At UN
on Darfur, Indicted War Criminals Go Virtually Unmentioned, Rebel Noor May Face
Sanctions
Byline:
Matthew Russell Lee of Inner City Press at the UN: News Analysis
UNITED NATIONS,
September 21 -- Darfur was the subject Friday of the first "high level meeting"
of this UN General Assembly. Along with the African Union, the UN issued a five
paragraph press communique, which notably did not mention the International
Criminal Court's warrants for war crimes pending against two Sudanese, including
Janjaweed leader Ali Kushayb and the al-Bashir government's minister of
humanitarian affairs, Ahmed Muhammed Harun. The first attendee to emerge to take
questions was former UN Deputy Secretary General and UNDP Administrator Mark
Malloch Brown, now handling the UN, Africa and Asia
for the United Kingdom. Malloch Brown among other things said that while he did
not raise the issue of the ICC indictees in his recent meeting with president al
Bashir, he did include it in his remarks in the UN's Darfur meeting. You'll have
to ask others if they raised it, or why they didn't, he said.
Inner City Press asked U.S.
Deputy Secretary of State John Negroponte if the U.S. had raised the issue of
the ICC indictees in the meeting. "We didn't raise it in this meeting, although
it is certainly an issue of concern to us," he answered. Behind him stood
Assistant Secretary of State
Frazer, who exactly one year ago
accused al-Bashir of sabotaging
African Union materiel coming in through Port Sudan.
Negroponte was asked, what about the rebel
leader Abdel Wahid Noor, who still indicates he will not be attending the
October 27 talks in Libya between the al Bashir government and the range of
rebels from Darfur. Negroponte said that the decision not to attend "should not
be cost-free," which he subsequently clarified meant the threat of U.S.
sanctions.
Friday on the UN's 38th floor: 3
Americans, 2 South Koreans, and...
Ban Ki-moon,
when asked Friday about Noor, gave a shorter version of his September 10
response to Inner City Press' question about bringing Noor into the process,
that "giving any prominent attention to any particular person is not desirable."
On September 10 he said:
"there are many leaders of movements.
There is some tendency of mushrooming of these factions. I urge that all the
leaders of the movements should participate in the forthcoming political
negotiation. It is necessary to participate and [express] their views, rather
than complaining or protesting outside of the dialogue forum. It is the same
with case of Mr. Abdel Wahid Noor. I know that he is staying in France, but he
should participate in this, if he really thinks about the future of Sudan and if
he thinks he is one of the leaders. At the same time, I would like to point out,
that, as a matter of principle, everybody should be given equal opportunity and
equal attention."
The
foreign minister of Noor's home-in-exile, Bernard Kouchner, expressed
frustration about question concerning Noor. "What do you want me to do about
it?" he demanded, calling a reporter "mon petit gars," my little guy.
Also
frustrated with the press was AU chairperson Alpha Oumar Konare. To a
straight-forward question about the AU's position on whether the "hybrid" force
should be entirely, or only mostly, made up of African troops, Mr. Konare said,
"That is a non-innocent question," accusing the broadcaster of trying to play up
differences in position between the AU and the UN. Here then is another question
lacking innocence: what is the African Union's position on the enforcement of
the ICC's warrants? The answer to this will be pursued.
Footnote: on
another issue of impunity and international criminal law, Inner City Press at
Friday's noon briefing asked Ban Ki-moon's spokesperson about a report that
Timorese president Jose Ramos-Horta was "dismissive" of Ban's threat that the UN
would not participate in the "Truth and Friendship Commission" if it allowed for
amnesty for war crimes. AFP
reported
that Ramos-Horta "said the boycott statement was not an official UN stance." So
Inner City
Press asked:
"there's an article about Jose Ramos-Horta,
and he said that they don’t intend to change the terms of reference of their
Truth and Reconciliation Commission to knock out amnesty, and he said he didn’t
think that what the Secretary-General said in July of the UN participating in
that tribunal is official UN policy. So I guess I'm asking: Is it the UN's
policy that it will not participate in that amnesty is given to, for war crimes,
genocide, and..."
Five
hours later, the Spokesperson's office confirmed that
this is
the policy. We'll see.
* * *
Click
here for a
Reuters
AlertNet piece by this correspondent about Uganda's Lord's Resistance Army
(which had to be finalized without the UN's DPA having responded.)
Click
here
for an earlier
Reuters AlertNet
piece by this correspondent about the Somali National Reconciliation Congress, and the UN's
$200,000 contribution from an undefined trust fund. Video
Analysis here
Feedback: Editorial
[at] innercitypress.com
UN Office: S-453A,
UN, NY 10017 USA Tel: 212-963-1439
Reporter's mobile
(and weekends): 718-716-3540
Other, earlier Inner
City Press are listed here, and
some are available in the ProQuest service.
Copyright 2006-07 Inner City Press, Inc. To request
reprint or other permission, e-contact Editorial [at] innercitypress.com -
UN Office: S-453A,
UN, NY 10017 USA Tel: 212-963-1439
Reporter's mobile
(and weekends): 718-716-3540