ICP
Asks UN
About Lack of
Whistleblower
Protections,
Miranda Brown,
Retaliation
By
Matthew
Russell Lee
UNITED
NATIONS, May 5
--
While many try
to insulate
today's UN
from the open
corruption of
the recent
past of
President of
the General
Assembly John
Ashe, there is
continuity to
this UN
scandal - and
to the UN's failure
to protect whistleblowers.
As
UN officials
including
Cristina
Gallach, whose involvement
in the scandal
is detailed in
the UN's own Office
of Internal
Oversight
Services audit
at Paragraphs
37 to 40 and
20(b)
have
moved to
evict
Inner City
Press
from the UN
premises (video
here) and
restrict its
access, Inner
City Press on
May 4 asked UN
Under
Secretary-General
for Management
Yukio Takasu
about two
portions of
the OIOS
audit. Video
here, see
below.
The UN
Controller,
with Takasu,
said she is
working on
whistleblower
protections,
in light of a
US Law making
15% contingent on
improvements
in
whistleblower
protection.
Inner
City Press:
Yesterday, the
comptroller in
the… said that
the UN is
continuing to
work on
whistle-blower
protections,
and she cited
the US law
that would
require a cut
of funding if
whistle-blowers
aren't
protected.
So, I wanted
to ask you,
today the
Government
Accountability
Project has…
has
highlighted
the case of
Miranda Brown,
who was fired
from the
Office of High
Commissioner
of Human
Rights (OHCHR)
as part of the
Anders Kompass
case.
She's asked to
be
reinstated.
And they have
a very long
analysis, but
they say one
line I want to
ask you to
respond
directly
to. They
say: "In
a setting such
as the UN
where public
access to
information
does not exist
and where
virtually all
operations are
governed only
by the opaque
internal legal
process of the
institution
itself,
whistle-blowers
have an
absolutely
crucial
function."
Can you say,
number one, do
you… are you
aware of the
Miranda Brown
case?
And what do
you think of
her firing at
the
time?
Two, what's
the work on
whistle-blower
protections
that the
comptroller
was referring
to? And
do you
disagree that
there is, in
fact, not a
FOIA [Freedom
of Information
Act] at the UN
to receive
information
and that the
internal
process…
Spokesman
Stephane
Dujarric:
I think the…
on Miranda
Brown, I have
nothing to add
to what we've
already said
on that
case.
Obviously,
the… you know,
whistle-blower
protect… the
work of
whistle-blowers
is very
important.
I know there
are efforts to
improve the
current
policies.
When we have
something to
announce, I'm
sure we
will.
And I think
the UN is…
there's a lot
of information
that is freely
available.
Now, I know
there is no
equivalent of
the FOIA, and
again, I think
to… I answered
that the other
day, which is
that it's in
the hands of
the Member
States.
rrovements
in
whistleblower
protection
How was
indicted Ng
Lap Seng's
Global
Sustainability
Foundation's
“sponsorship”
of the UN
slavery
memorial
opening event,
featuring Ban
Ki-moon,
accounted for
in the UN
budget?
Takasu gamely
said that
“in-kind”
contributions
are not
quantified or
listed. If so,
how many other
events did Ng
Lap Seng
entities
sponsor? Inner
City Press
asked how
Takasu's
Assistant
Secretary
General of the
Office of
Central
Support
Services
allowed Ng Lap
Seng's June
30, 2015 event
in the UN
Vistitors
Lobby, also
with no due
diligence by
Gallach's DPI,
to go forward.
Things slip
between the
cracks, Takasu
said,
indicating
that he would
like to
tighten things
up.
So
how much more
slipped
through the
cracks? And
how was
Gallach
allowed -- or
encouraged --
to retaliate
against the
Press which is
pursuing and
asking about
this story?
Given that
Gallach
clearly should
have recused
itself, when
will Inner
City Press be
restored to
its shared
office and
Resident
Correspondent
accreditation
status?
Inner
City Press On
May 2
asked Ban Ki-moon's
spokesman
Stephane
Dujarric if
any of the
OIOS
recommendations
due April 30
had been
implemented. No
information
has been
provided. From
the
UN transcript:
Inner
City Press: on
the audit, not
the UNDP one
that has not
been released
but on the
OIOS UN audit
— of the seven
recommendations,
four of them
were to have
been
implemented
with
documentation
by 30 April
including the
assignment of
responsibility
for the
changing of
the document
by the
Secretariat’s
DGACM
(Department of
General
Assembly and
Conference
Management),
the acceptance
of gifts by
Secretariat
staff, I could
go through the
other two… So
I'm asking
you, have
these been
implemented
and, if so,
will the
documentation
be made public
in the spirit
of
transparency?
Spokesman:
I have no
doubt the
concerned
departments
have been
following up
with
OIOS. If
I have
something to
share, I will.
Inner
City Press:
just for a
simple
statement… if
the UN finds
that a UN-paid
staff member
in the office
of the PGA
(President of
the General
Assembly) in
fact
erroneously or
fraudulently
had an A visa,
a diplomat's
visa for
purposes of
immunity, what
does the UN
do?
Spokesman
Dujarric:
Matthew, I'm
not going to
go into
hypotheticals.
We expect all
UN staff
members to
abide by the
rules, and if
they don't,
there are
sanctions
according to
policy...
Inner
City Press: I
end up asking
you questions
that you
didn't ask
from
yesterday.
There were
four or three
that you said
you’d get
back.
This is the
third.
The third has
to do with is
the position
of the head of
UNIC (United
Nations
Information
Centre) in
Brussels, a D1
or D2
position, to
your
knowledge?
Spokesman
Dujarric:
To my
knowledge,
it's a D1
position.
Inner
City Press:
Right.
So what would
explain a
person leaving
a D2 position
in New York
for a D1
position in
Brussels?
Spokesman:
Because… You
know
what? I
don't want to
get into
personal
issues of
people, but
sometimes
people make
career
decisions
based on all
sorts of
different
things.
I'm sure you
do and I
do.
Thank you.
What the UN
did not
transcribe, and
in fact cut
from its
audio, was
Dujarric
saying,
"Matthew,
that's a
f*cking stupid
question." But
Vine
here.
We'll have
more on this.
Inner
City Press: This
is related to
the John Ashe
case.
When people
work in the
PGA's office
and they work
for the UN,
but they work
for the PGA's
office, are
they supposed
to have a G4
visa or an “A”
diplomat
visa?
There's a
reason I'm
asking
this.
Some people
are seconded,
and
supposedly,
they can have
then an A
visa, which
gives much
greater
immunity.
Some people
are paid by
the UN, and I
wanted to get
an answer from
you whether
G4…
Spokesman
Dujarric:
If they are UN
staff, then I
would assume
they're under
G4 visas…
Inner
City Press:
What happens
if… what if
somebody is a
UN staff that,
for some
reason, for
some erroneous
reason,
happened to
have an A
visa?
Would this
give them
immunity?
Spokesman:
I don't
know. I
don't know.
Dujarric did
not come back
with an
answer, but
should have.
Inner City
Press is
exclusively
informed that
the UN allowed
“visa games”
in the case of
John Ashe's
chief of staff
Paulette
Bethel, who is
now in the
Cabinet of
current PGA
Mogens
Lykketoft and
is being
lobbied to
continue, with
immunity, with
the *next* PGA
(more on that
in a separate
forthcoming
exclusive
story).
Bethel had
been an
Ambassador
with an “A”
diplomatic
visa, full
diplomatic
immunity. But
while working
for Ashe,
Ban's UN paid
her. Still she
arranged to
have an “A”
visa --
significant
given the
corruption in
which her
Office was
allegedly
involved in.
Now, the
sources tell
Inner City
Press, there
is a review of
how Ban
Ki-moon's UN
has allowed
for abuse of
the visa (and
immunity)
system. On
this, too, we
will have
more.
Back on
March 11, Inner
City Press reported
and asked
this:
By having her
position with
Lykketoft,
Paulette
Bethel
continues to
have immunity.
Ban Ki-moon
has not waived
it, despite
the portrait
painted of her
the John Ashe
indictment.
She “knows
where the
bodies are
buried,” as
the phrase has
it.
And perhaps
for that
reason, Inner
City Press is
multiply
informed that
Bethel is
lobbying for a
continued
immunity job
with the NEXT
President of
the General
Assembly,
whether from
Cyprus or
Fiji.
In fact, Inner
City Press is
informed, both
candidates to
succeed
Lykketoft as
PGA, Cyprus
and Fiji, was
lobbied to
keep Bethel on
-- as a D2,
with full
immunity -- if
they win the
job, and were
promised (the
same) votes if
they do.
Now,
Inner City Press is
informed
of new (March
11)
developments
regarding
Paulette
Bethel's
immunity
status.
For now, what
does this
mean? Well --
did Lykketoft
make the same
corrupt deal?
Why WOULD
Lykketoft,
claiming to be
so different
from John
Ashe, keep
Ashe's chief
of staff on
his team? Even
Banned from
the UN second
floor where
Lykketoft's
office -- used
to campaign
for Helle
Thorning-Schmidt,
as Inner City
Press
exclusively
covered --
we'll have
more on this.
Here.
On
March 11,
Inner City Press
asked UN
Spokesman
Stephane
Dujarric --
who among
other things has
refused to
answer on
lending UN
Press Briefing
Room, in which
indictee Frank
Lorenzo
appeared
without being
listed in the
Media Alert --
about this. Video
here UN transcript here:
Inner
City Press: I
want to return
to the
indictment of
John Ashe, I'd
asked you
before, but I
have more to
ask about it,
that the
previous Chief
of Staff of
John Ashe,
Paulette
Bethel, is
currently the
number three
official in
Mogens
Lykketoft's
office.
And as Chief
of Staff,
she's listed
throughout the
indictment and
charge sheet
in the John
Ashe case.
I've also
become aware
that there's
requests being
made to
potential new
PGAs
(Presidents of
the General
Assembly),
Cyprus and
Fiji, to
continue her
in the
employment as
a D-2 UN
official. If a
person is a UN
staff member
but works for
the PGA's
office, one,
what is the
status of
their immunity
from
prosecution
and
testifying?
And, two, who
can waive that
immunity?
Is it the
Secretary-General,
as with other
UN staff, or
is there some
special status
for a UN staff
member who
works for the
PGA's office?
Spokesman
Dujarric:
Look, speaking
not in
relation to
the particular
case that you
mentioned,
because her
employment and
the employment
of anybody in
the PGA's
office is up
to the PGA
itself, the
Secretary-General
has the
authority to
lift the
immunity of
any UN staff
member.
Inner City
Press:
Does it seem
strange to you
that someone
listed so
prominently in
the indictment
remains on the
UN payroll?
Can you
describe the
immunity that
that
obtains?
If, for
example, the
US Attorney's
Office wanted
to speak to a
Chief of Staff
who went to
Macau, who was
involved in
all of these
actions…
Spokesman:
I'm not going
to speak to… I
can't
speculate…
Inner City
Press:
D-2, D-2
generally.
Spokesman:
I can't
speculate to
the
case. I
don't… I'm not
privy to
anything that
the US
Attorney may
or may not be
doing.
What is clear
is that
anyone, as far
as I know,
under the rank
of Assistant
Secretary-General,
which would
include D-2s,
such as
myself,
carries
functional
immunity.
As a matter of
principle,
immunity is
not there to
block any
criminal
investigation.
Maggie?
Voice of
America:
Steph,
anything on
Mr. de
Mistura's
smaller
conversations
Yes,
smaller
conversations...
There is a
history, here.
After
being thrown
out of the UN
on two hours
notice by
Under
Secretary
General for DPI
Cristina
Gallach on
February 19,
on March 10 back in
on a "non
resident
correspondent"
"Green P"
pass, Inner
City Press was
ordered out of
the UN at 8
pm, here,
as it worked
on this story
-- here's
an Inner City
Press story on
Bethel and Ban
Ki-moon's
connection to
the scandal --
in the UN
Lobby.
UNder
this kind of
harassment,
intimidation
and attempted
censorship,
there is only
one approach:
publish,
publish,
publish. If
Bethel didn't
have the
immunity that
comes with a
UN D-2 post,
what might she
testify to?
Who could
waive her
immunity?
The new Free
UN Coalition
for Access
-- whose sign
USG Cristina "The
Censor"
Gallach
directed to be
torn down
after she
evicted Inner
City Press
from its
long-time
office --
seeks to open
the UN and
these
processes -
watch this
site.