ICP
Publishes UN
Audit of Ng
& South
South News,
Starts Days
After UNCA
Ball
By Matthew
Russell Lee,
Full Text
Exclusive
UNITED
NATIONS, April
6 -- The UN's
unwillingness
to address the
obvious
corruption of
South South
News, to which
it has given
awards and Ban
Ki-moon photo
ops via its UN
Correspondents
Association,
and whose Ng
Lap Seng
bought
documents from
Ban's
Secretariat,
has become
even more
clear --
though not in
the UN's
favored media.
While
the UN tries
to blunt the
corruption
scandal by
handing first
questions and
more to
Reuters, Inner
City Press is
today putting
online here,
as a full text
exclusive, the
actual Office
of Internal
Oversight
Services audit
of the Global
Sustainability
Foundation and
David Ng Lap
Seng's Sun
Kian Ip
Foundation
and, at least
preliminarily,
South South
News.
The
audit does
list South
South News -
but
conveniently
decided to
begin review
only on
January 1 2012
-- days after
UNCA provided
Ng Lap Seng a
photo op with
Ban Ki-moon in
December 2011
in Cipriani's
Wall Street,
after
accepting
money from
South South
News. There is
more, here.
OIOS
Audit of Ng
& South
South News,
OIOS Cut Out
Ban Photo Op
with Ng at
UNCA Ball
by Matthew
Russell Lee
On April
5, Inner City
Press asked
Ban's deputy
spokesperson
if the Ng Lap
Seng related
World Harmony
Foundation is,
as it
appeared,
still a member
of the UN
Global
Company,
ironically
about
transparency,
six months
after the
indictment of
Ng. From
the UN
transcript:
Inner City
Press: is the
World Harmony
Foundation,
linked to Ng
Lap Seng and
Frank Liu,
still a member
of the Global
Compact?
Because on my
computer, it
still
is. And
I'm wondering,
since the
audit, has the
Global Compact
taken any
steps to make
sure that Ng
Lap Seng
affiliates are
not promoting
human rights
for the UN?
Deputy
Spokesman
Haq:
Certainly,
I'll check on
whether the
World Harmony
Foundation is
still part of
the Global
Compact.
I'd need to
check with the
Global Compact
office on
that.
Haq
never returned
with an
answer, which
in context
showed what
the answer
was. When
after Haq
presided over
a three ring
circus of
obfuscation by
UNCA -- now
the UN's
Censorship
Alliance --
board members
from Reuters,
France 24 and
AFP, Inner
City Press
managed to ask
him, did he
have an answer
on World
Harmony
Foundation?
In fact
he did, though
he had not
bothered to
convey it to
Inner City
Press and
apparently
never would
have, if not
asked again at
a noon
briefing. The
World Harmony
Foundation is
still a member
of the UN
Global
Compact, six
months after
the
indictment.
We'll have
more on this.
Even as
the Government
Accountability
Project
writes to Ban K-moon to
protest his
Secretariat's
"crude and
heavy handed"
retaliation
against Inner
City Press for
its questions,
four honchos
of the UN
Correspondents
Association
were allowed
by Ban's
Office of the
Spokesperson
on April 6 to
use the
briefing to
directly
address Inner
City Press,
complete with
canned
applause.
Ban's
deputy
spokesperson
Haq handed the
first question
to Reuters'
Lou
Charbonneau,
who have been
outed secretly
lobbying
to get Inner
City Press out
of the UN for
not accepting
theft of
exclusives; he
handed it over
to a France 24
correspondent
then -- see a
trend here? -
to Agence
France Presse.
Finally
Haq allowed
Charbonneau's
reporter
Michelle
Nichol to make
an outright
statement to /
at Inner City
Press, in the
briefing,
followed by
canned
applause. Here
is a petition
of 1,280
people in the
real world to
Ban to restore
what was
crudely taken.
On
April 4, UN
spokesman
Stephane
Dujarric gave
the first
question and
the audit to
Reuters bureau
chief Louis
Charbonneau,
to try to take
the sting out
of this
question.
But Reuters
has an obvious
conflict of
interest: it
has an
essentially
permanent seat
on the
Executive
Committee of
the UN
Correspondents
Association,
which took
South South
News' money
and gave its
funder Ng Lap
Seng a photo
op with Ban
Ki-moon.
Reuters' story
mentioned
South South
News but did
not disclose
its connection
to the company
and scandal.
Inner City
Press
published a
story on this
- and when
Reuters
Charbonneau
was called on
by Dujarric's
Deputy Farhan
Haq on April
5,
Charbonneau's
question was
whether the
South South
News
revelations -
the
interconnection
with UNCA and
Reuters he had
not disclosed
- would cause
or allow the
UN to dig into
the finances
of all
accredited
media.
Reuters
retiree Evelyn
Leopold jumped
in, any review
of media
taking bribes?
This from a
person who
routinely says
they represent
UNCA, which
undeniably
took Ng's
South South
News' money
and then gave
Ng a photo op
with Ban
Ki-moon.
Because
Haq like
Dujarric have
become, in
essence,
enforcers from
UNCA as when
they ordered
Inner City
Press to not
cover an UNCA
meeting help
on January 29
in the UN
Press Briefing
Room, Inner
City Press
held aloft an
UNCA "book," a
full two page
ad spread of
which was
bought by
South South
News - before
UNCA gave Ng
his photo op
with Ban
Ki-moon.
Haq
said to "ask
UNCA" -- who?
Giampaolo
Pioli who
rented an
apartment to
Palitha Kohona
and then
granted his
request as Sri
Lanka's
Ambassador for
a "UN"
screening of
his
goverment's
war crimes
denial film?
Inner
City Press
pointed out
that Haq and
Dujarric give
UNCA the first
question and
otherwise
"give them a
lot of play"
--
UNCA board
member Sherwin
Bryce Peace of
South African
Broadcasting,
who filmed
Inner City
Press'
physical
ouster from
the UN on
February 19,
cut in and say
directly to
Inner City
Press, "You
get a lot of
play."
Video
here.
Another UNCA
board member,
Charbonneau's
reporter
Michelle
Nichols, has
previously cut
off Inner City
Press'
questions in
the UN Press
Briefing Room;
UNCA board
member Carole
Landry of AFP
cut off Inner
City Press'
question at
the Security
Council
stakeout about
French
soldiers'
rapes by
saying
"Journalists
first."
The same
Reuters-like
conflict of
interest has
now happened
with Agence
France Presse,
on the UNCA
Executive
Committee in
2011 and now
again in 2016.
(Inner
City Press
quit UNCA and
its Executive
Committee in
2012, finding
the
organization
or at least
how it is run
to be corrupt;
it co-founded
the Free UN
Coalition for
Access, FUNCA.
Reuters
and AFP
have
in the past
and are
currently
pushing to get
Inner City
Press thrown
out of the UN.)
On April 4,
Inner City
Press put a
series of
questions to
UN Spokesman
Stephane
Dujarric, UN transcript
here:
Inner City
Press:
The scope of
the audit had
to do with the
Sun Kian Ip
Foundation and
the Global
Sustainability
Foundation,
but the audit
mentions
South-South
News.
So, you've
been saying,
as I've asked
you about
South-South
News, that,
when it comes
out, you'll
decide whether
a further
scope is
needed.
What I want to
know is, it's
become clear,
for example,
that David Ng,
also known as
David Ng Lap
Seng, was, in
fact, the main
sponsor of a
DPI
[Department of
Public
Information]
NGO
conference.
This was not
mentioned in
the
audit.
As we've
discussed
here,
South-South
News gave
money to UNCA
[United
Nations
Correspondents
Association],
which, in
turn, provided
a photo op for
Ng Lap Seng
with Ban
Ki-moon.
So, my
question is,
what now do
you say, after
this audit is
out, about the
need for a
further
audit?
And can you
comment on the
fact that
there has been
an
acknowledgment
of receipt by
OIOS of a
complaint
against
Cristina
Gallach as
head of DPI
for a variety
of
matters?
And where does
it stand,
please?
Spokesman:
On your second
part,
no. On
your last
question…
Inner City
Press:
No comment or
no
confirmation?
Spokesman:
I have no
comment and no
confirmation.
Or maybe no
confirmation
is a
comment.
I'm not
confirming,
and I'm not
commenting.
On your other
issue, the
status of
South-South
News is being
reviewed, is
its
accreditation
here.
The audit that
was public…
that was
reported on
over the
weekend will
be made public
on 22 April
following the
standard
operating
procedures of
OIOS, which
gives it 30
days between
sharing an
audit with
Member States
and releasing
it to the
public.
Inner City
Press:
Given that the
Global
Sustainability
Foundation,
the things
that are in
the audit
about it, what
now can you
comment on the
fact that, at
the founding
of the Global
Sustainability
Foundation in
the Delegate's
Dining Room,
both Ban
Ki-moon's
spouse and
Vijay Nambiar
were
present?
In what
capacity were
they
present?
And do they
have any
comment now
that it's
become clear
that the
entity was
nothing more
than a vehicle
for bribery
in…
Spokesman
Dujarric:
I think, as
we've told the
press, we're
obviously
concerned at
some of the
things the
audit
showed.
And if
there's… as I
mentioned,
further action
is being taken
looking at
individual
staff members
But is
Ban's spouse a
staff member,
if he isn't?
And the
insider media
that Dujarric
speaks / leaks
to -- while
walking out on
Inner City
Press'
questions --
doesn't ask.
In fact, while
Reuters has a
permanent seat
on the board
of the UN
Correspondents
Association,
which took
South South
News' money
and gave Ng a
photo op with
Ban Ki-moon
(UNCA's vice
president also
went to Ng's
Macau
conference
listed in the
audit), none
of this is
disclosed by
Reuters. This
is a
continuing
cover up, on
which we'll
have more.
Inner
City Press
repeatedly
asked Dujarric
and UNDP,
which has yet
to answer,
about the
i-Pads and
involvement in
the
conference.
But there are
many more
questions not
addressed in
this
whitewash.
And
Dujarric and
Ban's head
"Communications"
official
Cristina
Gallach, who attended Ng's South South Awards
and was questioned
by Inner City
Press about
it, then
ordered Inner
City Press ousted
without due
process -
now plan
a total
eviction
of Inner City
Press on April
6. This is
a cover up,
and corrupt.
Last
week Ban's
spokesman
Stephane
Dujarric read
out a
statement that
Ban's “Task
Force” report
on corruption
had been
circulated,
limited to
structural
flaws in the
Office of the
President of
the General
Assembly.
Inner
City Press, facing
eviction from
the UN for
seeking to
cover an event
by one of Ng's
and South
South News'
fundees, UNCA,
in the UN
Press Briefing
Room,
asked why Ban
wasn't
studying
corruption in
his own
Secretariat. Video here.
On April 1,
Inner Cit
Press Dujarric
this,
transcript
here:
Inner City
Press: I
understand
that we're
waiting to get
these audits
that you said
have been
finished
released, but
in the same
way that, that
there seems to
have been no
answer on
whether the
Secretariat,
outside of the
audit process,
identified who
it was in the
Secretariat
that modified
the document
of… for the
Macau
Centre.
I wanted to
ask you about
paragraph
48(H) of the
criminal
complaint
where it talks
about, you
know, the… the
“Kenyan UN
Official One”
and it
describes in
great detail…
basically, it
seems pretty
clear the
person took
money in order
to do various
things.
And it's
described as a
Kenyan.
So, my
question is,
doesn't seem…
there's
nothing in the
paragraphs
before or
after that
that refer to
either Sun
Kian Ip
Foundation or
Global
Sustainability
Foundation.
So, it's
something that
wouldn't
appear to be
dealt with by
the
audits.
What is the
UN's response
to this…
Spokesman:
The audits are
a first step,
and we'll see
what comes out
of it.
Inner City
Press:
But if the
audits…
Spokesman:
I think we
have to wait
for the audits
to be
finalized.
Inner City
Press:
Okay.
And when will
that… will
they come out?
Spokesman:
I should have
an answer for
you later this
afternoon.
And yet
nothing was
provided.
On March 31,
Inner City
Press asked
Dujarric this,
UN
transcript
here:
Inner City
Press: on
corruption,
there's a lot
of focus has
been on Ng Lap
Seng, but on
the side of it
that Sheri Yan
and the Global
Sustainability
Foundation,
there's
reporting… and
I'm going to
read to you
from a
published
report.
It says, the
United Nations
has ordered an
investigation
of Chong… of
Chau Chak
Wing, the boss
of Guangzhou
Kinggold
Group, which
is basically
the money
behind Sheri
Yan that was
flowed into
the Global
Sustainability
Foundation,
which paid for
the slavery
memorial at
the founding
of which Ban
Ki-moon's
spouse and Mr.
Nambiar were
present.
Is this, in
fact,
true? Is
the UN
actually doing
more
investigation
than I'm aware
of, or is this
report false
and you're not
investigating…?
Spokesman
Dujarric:
I haven't seen
the
report.
If you send it
to me, as I
said, I will
look at
anything that
is shown to
me.
Dujarric,
whose answers
show him
closely
reading his
tweets these
days, was
sent the quote.
Nothing.
Nothing at
all.
Part of the
answer, not
given by
Dujarric on
March 29 or
admitted by
him on March
30 when Inner
City Press
asked, was
that Ban's
personal
lawyer Miguel
de Serpa
Soares was on
the "Task
Force," one of
only three
members. On
March 30,
Inner City
Press asked
Dujarric about
this, UN
transcript
here:
Inner City
Press: I
hadn't seen
when you were
reading out
the task force
report on UN
PGA
office.
And upon
seeing it, I
noticed one of
the three
members is
also Miguel de
Serpa Soares,
who is… is my
understanding,
as well as
Under-Secretary-General
of Legal
Affairs, also
the counsel to
Secretary-General
Ban
Ki-moon.
So, I wanted
to know,
given, even
though the way
it's been
structured is
this was only
a look at the
PGA's office,
given… when
you read the
criminal
complaint,
there are
number of
references to
the
Secretariat.
How would you
respond to
those who say,
as Ban
Ki-moon's
lawyer, Mr.
Serpa Soares
has a legal,
ethical duty
not to find
anything wrong
by Ban
Ki-moon?
He's literally
required.
It would be
unethical for
him to say, I
have found
wrongdoing
with the
Secretariat.
* * *
These
reports
are
usually also available through Google
News and on Lexis-Nexis.
Click here
for Sept 26, 2011 New Yorker on Inner City
Press at UN
Click
for
BloggingHeads.tv re Libya, Sri Lanka, UN
Corruption
Feedback:
Editorial [at] innercitypress.com
UN Office: S-303,
UN, NY 10017 USA
Reporter's mobile (and weekends):
718-716-3540
Other, earlier Inner City Press are
listed here,
and some are available in the ProQuest service,
and now on Lexis-Nexis.
Copyright 2006-2015 Inner City Press,
Inc. To request reprint or other permission,
e-contact Editorial [at] innercitypress.com
|