As
UN
Weapons Expert
Sues to Keep
Job, UNMOVIC
Cover Up
Alleged, Gag
Order
on Inner City
Press Rejected
By
Matthew
Russell Lee,
Exclusive
UNITED
NATIONS,
December 29,
updated /
redacted -- A
Russian expert
in weapons of
mass
destruction,
claiming
retaliation
for having
exposed what
she called
a United
Nations
cover-up of
chemical
weapons left
over from
Iraq, is
challenging
the UN's
termination of
her employment
at New Years.
[REDACTED],
who served the
UN in Iraq, in
New York and
most recently
on North
Korea and
Iran, appeared
Tuesday in a
judicial
proceeding in
the
basement of UN
headquarters,
saying that if
the UN lets
her go, she
is in danger.
She
alleged
retaliation,
and that her
supervisor
Thomas Markram
had forced her
to
remove the
names of
countries she
worked on --
North Korea
and Iran
-- from her
job
description
and
evaluation.
The
chief
of UN
Disarmament
Affairs'
Weapons of
Mass
Destruction
Branch,
Gabrile
Kraatz-
Wadsak,
acknowledged
that Mr.
Markham had
forced these
two
countries
names to be
removed from [REDACTED]'s
employment
forms, but
said it was so
no "bias"
would be
perceived
against the
two countries.
[REDACTED]
went to the UN
Ethics Office,
which is
ostensiblly in
charge of
ensuring
protection of
whistleblowers.
They simply
referred her
elsewhere in
the UN system,
leading to the
December 29
hearing.
Inner
City
Press,
the only media
organization
covering the
hearing and
case, first
questioned [REDACTED]in
2007, when
five vials of
phosgene were
found
in the closed
down offices
of the United
Nations
Monitoring,
Verification
and Inspection
Commission,
(UNMOVIC).
On
Tuesday,
before
a gag order
was sought, [REDACTED]
alleged that
UN "management
concealed six
days" the
vials.
After
UNMOVIC
was
disbanded in
2007, [REDACTED]
continued
working in UN
Disarmament,
in
posts funded
by the John D.
MacArthur
Foundation.
(Testimony
says $2
million was
spent on a
mere four
posts in 22
months). [REDACTED]
argues
that it was
discrimination
and
retaliation
that she was
made
to work on
projects
outside the
scope of the
MacArthur
grant, such
that she is
now being let
go.
After
that,
a
deputy of
Russia's
Permanent
Representative
to the UN
Vitaly Churkin
called the
head of UN
Disarmament,
Sergio De
Queiroz
Duarte, asking
if Ms. Utkina
could be kept
on. Only if
money could be
found, Mr.
Duarte
replied,
according to
testimony.
Then a
prospective
donor
country --
left
unidentified
-- was
approached,
but did not
come
through.
UN
Dispute
Tribunal
judge Memooda
Ebrahim-Carstens
asked [REDACTED]
if she
currently has
an UN
security. No,
[REDACTED]
answered, but
"Hans
Blix protected
me." She added
that she lives
in an
apartment
building --
which Inner
City Press
will leave
unnamed --
where "eighty
percent" of
the tenants
work for the
UN, with
security video
cameras.
[REDACTED]said
that she could
not get a job
in the weapons
field in
Russia
because her
husband is
American, nor
in the
United States
because she is
not a citizen.
Her degree is
as a
chemical
weapons
production
engineer. What
do you want me
to do, she
asked, "put
that on my
Facebook?"
The
OLA
representative
countered that
the UN "can't
give jobs for
life."
He argued that
[REDACTED]'s
harm would not
be
irreparable,
that it
could be
compensated
with money if
she ultimately
wins on the
merit.
Ms. Uktina
cited a
medical
procedure
costing "three
times as
much as [her]
repatriation
grant" and the
possible need
to
return half of
the UN's
$25,000
educational
grant for her
daughter.
At
Tuesday's
hearing,
after the UN
Office of
Legal Affairs
representative
pointed
Inner City
Press out, a
motion was
made to
prohibit Inner
City Press
from reporting
on the
proceedings.
Inner City
Press opposed
the
motion, noting
that the
hearing was
listed as open
and that the
Ban
Ki-moon
administration
brags about
the
transparency
of its new
internal
justice
system. (Click
here
for a previous
Inner City
Press report
on
a UNDT
proceeding.)
While
granting
separate
orders to keep
documents
filed secret
from the Press
and
public, the
judge agreed,
but asked OLA
to in the
future make
earlier
motions to bar
the press. But
the Press
would need
notice and an
opportunity to
be heard,
Inner City
Press pointed
out. We'll
see.
* * *
UN
in
Guinea Bissau
Offers
Sanctuary to
Coup Leader,
Setting
Precedent?
By
Matthew
Russell Lee
UNITED
NATIONS,
December 29 --
When an
accused coup
leader shows
up
unannounced at
the UN asking
protection,
does he get
it? The answer
is yes. Monday
in Guinea
Bissau, former
Rear Admiral
Bubo Na Tchut
showed up at
the UN. The
government has
expressed
surprise that
he is
there, and
says it will
arrest him.
On
Tuesday
at
noon, Inner
City Press
asked the UN
whether the UN
knew in
advance he
would go
there, and
what the UN
will do in
response to
government's
position that
he should be
arrested.
The
UN
responded,
some hours
later, that
"he has asked
for
protection. We
have
been in
constant
contact with
the
authorities in
Guinea-Bissau
in an
effort to
resolve this
situation
peacefully and
in accordance
with
international
law."
Does
this
mean he
will go (back)
into exile?
What is the
UN's
responsibility
to turn
off an
indictee to a
host
government?
Or,
separately, to
the
International
Criminal
Court? This
could be a
test case, in
a country
where there UN
has an
extensive and
not
uncontroversial
role. Click here for a
previous Inner
City Press article about
Guinea Bissau.
UN's
Ban and Guinea
Bissau's prime
minister, coup
leader not
shown
For
now,
for the
record:
Subj:
Question
regarding
Guinea-Bissau
From:unspokesperson-donotreply
[at]
un.org
To:
Inner City
Press
Sent:
12/29/2009
4:52:19 P.M.
Eastern
Standard
Time
Regarding
your
question as
follows:
"please
confirm
the presence
in the UN
building in
Guinea Bissau
of accused
coup plotter
Admiral Jose
Americo Bubo
Na Tchute, and
state how he
got in,
whether the UN
knew in
advance he
would go
there, and
what
the UN will do
in response to
government's
position that
he should be
arrested."
Here
is
the response:
Former
Rear
Admiral Bubo
Na Tchuto
arrived
unannounced at
UN premises in
Bissau early
yesterday (28
Dec) and
remains there
at this time.
He
has asked for
protection. We
have been in
constant
contact with
the
authorities in
Guinea-Bissau
in an effort
to resolve
this situation
peacefully and
in accordance
with
international
law.
With
No
Wireless in
New UN
Building,
Master Planner
Takes Up
French
By
Matthew
Russell Lee
UNITED
NATIONS,
December 29 --
While the UN
has moved its
Department of
Political
Affairs,
Protocol and
Advisory
Committee on
Administrative
and Budgetary
Questions to
its Wal-Martlike
new
North Lawn
building,
on Tuesday
there was
still no
wireless
Internet
there. Nor was
ACABQ's space
ready, despite
its old space
having been
taken down.
Meanwhile
Inner
City
Press has
learned that
Capital Master
Plan chief
Michael
Adlerstein is
slated to take
the UN's
French course
starting
January
11, every
Monday and
Wednesday. How
do you say, a
la Marie
Antoinette, let
them eat cake?
When
last
we
covered
Adlerstein, he
was
confronting
Press members
about their
questioning of
the Panopticon
security
cameras
installed over
their
new desk in
the "swing
space" over
the library.
But when
asked about
the cameras by
Inner City
Press, which broke
the story,
he said only
"no comment,
no comment."
Previously, he
has barred the
Press from his
"Town Hall"
meetings about
the Capital
Master Plan.
Therefore
seeking
comment on l'affaire
langue
Francaise, ce
n'est pas
possible.
The cameras
have for now
belatedly been
removed,
canceling a
previously
scheduled
December 30
question and
answer session
about them.
The
new
building is
chock a block
with security
camera. Of
course, the
press will not
be
based there.
Neither will
the UN
Spokesperson's
Office. One
wonders
if accurate
information
will actually
flow the the third story
Ban
Cave on top of
Wal-Mart
to the
Spokesperson's
Office at the
entirely
other side of
the UN campus
in the
basement.
Could
this distance
explain the
December 23
statement,
still
unamended,
that despite the
entry into
Ban's
residence on
December 22 of
an individual
neither
invited nor
employed by
the UN,
"there was no
security
breach"?
Click here
for that.
UN's
Ban in new
space on Dec.
28, advisors
but no
wireless shown
The
only
meeting
at the UN on
December 29
was a hearing
of the UN
Dispute
Tribunal at
3 p.m. in
Conference
Room 8. It was
a "suspension
of action"
case, in which
the UN Office
of Legal
Affairs tried
to defend
having
given the
applicant its
response at
1:10 p.m.
before the 3
p.m.
hearing, while
opposing any
extension.
OLA argued
that the UN
"has
no money,"
while four
witnesses
cooled their
heals on fixed
blue
chairs along
the wall. The
judge spoke of
the
"difficulty of
getting
rooms" -- in
an empty
building. And
so the case
went forward,
with 24
hours to file
more
documents.
Despite the
hearing being
"open," OLA
sought and got
an
confidentiality
order for many
of its
filings.
The
A,
B and C
conference
rooms have had
all their
chairs taken
out, as has
the old
Vienna Cafe.
Up in the
lobby, small
cups of coffee
were sold for
$1.05. The
newsstand was
disassembled.
There was a
hole on the
4th
floor where
Chase's ATM
used to be.
Everything's
on the move,
with no
place to
return to.
Watch this
site.
* * *
Lauding
Sudan,
UN Nods
Disapprovingly
at Ban's
Turkmeni-Plans,
State Media
Appearances
By
Matthew
Russell Lee
UNITED
NATIONS,
December 29 --
When state
media in the
hermit state
of
Turkmenistan
published what
it called the
New
Years
greeting of UN
Secretary
General Ban
Ki-moon,
complete with
his promise to
travel to
the country in
April 2010,
the UN had no
comment.
Inner
City
Press
on December 28
asked for
confirmation
of Mr. Ban's
now published
travel plans.
For security
reasons, Inner
City Press was
told, the UN
only announces
such plans a
week in
advance. But,
Inner City
Press
was told, most
media rely on
reports like
Turkmenistan's.
So is
the UN
saying
Turkmenistan's
state media
breeched
protocol by
publishing
Ban's missive?
To this, there
was no answer.
Therefore no
reason
to
seek comment
on the BBC's
December 28
pick-up from
Sudan's state
media SUNA,
"Sudanese
leader
receives
congratulatory
message
from UN chief"
--
Khartoum,
December,
28 (SUNA):
President of
the Republic,
Field Marshal
Umar
Al-Bashir,
received
Monday [28
December] a
written
message from
the
UN Secretary
General, Ban
Ki-moon,
congratulating
him on the
anniversary of
Sudan
Independence
Day.
The
UN Secretary
General
expressed the
UN adherence
to its noble
goals and
values as a
global
platform in
all fields,
pointing out
that the
contribution
of the member
states
and the
commitment of
the leaders to
the countries
to achieve
goals
will enable
the UN to
confront the
current
challenges and
establish a
peaceful world
where any one
will enjoy
justice and
well-being.
Source:
Suna news
agency
website,
Khartoum, in
English 28 Dec
09
How
many
other
leaders -- in
these cases,
an ICC
indicted war
criminal and
the
former dentist
of the Father
of all
Turkmen,
Turkmenbashi
-- got
holiday wishes
from Ban?
There was also
no answer to
this.
UN's
Ban and
Turkmenistan's
President, New
Years
greetings not
shown
And
so,
legitimization
in Khartoum
and springtime
for Ban
Ki-moon in
Ashkabat, a
capital formed
by the
demolition of
its former
residents'
houses,
largely by a
French
construction
firm. On this
we can rely?
Watch this
site.
28.12.09
12:08
TURKMENISTAN.RU
UN
Secretary
General Ban
Ki-moon to
visit
Turkmenistan
in April 2010
UN
Secretary
General Ban
Ki-moon will
visit
Turkmenistan
in April 2010.
This was
announced in
the
Secretary-General's
New Year
message of
congratulations
to President
of
Turkmenistan
Gurbanguly
Berdimuhamedov.
The
text
of the message
was published
in today's
central
press...
* * *
UN
Is
Silent as
Egypt Bans
Press From
Protest of UN
in Cairo, Gaza
Freedom March
By
Matthew
Russell Lee
UNITED
NATIONS,
December 28 --
As protesters
massed in
front of the
UN in
Cairo,
Egyptian
authorities
blocked the
press from
covering the
protest or
speaking to
the
protesters.
At
noon
in New
York, Inner
City Press
asked the
Office of the
Spokesperson
for
Secretary
General Ban
Ki-moon, "does
the UN have
any comment on
Egyptian
authorities
barred the
press from
filming or
speaking with
people in
front of the
UN facilities
in Cairo
engaged in a
protest
regarding the
Gaza Freedom
March?"
Four
hours
later,
having heard
nothing back,
Inner City
Press went to
the
Spokesperson's
Office for an
answer to this
and other
questions. The
deputy
spokesperson
asked, which
UN building,
and indicated
that
there would be
no UN
response.
UN's
Ban and
Egypt's
Mubarak,
freedom of the
press to cover
protests at UN
not shown
Back
on
December
17, Inner City
Press asked an
organizer of
the Gaza
Freedom March
about Egyptian
policies, and
whether the UN
is going
enough. Video
here,
from Minute
28:30.
The response
was generally
that "the UN
should play a
stronger role"
(this included
in
Afghanistan,
another of
Inner City
Press'
questions).
Video here,
from Minute
40:50.
The
December
28 request for
comment, for
the record,
was not about
the
Gaza Freedom
March in
general -- the
UN has already
no commented
on
that -- but
about a host
government
interfering
with freedom
of the
press to cover
a protest in
front of the
UN. The
silence, then,
is
all the more
striking.
Watch this
site.
* * *
Unauthorized
Entry
into Ban's
Home and Party
Dodged by UN,
Disputing
Obama Analogy
By
Matthew
Russell Lee
UNITED
NATIONS,
December 24 --
At UN
Secretary
General Ban
Ki-moon's
official
residence on
December 22,
an individual
with no
invitation
and no UN pass
crashed Mr.
Ban's holiday
party,
multiple
sources tell
Inner City
Press.
They
describe
Mr.
Ban's personal
secretary Ms.
Kim stopping
the individual
and being
told --
falsely as it
turns out --
that the
individual
works for the
UN Department
of Political
Affairs but
for some
reason had no
pass or
identification,
and being let
in.
Ms.
Kim
asked,
"What
section?" and
was told,
"Elections" --
the
unit embroiled
in controversy
following its
role in the
flawed Afghan
election.
But
despite
reason
to believe the
person was not
even from the
UN, he passed
security
into Mr. Ban's
residence. The
individual
even received
a gift from
Mr. Ban,
before
proceeding to
enter without
authorization
other UN
premises.
On
December
23,
Inner City
Press
approached Mr.
Ban's new
spokesman
Martin Nesirky
on
his way to the
day's noon
briefing, and
asked about
the incident,
even
suggesting he
ask Ban's
secretary Ms.
Kim. Nesirky
returned to
his
office and put
in an inquiry.
Inner City
Press put the
question on
the record
during the
noon briefing
and was
promised an
answer.
Later
on
December
23, Nesirky
tersely
e-mailed Inner
City Press
that "there
was no
security
breach."
On
December
24,
Inner City
Press sought
and receive
additional
information,
including
the identity
of the person
-- also not
invited, but
having a UN
pass
-- who brought
the party
crasher, and
other
identifying
details.
After
that
day's
noon briefing,
Inner City
Press went to
Nesirky's
river view
office
and asked what
he had meant,
that there had
been no
security
breach.
Nesirky said
that the UN
doesn't
discuss
security
arrangements.
When
Inner
City
Press noted
that in
Washington in
the wake of
gate crashing
at
President
Obama's state
dinner with
India a whole
Congressional
hearing on the
topic of
security was
held, Nesirky
said the
situations
were not at
all analogous.
Why,
Inner
City
Press asked,
because Obama
is so much
higher profile
than Ban?
Nesirky said
that wasn't it
-- without
specifying
what he meant
--
and insisted
"there is no
story."
UN's
Ban, center,
and Nicolas
Cage, security
and
candor not
shown
Nesirky
chided
Inner
City Press for
pursuing the
issue, and
even said he
would only ask
Ban's office a
second time if
Inner City
Press returned
with not only
the first but
also the last
name of the
gate crasher.
This is
pointless,
since by two
witnesses'
account, Ban's
secretary did
not
even write
down the
person's name.
While
Mr.
Nesirky's
deputy
reportedly
made belated
telephone
calls Thursday
afternoon,
seemingly to
quiet possible
witnesses,
Inner City
Press
called Mr.
Ban's office
and asked to
speak with Ms.
Kim, on
deadline.
After the
first
transfer, a
female voice
began and then
hung up. When
Inner City
Press called
back, the
response was
that Ms. Kim
was no
longer
available.
Inner City
Press left a
cell phone
number stating
it was for a
story being
written that
day, on
deadline. The
deadline
has passed.
What
Inner
City
Press finds
troubling is
that the UN
would
reflexively
claim that
"there was no
security
breach," then
would refuse
to
confirm or
deny specific
facts about
unauthorized
entry into the
Secretary
General's
official
residence.
Relatedly, if
these are the
UN's answers
on an incident
at the
Secretary
General's
residence, how
are the
answers on
human rights,
peace and
security and
even
environmental
issues more
credible?
Whereas
governments
and
legislatures
make for at
least some
accountability,
often in the
UN there is no
accountability,
and it starts
at the top.
Watch this
site.
From
the
December
23,
2009
transcript
Spokesperson
Nesirky:
I think you
have another
question, I’m
pretty sure
you
do.
Inner
City
Press: Okay, I
do. No,
actually, then
I will if I
get your
drift. It’s… I
wanted to… I
guess, and
it’s something
that
maybe you’ll
have an answer
on later
today, but
some are
saying
that in
yesterday’s
reception at
the
Secretary-General’s
residence that
there was an
unauthorized
attendee, and
that the
personal
secretary to
the
Secretary-General,
you know, was
aware of
this and for
some reason it
was waived. I
wanted to know
both what
the procedures
are, given, in
light of the
event at the
White House
at the State
dinner for
India, what
are the
relevant
procedures at
the UN for
such things,
and is it in
fact the case
that an
unauthorized
attendee
attended, and
what will be
done about it?
Spokesperson:
Yes,
you mentioned
this as we
were passing
in the
corridor just
now. I
don’t have an
immediate
answer for you
on this
specific
incident. And
also, in more
general terms,
I would not
wish to go
into details
about security
arrangements.
That’s clearly
not
appropriate,
but I can just
assure you
that the
security
detail for
the
Secretary-General
is extremely
rigorous and
they work
extremely
hard for the
Secretary-General’s
safety. That’s
put in a
general
context, and
the more
specific
question
you’ve raised,
I’ll see
what I can
find out. It’s
not something
that I was
aware of.
[The
Spokesperson
later
confirmed that
there was no
security
breach at the
Secretary-General’s
residence.]
Subsequent
e-mail:
Subj:
your
question about
SG residence
last night
From:
unspokesperson-donotreply
[at] un.org
To:
matthew.lee
[at]
innercitypress.com
Sent:
12/23/2009
12:33:05 P.M.
Eastern
Standard Time
Further
to
the
Spokesman's
response at
the briefing
to the above,
there was
no security
breach at the
SG residence
last night.
A
question is,
what does the
UN mean by
"security
breach"? Watch
this site.
* * *
At
UN,
Dawn Budget
Deal Benefits
Bahrain, Has
Russia Bitter,
Politics of
Human Rights
By
Matthew
Russell Lee
UNITED
NATIONS,
December 24 --
A UN
budget
deal was
sealed at 4
a.m. on
Christmas Eve,
just as the
building
itself began
to be gutted.
While
two countries,
Bahrain and
Bahamas,
managed to get
their
assessment
decreased by a
side letter
from General
Assembly
President Ali
Treki,
Russia and its
allies lost a
vote about
rates of
exchange, and
only
begrudgingly
supported the
overall deal.
Israel
called
for a
vote on
support of the
Goldstone
report on
Gaza, and
found only a
couple of
African
countries and
North Korea to
support it.
The
campaign by
Syria and
others against
Terje Roed
Larsen's role
in
Lebanon never
came to
fruition.
India on the
other hand
gave a long
speech
denouncing the
upgrade of a
human rights
liaison post
in New
York to
Assistant
Secretary
General, but
did not call
for a vote.
Throughout
the
night,
when
Ambassador and
Treki met and
milled around
in the UN's
basement,
Inner City
Press quizzed
Permanent
Representatives
and
staffers and
got
increasingly
candid answers
as the night
went on.
"This place is
a joke," said
one South
Asian envoy.
"We
pay too much,"
said a Latin
American.
"Bahrain's
play was
shameful." The
live blog is
online here.
In
between
the
Budget
Committee vote
at 2 a.m. and
the large
session
upstairs to
confirm it
from 3 to 4,
dozens of
Ambassadors
toasted with
Scotch
whiskey and
the remains of
take-out
pizza, wishing
each other
happy
holidays. The
Delegates
Lounge, a
fixture, will
close on
Christmas
Eve for up to
two years.
During the
first part
there will be
no
construction
in the space:
it will simply
lie empty,
which the
General
Assembly next
door remains
open. "They're
just closing
it to close
it,"
several
delegates
complained.
Unlike
in
his
first year
when despite
pleading from
Secretary
General Ban
Ki-moon
the U.S. broke
consensus on
the budget,
Wednesday
night Mr. Ban
was
nowhere to be
seen.
UN's
Ali Treki in a
theater like
setting, story
still
developing
Ban's
Controller
stood
BlackBerrying
in the
basement.
Later his
Under
Secretary
General for
Management sat
on the
Budget
Committee
podium without
saying a word.
She left
before the GA
vote.
Inner
City
Press
asked about
India's
argument that
using the
budget process
to upgrade
particular
posts will
create a
precedent for
more sleaze. I
don't
opine on that,
she said. A
staffer from
the PGA's
office said
that
current holder
of the post,
American
Jessica
Neuwirth, will
not
benefit from
the upgrade.
"She was only
brought in for
eleven
months," he
said. So who
will get the
post, after
all this
hoopla?
The
evening
-- or
early morning
-- ended with
Myanmar
denouncing
criticism of
its human
rights record,
but vowing as
part of its
foreign policy
to continue
to cooperate
with the
Secretary
General's
"Good
Offices."
The occupant
of that post,
Ibrahim
Gambari, has
been
re-assigned to
Darfur, for
reasons as
much budgetary
as political.
At the UN it
is
hard to
disconnect the
two. Happy
holidays.
* * *
At
UN,
Final Night
Falls on
Budget, of
Scales,
Bahrain and
Human Rights,
Live Blogging
Budget from UN
By
Matthew
Russell Lee
UNITED
NATIONS,
December
23-24, updated
below
-- As the UN
budget process
moved into
what
should be its
final night,
Permanent
Representatives
milled around
basement
Conference
Room 8, amid
cigarette
smoke and
furniture set
to
be moved out
the next
morning.
Beyond
the
two
issues on
which Inner
City Press has
so far exclusively
reported
--
the requests
by Bahrain and
Bahamas to pay
less, and
India's
opposition
to upgrading a
human rights
post --
the issue was
when
and
how to review
the scales of
assessment.
The
130
developing
countries in
the Group of
77 demand no
review for the
next three
years. Western
countries and
other some
others, who
feel their ox
is
gored, are
pushing for
faster review.
Mexico's
delegation,
for example,
point out that
they pay "over
fifty
percent of
Latin
America," even
after
suffering
swine flu and
a
decrease in
tourism.
The
Group
of 77,
which fell
into some
disarray
during the
climate change
talks in
Copenhagen,
remains united
in the UN
Budget
committee.
They have
thrown their
weight behind
Bahrain and
the Bahamas,
who are
predicted
to prevail in
being dropped
in
peacekeeping
assessment
from Category
B to C, with a
7.5% discount.
Despite
India's
objections
that human
rights are
being
conflated with
supporting an
upgrade of a
post, it is
suggested to
Inner City
Press that
"India
will back
down."
President
of
the
General
Assembly Ali
Treki has
already met
with
Ambassadors,
then
retreated to
his second
floor office.
One of his
advisors
remains in
the basement,
glad handing
the chairman
and secretary
of the Budget
Committee.
There was talk
of Secretary
General Ban
Ki-moon, who
stayed
hidden
throughout the
first budget
vigil of his
Secretary
Generalship,
waiting in the
wings.
UN's
Ban and Treki
at another
meeting, this
year's
budget not yet
shown
For
the
U.S.
delegation,
beyond their
long time bow
tied
representative,
Alejandro
Wolff is in
the basement,
there's no
sign of Susan
Rice. Inner
City
Press asked
Ambassador
Rice earlier
on Wednesday
for the U.S.
view on
the budget, if
she is
satisfied with
her Mission's
level of
involvement,
and whether
like at least
her last two
predecessors
she
believes the
UN budget is
too piecemeal,
not
transparent
enough.
Ambassador
Rice
replied
that of course
she is
satisfied with
her Mission's
performance,
and that the
U.S. is very
involved in
making sure
Missions get
enough
resources. But
what about the
when to review
the
scales of
assessment?
More
fundamentally,
what about the
piecemeal
budget process
in which "add
ons" comprise
more than $1
billion? More
blogging to
follow: watch
this space.
Update of
7:27 p.m. --
the basement
is still full
of
Ambassadors,
but UN TV
keeps showing
live shots of
the empty
General
Assembly
chamber
upstairs, in
front of which
four Security
officers are
posted. In the
cafeteria, the
chairs and
tables are
being carted
away.
Some the
basement
furniture,
too, will be
on the move.
An African
Ambassador
stops to tell
Inner City
Press that
"the PGA would
be wise
to re-schedule
the plenary
for 10 a.m.
tomorrow."
Update
of
7:45 p.m. --
in the
Delegates
Lounge, Deputy
Permanent
Representatives
are lifting a
glass on the
last, or next
to last,
night of the
UN bar.
"They're at
the level of
Perm Reps down
there," one
tells Inner
City Press.
"Let them earn
their
money."
Update
of
8:10 p.m. --
even
countries'
Budget
Committee
experts are no
longer in the
loop. "My
Ambassador is
in there," one
tells
Inner City
Press,
gesturing at
the entrance
to Conference
Room 8.
"But I don't
know where
things stand."
In
the
interim,
Inner City
Press has dug
into who it
would be, who
would get the
upgrade to ASG
level from
D-2. It's
American
Jessica
Neuwirth, whom
Inner City
Press
questions on
camera in
April, vidoe here
from Minute
40:05. One UN
human rights
expert has
expressed
disgust at the
way
the
Secretariat
has tried to
upgrade the
post, a
promotion
through
the budget
process. Only
at the UN.
Update
of
8:26 p.m. --
an Inner City
Press source
emerging from
Conference
Room 8 says
they are
discussing the
scale of
assessments
for
peacekeeping,
with the U.S.,
Japan and EU
opposing the
G-77's push to
move Bahrain
and Bahamas
from
Classification
B to the
discounted C.
The
news: there is
a proposal to
abolish
Classification
C....
Update
of
9:21 p.m. --
the crowd
outside
Conference
Room 8 has
grown;
President of
the General
Assembly Ali
Treki has
descended
again, and
still to no
avail. Inner
City Press is
asked: why are
you the only
media here?
Later a camera
crew comes.
But they are
covering
neither
scale of
assessments
nor human
rights. They
are here, it
seems, by
mistake,
asking Treki
about the UN
tribunals for
Rwanda and
Yugoslavia.
Inner City
Press asks the
crew: did he
say anything
useful or
useable? No,
is the answer.
Will the
results in
Conference
Room 8 be any
better or more
authentic? Or
is this all
just theater?
Update
of
9:34 p.m. -- a
PGA staffer
tells Inner
City Press
that a deal is
near on
Bahrain and
Bahamas. He
calls it a
"transitional
arrangement"
from
Classification
B to C.
Classification
C, he
says, was set
up as a
compromise in
2000 under
then U.S.
Ambassador
Holbrooke, as
a way to "shut
up" Kuwait,
the Emirates
and
Singapore, so
Holbrooke
could bring
about some
other
reduction.
Another
diplomat
marvels at how
little the
U.S. Mission
says now.
"When Rice is
not in New
York, you
don't hear
anything," he
says. "The
others used to
be allowed to
talk. Now they
are not."
Ambassadors
strain in the
doorway of
Conference
Room 8. It is
untransparent,
but something
is afoot.
Update
of
9:42 p.m. --
in the corner
by Conference
Room 4, U.S.
deputy
Alejandro
Wolff speaks
with G-77
members.
Afterwards,
Inner City
Press is told
by G-77 that
Bahrain and
Bahamas will
be put into
Classification
C, with its
7.5% discount,
for three
years. What
about
the human
rights liaison
upgrade to
ASG? G-77's
chair in New
York
scoffs. Why
do we need
another
useless ASG?
We will vote
with India!
We'll see.
Update
of
9:47 p.m. -- a
crowd comes
out of
Conference
Room 8, with
shouts
of "Conference
Room 4! We'll
go to
Conference
Room 4!" It
is the Group
of 77, almost
77 of them
now, going to
plan strategy.
"It's
percolating,"
a G-77 member
in
Classifaction
C tells
Inner City
Press. "Like
the coffee."
Update
of
9:54 p.m. --
while the G-77
and EU
consult, Inner
City Press has
received the
following
predictions
from perhaps
the best
placed
source: India
will NOT call
for a vote on
the human
rights liaison
upgrade to
ASG, even
though "Navi
Pillay has not
made the case
for the
upgrade." The
argument has
become that
there are six
or
seven
"development"
USGs in New
York, and none
for human
rights.
Second
prediction:
Israel
WILL call for
a vote
opposing the
Goldstone
report follow
up.
But a Middle
Eastern source
says Israel
does not have
support from
the usual
places for
this.
Nonetheless, a
vote is
predicted.
Syria,
too,
is
predicted to
back down on
calling for a
vote on Roed
Larsen's
mandate. This
is perhaps
wishful
thinking by
the source. He
is
correct,
however, in
diagnosing
that
unresolved
political
issues rear
their head in
the budget's
eleventh hour.
Update
of
10:27 p.m. --
Finally, there
are numbers.
How much would
the
Permanent Five
members of the
Security
Council have
to pay, if
Bahrain and
Bahamas are
allowed to
shift down
from
Classification
B
to C?
$300,000, is
the answer
from one of
the P-5. 50%
or so to the
U.S., 15% each
to France and
the UK, the
rest Russia
and China.
"But
it's
the
principle of
the thing!"
the P-5, as
well as Japan
and others,
say. But
principle left
the station in
2000, which
the artibrary
Classification
C was set up
to solve some
other
political
problem.
UN
Controller
Jun
Yamasaki is
now down in
the basement.
Inner City
Press asks him
"what
for." He
agrees that
"the scales"
are up to the
member
states. But so
it is the ASG
upgrade? The
Goldstone
report follow
up?
Inner
City
Press
asks Israel's
representative:
will you call
for a vote?
They say you
are
threatening to
do so. He
replied, "It
is not a
threat. And
it is more
than a follow
up." And so
that train,
too, has left
the station.
Update
of
10:35 p.m. --
in this micro
issue, of
$150,000, stop
the presses.
Inner City
Press asks the
P in the P-5,
"if Bahrain
and Bahamas
are reduced,
does it cost
you $100,000
or $150,000?"
The answer
is, "It's not
sure that
Bahrain and
Bahama will be
reduced."
Could be a
long night.
Update
of
11:10 p.m. --
the word is,
Bahrain and
Bahamas will
get moved to
Classification
C, but not in
the
resolution.
Rather, they
will get a
letter of
guarantee from
the President
of the General
Assembly. On
the overall
scale of
assessments,
Russia has
made a new
proposal. But
G-77 is not
backing them
up: every
country for
themselves,
it's up to
you. Everyone
is eating
pizza and
waiting for
another
paragraph to
be
written.
Update
of
11:17 p.m. --
Russia, it's
said, has some
supporters,
including
Mexico and
Kazakhstan.
But not enough
supporters...
Update
of
11:38 p.m. --
amid talk of
an "agreed
scenario,"
Ambassadors
huddle in
front of
Conference
Room 7: Sudan
and
Singapore, the
U.S. and UK.
This is how
deals are cut
at the UN.
Update
of 11:59
p.m. -- from
within
Conference
Room 8, some
clapping. A
delegate
emerges and
tells Inner
City Press,
"It's done. In
45 minute,
committee
vote in
Conference
Room 3."
(After that,
there'll be a
wait for
translation
before the
full General
Assembly.)
But even as
typing this
up, Inner City
Press asks
Kazakhstan's
Ambassador:
are you
happy with how
the Russian
proposal has
been
addressed? No,
is the
answer. We
will be
putting it to
a vote. We are
not happy.
She is
eating La
Vache Qui Rie
cheese on
Breton
crackers. The
room is full
of smoke.
Update
of
12:10 a.m. --
Mexico
clarifies that
it previously
supported
Russia's one
year proposal,
but fell away
when Russia
changed it
into
a proposal
about market
exchange
rates. Now,
alongside
Kazakhstan and
some others,
Ukraine
(Mexico says)
is supporting
Russia's
position.
Hmm.
Ali
Treki
flashes
Inner City
Press a thumbs
up, it's done.
There will be
at least two
votes called
for. And there
is more to be
said, not only
about the
budget. But
budget first,
in this space,
when the Fifth
Committee
votes.
Update
of
12:45 a.m. --
Delegates
stand in line
in Conference
Room 3,
waiting to get
their copies
to vote on. A
European
representative,
saying "good
night" to
Inner City
Press,
explains that
her
mission works
the budget in
three shifts.
The skeleton
crew is coming
in for the
vote.
Inner
City
Press
asked the
Committee
chairman,
Peter Maurer
of
Switzerland,
how many
countries he
thinks will
vote along
with Russia. I
don't know, he
says. You will
see.
Update
of
1:09 a.m. --
finally, the
two scales of
assessment
resolutions
are
distributed.
The
peacekeeping
scale says, in
paragraph 16,
that the
GA "recognizes
the concerns
raised by
Member States,
including
Bahrain and
Bahamas,
regarding the
structure of
the levels."
Both have been
assured they
will get a
side letter
from the
President
of the General
Assembly.
Inner City
Press asked at
the document
window, but
where's the
Russian
amendment? The
response:
that's a
different
story. Still
the curtain
that covers
the voting
board has
not been drawn
back. But
Maurer has
gaveled the
meeting to
order.
Update
of
1:13 a.m. --
the first
items called
by Maurer are
the
international
criminal
tribunals for
Rwanda and the
former
Yugoslavia.
Jun Yamasaki
speaks on
changes in
rates of
exchange.
Update
of
1:22 a.m. --
Maurer asks
again and
again, are
there any
comments?
Are there any
objections? I
see none, it
is so decided.
Does any
delegation
wish to make a
statement
after the
adoption of
the draft
resolution?
Eritrea's seat
is empty. We
will be
writing about
their
speech outside
the Security
Council (much)
earlier
today.
And now
India is
taking the
floor.
Update
of
1:24 a.m. --
India says it
proposed to
maintain the
liaison at D-2
level. I would
like to keep
this on
record. "I
find it
difficult
to accept..
Human rights
and Human
Resources
management
tool... This
needs to be
understood...
We are moving
this
amendment...
this is not
about
nurturing
human
rights... this
is
budgetary....
without
prejudice to
our positions
on several
aspects to
human
rights...
Human rights
is one for the
GA... I need
to remain most
delegates
here... a job,
an assignment,
a protocol job
in the real
sense of the
term... why is
there a need
to upgrade...
cannot attend
meetings...
surely, simple
expeditious
answers, tell
the USG to
give all area
access pass...
Update
of
1:28 a.m. --
"India's
commitment to
multilateralism...
we
have been
participating....
fully aware
it's 1:30
a.m., one and
a
half hour
beyond when we
should have
completed our
work...
without
wishing to
make matter
divisive... I
wish to inform
you, we would
not
wish to press
for the
amendment we
had mentioned
earlier in the
day
today..."
And
so it is
adopted,
without
amendment.
There is
applause.
Update
of
1:36 a.m. --
now Israel is
calling
for a vote on
the
Goldstone
report.
A/64/7/L.3 of
ACABQ about
the Goldstone
report. "As a
matter of
principle...
we cannot
support...
established
with
predetermined
conditions."
In
favor
136, against
2, abstain 3.
Guatemala says
it made a
mistake,
wants to be
green.
The
U.S.
has voted in
favor of part
5... The U.S.
supports
creation of
expert on
Sudan, DPRK
and Myanmar...
Somalia... We
will not
reiterate
our views, it
does not
change our
view of the
report.
Update
of
1:45 a.m. -
now Russia is
speaking,
"despite all
efforts...
we have not
been able to
achieve a
consensus on
scale of
assessments
for the
regular
budget... this
draft does not
take into
account the
views of
Russia,
Belarus,
Kazakhstan,
Ukraine and
others...
fluxuations in
currency
rates,
over-estimates...
Russian
federation
is submitted
its own
amendment to
paragraph 6...
Update
of
1:49 a.m. --
this table is
the same as
Russia
distributed in
Room
5 on December
1.... Now
Kazakhstan is
taking the
floor,
excusing
Maurer for
calling her
"sir," "it's 2
a.m.," she
says. The mic
is not
working.
"Sabotage,"
Maurer jokes.
She begins in
Russian.
Update
of
1:52 a.m. --
she says Iraq
is given
special
treatment,
"that
is
understandable,"
why would poor
Kazakhstan as
a developing
country have
to pay this...
I propose that
the proposal
of the
Russian
federation, we
put it to a
vote today...
We support it,
the
amendment to
item 136..."
Update
of
1:55 a.m. --
Japan says the
agreement is
for scales to
remain the
same for three
years, with
review
"urgently."
Japan urges
opposition to
the Russian
amendment.
Update
of
1:59 a.m. --
Ukraine, which
Maurer called
"The Ukraine,"
says it
supports
Russia's
amendment not
because it
benefits
Ukraine,
but because
it's right.
Now Sweden, on
behalf of the
EU: "against
the
proposed
amendment by
the Russian
federation."
Update
of
2:04 a.m. --
Russia loses,
22-85-27.
Russia's
supporters
include
Nicaragua and
Venezuela,
Laos and
Mongolia ,
Serbia, Qatar,
Myanmar
and so forth.
Afterwards
Russia notes
that this is
not a
consensus
resolution.
Belarus
trashes the
Committee on
Contributions
as biased.
Update
of
2:07 a.m. --
looking back
at the
Goldstone
vote, now that
the voting
sheet has been
released, when
you take
away
Guatemala's
erroneous
vote, Israel
has only three
abstainers in
support, and
these are
surprising:
Cote d'Ivoire,
Cameroon and
Benin.
Say what?
Update
of
2:09 a.m. --
on scale,
Maurer reads
out it is the
understanding
of
the Committee
that Bahamas
and Bahrain
will be
treated as
Category C.
And there are
no comments --
except
Bahamas, which
wants to thank
its
supporters.
Update
of
2:13 a.m. --
Sweden says
the EU
accepted the
Chairman's
proposal
on the
peacekeeeping
scales -- that
is, the letter
from the PGA
to
Bahrain and
Bahamas.
Update
of
2:15 a.m. --
Maurer says
it's over,
come to the
GA. He thanks
the
bureau. "it's
not the moment
to get
philosophic...
to GA and then
sleep
before
daylight
starts."
Update
of
2:17 a.m. -
Mosves
congratulates
Paul, 17 years
serving the
5th
committee,
there is
applause. 35
minutes gap
before the GA.
Update
of
2:41 a.m. --
in the
Delegates
Lounge, there
are drinks and
congratulations.
Mosves says he
is the only
Committee
secretary
allowed
in to the most
sensitive
negotiations,
because he has
no position,
only
wants to help
them get where
they want to
go. Other
committees are
not
binding, he
said. In the
5th it must be
by consensus.
He tells a PGA
staffer, see I
brought it in
earlier than
last year,
when it was
8:01
a.m..
The staffer
later scoffs.
USG Angela
Kane has
headed off,
no need to
wait for the
GA. Will
Russia raises
its issue
again in the
GA? Inner City
Press is told
no. Israel
will,
yes. With only
three
abstainers?
Update
of
3:12 a.m. --
Ali Treki
gravels the
meeting to
order. In the
TV
booth, there
are no
headsets for
translation.
It sounds like
he is
singing.
Update
of
3:17 a.m. --
underneath TV
booth 14 there
are many empty
seats in
the GA.
Comoros, DRC,
Lesotho,
Paraguay...
Not voting in
the Budget
committee
earlier
tonight (or
this morning)
were, among
others,
Belize,
Botswana,
Burundi, Cape
Verde, Central
African
Republic and
Chad. The
Comoros, El
Salvador,
Equatorial
Guinea and
Eritrea....
and
on from there.
Update
of
3:34 a.m. --
after the
resolution
criticizing
Myanmar's
human
rights record
passes
86-23-39
(Norway asked
that it's vote
be changed
to yes), the
Solomon
Islands speaks
up to say that
due to
pressure it
is changing
its position
from that in
the 3d
Committee.
Another
change: on
Israel's vote,
the DPRK
(North Korea)
abstains, in
seeming
support of
Israel -- or
simply against
any human
rights mandate
anywhere.
Update
of
4:07 a.m. --
the Kazakhstan
Ambassador
brings it to a
close, be
well, be
happy, be
lucky!
The
voting screen
depicts a
green and
orange
Christmas
tree.
Update
of
4:14 a.m. --
the Japanese
delegates are
still at their
GA table,
talking on
their cell
phones.