Senior UNDP Officials Summoned to Southern District
of NY in N. Korea Case
Byline: Matthew Russell Lee of Inner City Press at
the UN
UNITED NATIONS, March 28 -- Alongside the
delayed
"urgent
audit" by the UN Board of
Auditors of the UN Development Program's payment of hard currency in North
Korea, there is a criminal investigation of senior UNDP officials.
Inner City Press has learned that 13 UNDP officials
have been invited to appear at the office of the U.S. Attorney for the Southern
District of New York for questions about, among other things, their awareness of
UNDP's acceptance and concealing of counterfeit bills in North Korea.
Among the invited are said to be UNDP finance
director Darshak Shah, the head of the Regional Bureau for Asia and the Pacific,
Hafiz Pasha, UNDP trust fund controller Bruce Jenks, Julie Anne Mejia, and UNDP
finance chief Darshak Shah. Among the topics is who knew what, when. Most of the
invited individuals -- and several individuals yet to be invited -- are known to
have received warnings of irregularities in UNDP's programs in North Korea and
elsewhere, long before the problems were inquired into by letters from the U.S.
Mission. These began with a November 17, 2006, letter to UNDP Administrator
Kemal Dervis from the U.S. Ambassador for UN Management and Reform, Mark D.
Wallace. While the current process is described as voluntary, if declined the
next step would be a request to the UN to have the officials' immunity lifted.
The prosecutors have yet to invite the
top two in UNDP, Kemal Dervis and Ad Melkert. While decried by knowledgeable
sources as spin, some inside UNDP opine that, channeling Machiavelli, Dervis is
hoping that the investigation provides him with a pretext to fire or clear out
senior staff whom he inherited from previous Administrator Mark Malloch Brown.
The danger in Dervis' strategy, these sources say, is that while Dervis directed
Ad Melkert and even chief of staff Tengegnwork Gettu to sign most of the letters
responding to U.S. Ambassador Wallace's questions, Dervis himself made
representations about purported lack of knowledge or responsibility, including
at a meeting held on December 22. UNDP sources recount to Inner City Press a
more recent, and more heated, meeting between Amb. Wallace and Dervis. We aim to
have more on this.
Kemal
Dervis: show me the money (but is it counterfeit?)
In earlier meetings with the U.S.
Mission, finance chief Darshak Shah was asked about topics including the
counterfeit (how much and when did he know), and Mr. Shah responded with denials
which are now being more fully weighed.
The issues inquired into implicate not
only current but also past UNDP officials, and provide a roadmap of the various
clans or "families" in UNDP. For example, the current head of UNDP's Regional
Bureau for Africa, Gilbert Houngbo, served as financial overseer during much of
the time at issue. Mr. Houngbo is described as a right hand man of Mark Malloch
Brown, and close associate of Bruce Jenks. Houngo had been Malloch Brown's chief
of staff but could not keep that position as Kemal Dervis came in. So Malloch
Brown arranged for Houngbo to be named head of the Regional Bureau for Africa.
But Houngbo's counterfeit knowledge travels with him, from one floor to another
in UNDP's First Avenue headquarters building.
Another UNDP power at that
time has since left the agency, to head the UN Office of Project Services: Jan
Mattsson. As Inner City Press
reported earlier today,
Mattsson has this month threatened the "severest disciplinary action" against
any individuals who share whistle-blowing information with the press. Click
here
for that story. On Wednesday afternoon, U.S. Ambassador Mark D. Wallace provided
this on-the-record comment to Inner City Press: "The U.S. strongly supports real
whistleblower protection. Too often we have seen the UN bureaucracy hunker down
to protect itself from criticism rather than taking the real steps to reform
itself. The US stands by any legitimate and truthful whistleblower and calls on
all UN entities to take steps to ensure their protection."
We aim shortly to have more on UNDP's
reactions in the face of the audit and the criminal investigation.
UNDP's Administrator Kemal Dervis,
spokesman David Morrison, and North Korea Resident Coordinator Timo Pakkala were
each asked, days ago and without answer, questions including about the
particularly batch of counterfeit currency, from "an Egyptian" whom has thus far
been left unnamed by UNDP, which purportedly "remained in a safe at the UNDP
office until last month when the head of the North Korea office recalled that
the bills were there during a visit to UNDP headquarters in New York." Inner
City Press asked the three:
How long did
Mr. Pakkala, the head of the North Korea office, have access to the safe? Why
was it only in February that it was "recalled" that the bills were in the safe?
What is the
name of the referenced "Egyptian"?
Confirm or deny
(and if confirm, explain) any recent suspension by UNDP -- which Mr. Morrison
was directly asked about last week outside room 226, when he answered that he
was unaware of any such suspension and has yet to seek to amend or supplement
his answer.
We will have more on UNDP's
reactions and actions, including against staff, in the face of the delayed
"urgent audit" and the widening criminal investigation. One of the way it may
widen is based on the recognition that the half-dozen UN operations managers in
North Korean during the time at issue came not only from UNDP, but also from
UNFPA,
UNICEF,
OCHA and the World Health Organization, which has acknowledged to Inner City
Press being the
pass-through for separate funds from South
Korean to North Korea.
Developing.
Again, because a number of Inner City Press'
UN
sources go out of their way to express commitment to serving the poor, and while
it should be unnecessary, Inner City Press is compelled to conclude this
installment in a necessarily-ongoing series by saluting the stated goals of the
UN agencies and many of their staff. Keep those cards, letters and emails coming, and phone
calls too, we apologize for any phone tag, but please continue trying, and keep
the information flowing.
Feedback: Editorial
[at] innercitypress.com
UN Office: S-453A,
UN, NY 10017 USA Tel: 212-963-1439
Reporter's mobile
(and weekends): 718-716-3540
On UNDP Audit's 7th Day, Questions of Two Sets of
Books and Prejudged Outcome
Byline: Matthew Russell Lee of Inner City Press at
the UN: News Analysis
UNITED NATIONS, March 26 -- One week now into the
delayed "urgent audit" ordered by Ban Ki-moon on January 19, sources point out
recent changes in the financial books of the UN Development Program concerning
spending in North Korea in 2006. In one set of books, the figure is $4,569,000.
In another, more recent or "beta" set of books, the figure is $3,279,000. This
second set of book is called "Executive Snap 4.0 Beta."
The modifications are
attributed by sources to the Director of UNDP's Office of Finance, Darshak Shah,
and UNDP's trust fund meister Bruce Jenks. While what explains the $1,291,000
difference is not yet clear, this switch may explain the extraordinary
gun-jumping comments to Sunday's Chicago Tribune by UNDP's spokesman David
Morrison.
Morrison
wrote, "The audit began last week at UNDP headquarters in New York. UNDP
welcomed this audit, it is doing everything it can to facilitate it, and it
looks forward to the findings -- which we are confident will flatly contradict
the assertions in" the Chicago Tribune and by implication elsewhere. Monday's
AP picked up on the UNDP counterfeit story, quoting Morrison that the
counterfeit bills "remained in a safe at the UNDP office until last month when
the head of the North Korea office recalled that the bills were there during a
visit to UNDP headquarters in New York." But what of the 22 months that
this head of office, Timo Pakkala, had the keys to the safe? Did he never open
it? UNDP's spokesman was seen earlier Monday trying to spin invited
media, while ignoring questions about improper hiring, click
here
for that story.
The audit began on March 19, a full two months
after Ban Ki-moon called for it. Why did the UN Board of Auditors wait so long
to begin the audit, and now a week in still not even have specific terms of
reference?
How
can the audit proceed without access to those with first-hand knowledge?
These
questions will be explored in coming days.
In addition to the $4.6 million in reported 2006 spending in North Korea, in
UNDP's first set of books there are additional expenditures characterized as
"Thematic Trust Funds Expenditure" and plain "Trust Fund Expenditure," raising
the 2006 total to $7 million, quite different from the number UNDP presented to
its Executive Board in January 2007.
UNDP's
Atlas: danger ahead
At Monday's UN noon briefing, Inner
City Press asked to question UNDP Associate Administrator (and self-described
managing director) Ad Melkert in person before or after he met with Deputy
Secretary General Migiro at 3:15 p.m.. From the
transcript:
Inner City
Press: And the other thing is: I noticed on the Deputy Secretary-General's
meeting with Ad Melkert of the United Nations Development Program (UNDP) this
afternoon... I guess I want to know the purpose of that, and whether we could
speak to either or both of them before or after, given the North Korea-UNDP
situation, and we also have a question for the UNDP about some
hiring by Mr.
Melkert. So, it would be very timely if you could at least put in a request for
a brief stakeout.
Deputy
Spokesperson: Sure.
As usual with UNDP, the silence was and
is deafening. It was never explained why UNDP's Bureau of Management's Akiko
Yuge was sent out of town for the two weeks that auditors would be working in
New York; now sources say Ms. Yuge and others have been summoned back. We will
have yet more on UNDP immanently.
On 4th Day of N. Korea Audit, UNDP Spins From Leaked
Minutes
Byline: Matthew Russell Lee of Inner City Press at
the UN: News Analysis
UNITED NATIONS, March 22 -- As the delayed "urgent
audit" of the UN Development Program's operations in North Korea went into its
fourth day, UNDP spokesman David Morrison dismissed the leaked minutes of a
meeting of UN Operation Management Team in North Korea, which specifically asked
that cash payments in hard currency stop.
"We are clear on the record that we don't deal in cash," Mr. Morrison said.
Minutes of a December 8, 2005
meeting in Pyongyang involving local officials of UNDP and five other UN
agencies clearly stated that "CASH payments should be eliminated." Click
here to
view. While in the online version of the minutes, the names of meeting
participants were whited-out, Inner City Press today in this article, below,
publishes the names of operations managers. All of these individuals, each of
whom, unlike spokesman David Morrison, has direct knowledge of UN practices in
North Korea, has yet to be interviewed by the UN Board of Auditors.
Meanwhile, for two weeks after UNDP ostensibly ordered the suspension of its
operations in North Korea, staff members seconded by the Kim Jong Il government
were still allowed access to the computer files and ATLAS financial records
needed for the audit. As acknowledged Thursday by UNDP's Morrison, four such
seconded staff still have access to UNDP's computer system. These include
ostensible drivers, who according to published reporters cash checks into hard
currency, so such access may be hard to defend. Concerns about destruction of
and tampering with evidence have been raised to the agencies and to the
auditors. The response has been retaliation.
Dervis:
1st of 2 press conferences in 19 months
Since UNDP sent its spokesman
David Morrison to the UN's televised noon briefing on Thursday, Inner City Press
asked that he take questions on camera. From the
transcript:
Inner City
Press: I noticed the Spokesman for UNDP is here and I'm assuming this is about
these memos that have surfaced showing that requests were made earlier than
previously recorded about cash payments and seconded staff. Is he going to come
to the podium?
Spokesperson:
I understand that we do have Dave Morrison here and he is willing to take
questions. I actually don't know whether he is coming to the podium but we do
have a guest first. So, maybe you can talk to him immediately after the
briefing....
...Inner City
Press: I guess I just want to say on the UNDP thing, it will work much better
that Morrison come to the podium, whatever we're calling it, just because on
procurement, I know that you did... by Friday, they came, but they did it in the
hall and today they’re coming back. So it just seems it’s just more efficient
to just do it on the record or whatever.
Spokesperson:
Okay, well let's ask him after we finish.
Despite a second request, David Morrison
declined to speak on camera, but rather waited in the hall. At 1 p.m., Inner
City Press asked him if UNDP fires or suspends staff for providing documents to
the press. Mr. Morrison responded, "I don't know, I don't know enough about the
intricacies of UNDP's human resources policy.... I can look into it." Ten hours
later, no information had been provided.
During
those ten hours, UNDP management continued on what staff describe as a "witch
hunt," demanding to know who has spoken to the media, to Inner City Press, by
name. Ban Ki-moon has spoken of transparency and of rooting out corruption.
Suspending and threatening to retaliate against those who blow the whistle on
irregularities is inconsistent with this -- it is "criminal," in the words of
one UNDP staff member.
The local UN staff in North
Korea raised their concerns about cash payments and seconded staff to the UN's
Resident Coordinator Timo Pakkala in
January 2006.
Thursday Inner City Press asked David Morrison how and when
this information
was conveyed further up inside UNDP. "I don't know what is our standard
procedure with minutes of country team meetings," he said. "Can we find out?"
There was no answer. Meanwhile, the practice is that minutes of country team
meetings go to Regional Directors of each UN Country Team member -- in the case
of UNDP, to Hafiz Pasha.
Inner City Press is told that the warning
was conveyed to officials including UNDP Director of Finance Darshak Shah, to
Treasurer Julie Anne Mejia and to Jan Mattsson, the head then of UNDP's Bureau
of Management and now the Executive Director of UNOPS. Thursday, Inner City
Press asked again that UNDP Administrator Kemal Dervis take questions. Morrison
said that he is the spokesman, and that "Kemal Dervis, as I think is
established, meets with the press on a very regular basis."
At UN
headquarters, Dervis last took questions in December 2006, before this North
Korea scandal broke, and before that not for sixteen months. Even to the UNDP
Executive Board session about the North Korea issues, Dervis did not appear.
Sources say that Dervis will not last long on the job. But the scandal will not
go away.
The attendees of the December 8, 2005 meeting in
Pyongyang, calling for reform:
Wannee
Piyabongkarm (WFP);
Lorraine Lamtey (WFP); Tony Shkurtaj (UNDP), Charles Lolika (UNICEF); Toe oung (WFP);
Umesh Gupta (WHO); Withers U (UNFPA).
Developing...
On Third Day of UN's North Korea Audit, Memos Show
Warnings But Not the Source of Funds
Byline: Matthew Russell Lee of Inner City Press at
the UN: News Analysis
UNITED NATIONS, March 21 -- On the third
day of the delayed "urgent audit" of four UN agencies that Ban Ki-moon called
for on January 19, Fox News
ran a
retrospective on the attempts by a group of unnamed individuals whom Fox calls
reformers to get the UN agencies to harmonize their policies and, Fox implies,
to clear them up. Fox links to a half dozen documents, including minutes of
meetings in late 2005 and early 2006. The minutes memorialize for example that
UNICEF in particular wanted to continue to pay in hard currency, but to limit
staff "R&R" from every two to every three months. WFP on the other hand awarded
R&R every six weeks, and had a bus that fit 60 people. There was nowhere to go,
however. The international staff were confirmed to what Fox calls the
"secrecy-shrouded diplomatic Munsudong district of Pyongyang (known to some
North Korean diplomats as 'the greenhouse')."
The memos have all names redacted, and
Fox's story does not mention the name of the Administrator of UNDP, Kemal Dervis.
This seems strange, given that sources among the UN Security Council's Permanent
Five members opine that Mr. Dervis' tenure at UNDP is drawing to a close, that
"only the modalities" remain to be worked out. Similarly, the Fox story
mentions now-gone Secretary-General Kofi Annan before it mention, in its final
paragraph and only with reference to the audit, current S-G Ban Ki-moon. Not
mentioned at all is where the money being spent by the UN agencies came from: in
large part, South Korea, where and while Ban Ki-moon was Foreign Minister.
Mr.
Ban with former South Korean Amb. to the UN Lee See-Young, March 21, 2007
Perhaps Fox' tale is one in a
forthcoming series. There are rumblings afoot to that effect. Also, interesting
questions have been
raised about
the UN accepting then holding counterfeit currency from the Kim Jong Il
government, click
here.
Because the Fox story does not
provide the names, and the memos put on line have all the names redacted, here
from Inner City Press is a list of UNDP's Pyongyang international staff: Timo
Pakkala, Vineet Bhatia (still in-country); Du Yuexin; Paul Brewah; Mulualem
Zeleke; Melvin Padua; Vijay Thapa and Maartin Boon.
Here is
a link to the December 8, 2005 meeting Fox describes,
here is
the January 24, 2006 memo to Timo Pakkala, and
here are
the minutes of the resulting April 13, 2006 meeting, in which we learn among
other things that UN international staff had fruits and vegetables imported from
China, and that WHO wanted to fly its own flag, and not the UN's, on its
vehicles. What does it all add up to? That remains to be seen.
Click
here
for Inner City Press' coverage today of the UN Office of Drugs and Crime.
UNFPA's Dubious Tales On UN's N. Korea Audit's 2nd
Day, Red Faces at UNDP
Byline: Matthew Russell Lee of Inner City Press at
the UN
UNITED NATIONS, March 20 -- With the
delayed
"urgent audit" of North Korea programs
called for by Ban Ki-moon on January 19
now in its second day, inconsistencies are cropping up.
The
90-day deadline for the audit is now described as merely being a goal. The
government of the Democratic People's Republic of Korea has yet to signal that
any auditors will even be allowed to enter the country.
While
the delay in starting the audit is attributed to "unforeseen staff travel
arrangements of one of the auditors," UN insiders tell Inner City Press that it
was the Pyongyang to New York travel of Resident Coordinator Timo Pakkala that
was delayed for one week, so that certain surgical modifications to the records
could be made. A point at issue now is not only how much money was expended, but
where in fact it went.
On Tuesday, the audit's second day,
officials from the UN Population Fund put in an appearance at the UN Board of
Auditors' office on the 26th floor of the UNDP building, where they claimed that
UNFPA's programs in Pyongyang did not have the problems which forced UNDP to
suspend its operations earlier this month.
This is belied by a draft internal audit
report obtained by Inner City Press, and presumably available to the Board of
Auditors. If it is not, since in the face of this audit documents have a way of
disappearing or being modified, extensive quotes from the UNFPA internal audit
are below.
But first, after receiving no-comment from the
Board of Auditors, Inner City Press' previous questions about the audit
have been responded to by UN Controller Warren Sach:
Subj: Question
on audit, from today's noon briefing: why was audit pushed back a week, etc,
thanks
From: Warren
Sach
To: Inner City
Press
CC: goolsarrans
[at] un.org
Date: 3/19/2007
2:14:37 PM Eastern Standard Time
1. Why
was the audit pushed back a week? As per a 7 March 2007memorandum from the
Board of Auditors, the planned start date of the audit will be delayed by one
week due to unforeseen staff travel arrangements of one of the auditors.
2. What
impact might it have on complying with the 90 day time frame?
Please see
below answer on the proposed time frame.
3. When
does the 90 day time frame expire? The Secretary General has requested
through the Advisory Committee on Administrative and Budgetary Questions (ACABQ)
that the Board of Auditors conduct the required activities within a time frame
of 90 days. The Board of Auditors has agreed to take up the work as a matter of
priority which we hope can be achieved within the timeframe requested by the
Secretary General.
4. Has
any request been made for auditors to enter DPRK? The Secretary General has
sent a letter to the Permanent Representative of the Democratic People’s
Republic of North Korea informing them of the audit and requesting assistance to
facilitate travel arrangements and visas.
5. Has
there been any response? The letter to the DPRK was sent on the 12th of
March 2007. We have not received any follow up communication in the past few
days.
6. Has
there been any response to Ban Ki-moon's February 28 letter on this issue?
The letter from the Secretary General dated 28 February 2007 was a response to a
correspondence received from the Permanent Representative of DPRK. We have not
received any follow up communication from the DPRK.
While appreciating this reply
from Warren Sach, who has also taken back on but has yet to respond about the
post of Ban Ki-moon's representative to the UN Pension Fund, it is still unclear
when the audit's 90 day "clock," previously referred to by Ban Ki-moon's staff,
expires. Additionally, there is among insiders a counter-explanation of the
audit's one-week delay in starting, that involves the Pyongyang to New York
travel of Resident Coordinator Timo Pakkala being delayed for one week, so that
targeted chances to documentation could be made. More on this to follow. Within
UNDP, there is growing paranoia. The Administrator's discomfort is, insiders
say, incarnated in a skin condition used to deny press access. No questions!
And no answers, either, for example as to why the head of UNDP's Bureau of
Management Akiko Yuge
has left New York
for precisely the two weeks of the audit's first (and some say only) phase.
For now, the members of the Board of
Auditors are making phone calls and holding meetings. On Tuesday, they went to
UNFPA, where they were told a number of stories, including that UNFPA's programs
in Pyongyang did not have the problems which triggered the audit and forced UNDP
to suspend its operations in North Korea.
UNFPA's
Thoraya Obaid: UN interview, not (yet) audit
UNFPA's story is contradicted by a
document obtained by Inner City Press, an internal audit report of
UNFPA's County Office in DPR Korea, dated May 2006.
This
internal audit was carried out by KPMG in-country from May 23 to May 29 and is
68 pages in length. Even while sidestepping UNFPA's provision of hard currency
to the Kim Jong Il government -- perhaps because all of UNFPA's payments were
and are through UNDP, as more recently acknowledged by UNDP's spokesman -- the
audit paints a disturbing picture of UNFPA.
At UNFPA
in North Korea there is sloppy bookkeeping, at least, for payments of $96,000
and $93,000 and $77,000. KPMG diplomatically notes an "absence
of documentation for independent verification." There was a murky "transfer of
assets" worth $420,000 to the North Korean government. A consultant was hired to
slap together some praise of UNFPA's and the DPRK's "partnership," but was paid
before the work was done, and the work was never evaluated. In a project from
the European Commission, KPMG notes "unauthorized use of project resources,"
without saying by whom. But this is what the Board of Auditors should find out
and make public.
Back
in January, Inner City Press asked UNFPA for comment on
these issues.
Spokesman Abubakar Dungus on January 22 said he would respond that day. He did
not, and has not. On January 26, Mr. Dungus' boss Safiye Cagar told Inner City
Press that Mr. Dungus was on retreat. Minutes later, UNFPA security chief Janie
McCusker attempted to have Inner City Press' correspondent barred from the UNFPA
Executive Board meeting. When this failed, Ms. McCusker was seen whispering with
Ms. Cagar, Kwabena Osei-Danquah and UNFPA Executive Director Thoraya Obaid.
Missing from this scene was UNFPA's Alaadin Morsy, who has been
threatened by Ms. Obaid with a document, contested by Mr. Morsy, concerning
"the vehicle that you imported when you
were first place on the ATR Project in Egypt... the vehicle was imported for
your personal use without paying customs duties to the Government of Egypt. If
you were employed for less than three years on the project, you were obligated
to either re-export the vehicle or pay the customs duty that would have been
owed when you imported the car in 2002. Your employment with the project was
terminated after one year and you should have taken one of these two action. To
the best of our knowledge and that of the Ministry of Foreign Trade and Industry
and the Egyptian Customs Authority, you have not done so. Mr. Tim S. Buehrer of
the Secretary-General's office has stated that he has contacted you on numerous
occasions concerning this matter but that you have not responded."
Some have predicted the ejection from the
UN System of either Mr. Morsy or Ms. Obaid. These are other issues, beyond but
not unrelated to hard currency and mis-management, into which the Board of
Auditors should delve, along with these additional findings from UNFPA's May
2006 internal audit, for example on the key question of accepting personnel from
the DPRK government:
"National staff
were seconded from the Ministry of Foreign Affairs for National Program Officer,
Finance and Administration Associate and Secretary positions and the driver was
seconded from the General Bureau for Affairs with Diplomatic Missions... There
was no documentation on the health status and evidence of educational background
in addition to the Curriculum Vitae for seconded staff maintained in the staff
personal file... Competencies of personnel not verified prior to secondment
acceptance."
These are precisely the issues on which Ban
Ki-moon called for the audit. UNFPA now tells the Board of Auditors that
everything's fine. How? There is also this, in the internal audit of UNFPA:
"World Health
Organization (WHO) was the implementing UN agency for DRK3R203. An Annual Work
Plan was developed and signed on 1 February 2005. The following issues were note
in the execution arrangement with WHO:
The budget
allocated for WHO execution was US$193,500 for 2005. However, in the AWP, an
amount of US$47,000 was manually recorded as balance carried forward from 2004
in addition to the allocation in 2005. The amount was inconsistent with WHO
financial report claiming that the amount carried forward from UNFPA from 2004
was US$62,452; Our review of the financial report submitted by WHO revealed that
an amount of US$156,388 out of total budget of US$255,952 was still in 'unliquidated/earmarking'
column indicating that the plan activities (mainly fellowships) for the year
have not taken place. As at our audit date, the Office was not able to confirm
whether WHO has successfully completed the outstanding activities as at 31
December 2005. The information on the utilization of the unliquidated amount was
only provided to the Office after being requested the audit team. Ineffective
monitoring of resources. Error in financial reporting."
In response to
a direct question from Inner City Press of whether the World Health Organization
received $10 million from South Korea while Ban Ki-moon was foreign minister,
WHO spokeswoman Christine McNab replied that, "Yes, last year South Korea
committed to providing the equivalent of US 10 million per year as support to
DPRK through WHO for health-related humanitarian assistance, for three years."
This has given rise to a question of how much money the South Korean government
transferred to North Korea, through UN agencies, while Ban Ki-moon was South
Korean Foreign Minister, click
here
for that story.
In the "Management comments" of the
audit, UNFPA claims that it "is doing good comparing with other UN agencies
resident in DPRK." The auditor KPMG -- also the auditor of UNDP in North Korea
-- does not reply. Then again, since UNFPA has refused to show these audits even
to the member states on its Executive Board, perhaps there's no reason for KPMG
to reply. Reply to whom? Only now, there is an answer -- to the Board of
Auditors, unless all of these documents and drafts disappear.
On UNDP and bank accounts, the UNFPA internal
audit says
"The monitoring
and oversight of UNFPA funds in UNDP’s bank account in the Korea Foreign Trade
Bank was performed by UNDP. The Office had no involvement in the management of
banking accounts and facilities in 2005. However, according to the UNFPA
Internal Control Framework, which came into effect on 22 March 2006, Country
Offices are to receive and check completed bank reconciliations from UNDP on a
monthly basis.... Lack of oversight on bank reconciliations."
After dodging the question
from the time it was
raised to Kemal Dervis on February 1,
UNDP's spokesman recently stated that upwards of $10 from "other UN funds and
programs," the "vast majority of it" from UNFPA, was paid through UNDP. UNDP has
not disclosed information which its spokesman, in the hallway outside the
briefing room, promised to provide, about safeguards in place to track this
UNFPA and "other" money. Rather, UNDP has said, "Wait for the audit."
But if from Day Two of the audit, UNFPA
does not tell the truth, and the auditors may never go to North Korea, how will
the truth be found? Developing.
With Audit
Starting in NY, UNDP Manager
Akiko Yuge
Leaves Town,
Sale-of-Jobs Unanswered
Byline: Matthew Russell Lee of Inner City Press at
the UN: News Analysis
UNITED NATIONS, March 19 -- As the
delayed
"urgent audit" of North Korea programs
called for by Ban Ki-moon on January 19
today begins at the UN Development Program, the director of UNDP's Bureau of
Management Akiko Yuge has conveniently left town, internal UNDP e-mails obtained
by Inner City Press show.
Sources say that UNDP's legal chief James
Provenzano and finance director Darshak Shah may also have left. (Since UNDP no
longer answers even basic questions, this cannot be confirmed. As to Ms. Yuge,
see the intra-UNDP email below.)
Mr. Shah and Ms. Yuge were among the eight UNDP officials to whom the Executive
Secretary of the UN Board of Auditors, Swatantra Goolsarran, sent his
March 1 memo scoping out the audit
including requested interviews, their absence from headquarters during the audit
has raised questions about staff. So has the fact that the scope of audit memo
was not sent to UNDP's Asia chief, Hafiz Pasha, but only to his
ostensible deputy, David Lockwood. The credibility of the audit is increasingly
doubted by knowledgeable sources inside UNDP.
UNDP's large but recently
lethargic (at least on this issue) communications office has not helped dispel
the doubts. A series of questions about the audit and UNDP's North Korea program
have done unanswered. Even two non-North Korea questions asked on camera then in
writing last week, regarding UNDP's reported support of a gold mine in Romania
and the selling of jobs and promotions alleged by UNDP staffers, have been
entirely ignored. UNDP's David Morrison was asked these questions at the March
13 noon briefing filmed by UN TV, click
here
for video, from minute 40:30 to 42:39.
Inner City Press followed this up with an email:
Subj: Follow-up
to today's UN noon briefing, & some long-outstanding questions, thanks
Date: 3/13/2007
2:05:40 PM Eastern Standard Time
To:
david.morrison [at] undp.org, ad.melkert [at] undp.org, kemal.dervis [at]
undp.org
CC: [cc's
deleted in this format]
From: Inner
City Press
Hello -- This
follows up on questions asked at today's UN noon briefing. On deadline, need a
yes or no answer on whether the previous head of the Department of Management
ever imposed conditions appointments or promotion (or in cases of demotion /
re-classification downward). We are told that this was sometimes explained as
being akin to a "headhunter's fee."
Because we
are on deadline, we are also cc-ing some of the individuals, who we have been
told may on this question have knowledge. [Ed.'s note: cc's deleted in
this format.]
I am attaching
for your comment and explanation three documents concerning the controversy
regarding UNDP's position on, and involvement in, gold mining project in
Romania. Also, a breakdown of the $10.88 million you cited today, and your
response to Ben's question about the $151 million figure in OCHA's consolidated
appeal. I am pasting below yesterday's reminder email, and note that a long-ago
asked question -- how many people work for UNDP? -- message, which included
other still-unanswered questions, pasted below -- has yet to be answered. Ad
Melkert is cc-ed because he indicated such answers would become faster.
And again, we
believe that Mr. Dervis as Administrator should come and give a briefing in
226, given the issues that have been raised.
Still, no response whatsoever. Therefore, for now,
here is an edited version of one of the UNDP staff complaints that has been
directed to Inner City Press, despite David Morrison's counter-story that
procedures and whistle-blower protections exist in UNDP such that no one should
go to the press:
Subject: Re:
Attn: Mr. Matthew Russell Lee
Date: 3/2007 [Date and time omitted due to last line of 2d email, below]
From: [Name withheld, entitled to all whistle-blower protections]
To: Inner City Press
...on jobs for
favors first. I know some people to whom Brian Gleeson offered promotions or
appointments in exchange of the cash equivalent of the first salary. He
mentioned this option to me as well when my post was re-classified downwards. I
pretended it was a joke, but afterwards the relations became very strained. For
quite some time I was kind of sidelined...
Then --
Subject: Re:
Attn: Mr. Matthew Russell Lee - many thanks, some [follow-up] questions
Date: 3/2007 [Date and time omitted due to last line of this email]
From: [Name withheld, entitled to all whistle-blower protections]
To: Inner City Press
...Usually
$10,000 or first salary. Brian was quoted to say that as UNDP was becoming
corporate-like, it would be normal to charge as head hunter agency would charge.
...Our I.T.
manager said that the management could track what we do on the Internet at any
instant. So much for our rights, which could be another topic for you to
explore.
Yes, that will be another topic. And on the
Romania gold mine controversy, we have tried another route, which we hope will
soon bear fruit, at least a response of some sort. But why would UNDP made no
response at all for six days to questions about these sale of jobs and
promotions allegations, questions raised in a formal UN-televised press briefing
and then also in writing, with additional names provided?
This was sent out, Friday after close of business:
From:
Bernadette Jones
Sent: Mar 16,
2007 18:10
Subject: O-I-C
of BOM
Dear All,
This is to
advise that Ms. Akiko Yuge will be away from Headquarters from 18 to 31 March
2007, inclusive. During her absence Ms. Jocelline Bazile-Finley will be the
Officer-in-Charge of the Bureau of Management. Please also note that Ms. Bazile-Finley
is the Acting Chief Procurement Officer for this period.
Thank you
Bernadette
Jones , Executive Assistant to the Assistant Administrator and Director, Bureau
of Management
We will have more about UNDP's
procurement. But why would UNDP send its new director of Management, Brian
Gleeson's successor, away from headquarters precisely during the two week New
York period of the "urgent audit" of UNDP's management of its North Korea
program? Questions, questions...
Other, earlier Inner
City Press are listed here, and
some are available in the ProQuest service.
Copyright 2006 Inner City Press, Inc. To request
reprint or other permission, e-contact Editorial [at] innercitypress.com -
UN Office: S-453A,
UN, NY 10017 USA Tel: 212-963-1439
Reporter's mobile
(and weekends): 718-716-3540