As
Death Penalty Issue Heats Up, Ban and Annan Compared, as World Bankers on Poor
Byline:
Matthew Russell Lee of Inner City Press at the UN: News Analysis
UNITED NATIONS,
November 5 -- A resolution proposing a global moratorium on the death penalty
was introduced at the United Nations last week, led by Italy. On November 2, the
Italian NGO Community of Sant'Egidio, founded by Mario Marazziti, delivered to
the President of the General Assembly, Srgjan Kerim, over five million
signatures in support of a moratorium. Inner City Press asked the spokesperson
for Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon for his position, if he supports a moratorium.
The spokesperson replied, "Well, right now the issue is in front of the General
Assembly."
At a
press conference about the signatures, Inner City Press asked representatives of
Amnesty International and of the Community of Sant'Egidio how they viewed Mr.
Ban's position on the death penalty, including comparing it to that of his
predecessor. Amnesty's Yvonne Terlingen noted that in Ban's first week -- first
day, actually -- on the job as Secretary-General, he expressed a position on the
death penalty far more ambiguous than that of Kofi Annan. She said that things
got better after that; the representative of the Community of Sant'Egidio called
Ban's position "increasingly strong," but still short of Annan's.
Messrs. Zoellick and Ban, each
subject last week to comparisons
Such
comparisons drew Ban's spokesperson's comment on November 2, when at the noon
briefing a defense of World Bank president Robert Zoellick's commitment to the
Millennium Development Goals was offered, leaving most correspondents scratching
their heads. The spokesperson
read out:
Mr. Robert Zoellick participated in the
CEB [United Nations System Chief Executives Board for Coordination] meeting, as
I said last week. One of the focal issues at that meeting was the
Secretary-General’s initiative on Africa MDGs. And as you know, the World Bank
has been an active participant in that initiative. Mr. Zoellick came to
Headquarters for the launching and he strongly expressed his commitment to
fighting poverty and exclusion. As such, recent comments on Mr. Zoellick's
commitment to the MDGs are the personal views of the Special Ambassador for the
MDGs in Asia and the Pacific and do not reflect those of the UN or the
Secretary-General.
This sent
correspondents, as least this one, searching back for the offending comments by
the Special Ambassador for the MDGs in Asia and the Pacific. Sure enough, in
Indian Express of October 26, envoy Erna Witoelar
misspelled as Witoeler was quoted that " As leadership changes hands in IFIs, so
do strategies. For instance, former World Bank President Wolfensohn was more
pro-poor than current President Robert Zoellick." A week later, Ban's
spokesperson rose to Zoellick's defense. One can only imagine the back story to
this -- for now. Watch this site.
* * *
Click
here for a
Reuters
AlertNet piece by this correspondent about Uganda's Lord's Resistance Army.
Click
here
for an earlier
Reuters AlertNet
piece about the Somali National Reconciliation Congress, and the UN's
$200,000 contribution from an undefined trust fund. Video
Analysis here
Feedback: Editorial
[at] innercitypress.com
UN Office: S-453A,
UN, NY 10017 USA Tel: 212-963-1439
Reporter's mobile
(and weekends): 718-716-3540
Other, earlier Inner
City Press are listed here, and
some are available in the ProQuest service.
Copyright 2006-07 Inner City Press, Inc. To request
reprint or other permission, e-contact Editorial [at] innercitypress.com -
UN Office: S-453A,
UN, NY 10017 USA Tel: 212-963-1439
Reporter's mobile
(and weekends): 718-716-3540