At UN
Environment
Solheim Blames
His Travel
Abuse On His
Staff In Email
Leaked to
Banned Inner
City Press
By Matthew
Russell Lee, Exclusive, CJR
PFT
UNITED NATIONS
GATE, September 18 – Even on
the environment, the UN's last
refuge as it fails under
Antonio Guterres on conflict
prevention and
anti-corruption, the UN is in
decay. This article is the
fourth in Inner City Press'
exclusive series on corruption
in UN Environment, the
re-branded UNEP, under Erik
Solheim of Norway. After
publishing three, Guterres had
Inner City Press roughed up on
June
22 and July
3, 2018 and banned
since. It is pure censorship.
But still our reporting, and
that of our sources outraged
at what Guterres is doing and
others scrutinizing the UN if
only their home country
officials, see
below, continues. On September
17, Inner City Press
exclusively published the
first in a series on travel
waste in UNDP, starting with
the bribery-used Office of
South South Cooperation, here.
This while Guterres' spokesman
Stephane Dujarric refuses to
answer questions about the
public costs of travel, of
Guterres or Solheim,
preferring to dissemble about
why and on what basis Guterres
and Alison Smale have banned
Inner City Press. On August 27
Dujarric said it was for
creating a "hostile
environment for diplomats."
Vine video here.
On September 17 he said, to
the contrary, it was all
Guterres' Secretariat and
there were not "any inputs
from any member states." Video
here.
Which is it? This
is today's UN pattern of
decision, replicated from
Guterres' 38th floor to UNEP,
see Solheim's September 17
internal mem, below. First,
from the UN Office of Internal
Oversight Services draft audit
of Solheim: "Some of the trips
to Oslo and Paris were called
'bilateral meetings,' even
though they took place during
weekends or the Christmas
holidays... On one occasion he
made an eight hour flight from
Washington DC for a weekend in
Paris, before he boarded
another flight for New York."
This is what Guterres has been
doing -- 15 times -- including
this coming weekend in Lisbon.
And Guterres spokesmen refuse
to answer Inner City Press
repeated questions about the
costs, choosing instead to
work for Inner City Press'
roughing up and banning from
the UN, then to intimidate
remaining correspondents who
attempt to ask about it. But
who will audit Guterres? Inner
City Press has provided
extensive information to OIOS
whose Ben Swanson has to his
credit confirmed receipt. Now
what? The draft OIOS audit of
Solheim continues: "The UNEP
and UN’s Nairobi office should
reclaim from these employees
(1) all travel expenses and
the related working hours
which have not been accounted
for; and (2) all additional
costs incurred by the UNEP as
a consequence of uneconomic
and inefficient decisions by
the management." So who will
Guterres be returning money
to? And who will hold him
accountable for the
retaliatory roughing up of the
only journalist who asked
about his use of funds to
travel to Lisbon, and dared to
document by Periscope
broadcast on Sutton Place the
many times Guterres has been
out of New York without
disclosure? The use of UN
Security to threat Inner City
Press against filming on a New
York City sidewalk - across
the street from Guterres'
publicly funded mansion - and
subsequent 3 July 2018 assault
outside the UN Budget
Committee meeting including
tearing of shirt, damaging of
laptop computer and twisting
of arm? Aftenpost runs
this quote too: The two other
senior staffers were allegedly
given permission by Erik
Solheim to work out of Paris,
in spite of being formally
assigned to Nairobi. One of
them allegedly received more
than 165 000 NOK (20 000
dollars) in a special security
allowance for Nairobi, in
spite of being relocated to
Paris. Permitting these
leaders to work in Paris is a
direct violation of UN’s
regulations, according to the
draft report. 'Such
arrangements will set the
presedent [sic] for other
employees who wish to work out
of a place of their own
choice, and probably lead to
speculations about unfair
treatment or claims when such
request are being
rejected.'" Inner City
Press' September 13 question
to Guterres' spokesmen has
gone entirely unanswered,
despite the written promises
of Alison Smale. But here's
from Erik Solheim, leaked
nearly immediately to Inner
City Press: "From: Erik
Solheim
Date: 17 September 2018 at
16:42:10 CEST
To: unon.org
Subject: Update: ongoing audit
of UN Environment’s travel
Dear Colleagues,
I hope this email finds you
well. As many of you are
aware, in recent days, several
media
articles have referred to
preliminary findings of an
ongoing audit of
mission-related travel within
UN Environment.
I am writing to personally
address these reports and
update you all on the current
standing of this audit.
First, I welcome a transparent
and fact-seeking audit of any
part of our activities. When
this audit by the United
Nations Office of Internal
Oversight Services has come to
term, I am certain the
findings will help us in our
endeavor to continuously
improve our work.
If the audit shows that we
have made any mistakes, we are
committed to take immediate
action and rectify every one
of them, with no exception. We
will admit to any mistakes
that may have occurred. Where
administrative shortcomings
have been clearly identified,
we are already starting to
take steps to improve
processes and procedural
controls, particularly as it
relates to travel costs.
On this point allow me to
state it clearly and to avoid
confusion. The Office of
Internal Oversight Services
earlier this year investigated
all my travels in great detail
and found three instances of
oversight out of all of them.
The money was refunded
immediately. Better
administrative control systems
would have helped avoid these
mistakes in the first place.
I believe this audit – which
is not an investigation but an
audit of UN Environment travel
processes - will provide us
with an opportunity to revise
and improve our systems. Rest
assured that this will be done
in a transparent and efficient
manner.
In my two years, as Executive
Director of UN Environment, I
have been proud to lead teams
of dedicated professionals
working on the most urgent
environmental challenges of
our time. This requires global
commitment to unprecedented
action, driven by new levels
of personal action and
political will. During my
tenure, I have worked
tirelessly to deliver such
action and mobilize that will
for the success of our work
together.
Making good on this type of
global agenda demands
engagement with the world and
indeed an expanded approach to
our work. I am therefore
determined to continue to
focus on our mandate – to
create real results for real
people with real impact on the
ground. These necessary
results can only be obtained
in close dialogue with Member
States, businesses and civil
society. This is in line with
the Secretary-General’s vision
for a more impactful United
Nations in the 21th century.
At the same time, I want to
reassure you that all travel
decisions are made with a
focus on maximizing the
effectiveness of this
organization and meeting the
urgent environmental
challenges we are facing
together, everywhere. If in
pursuit of that goal,
administrative rules are found
to have been overlooked, I
accept personal responsibility
and offer my strong commitment
to immediately refine this
process going forward.
The leaked preliminary
findings, on which these media
reports are based, were draft
notes as a starting point for
consultations between the
Office of Internal Oversight
Services and UN Environment.
As such it may, by its very
nature, contain
misunderstandings or
inaccuracies. As a part of
this process, we have provided
extensive follow-up
information to the Office of
Internal Oversight Services. I
ask that you keep in mind that
many of the findings are in
the process of
validation. We are now
awaiting a first draft of the
report for our comments prior
to the report being finalized.
Once the Office of Internal
Oversight Services completes
its final report, it will be
public on its website, as is
standard practice. We will
then work diligently to
implement the auditor’s
recommendations.
I look forward to discussing
this with you tomorrow at the
Townhall.\
Warm wishes,
Erik Solheim
Head of UN Environment
UN Environment." So Solheim
blames his administrative
staff, while imposing on UNEP
staff more bureaucratic
restrictions than UN rules
require. As with Guterres -
and others at the top of the
UN, more on UNDP coming - it's
a case of "Do as I say, not as
I do." Here's just one of
Inner City Press' questions to
Guterres spokesmen, entirely
unanswered after five days:
"September 13-2: Regarding the
UN system's rules for use of
UN funds for personal travel,
and in light of the OIOS
criticism of Erik Solheim at
UNEP (below), what is the SG's
comment and action, will be
ensure that the OIOS audit be
released to the public in its
entirety and that his own
travel be subject to an
independent audit? See, “"Some
of the trips to Oslo and Paris
were called 'bilateral
meetings,' even though they
took place during weekends or
the Christmas holidays... On
one occasion he made an eight
hour flight from Washington DC
for a weekend in Paris, before
he boarded another flight for
New York." Has the SG done
anything similar since Jan 1,
2017?
"The UNEP and UN’s Nairobi
office should reclaim from
these employees (1) all travel
expenses and the related
working hours which have not
been accounted for; and (2)
all additional costs incurred
by the UNEP as a consequence
of uneconomic and inefficient
decisions by the management."
Should the money be returned,
does the SG think?
Finally, confirm that the two
others at UNEP subject to OIOS
criticism are Anne Lemore and
Lisa Svensson, or state why
you will not do so, given the
allegations of waste of public
funds, and when you would
release the names." We'll have
more on this. Guterres' USG
Alison Smale twice promised
that questions will be
answered, but like so much
else she has said and written,
this is false. To continue
reporting we ask questions at
the UN Delegates Entrance, or
seemingly in the "High Level"
Week on Second Avenue and 46th
Street - and Smale says this
creates a "hostile environment
for diplomats." These people
are censors and it must all be
reversed. They are further
killing the UN, and have
assaulted press freedom. We
will have more on all this.
As Inner City
Press reported in March 2018
before being roughed up and
now banned from the UN for
UNGA73 and beyond, UN
Environment, the re-branded
UNEP, is paying over EUR
500,000 in a (reverse)
corporate partnership with
Volvo Ocean Races, see below.
Guterres' deputy Amina J.
Mohammed has refused Press
questions since November on
her role in signing 4000
certificates to export from
Nigeria and Cameroon
endangered rosewood already in
China. Guterres, Mohammed and
Alison Smale's only response
has been to censor
and continue to restrict
the Press which asks, despite
5000 signature petition,
UNanswered. Now whistleblowers
in UNEP have written to
Guterres, and exclusively sent
a copy and documents to Inner
City Press on UNEP mis
management, harassment and
misuse of government
resources. Who authorized UNEP
to spend EUR 500,000 in a
mis-named corporate
partnership with Volvo Ocean
Races? Before today publishing
the documents, Innr City Press
on March 1 asked Guterres'
spokesman Stephane Dujarric
about it, video
here,
UN
transcript here:
and below. Dujarric did not
explain, then or for the rest
of the day; he said he hadn't
spoken with Guterres about it.
Oh. Inner City Press is today
publishing in full, on Scribd
and Patreon,
the agreement with Volvo Ocean
Races signed by Erik Solheim,
here,
and the EUR 500,000 agreement
signed by UNEP's Lisa Emilia
Svensson, here
and
here. This UN agency is
paying for "public appearances
by Dee Caffari and the crew"
-- Ms. Caffari is a British
sailor -- and for "hospitality
activities." It's a new low.
From the March 1 UN
transcript: Inner City Press:
I also wanted to ask you about
UNEP (United Nations
Environment
Programme).
Whistleblowers there have
alleged a number of
irregularities, but the one
that caught my eye and I've
published has to do with the
allegation is that UNEP, which
claims under Mr. [Erik]
Solheim to have a number of
corporate partnerships is, in
fact, in some cases paying the
corporation for the
partnership. I.e., it's
not a partnership like, you
know, Barcelona Football Club
with UNICEF, where they
pay. In this case,
they're alleged that, under
Mr. Solheim, the UN
Environment, as it's now
called, is paying $500,000 to
Volvo Ocean Races. And I
wanted to know is it… one, I
don't know if it's true, but
they work there and they have
a lot of names and a lot of
information. Spokesman:
I think you can ask those
questions directly of
UNEP. I have no doubt
that Mr. Solheim is operating
and running the agency in
accordance to all relevant
rules and regulations. Inner
City Press: Did the
Secretary-General receive this
e-mail? Because it was
sent out as a cri de coeur
of the people who work there,
saying… Spokesman: I
have not spoken to him about
it." Why not? Here's from what
Solheim as written: "Dear
colleagues, You may have
received or heard about an
anonymous email sent to me
this week and copied to many.
It consists of slander, rumors
and false allegations. Worse,
the message contains unfounded
attacks on many good
colleagues working hard for UN
Environment. This is
unacceptable. We must strive
for openness." So here's from
the letter: "Dear Mr. Solheim,
It is almost 1.5 years since
you became the Executive
Director of UNEP.
While our wish would have been
to address the issues below
with you in person, this
message is being sent to you
anonymously for our
protection, and given threats,
harassment and actions being
taken against staff who have
tried to speak out,
particularly as pertains to
financial and human resource
anomalies. i) Executive Office
– Waste of government
resources: We constantly
receive feedback on the
limited financial resources in
the organisation. Since
you came on board, you have
established numerous positions
in the Executive Office,
leading to an estimated 25
positions with about 14
professionals, while all
previous Executive Directors
worked effectively with only
about 7 professionals...The
additional cost of these
positions is over USD 1.1
million in a year. These
funds could well be used to
implement activities that meet
our obligations and those of
our Member States. You
have gone ahead to establish a
temporary P5 Deputy Chief of
Staff, in addition to having a
Chief of Staff D1 and a P3
Special Assistant to the Chief
of Staff. The new
position will cost another USD
206,000. This adds up to
USD 1.3 million wasted
resources. How inefficient can
an Executive Office be to
warrant so many staff and
special support to one person,
when there are no sufficient
resources to support
activities in the substantive
Divisions! You have
inappropriately announced to
the Member States that you
will be advertising the
positions of the D2 Director,
Ecosystem Division and
Director, New York Office
without even discussing this
with Mette Wilkie and Elliot
Harris, the incumbents of the
posts respectively. The
organisation is being led by
your personal preferences and
those of, the Chief of Staff,
Anne LeMore who you brought
into the organisation -and
Sami Dimassi, Officer
in-Charge of Corporate
Services, whom you appointed
against the decision of OHRM,
given the un-merited
selection. You appointed a P5,
Gary from another agency to
come and lead the Policy
Division, while you have an
already capable D1, Sheila
Aggarwal-Khan. This is
another example of a wasted
USD 205,600.
You are hardly available to
provide leadership to the
organisation as you are
constantly traveling together
with your special assistants
most specifically Hao
Chen. Millions of
resources have been lost in
your business class travels,
some of which are not
necessary. ii) Corporate
Services Division, illegal
actions, personal gain &
conflict of interest: You have
still maintained Sami Dimassi
as officer in charge of
Corporate Services Division,
despite the temporary
selection being rejected by
OHRM. We wonder why Sami has
been mandated to be making key
management decisions yet he
has not gone through a proper
recruitment process as officer
In-charge of that Division and
has no qualifications and
experience to match the job
profile. His main activities
are scuttling other people’s
careers and family lives. It
is unimaginable that United
Nations can allow a staff
member in the calibre of a
Director to continue in the
system and continue
threatening other staff
members including senior staff
while quoting your name. The
Secretary General in his
previous address to staff has
stated that he will not
entertain any form of
harassment in the Organization
yet Sami continues to do this
in all his dealing with staff
from certain quarters. The
following are a few examples
of the mandate you have
granted to your appointee
against the decision of the
United Nations Secretary
General. Sami who is a
Lebanese national, with
Canadian citizenship in the
system, has appointed Fadi
Abou-Elias, another Lebanese
to lead the budget activities,
separating these from finance
and the able leadership of
Moses Tefula who is an expert
with a doctorate in the field
and with extensive experience.
It is obvious to any expert in
accounting and finance, the
separation has been done to
benefit specific individuals.
Also, other UN agencies have
consolidated these functions.
Sami subsequently created a P3
position in the budget unit
and appointed yet another
Lebanese national, Joseph K.
against the programme support
budget (PSC). These
funds are supposed to provide
programme support to the MEAs
and Divisions that bring in
the resources, in addition to
corporate administrative
support. In addition,
Sami and Fadi managed to
enforce the selection of
Fadi’s wife Nada Matta as P3
Fund Management Officer in the
Science Division (where Sami
worked previously) after being
placed on temporary post to
enable a quick
appointment. All
budgetary matters of the
Division are well sorted by
her husband Fadi, bringing a
conflict of interest, since he
is the same one managing the
organisation’s overall budget,
against the UN financial rules
and regulations. Much of her
work is managed by her husband
which is obvious in her change
in decisions and guidance
provided to the Division, once
she receives her husband’s
input to questions she may
have answered without much
knowledge. Recently, you
appointed Emanuele Corino, P4
to lead all human resources
and administration
issues. Emanuele is no
expert in HR and has very
limited knowledge in the
field. He is an IT-expert
Sir. You have taken this
responsibility from a capable
P5, Mariama, with decades of
expertise in the field.
Emanuele came on board as a
consultant through UNOPS, who
was then appointed as a UNOPS
staff and despite Secretariat
questions of his illegal
appointment to UNEP he
continued to lead procurement
activities. He is being
supported by an excellent P4
who is an expert in HR and
would better lead this docket
if not the P5 Mariama.
In addition, the cost of
paying Mariama,USD 205,600goes
to waste as all her work has
been handed over to an
incapable Emanuele, and staff
under her supervision deployed
to other Divisions. Emanuele
is propagating the use of
UNOPS in hiring of HR services
and procurement services.
Consultants and staff,
including in your office Sir,
have been hired through UNOPS
to circumvent the UN rules and
regulations and he endorses
it, being a beneficiary of
such illegal processes. It
also leads to misuse of
resources provided by member
states as UNOPS charges for
these services that are
provided for free by UNON. He
is doing all this in
collaboration with two senior
HR officers in UNON and a
senior Finance officer in
UNON-DAS who has been promised
to take over a position in
UNEP. We request for a full
investigation into this matter
and the illegal conduct of the
staff including misuse of his
position. All the above
positions have been granted to
men, while you continue to
preach gender (and in respect
to the gender parity strategy)
but unfortunately you are not
leading by practice.
Sir, it is now public
knowledge that the Chief of
Finance in your organization,
Moses Tefula has filed a case
in the United Nations Dispute
Tribunal for suspension of
illegal action to move him,
and to suddenly and
unilaterally reclassify his
position to a post downwards
and transfer him to a position
not commensurate with his
grade. More details are
publicly available in the UNDT
website on UNDP/NBI/017/124.
Sami and his support group is
the architect behind this
illegal action so that he can
hand-over the powerful docket
of Senior Finance Officer to
his friends as is already
happening. Sir, we remind you
that the Member States have
entrusted UNEP with close to a
billion US dollars of annual
contributions and it is
un-imaginable that management
of such resources can be
delegated to friendship
circles. While management may
not like some staff members
especially those from the
black race to hold such key
positions, we cannot allow the
contributions of member states
which come from the taxes of
their nationalities to be
jeopardized. iii) Harassment
and illegal actions to get rid
of colleagues who do not meet
your, Sami Dimassi and Anne Le
More’s liking. Efforts have
been made to cause instability
in the Divisions with missions
purported to review the
Division. This has
created fear among staff,
uncertainty and worry on who
will be gotten rid of, or who
will be moved to an
extra-budgetary post (XB) or
contract non-renewal, in order
to be sent home. In this
case XB is assumed to be any
funds that are not from the
regular budget or from the
Environment Fund. This
was done in the Regional
Office for Africa, the
Communication Division, Geneva
office and other offices where
missions are being undertaken
to threaten staff. A brutal
example is the move of a P3
Regional Information Expert
from Bahrain, along with four
others because Sami did not
like her, despite her previous
performance appraisals meeting
and in some instances
exceeding expectations.
She has a young family of two
children whom she has had to
leave in Bahrain under threat
that she either takes up the
move to Nairobi or leaves the
organisation. She was
moved from a regular budget
(RB) post, to temporary
Environment Fund (Fund
Reserve) for one year and is
to then be moved to an
extra-budgetary (XB) post that
has no resources, in the
expectation that if no funds
are forthcoming or if she is
not able to mobilise funds,
she will be out on the
streets. This is after
service to the organisation
for 10 years. This is brut ant
misuse of authority by Sami.
It is against the
“Family-friendly policies” of
the UN system wide policy on
gender parity which requires
decision on staff mobility to
be communicated at least six
months prior to the moves and
moves scheduled six months
following the completion of
the school year or accommodate
the family needs otherwise as
appropriate. The poor staff
member is under distress,
separated from her family who
are in a foreign duty station
and has to incur personal
trips to see her young ones.
In contrast, you, Sir, have
approved that your friend, a
D1, Lisa Svensson can work
from Europe, because for
personal reasons she does not
wish to work in Nairobi.
Her big office in Nairobi
remains vacant with her name
and organisational equipment
while the same has to be
provided again by another
office in Europe. She
leads the marine team remotely
as the rest of the staff under
her responsibility are in
Nairobi. Sir, how inhuman can
you and Sami be, to summon one
staff member, who is from a
developing country against her
wish, separating her from her
young family, but provide a
golden platter for another who
is from a developed country...
When you came on board in
2016, you immediately began
with changing the
organisation’s name, claiming
not to understand acronyms,
which have been used since the
establishment of the
organisation over four decades
ago. The whole world
knows UNEP, UNDP, UNICEF
etc. Are you purporting
that these should have been UN
development, UN children… so
that one day you Sir, can
understand what they do, and
that the work of the
organisation has not been
understood since 1972 due to
its use of the acronym UNEP?
Despite numerous interventions
during the meetings of the
Committee of Permanent
Representatives (CPRs)
questioning the legitimacy of
this change from UNEP to UN
Environment, you have given a
deaf ear. Most are the
times that you open the
session and then take off,
leaving your Deputy Executive
Director Ibrahim Thiaw to find
excuses for you... You forget
that the rules are not set by
the organisation, but through
it by the Member States of the
UN... You talk of reform and
efficiency. With all the
above, and many more examples
that would result in a very
lengthy document,you have
failed the organisation, you
have failed us. Your actions
are provoking staff to boycott
the next Town Hall meeting in
respect of all colleagues
affected by your actions and
those of your circle of
friends that are running the
organisation to peril. Our
plea is to call for an
immediate audit of the
organisation, intervention and
investigation." We'll have
more on this. A Climate Risk
event was held at the UN on
January 31, complete with a
delayed press conference with
four speakers. Inner City
Press asked them about the
role of the UN, not just as a
venue but as an actor, with a
Deputy Secretary General Amina
J. Mohammed who in 2017 signed
4000 certificates for
already-exported endangered
rosewood in China. The UN
Global Compact accepted CEFC
China Energy until Inner City
Press repeated asking about
its role as beneficiary of a
UN bribery scheme to get oil
in Uganda and Chad; China
Energy Fund Committee is
*still* in Special
Consultative status with
ECOSOC. Periscope video here,
since the UN has withheld its,
under UNTV boss Alison
Smale. Among the
panelists, Betty Yee,
California's Controller,
repeatedly cited transparency.
Fred Samama of Amundi to his
credit acknowledged there is a
danger of green-washing. Peter
Damgaard Jensen of PKA said
the UN could / should help
emerging markets. (This is
true, but today in Cameroon
for example, the UN only
supports colonialism and
exploitation.) Iconic Jack
Ehnes of CalSTRS appeared
sympathetic. But will they
continue to blithely provide a
platform for the greenwashing
not only of oil companies like
CEFC China Energy, but of
censoring UN officials like
Amina J. Mohammed, who helped
export endangered rosewood
then refused all Press
questions on it, and continues
to censor and restrict the
Press which asks? We'll have
more on this - and on “The
Investor Agenda.” Amid UN
bribery scandals, failures in
countries from Cameroon to
Yemen and declining
transparency, today's UN does
not even pretend to have
content neutral rules about
which media get full access
and which are confined to
minders or escorts to cover
the General Assembly.
Inner City Press,
which while it pursue the
story of Macau-based
businessman Ng Lap Seng's
bribery of President of the
General Assembly John Ashe was
evicted by the UN Department
of Public Information from its
office, is STILL confined to
minders as it pursues the new
UN bribery scandal, of Patrick
Ho and Cheikh Gadio
allegedly bribing President of
the General Assembly Sam
Kutesa, and Chad's Idriss
Deby, for CEFC China Energy.
Last week Inner
City Press asked UN DPI where
it is on the list to be
restored to (its) office, and
regain full office - and was
told it is not even on the
list, there is no public list,
the UN can exclude,
permanently, whomever it
wants. This is censorship, and
has been accepted and even
encouraged by what has become
the UN Censorship Alliance,
which accepted funds from Ng
Lap Seng's South South News
and had Inner City Press
ejected from the UN Press
Briefing Room as it inquired
into the story.
When this UNCA
held its annual meeting on
January 29, it could barely
reach quorom (Periscope here);
it covered over the glass
doors of the clubhouse the UN
gives it with a sign board.
Disgruntled members forwarded the
"agenda" -- "1) Introduction of the new
2018 UNCA Executive Committee. 2)
Presentation of UNCA sub-committees and
their upcoming agendas. 3) Presentation
of 2017 UNCA & UNCA Awards
financials. 4) UNCA 70th anniversary. 5)
Other matters." We'll have more on this.
***
Feedback:
Editorial [at] innercitypress.com
Past
(and future?) UN Office: S-303, UN, NY 10017 USA
For now: Box 20047,
Dag Hammarskjold Station NY NY 10017
Reporter's mobile (and weekends):
718-716-3540
Other,
earlier Inner City Press are listed here, and some are available in
the ProQuest service, and now on Lexis-Nexis.
Copyright
2006-2018 Inner City Press, Inc. To request reprint or other
permission, e-contact Editorial [at] innercitypress.com
for
|
,
