After
Botched Procurement in Burundi, UNDP Denied Documents to UK & Belgian Board
Member, Who Was Then Hired
Byline: Matthew Russell Lee of Inner City Press at
the UN: News Analysis
UNITED NATIONS, January 17 -- Using
Belgian and British aid funds, the UN Development Program in mid-2007 undertook
to purchase medical equipment in the Central African nation of Burundi. During
the procurement process, one bidder's information was improperly given to a
competitor and UNDP quietly tried to cancel the project,
documents obtained by Inner City Press reveal.
The Belgian Mission to the UN, and Sue Hogwood of the UK Department of
International and Foreign Development both demanded explanations and evaluation
reports. UNDP refused to provide these funders with the underlying documents.
See
UNDP letter, here.
Geert
Vansintjan, then the Belgian Mission's Development Counselor, wrote to UNDP
Controller Darshak Shah, conveying his government's analysis that "you can give
money to UNDP, you will not get access to what they call internal documents...
UNDP procedures not at all transparent... We can improve on the UNDP without
falling into the U.S.-trap." In response, rather than provide the documents or
clean up the procedures, it was arranged for Mr. Vansingtan to get a job with
the UN, with UNDP's sister agency the UN Office of Project Services. And in late
December, in preparation for a UNDP Executive Board meeting starting next week,
UNDP released a draft "Accountability
Framework" in which it could
still withhold even from funders any documents
affecting
"staff, third parties or a country government" -- that is, precisely the type of
documents of financial impropriety withheld from Belgium and the UK in this
case.
Request for UK comment was submitted
Thursday morning
UNDP's
letter, from Country Director Antonius
Broek, was also sent to Norway,
apparently because the botched procurement also involved the UN's Peacebuilding
Fund, PBF. Broek refers to an "anticipated increase in procurement volume from
the PBF funded projects." Broek, along with the UK's Ms. Hogwood and the Special
Representative of the Secretary General in Burundi, had received the complaint
of the vendor, Hospital Medical Services Bujumbura, which protested that UNDP
had divulged to an eliminated bidder the details of HMS' financial offer. UNDP's
Richard Barathe, "Senior Advisor for Strategic Partnerships," had received a
summary:
"Three million
Euros was received from Belgium for the '2006 Burundi Emergency Program Open
Trust Fund... The Contribution Agreement, which itself is not dated... there is
another request from the Belgians for clarification focusing on the procurement
irregularities."
On August 9, 2007, the Belgian Mission's
Geert Vansintjan wrote to Darshak Shah regarding "Burundi UNDP Trust Fund,"
stating
"I did not yet
get any feedback from your own office on the case mentioned above... Lessons
learned: you can give money to UNDP, you will not get access to what they call
internal documents... UNDP procedures not at all transparent... local ownership
is gone... damage control is paramount. The most important asset of UNDP is its
reputation. You should be able to project an image of taking procurement
seriously. I want this reaction because I want to show my field office that they
are not alone and that we can improve on the UNDP. without falling into the
US-trap."
Upon receipt of this message, viewed as a
threat, UNDP's Darshak Shah wrote to Krishan Batra, "please ensure that the
response is sent asap. I suggest we also meet with Geert. Belgian Mission is an
important supporter of UNDP."
Less than two months later, UNDP's sister
agency UNOPS hired Geert Vansintjan, on a "special" and thus non-competitive
basis, as "Senior Partnership Manager for the North American Office. UNOPS'
executive director Jan Mattson, previously at UNDP, wrote to staff that "since
mid-2003 he has represented Belgium on UNDP / UNFPA and UNICEF boards as a
delegate, actively participating in the change management process, working on
accountability frameworks, results-based management, strategic plans, and UN
reform." The "UNDP / UNFPA board also oversees UNOPS. And that he turned around are took a job at the agency he was supposed
to oversee.
Voting in Burundi while UNDP plays
games
News analysis: when
embroiled in scandal,
UNDP often emphasizes that while it may not be giving information to the press,
it is accountable and transparent to the member states which give
it money and sit on its Executive Board. But in this case, two countries which
funded UNDP were denied access to basic records of an admittedly irregular
procurement exercise. Belgium, it should be noted, is becoming the vice-chair of
UNDP's Executive Board. To give a job to the Belgian mission's development
counselor, who was pushing to get information that UNDP did not want to provide,
is an example of how UNDP's top management manages to escape, rather than
embrace, accountability.
Looking forward, there is a growing sense that just as the Secretariat
promulgated a set of Post-Employment Restrictions, albeit weak, rules are needed
to prohibit those who oversee or audit agencies from going to work for them for
a set period time after leaving their oversight role.
Shorter term, these
specific conflicts of interest, the availability of audits, the lack of
oversight that led to contracting with Corimec and the $280,000 housing subsidy
windfall of UNDP's head of Millennium Campaign, are all topics for the upcoming
Executive Board meeting.
* * *
These reports are also available through
Google News and on Lexis-Nexis.
Click
here for a
Reuters
AlertNet piece by this correspondent about Uganda's Lord's Resistance Army.
Click
here
for an earlier
Reuters AlertNet
piece about the Somali National Reconciliation Congress, and the UN's
$200,000 contribution from an undefined trust fund.
Video
Analysis here
Because a number of Inner City Press'
UN sources go out of their way to express commitment to serving the poor, and
while it should be unnecessary, Inner City Press is compelled to conclude this
installment in a necessarily-ongoing series by saluting the stated goals of the
UN agencies and many of their staff. Keep those cards, letters and emails
coming, and phone calls too, we apologize for any phone tag, but please continue
trying, and keep the information flowing.
Feedback: Editorial
[at] innercitypress.com
UN Office: S-453A,
UN, NY 10017 USA Tel: 212-963-1439
Reporter's mobile
(and weekends): 718-716-3540
Other, earlier Inner
City Press are listed here, and
some are available in the ProQuest service, and now on Lexis-Nexis.
Copyright 2006-08 Inner City Press, Inc. To request
reprint or other permission, e-contact Editorial [at] innercitypress.com -
UN Office: S-453A,
UN, NY 10017 USA Tel: 212-963-1439
Reporter's mobile
(and weekends): 718-716-3540