Matthew… you're…
Inner
City Press:
No, seriously. I take
photographs and publish them
in a service, and so I want to
know…
Spokesman: Matthew,
Matthew, Matthew, besides me,
you're probably one of the
most self-centred people I've
ever met. This is not
about you. This is a
decision we've taken to
rationalize the process…
Inner City Press: So is the
list going to be made
public? I'm asking you.
Spokesman: Thank
you. Michelle, sorry,
Michelle, did you have a
question?" That would be
Reuters. This comes after
Inner City Press covered
Guterres offering "warm
regards" to Egypt's anti-press
Sisi, to whose state media
Akhbar al Yom Guterres and his
Alison Smale are awarding
Inner City Press long time UN
work space. Now Guterres is
trying to select who can cover
his swearing in of new
Political Affairs chief
Rosemary DiCarlo, and his
meeting with Martin Luther
King III. Both were listed as
"photo agency only." Inner
City Press asked Dujarric,
"please explain in tomorrow's
Media Alert the new use of
this phrase: “Photo agencies
only” - why has this been
added? What does it mean? Who
defines it? What is the
reasoning / purpose?" Dujarric
replied, "As for the media
alert, this is for events that
are photo-ops only. We will
have UN photo, UN TV and photo
agencies only. Yes, it’s a new
thing." Inner City Press has
asked Dujarric and his deputy
Farhan Haq: May 8-1: Where is
the definit[ion] of "photo
agencies"? May
8-2: Separately, what is
the purpose of trying to limit
access to usually ill attended
photo ops? May 8-3: Who
decided on this 'new thing'?"
Shortly before the 9:25 am
deadline, Dujarric replied,
"i’m trying to bring a bit
more order and sent to how we
do photo ops. “Photo
agencies” are entities
whose imain purpose is
photo coverage." It's
laughable - as written, it
must also exclude Reuters,
AFP, AP and others. But at the
May 9 noon briefing, these
went for once and Dujarric
made it clear they and others
could still go. So what is the
definition? Inner City Press
is informed that there is now
in preparation of list of
(Dujarric / Guterres) approved
correspondents. But when Inner
City Press asked - since it
publishes photos on Alamy,
more than others said to be on
the list - Dujarric replied
from the podium that Inner
City Press is "self-centered."
This is sleazy, and worse.
We'll have more on this. Inner
City Press has never even
tried to ask a question at a
UN photo op. It's that
Guterres wants to prevent
coverage, for example of his
"warm regards" to Sisi. This
is corrupt. The UN Media Alert
for May 5 listed a “Portuguese
Language Day Celebration;”
when Inner City Press asked
the spokesman for UN Secretary
General Antonio Guterres it
was told there would be remarks
by Guterres, who is
increasingly rarely in New
York. Events in the UN Media
Alert are open to all
journalists - but in today's
UN, rules mean little.
On May 5 UN
Security stopped Inner City
Press saying, No, I know who
you are. Another UN Security
Officer asked, Why don't you
like the UN? Haiti cholera impunity
came to mind, or UN Security
Deputy Chief McNulty throwing
Inner City Press' laptop on
the sidewalk when it was
evicted (audio here)
for covering an event in the
UN Press Briefing Rule - also
ostensibly open to all
journalists.
On My 5
while UN Security was focused
on making it impossible for
Inner City Press to do its
job, they allowed children,
presumably Lusophone, to play
on the UN's slavery memorial,
which its Department of Public
Information took money for
from now convicted UN briber
Ng Lap Seng, even according to
the UN's own audit.
The UN was turned into Antonio
Guterres' Lusophone garden
party. Any number of state
media, like rarely present
Egyptian Akhbar al Yom to
which DPI under Alison Smale
continues to assign Inner City
Press' long time work space
to, could enter and cover the
event without no interaction
much less blocking by UN
Security. (Smale retweeted
Guterres' Portuguese language
self celebration, here
- but could not or would not
assure that the Press could
cover the event, in the Media
Alert, and has not in eight
months responded to 5000
signature petitions
and request for reinstatement
and rules).
The May 5
targeting of Inner City Press
-- "I know who you are" -- is
allowed by downgrading and
keeping down Inner City Press
as "non resident
correspondent," while giving
full resident correspondent
status to no-show state media
like Akhbar al Yom's Sanaa
Youssef who has not asked the
UN a question in more than a
decade. Inner City Press, by
contrast, is required to have
a minder. But the UN is a
place now of targeted
censorship - the cancellation
by the UN Alliance of
Civilizations is just the most
recent example. We'll have
more on this.
***
Your
support means a lot. As little as $5 a month
helps keep us going and grants you access to
exclusive bonus material on our Patreon
page. Click
here to become a patron.
Feedback:
Editorial [at] innercitypress.com
Past
(and future?) UN Office: S-303, UN, NY 10017 USA
For now: Box 20047,
Dag Hammarskjold Station NY NY 10017
Reporter's mobile (and weekends):
718-716-3540
Other, earlier Inner City Press are
listed here,
and some are available in the ProQuest
service, and now on Lexis-Nexis.
Copyright 2006-2018 Inner City
Press, Inc. To request reprint or other
permission, e-contact Editorial [at]
innercitypress.com for
|
,
