At
UNESCO Corruption Exposed While Member
States Silent Like On Guterres Failures
By Matthew
Russell Lee &
sources,
Exclusive
UN GATE, Jan 27 – The
210th session
of the
Executive
board of
UNESCO ended
today. Typical
of the
corruption of
the UN system
under Antonio
Guterres, now
lusting after
an UNmerited
second term, not
a single
question was
raised by
member states
about the
fraudulent
management of
the UN agency.
No
question about
the evaporated
430.000 US
dollars,
mentioned in
the UK
ambassador’s
letter (here),
nor about the
600.000 Euros
Italian
individual
donation sunk
in a BFM
clandestine
account for
special use by
Madam DG
Azoulay.
No
question as
well about the
mistress of
Kacyanides,
with the
initials LNH,
promoted by DG
Azoulay to P5
level in total
violation of
staff
regulations.
Board members
demonstrated a
total
abdication of
their
paramount
responsibility,
as funders of
the
organization,
to hold
accountable
the French DG
Azoulay for
her abuse of
power in
misusing
public money.
They bargained
during hours
about dashes
and commas in
the draft
decisions,
spent days
absurdly
delineating
the way ahead
for UNESCO to
“save the
world”, with
its annual
budget
representing
six times less
than the money
spent for
ice-cream
yearly, in
Italy alone.
Board members
confronted
each other on
inconsequential
issues, but
politely
reached a
consensus to
preserve Madam
Azoulay from
inquiries
about the
pickpocketing
by her
administration
of tax-payers
money.
What's more,
in light of
their
institutional
responsibility
of custodians
of
accountability
and
constitutionality
at UNESCO, the
Chair of the
Executive
board, the
Ambassador of
Equatorial
Guinea Agapito
Mba Mokuy, and
the President
of the General
conference,
the Turkish
Ambassador,
Altay
Cengizer, were
both expected
to request
clarifications
about the
revealed by
Inner City
Press daylight
robbery of
public
funds.
On the
contrary, “we
heard at this
Board so many
‘thank you’ to
Audrey Azoulay
from the usual
member states,
that some of
us start
wondering
whether the
overwhelming
corruption at
UNESCO,
channeled
through the
Cabinet of
Azoulay, has
not reached
out to those
member states
as well”, said
one high
official who
agreed to talk
to Inner City
Press under
the cover of
anonymity. “It
would not be
surprising if
those
Ambassadors
are
complementing
their
emoluments by
pleasing the
Director
general, who
in return is
gratifying
them”.
Those
who challenged
the UNESCO
administration
with facts
about the
unpleasant
reality were
the two staff
unions. Last
Friday, 22
January, the
STU issued a
strong
statement on
its areas of
concern,
underscoring
the problems
with the
mobility
exercise that
it is not
carried out
according to
the
recommendation
by IOS; the
lack of career
development
and
professional
prospects; the
abrogation of
the internal
justice system
with the
abolition of
the Reports
Board, “which
places the
Administration
in the
position of
judge and
party and
deprives staff
of impartial
appeals
opportunities”.
Furthermore,
the STU
restated its
commitment to
the principle
of “zero
tolerance
towards
behaviors that
disrespect
values and
rules”.
Yesterday, the
President of
the
international
staff
association
(ISAU) also
addressed
member states:
“UNESCO's
strategic
transformation
is an ongoing
concern of
ISAU” (…)
“I
should
therefore like
to express my
concern at the
Administration's
propensity to
ignore the
opinions of
its staff and
insidiously
erode their
fundamental
rights through
the recent
revisions of
the Human
Resources
Manual.
(…) the recent
measures taken
by the
Administration
not only
constitute a
denial of the
staff and its
value, but
also a
contempt for
the staff
associations
and their
representatives,
elected to
bring their
voices and
grievances to
Management.
…ISAU hopes
that its
written
comments and
oral
statements
will resonate
in order to
prevent a
culture of
deafness and
mistrust from
developing
within the
Secretariat.
Such a
situation
would be
unreasonable
and
irrational, as
it could
undermine both
the integrity
and the
effectiveness
of our
Organization”.
Those strong
warnings are a
timely wake-up
call for both
staff and
member states.
No other DG in
the history of
UNESCO has
abolished so
many staff
rights.
In
three years
since her
election in
November 2017,
DG Azoulay
repealed the
following
rules and
mechanisms for
internal
justice and
protection of
staff
members:
- Cancellation
of Staff Rule
102.2 of the
Human Resource
Manual
allowing staff
members to
make
individual
reclassification
requests. This
cancellation
has been
decided
against the
viewpoint of
STU, ISAU and
Member
States;
- Abolition of
the Special
Advisory
Committee; -
Abolition of
the Review
Panel; -
Abolition of
the Reports
Board, despite
the STU and
ISAU strong
protests
-
Abolition
of the Joint
Disciplinary
Committee
allowing the
administration
to fire
recalcitrant
staff with no
possibility
for
examination
and internal
justice
protection
against
abusive
dismissals and
separations
from the
organization.
-
Recalculation
of the sick
leave granted
to staff
members and
reduction in
the
reimbursement
scheme of the
UNESCO medical
fund in total
violation of
Statutes and
staff
regulations.
Thus, almost
all internal
justice
mechanisms,
providing for
the staff to
contest and
defend their
rights, have
been abolished
by the French
Azoulay. “In
2021, UNESCO
embarked on
the journey to
a North Korean
style
dictatorship.
And the EU
Ambassadors
are fervently
supporting it,
in their best
traditions of
democratic
hypocrisy.
Staff members
must act
together so as
to avoid their
individual
elimination by
the
administration,
one by one”,
added our
source.
Besides
the imperative
questions
raised by the
staff unions,
the following
ones are still
pending:
1)
In his letter,
the UK
ambassador
pointed out
that the
embezzlement
allegations of
financial
impropriety
and breach of
rules were
factual
information
and proved to
be “a
confirmed
financial
fraud”. So,
who will be
fired and who
will reimburse
the 430.000 US
dollars public
money?
2) The
personal
contributions
to UNESCO made
by
individuals.
The Cabinet of
Azoulay
instructed
BFM to
make sure that
Madam Azoulay
would be able
use those
funds
secretly. The
donation of
some 600.000
Euros to
UNESCO, made
by an Italian
citizen
disappeared in
a undisclosed
account. So,
when will the
Italian
ambassador,
Massimo
Riccardo, ask
for
explanations?
3)
Pending as
well the
investigation
of the
internal
arrangements
by the Cabinet
of DG Azoulay
granting
impunity to
those
accountable
for the
unjustifiable
and
speculative
spending of
some 2 million
dollars by
UNESCO. In two
separate
contracts, one
for 1.536.000
EURO, and
another one
for 180.000
EURO, UNESCO
contracted a
French company
(with the
benediction of
the French DG)
to do the core
redesign of
the
organization’s
financial and
administrative
systems and
tools.
Subsequently,
those amounts
had been paid
to the French
enterprise
without
getting the
expected
deliverables
and the UNESCO
staff was
instructed to
do the job
instead. In
spite of those
incriminating
facts, both
the chief
officer of the
core redesign
project Sameer
Pise and the
initial
coordinator of
this scheme,
Sachin Bhatt,
remain fully
protected by
DG Azoulay and
both got
promoted by
her.
4)
The staff
members cases
lost in Geneva
where UNESCO
got sentenced
by the ILOAT
to pay
hundreds of
thousands of
taxpayers’
money. IOS
must
investigate
the work of
the senior
staff members
in HRM dealing
with contested
cases, namely
A. Grisar and
A. Duganis. A
sanction that
would
certainly put
an end to this
persisting
detrimental
situation in
dealing with
personnel
files, is an
automatic wage
withholding of
HRM managers
so as to
reimburse the
financial loss
for the
Organization
provoked by
their
incompetence
in dealing
with contested
files.
This is
where UNESCO
stands today,
a UN agency
ravaged by
greed and
financial
misappropriations,
propitious to
the
flourishing of
abuse of
power,
corruption and
nepotism.
Watch this
site.
***
Feedback:
Editorial [at] innercitypress.com
Past (and
future?) UN Office: S-303, UN, NY 10017 USA
For now: Box 20047,
Dag Hammarskjold Station NY NY 10017
Reporter's mobile (and weekends):
718-716-3540
Other, earlier Inner City Press are
listed here,
and some are available in the ProQuest
service, and now on Lexis-Nexis.
Copyright 2006-2020 Inner City
Press, Inc. To request reprint or other
permission, e-contact Editorial [at]
innercitypress.com for
|