UNESCO Sleaze For Second Term For
Azoulay Must Be Denied Corrupt Censor
Guterres at UN
By Matthew
Russell Lee &
sources,
Exclusive
UN GATE, Nov 29 – UNESCO, like the
whole UN system under Antonio
Guterres is falling apart into
abyssal nonsense and
corruption. Still over the
last two weeks, ambassadors
observed a strange diplomatic
ballet despite the COVID-19
country-wide lockdown that
came as a surprise even for
the politically thick-skinned
ones.
UNESCO Director
General Audrey Azoulay and her
closest teammates were meeting
individually with selected
representatives of members
states to the executive board
in order to secure their
public statements during the
forthcoming 210th board
session in support of her
reelection ahead of the
consideration by the members
of the board of the procedure
to be followed for the
nomination of the
Director-General of the
agency.
UNESCO has seen
corruption and abuse of power
over the last three years on a
number of occasions, but never
the lack of respect for the
governing bodies and for the
Constitution (here)
has reached that level
before.
Regardless
of the established procedure
for the nomination of the DG
of the agency, contained in
document 210 EX/24 (available
here).
Audrey Azoulay keeps using
political pressure, false
promises and fat envelopes to
bargain her reelection without
following the rules and
procedures as adopted by
member
states.
The agency is
obviously losing its solid
constitutional foundations
with the French DG that appear
to be scared to death by the
option of a fair competition
in the forthcoming reelection
process. Indeed, all those
support-mobilizing efforts are
made in order to dissuade a
potential candidacy from
another country and thus to
persuade against the emergence
of another
contender.
It is a
shameful diplomatic
configuration and if those
exposed below actually speak
in her favor next week, this
will confirm their publicly
announced preference to
abolish the constitutional
provisions and the rule of law
at UNESCO. According to our
sources, those who pledged to
speak in support of DG Azoulay
before even approving the
deadline for submission of
candidacies and prior to the
approval of the procedure for
DG election by the governing
body are the following
states/ambassadors:
Albania
Mr Ferit
HOXHA
Bangladesh Mr Kazi
Imtiaz
HOSSAIN
Brazil Mr Santiago
IRAZABAL
MOURÃO
Bulgaria Mr Anguel
TCHOLAKOV
Cuba Mr Oscar LEÓN
GONZÁLEZ
Ethiopia Mr Henok
TEFERRA
France Ms Véronique
ROGER-LACAN
Germany Mr Peter
REUSS
Italy Mr Massimo
RICCARDO
Japan Mr Atsuyuki
OIKE
Jordan Mr Makram
QUEISI
Morocco Mr Samir
ADDAHRE
Portugal Mr António
NÓVOA
Republic of Korea Mr
Dong- Gi
KIM
Senegal Mr Mamadou
TALLA
Serbia Ms Tamara
RASTOVAC
SIAMASHVILI
Spain Mr Juan Andrés
PERELLÓ
RODRÍGUEZ
Togo Mr Komlavi
Francisco
SEDDOH
Tunisia Mr Ghazi
GHERAIRI
Still,
several questions remain
pending: Why would a
member state consider
supporting a candidate prior
to the fixed deadline for
submission of candidacies? Are
member states becoming totally
nuts to go against the
Constitution and would they
agree to get involved in this
scheming machination with
another DG heading the Agency?
What Nordic
countries have to say about
this blatant case of
corruption and traffic of
influence that kills the rule
of law at UNESCO? Why are they
– the pretended paragon of
uprightness and morality -
turning their back on the
rules they voted themselves
and what is the reason for
complacently closing their
eyes while the French DG is
openly pressuring and bribing
the other ambassadors?
The corruptive move by Azoulay
creates a dangerous precedent
of a parallel decision-making
election-related process
substituting the one adopted
by the general conference
leaving thus behind some 135
member states non-members of
the board that are expecting
the constitutional order be
followed.
A former high
ranked UNESCO staff in charge
of legal affairs pointed out
to Inner City Press: “What
Azoulay is doing at that point
of her mandate, is simply
outrageously illegal.
Selection of DG is decided by
a secret ballot. Now, she
summons member states to
support her by speaking out in
public. Such an open hijacking
of the electoral process has
never been observed before in
a UN agency”. Another severe
breach in the rules is this
self-proposed candidacy. “The
Constitution and the procedure
are very clear in that
respect. Only a member state
can propose a candidate, not a
person him/herself” the former
staff added. “This is actually
a major anti-constitutional
issue, serious enough, to be
submitted for consideration to
the legal affairs division of
the United Nations and
subsequently for investigation
by the Joint Inspection Unit
of the United Nations
System”. Most probably,
the French Government and the
EU countries will flip-flop on
the constitutional principles
and try to protect the French
DG in her “coup d’etat’
efforts, since they are fully
aware that any other candidate
would easily wipe out next
year the incompetent and
purposeless French
finger-puppet Azoulay.
Will that
short-sighted electoral
strategy work? The forthcoming
session of the executive board
will tell. This is where
UNESCO stands today. A UN
agency propitious to the
flourishing of corruption,
anti-constitutional political
moves, sexual
performances-based promotions,
abuse of power and nepotism.
We will have more on that.
***
Feedback:
Editorial [at] innercitypress.com
Past (and
future?) UN Office: S-303, UN, NY 10017 USA
For now: Box 20047,
Dag Hammarskjold Station NY NY 10017
Reporter's mobile (and weekends):
718-716-3540
Other, earlier Inner City Press are
listed here,
and some are available in the ProQuest
service, and now on Lexis-Nexis.
Copyright 2006-2020 Inner City
Press, Inc. To request reprint or other
permission, e-contact Editorial [at]
innercitypress.com for
|