In
Ban's UN Ng's Corruption
Continues As
GG-UNSDG, ICP
On Case,
Evicted
By
Matthew
Russell Lee,
Exclusive series
UNITED
NATIONS, May 6
-- While
many try to
insulate
today's UN
from the open
corruption of
the recent
past of
President of
the General
Assembly John
Ashe, there is
continuity to
this UN
scandal. This
includes a
revival of the
Ng
Lap Seng's old
"South South
News" team,
with El
Salvador
ex-Ambassador
Carlos Garcia
and others,
even as those
investigating
this UN
corruption are
evicted and
restricted,
and those
covering it up
are rewarded.
The
so-called
"Global
Governance for
the United
Nations
Sustainable
Development
Goals
(GG-UNSDG)"
has sprung up,
with photos of
Ban Ki-moon
and Garcia and
a UN
Correspondents
Association
Vice President
who also
attended
indicted Ng
Lap Seng's
August 2015
Macau event, saying
on its website
as of May 6,
2016 that
it
"in
collaboration
with the
Permanent
Mission of
Grenada to the
United Nations
and the
Montessori
Model United
Nations
organized a
High-level
Meeting on
Media,
Education and
Global
Governance for
the UNSDG at
the New York
Hilton Hotel.
The key note
speakers
included H.E.
Mr. Carlos
Alberto Rojas
Santos, Deputy
Permanent
Representative
of Honduras to
the United
Nations; Mrs.
Marcela Suazo,
Director of
South-South
Unit, UNFPA;
Mr. Diego
Diaz, Trade
Commissioner
of Guatemala,
Trade Office
in New
York;
Mr. Julio
Pujols,
Counsellor of
the Dominican
Republic to
the United
Nations; Mr.
Haliscelik
Kahraman, New
York & UN
Bureau Chief-
Turkish Radio
and
Television-
TRTWorld; and
Mr. Yuntao
Guo, Secretary
General of the
Global
Governance for
the United
Nations
Sustainable
Development
Goals."''"
But
GG-UNSDG's
website's
administrator
is Francis
Lorenzo, who
had
pleaded guilty
to UN bribery
charges.
Another
connection to
Ng Lap Seng is
Christian
Batres,
involved in
the website
and in Sun
Kian Ip
Foundation
before it. As
Inner City
Press
reported,
before and
after its
eviction by
Ban Ki-moon,
everything is
for sale in
Ban's UN.
We'll have
more on this.
Ban's
Gallach and
Dujarric have
defended the
continuation
of South South
News with a UN
office while
Inner City
Press is
evicted and
restricted,
now wil play
dumb on this
new corruption
as moneyed
South South
News issued a
statement
attach unnamed
independent
journalists -
Ban's UN has
come to this,
with big Gulf
and western
media
conflicted out
since South
South News
funded the UN
Correspondents
Association
they use to
attach their
independent
competitors -
to this has
the UN sunk.
On
May 4 Inner
City Press
asked UN Under
Secretary-General
for Management
Yukio Takasu
about two
portions of
the OIOS
audit. Video
here.
How
was indicted
Ng Lap Seng's
Global
Sustainability
Foundation's
“sponsorship”
of the UN
slavery
memorial
opening event,
featuring Ban
Ki-moon,
accounted for
in the UN
budget?
Takasu gamely
said that
“in-kind”
contributions
are not
quantified or
listed. If so,
how many other
events did Ng
Lap Seng
entities
sponsor? Inner
City Press
asked how
Takasu's
Assistant
Secretary
General of the
Office of
Central
Support
Services
allowed Ng Lap
Seng's June
30, 2015 event
in the UN
Vistitors
Lobby, also
with no due
diligence by
Gallach's DPI,
to go forward.
Things slip
between the
cracks, Takasu
said,
indicating
that he would
like to
tighten things
up.
So
how much more
slipped
through the
cracks? And
how was
Gallach
allowed -- or
encouraged --
to retaliate
against the
Press which is
pursuing and
asking about
this story?
Given that
Gallach
clearly should
have recused
itself, when
will Inner
City Press be
restored to
its shared
office and
Resident
Correspondent
accreditation
status?
Inner
City Press On
May 2
asked Ban Ki-moon's
spokesman
Stephane
Dujarric if
any of the
OIOS
recommendations
due April 30
had been
implemented. No
information
has been
provided. From
the
UN transcript:
Inner
City Press: on
the audit, not
the UNDP one
that has not
been released
but on the
OIOS UN audit
— of the seven
recommendations,
four of them
were to have
been
implemented
with
documentation
by 30 April
including the
assignment of
responsibility
for the
changing of
the document
by the
Secretariat’s
DGACM
(Department of
General
Assembly and
Conference
Management),
the acceptance
of gifts by
Secretariat
staff, I could
go through the
other two… So
I'm asking
you, have
these been
implemented
and, if so,
will the
documentation
be made public
in the spirit
of
transparency?
Spokesman:
I have no
doubt the
concerned
departments
have been
following up
with
OIOS. If
I have
something to
share, I will.
Inner
City Press:
just for a
simple
statement… if
the UN finds
that a UN-paid
staff member
in the office
of the PGA
(President of
the General
Assembly) in
fact
erroneously or
fraudulently
had an A visa,
a diplomat's
visa for
purposes of
immunity, what
does the UN
do?
Spokesman
Dujarric:
Matthew, I'm
not going to
go into
hypotheticals.
We expect all
UN staff
members to
abide by the
rules, and if
they don't,
there are
sanctions
according to
policy...
Inner
City Press: I
end up asking
you questions
that you
didn't ask
from
yesterday.
There were
four or three
that you said
you’d get
back.
This is the
third.
The third has
to do with is
the position
of the head of
UNIC (United
Nations
Information
Centre) in
Brussels, a D1
or D2
position, to
your
knowledge?
Spokesman
Dujarric:
To my
knowledge,
it's a D1
position.
Inner
City Press:
Right.
So what would
explain a
person leaving
a D2 position
in New York
for a D1
position in
Brussels?
Spokesman:
Because… You
know
what? I
don't want to
get into
personal
issues of
people, but
sometimes
people make
career
decisions
based on all
sorts of
different
things.
I'm sure you
do and I
do.
Thank you.
What the UN
did not
transcribe, and
in fact cut
from its
audio, was
Dujarric
saying,
"Matthew,
that's a
f*cking stupid
question." But
Vine
here.
We'll have
more on this.
Inner
City Press: This
is related to
the John Ashe
case.
When people
work in the
PGA's office
and they work
for the UN,
but they work
for the PGA's
office, are
they supposed
to have a G4
visa or an “A”
diplomat
visa?
There's a
reason I'm
asking
this.
Some people
are seconded,
and
supposedly,
they can have
then an A
visa, which
gives much
greater
immunity.
Some people
are paid by
the UN, and I
wanted to get
an answer from
you whether
G4…
Spokesman
Dujarric:
If they are UN
staff, then I
would assume
they're under
G4 visas…
Inner
City Press:
What happens
if… what if
somebody is a
UN staff that,
for some
reason, for
some erroneous
reason,
happened to
have an A
visa?
Would this
give them
immunity?
Spokesman:
I don't
know. I
don't know.
Dujarric did
not come back
with an
answer, but
should have.
Inner City
Press is
exclusively
informed that
the UN allowed
“visa games”
in the case of
John Ashe's
chief of staff
Paulette
Bethel, who is
now in the
Cabinet of
current PGA
Mogens
Lykketoft and
is being
lobbied to
continue, with
immunity, with
the *next* PGA
(more on that
in a separate
forthcoming
exclusive
story).
Bethel had
been an
Ambassador
with an “A”
diplomatic
visa, full
diplomatic
immunity. But
while working
for Ashe,
Ban's UN paid
her. Still she
arranged to
have an “A”
visa --
significant
given the
corruption in
which her
Office was
allegedly
involved in.
Now, the
sources tell
Inner City
Press, there
is a review of
how Ban
Ki-moon's UN
has allowed
for abuse of
the visa (and
immunity)
system. On
this, too, we
will have
more.
Back on
March 11, Inner
City Press reported
and asked
this:
By having her
position with
Lykketoft,
Paulette
Bethel
continues to
have immunity.
Ban Ki-moon
has not waived
it, despite
the portrait
painted of her
the John Ashe
indictment.
She “knows
where the
bodies are
buried,” as
the phrase has
it.
And perhaps
for that
reason, Inner
City Press is
multiply
informed that
Bethel is
lobbying for a
continued
immunity job
with the NEXT
President of
the General
Assembly,
whether from
Cyprus or
Fiji.
In fact, Inner
City Press is
informed, both
candidates to
succeed
Lykketoft as
PGA, Cyprus
and Fiji, was
lobbied to
keep Bethel on
-- as a D2,
with full
immunity -- if
they win the
job, and were
promised (the
same) votes if
they do.
Now,
Inner City Press is
informed
of new (March
11)
developments
regarding
Paulette
Bethel's
immunity
status.
For now, what
does this
mean? Well --
did Lykketoft
make the same
corrupt deal?
Why WOULD
Lykketoft,
claiming to be
so different
from John
Ashe, keep
Ashe's chief
of staff on
his team? Even
Banned from
the UN second
floor where
Lykketoft's
office -- used
to campaign
for Helle
Thorning-Schmidt,
as Inner City
Press
exclusively
covered --
we'll have
more on this.
Here.
On
March 11,
Inner City Press
asked UN
Spokesman
Stephane
Dujarric --
who among
other things has
refused to
answer on
lending UN
Press Briefing
Room, in which
indictee Frank
Lorenzo
appeared
without being
listed in the
Media Alert --
about this. Video
here UN transcript here:
Inner
City Press: I
want to return
to the
indictment of
John Ashe, I'd
asked you
before, but I
have more to
ask about it,
that the
previous Chief
of Staff of
John Ashe,
Paulette
Bethel, is
currently the
number three
official in
Mogens
Lykketoft's
office.
And as Chief
of Staff,
she's listed
throughout the
indictment and
charge sheet
in the John
Ashe case.
I've also
become aware
that there's
requests being
made to
potential new
PGAs
(Presidents of
the General
Assembly),
Cyprus and
Fiji, to
continue her
in the
employment as
a D-2 UN
official. If a
person is a UN
staff member
but works for
the PGA's
office, one,
what is the
status of
their immunity
from
prosecution
and
testifying?
And, two, who
can waive that
immunity?
Is it the
Secretary-General,
as with other
UN staff, or
is there some
special status
for a UN staff
member who
works for the
PGA's office?
Spokesman
Dujarric:
Look, speaking
not in
relation to
the particular
case that you
mentioned,
because her
employment and
the employment
of anybody in
the PGA's
office is up
to the PGA
itself, the
Secretary-General
has the
authority to
lift the
immunity of
any UN staff
member.
Inner City
Press:
Does it seem
strange to you
that someone
listed so
prominently in
the indictment
remains on the
UN payroll?
Can you
describe the
immunity that
that
obtains?
If, for
example, the
US Attorney's
Office wanted
to speak to a
Chief of Staff
who went to
Macau, who was
involved in
all of these
actions…
Spokesman:
I'm not going
to speak to… I
can't
speculate…
Inner City
Press:
D-2, D-2
generally.
Spokesman:
I can't
speculate to
the
case. I
don't… I'm not
privy to
anything that
the US
Attorney may
or may not be
doing.
What is clear
is that
anyone, as far
as I know,
under the rank
of Assistant
Secretary-General,
which would
include D-2s,
such as
myself,
carries
functional
immunity.
As a matter of
principle,
immunity is
not there to
block any
criminal
investigation.
Maggie?
Voice of
America:
Steph,
anything on
Mr. de
Mistura's
smaller
conversations
Yes,
smaller
conversations...
There is a
history, here.
After
being thrown
out of the UN
on two hours
notice by
Under
Secretary
General for DPI
Cristina
Gallach on
February 19,
on March 10 back in
on a "non
resident
correspondent"
"Green P"
pass, Inner
City Press was
ordered out of
the UN at 8
pm, here,
as it worked
on this story
-- here's
an Inner City
Press story on
Bethel and Ban
Ki-moon's
connection to
the scandal --
in the UN
Lobby.
UNder
this kind of
harassment,
intimidation
and attempted
censorship,
there is only
one approach:
publish,
publish,
publish. If
Bethel didn't
have the
immunity that
comes with a
UN D-2 post,
what might she
testify to?
Who could
waive her
immunity?
The new Free
UN Coalition
for Access
-- whose sign
USG Cristina "The
Censor"
Gallach
directed to be
torn down
after she
evicted Inner
City Press
from its
long-time
office --
seeks to open
the UN and
these
processes -
watch this
site.