In
Corrupt UN of Guterres UNDP
Wastes Public Money on ERP
Canadian Nepotism Like UNFPA
By Matthew
Russell Lee, CJR Letter
PFTracker
UN GATE, August 2
– While untransparent and
largely absentee UN Secretary
General Antonio Guterres has
reformed little at the UN,
other than asserting that he
has absolute impunity to have
a critical journalist roughed
up and banned,
now for 1587 days, each
agency goes its own way.
Whistleblowers within UNFPA,
the Population Fund that
supported and defended its own
representative Diego Palacios'
sexual harassment of
contractor Prashanti Tiwari in
India, exclusively tell Inner
City Press about UNFPA's
initiative to leave the common
ERP technical system ("ATLAS")
that it currently shares with
UNDP, UNV, UN Women, UNCDF,
UNITAR, UN University and
others to build their own ERP
system. While UNFPA officially
pays lipservice to the UN
reform, its leadership has
activitly initiatied a project
to build its own stand-alone
ERP system without properly
coordinating with its sister
agencies. This is preempting
any future UN reform
discussions.
Now in August
2022, Inner City Press is
alerted by whistleblowers: "On
July 29, 2022 the BMS Director
announced ERP Project Quantum
Launch move to January
2023. On 15 June 2021
Achim Steiner, UNDP
Administrator’s message to all
staff communicated the Atlas
replacement project plan
dividing it into three phases
with go live dates -
phase 1a – gradual throughout
2021, phase 1b – go live
September 202, phase 2 –
go-live in early 2022. It is
bewildering to hear project
delayed for a year without any
culpability after spending
more than 25 million.
The Quantum project manager is
a close friend of UNDP IT
Chief and both are Canadian
citizens. The project
likewise allocated more than
half a dozen key positions to
the Canadian citizens.
The Quantum testing started in
March 2022 with go-live plan
date of July 1, 2022 and next
September 1, 2022. The
project didn’t failed both
targets. Testing is
motionlessly in progress, more
than 12,000 errors
known. Testers are
frustrated and everyone is
questioning the project team
ability but no one is
questioning because of
revenge. Quantum has several
limitations equated to Atlas
and the Atlas replacement
motive is mysterious.
UNFPA joined Quantum project
after spending millions and
failed on similar
project. The tax
payers money desired more than
ever to serve humanity who are
suffering because of war,
inflation, climate
change. The Quantum
project tenacities and
expenditure requires inquiry
and responsibility." Watch
this site.
UNFPA has mislead its own
Executive Board where it asked
for "IT improvement" in the
amount of $24 million but not
mentioning that it would leave
the common UN consortium to
build its own ERP system. This
decision is not only costly
but will also increase IT
maintenance cost for UNDP, UN
Women and the other agencies
as it lowers the economies of
scale. UNFPA leadership
continues to pay lipservice to
the UN reform while activitly
leaving a common platform.
They did not even bother to
formally inform the other
agencies... On the morning of
December 19, Inner City Press
in writing asked Guterres'
spokesman Stephane Dujarric
questions about UNFPA. As with
all other questions this week,
from Cameroon to Sri Lanka to
Guterres' refusal to audit UN
NGOs implicated in UN bribery,
Dujarric didn't deign to
respond, while serving pro-UN
state media. He is a censor.
And the UN corruption spreads
under Guterres abetted by
censorship.
Two key elements
of press freedom are not
banning access as the UN has
done to Inner City Press for
169 days now and being
transparent, another UN
failing. And this failure was
on display again on October
23, when before a UN noon
briefing it was banned from,
but with the promise its
written questions would be
answered, Inner City Press
asked in writing to 10 UN
officials and spokespeople:
"October 23-2: It is reported
that the UN is blaming its
continued lack of any Freedom
of Information Act procedure
on supposed management
reforms. What is the
connection? What is the hold
up? And for example, how many
times has the SG visited
Lisbon since January 1, 2017
and how much, including in
Security costs, has it cost
the UN / the public?" Eight
hours later, no answer at all.
No response to any of the five
questions Inner City Press
submitted, four on Africa,
after a noon briefing in which
not one of the correspondents
allowed in the briefing room
asked any questions related to
anything in Africa, on which
the UN (and the Secretary
General's son Pedro Guimarães
e Melo De Oliveira Guterres)
raise money. For years, before
being roughed up by UN
Security under UNSG Antonio
Guterres and banned by a no
due process letter by his
Global Communicator Alison
Smale, Inner City Press has pushed
for a Freedom of Information
Act covering the UN and its
use of public money. Now it
turns out that Smale, who have
never spoken to Inner City
Press before banning it, has
dissembled about her and
Guterres' supposed commitment
to transparency. The
publication EYE writes
this week: "In an interview
with EYE in February of 2018,
Alison Smale, Under Secretary
General for the Department of
Public Information, said the
Secretariat would like to
create a rigorous” access
policy but first needed to
resolve an internal debate
about which department should
be the “custodian” of UN
records. The custodianship of
records is usually one of the
least difficult issues handled
by institutions adopting
access policies. Since then,
the Secretariat has conducted
a major reorganization, but
appears no closer to settling
the custodianship issue or
beginning an effort to prepare
an access policy. A UN
spokesman on Oct. 19 cited
ongoing management reforms as
the reason, saying, “Any
changes on access to
information policies would
have to follow afterwards.'"
Always an excuse from the UN.
And where is UN Special
Rapporteur David Kaye, who
purported to call for a FOIA
but can't even hold Smale
accountable for no due process
censorship and Guterres for
secret banned list? Meanwhile
Inner City Press has FOIA
requests pending with the US
State Department, NYC,
the UK
and Netherlands.
(By contrast, Inner City Press
non-UN related FOIA get
responded to and reported, for
example here
in the Intercept.) We'll have
more on this. We have
revisited not only the
shocking censorship regime at
the UN of Alison Smale, until
a year ago the New York Times'
bureau chief in Berlin, but
the equally shocking failure
of the NYT's three UN
correspondents to cover or
even respond on Smale's
lifetime ban imposed on an
investigative journalist.
On August 17, Smale
after a 45 day "review" that
did not include a single
interview with Inner City
Press issues a lifetime ban on
its entry into the UN. It was
noted not only in BuzzFeed
and The
Hill, but in the largely
anti-Trump Press Freedom
Tracker, here.
But from the New York Times,
nothing. Since then, a
two-page New York Post story,
here. And still no financial
disclosure from Smale.
Instead, a telling tweets /
re-tweets by Smale of the NY
Times, and of UK Minister Lord
Ahmad of Wimbledon, here.
And more hypocrisy: Smale
virtue-signaling on NYT
internship policies, here,
while the UN continues unpaid
internships. No due process to
oust for life critical media:
Smale is a Censor. Inner City
Press submitted material to
the NYT editorial pages and
James Bennet - no response.
Inner City Press emailed the
NYT's three UN correspondents,
Rick Gladstone, rickg [at]
nytimes.com, Somini Sengupta
sengupta [at]nytimes.com, and
the newer but no more
responsive Michael schwirtz
[at] nytimes.com - and days
later, nothing, to this: "I'm
requesting that you / the NYT
report on this: the UN's
ex-NYT Alison Smale as USG of
DPI on Friday imposing a
lifetime ban on me, with no
due process, no appeal.
The letter is attached. My
rebuttal(s) so far are online
at
http://www.innercitypress.com/unguterres4smalebansicpmoroccoscam081818.html
The reasons given are bogus -
the warning letters, one the
product of a complaint from
the Mission of Morocco whose
policy on Western Sahara I
often question, the other a
complaint from a DPI official
who didn't like an article I
wrote. How can I be banned
from the UN for this? Most
pressingly, how can Smale and
SG Guterres block me from
covering next month's General
Assembly high level week,
which I've covered for 12
years? The deadline to
accredit is September 5.
If I have to, I will cover it
from the street (a practice
Smale called derogatory, but
see "On Cameroon Inner City
Press Video Guterres' Smale
Calls Derogatory for Lifetime
Ban Remonetized by
YouTube.") I do not
believe the UN should, or
legitimately can, target,
rough up, suspend and now ban
for life a critical
journalist. I am requesting
that you cover this, or work
so another NYT reporter does.
It is UN (and beyond) story.
Since the NYT reported Inner
City Press' entry into the UN,
it would seem it would cover
its being roughed up,
suspended and now banned for
life, on such bogus grounds,
particularly at this time and
given The Times' advocacy for
press freedom and access
elsewhere." And days later -
nothing. We'll have more on
this. Tellingly, while one
might expect the UN Department
of Public Information to be
more public than other of
Security General Antonio
Guterres' departments, the
chief of DPI Alison Smale is
not even on the public
disclosure list as of August
16, 2018. What could explain
it? Since DPI has all day and
a bent to propagandize, one
can imagine the excuse being
that Smale was only awarded
the position on 9
August 2017, after, say
the USG of Counter Terrorism
who is listed: he was named in
June 2017. But the excuse
breaks down: making public
disclosure, here,
of a property in Moldova, is
Natalia Gherman who was only
awarded her UNRCCA position on
15
September 2017, more
than a month after Smale. So
why isn't Smale in the public
financial disclosure list?
Isn't this particularly
inappropriate for a former
Berlin bureau chief of the New
York Times, which calls for
such disclosures by public
official like Smale is, but
doesn't act like? We'll have
more on this, and on other
disclosures: some don't even
fill out the Assets section,
only Outside Activities, for
example. Why have Guterres and
Smale, and their non-responsive
spokesman Stephane Dujarric,
banned Inner City Press from
the UN and the noon briefing
for 44 days now? Watch this
site. The New York Times on
Wednesday evening put online
its faux
humble contribution to the 100
editorials called for the
Boston Globe, saying Trump's -
studiously not named -
"attacks on the press are
particularly threatening to
journalists in nations with a
less secure rule of law and to
smaller publications in the
United States." The irony, now
raised to the Times' James
Bennet and others, is that
their former colleague and
bureau chief Alison Smale is,
at the UN, engaged in an
attack on a smaller
investigative Inner City
Press. After it was roughed up
by UN Security on
June 22 and July
3 while covering a
speech by her new boss UN
Secretary General Antonio
Guterres and his budget,
Smale
despite the conflict of
interest about Inner City
Press' coverage of her internal
Town Hall meeting and
whistleblowers say diversion
of Swahili
funds saw fit to ban Inner
City Press from the UN for 43
days and counting now. She has
put herself in charge of a
"review" of Inner City Press
involving anonymous complaints
Inner City Press has not been
shown. (That Smale's
significant other, Russian
pianist Sergei Dreznen told
Inner City Press it should change
and wear a suit or face her
wrath is another matter.)
Smale's UN Department of
Public Information has told
those who have asked,
including for example even the
Kazakhstan Mission to the UN
as well as the Government
Accountability Project and the
Reporters Committee for
Freedom of the Press that her
review and ruling will be
issued soon - with no due
process for Inner City Press,
whose reporting has been
injured for more than six
weeks, on its beats from UN
corruption to Yemen
and Cameroon.
This is the Times' legacy in
press freedom? Tellingly,
despite the New York Times
previously covering Inner City
Press at the UN, for example
gushingly in 2007
and as a character study in 2016
(with quotes from Guterres'
spokesman Stephane Dujarric
which have typically turned
out to be false), this violent
ouster and ban by ex-NYT Smale
has garnered not a single word
in the ostensibly pro free
press Times, whose
correspondents have been
written to and are aware,
despite coverage in The Independent
(UK), the Columbia
Journalism Review, Fox,
POLITICO
and even a note in CNN.
We'll have more on this.
Inner City Press on July 5 was
told at the UN gate that it
was banned from entering any
UN premises, the day after it
filed a criminal complaint
against UN Security Lieutenant
Ronald Dobbins and another for
physically removing
it from covering the July 3
meeting about the UN's $6.7
billion peacekeeping budget,
as witnessed and essentially
cheered on by Secretary
General Antonio Guterres'
Assistant SG Christian
Saunders, tearing its
reporter's shirt, painfully
and intentionally twisting his
arm and slamming shut and
damaging his laptop. Video here. Columbia Journalism Review
here.
On August 11,
amid a now 41 day ongoing
“review” of Inner City Press
that has shifted from the
initial charge of being in the
building too long on July 3
covering the Budget Committee
meeting to undefined
“harassment” of unnamed off
the record correspondents, the
murky role of Alison Smale, a
former bureau chief of the New
York Times which speaks so
much of attacks on the press
from Washington, in attacking
the Press at the UN is coming
into focus.
Smale never responded to a
single one of Inner City Press
e-mails since September 2017,
even as she openly cavorted
with retired corporate media,
even on camera. Contrary to
the wider NYT's purported
celebration of aggressive
investigative press, Smale has
attacked the most
investigative and, perhaps,
aggressive of UN press. She
retweets little but the NYT;
she has said her focus is
making Guterres look better.
Why has she not recused
herself from "reviewing" the
critical Press? There has
already been filed a detailed
misconducted complaint
filed with the Secretary
General, and she has
apparently given up on trying
to respond to the second,
detailed request for answers
from the Government
Accountability Project. Has
Smale become, tongue firmly in
cheek, akin to Aung San Suu
Kyi, previously vaguely
associated with freedom once,
with the power to act, the
totalitarian or merely elitist
impulse becomes clear? While
the NYT publisher finger
waggles, what of Smale's
elitist censoring, featuring a
Kafkaesque star chamber in
which the allegations of
unnamed corporate and state
media are taken as true, with
no opportunity to be heard?
Smale has among other things
been blocking Press coverage
not only of UN corruption but
of the slaugher in Cameroon,
for 41 days and counting.
We'll have more on this.
Guterres'
spokesman Farhan Haq has told
Fox
News: “there have been a
number of allegations from
fellow journalists that Lee
has harassed them over the
years. 'A lot of journalists
have not just been harassed
but threatened by him and
that’s a problem,' Haq said.”
That
last line is extraordinary.
Without identifying a single
one of these "lot of
journalists," Haq declares
their anonymous allegations to
be true: "HAVE not just been
harassed but threatened me
him." This stands in contrast
to the UN not accepting - in
the case
of Alison Smale and Stephane
Dujarric, trying to not even
acknowledge receiving - Inner
City Press' written, on the
record allegations complete
with exhibits. It's called
favoritism, and censorship.
This same
Farhan Haq recently answered
one of Inner City Press'
written questions, about why
Guterres had taken no action
on its documented exclusive
May 24 report
for which it received threats
(and subsequent letter
to Guterres and Smale) that
through presumptive nepotism,
management of the UN Security
Council's website had been
given to John
van Rosendaal,
the
photographer husband of Kyoko
Shiotani, the
chief of staff of Guterres'
Under Secretary General for
Political Affairs Rosemary
DiCarlo, previously US Deputy
Ambassador to the UN under
Susan Rice and Samantha Power.
Haq responded,
"If there are
allegations of misconduct they
should be taken to the
internal oversight offices and
mechanisms. Unfounded
allegations do not constitute
a formal complaint." So how
does Haq for the UN now deem
anonymous allegations against
Inner City Press not only as
formal complaints, and as
true?
This is Kafkaesque. Inner City
Press quit the UN
Correspondents Association
after finding it to be
corrupt. Its president after
having rented one of his
Manhattan apartments to
Palitha Kohona, who as Sri
Lanka's Ambassador to
the UN accused of a role in
the White Flag Killings,
unilaterally granted Kohona's
request to him to screen a Sri
Lanka government war crimes
denial film as an UNCA event,
in the Dag Hammarskjold
Library auditorium. This was
done without approval of or
even notice to all Executive
Committee members of which
Inner City Press was one. When
Inner City Press reported on
it, not only the UNCA
president but only Committee
members from Reuters, AFP and
other outlets demanded that it
take the article offline.
Inner City Press offered the
UNCA president as much space
on Inner City Press as he'd
want to reply, but he and UNCA
wanted censorship, then as
now.
After Inner City Press quit
UNCA, and faced counterfeit
troll Twitter accounts
and anonymous (but leaked)
complaints to Guterres' now
lead spokesman Stephane
Dujarric from Lou Charbonneau
of Reuters (now Human Rights
Watch) here
and censored from Google with
the Digital Millennium
Copyright Act here
and Voice of America, here as
obtained under the Freedom of
Information Act, it has not
spoken to these individuals
since.
Whatever claimed harassment or
threatens they are claiming to
or for the UN is not based on
any actual interaction, only
Inner City Press' articles
and, it seems, equally First
Amendment protected Periscope
broadcasts, even one that was
inadvertent and deleted but
ghoulishly monitored and
captured by or for the UN.
(More on this soon).
The simple
point: it is illegitimate to
rough up a journalist for
covering a Budget Committee
meeting then ban him from his
beat pending a review of the
incident - then invent new
charges, with unnamed accusers
and not opportunity to respond
with an eye toward continuing
the ban. So what's next? Watch
this site.
On August
3, Guterres' deputy spokesman
Farhan Haq replied to
the Reporters Committee for
Freedom of the Press a week
after RCFP called the
vacationing Guterres' chief of
staff Maria Luiza Viotti to
express concern at the ban and
to offer to facilitate the
restoration of Inner City
Press' access (that call was
returned by lead spokesman
Stephane Dujarric, also now on
vacation). Haq on August 3
said that the UN's "review" is
nearly done, and he promised
that Inner City Press will get
notice of the results in the
"coming days," with a
reference to a "summary of the
findings."
On August
8, with still no results
announced and Inner City Press
still not contacted to be
heard since July 10, Haq was
asked, from the UN transcript:
"Q: Farhan, can you confirm
receipt of a formal complaint
that has been submitted to the
Secretary-General by Inner
City Press on prohibited
conduct? Did you… have
you received…?
Deputy Spokesman: I
believe that has been received
and is being reviewed.
Question: What action
will be taken into… in regards
to that? And will that
hold up a decision that has
been ongoing on the status of
Inner City Press?
Deputy Spokesman: I
don’t believe it will hold up
any decision. I think,
once a decision is made, we
will convey it to Matthew, and
then I will let you guys
know."
But know
about what? For this
investigation, Inner City
Press in the 31 days has been
contacted only once, for a
Kafkaesque "interview" by two
UN Security officers in a
windowless room in the
basement of the UNITAR
building across from the UN.
The officers refused to write
down even Inner City Press
assertion that Dobbins has
animus, given an investigative
piece Inner City Press had
published using documents
leaked to it showing
irregularities in promotions
in UN Security, including but
not limited to Dobbins'.
Since then,
Dujarric who had initially
said Inner City Press'
reporter would be talking to
various parts of the UN system
shifted down to saying the
investigation is only by the
Department of Public
Information. That means no
investigation of or
accountability for UN Security
roughing up Inner City Press.
It also involved a Department
whose leadership Inner City
Press has questioned for its
lack of content neutral
accreditation and access rules
essentially investigating
itself, without even the
pretense of due process for
Inner City Press which has not
been contacted.
Who
is conducting the review? DPI
chief Alison Smale, who has
ignored Inner City Press'
emails and 5000+ signature
petition since she took office
11 months ago, is on vacation.
The Officer in Charge is Hua
Jiang, who work for the UN in
Sudan where Orwellian
investigations are the rule;
Ms. Jiang refused to answer
Inner City Press' questions,
What am I being investigated
for? Ms Jiang also
previously threatened Inner
City Press' accreditation if
it did not take down a sign
for the alternative Free UN
Coalition for Access off the
door of the office she and DPI
evicted Inner City Press from
in 2016, awarding it to an
Egyptian state media whose
essentially retired
correspondent rarely comes
into the UN and hasn't asked
the UN a question in a decade.
(But no investigation of
that.)
What could DPI be
investigating? Haq said Inner
City Press was charged with
two offenses, being in the UN
on June 22 and July 3. But why
was Inner City Press in the
General Assembly Lobby on June
22 at 7:15 pm? There was an
event listed in the UN Media
Alert at beginning at 6 pm.
But Antonio Guterres did not
arrive until 6:45 pm for this
speech. The Access Guidelines
say non resident
correspondents can remain in
past 7 for an advised meeting
and one hour after. So Dobbins
had no right to push Inner
City Press out on June 22. But
he did, and Guterres and DPI's
Alison Smale and the others
Inner City Press wrote to on
June 25 did nothing about it.
Why did
Dobbins and his unnamed
colleague use force, before
talking, on July 3?
Why was
Inner City Press in the
building at 10 pm on July 3?
There was a meeting of the UN
Budget Committee, advised to
Inner City Press, exactly the
type of meeting has covered
for ten years including the
last two as a non resident
correspondent (reduced to that
status for pursuing the Ng Lap
Seng / John Ashe UN bribery
scandal into the UN Press
Briefing Room). In fact, Inner
City Press many times been
thanked for its coverage of
such budget meeting, not only
from around the world but by
UN staff and diplomats in the
New York area. "It's the only
way if know if we'll have to
come in for vote in the
General Assembly," one said.
DPI only puts the meetings in
the Media Alert if there is a
vote - contrary to its policy
of listing UN Security Council
consultation even if there is
no vote -and there is no way
to know, at 10 pm, if
agreement will be reached at 2
am and a vote taken
thereafter. These are things
DPI should have asked Inner
City Press about, if it has
any thought of rendering
another censorship decision.
These are the ground Haq and
Dujarric listed, later adding
vague civility, with Dujarric
misreprentating the number of
times and location Inner City
Press dropped the "F-bomb"
(once, in the soundproof focus
booth). Dujarric has dropped
multiple F-bombs in the
Briefing Room. And UNCA
President Giampaoli Pioli at
the UN Security Council
stakeout loudly called Inner
City Press an "as*hole." DPI
was told of it, with audio here,
and did nothing. Just as DPI's
MALU told Inner City Press it
could livestream Periscope
video on the third and fourth
floors, and all of the second
floor except through the
turnstiles, without an escort
or minders. And as to 7 pm,
other non resident
correspondents routinely stay
past that hour not even
working like Inner City
Press but, as for example on
June 26, drinking with
Guterres. So it would be
illegitimate to act on Inner
City Press' "incivility,"
particularly without having
given it any opportunity to be
heard, in 31 days, on this or
anything else they might
pretextually come up with.
We'll have more on this. Watch
this site.
While the UN in the past ten
years has become increasingly
resistant to the critical
Press, it has been under
Guterres that the UN's
response has been physical
violence and outright banning.
Earlier this year Guterres'
spokesman Stephane Dujarric
started complaining about
Inner City Press' coverage of
Guterres, including for
example its entirely legal
Periscope live-stream from the
sidewalk across Sutton Place
from the UN mansion Guterres
lives in, which showed that on
the day Guterres told the
world to turn off all lights
for an hour for the
environment, his were all
ablaze.
Trying to defuse Guterres
administration retaliation,
Inner City Press had an
intermediary, whom we'll leave
unnamed, convey to Dujarric on
June 20 that Inner City Press
had voluntarily suspended all
broadcasts from near the UN
mansion, for a month.
Dujarric, who only the day
before had given a private
press conference in the UN
Press Briefing Room to a three
person crew from Al
Jazeera (which
complained when Inner City
Press on Periscope called it a
sleazefest), told the
intermediary it was too late,
"I wish you had been involved
a while ago." There's worse
waiting, Dujarric told the
intermediary on June 20. Worse
waiting to happen: not allowed
in.
On June 22
UN Lieutenant Ronald E.
Dobbins, with his own motive
having been mentioned in Inner
City Press' expose of
irregularities in promotions
in UN Security, arbitrarily
singled out Inner City Press
and made it leave the UN at
7:15 pm in the middle of an
event, in the UN Media Alert,
which featured a Guterres
speech. Inner City Press
live-streamed as it was pushed
through the GA lobby, and did
say “This is corrupt.” (That
cannot be a violation of the
UN's / UNCA's vague injunction
to civility, in the midst of
an impermissible ouster
mid-coverage.)
On
June 25 Inner City Press wrote
to Guterres, the chief of
staff and Deputy SG and DPI's
Alison Smale, saying that Lt
Dobbins had improperly ousted
it and had a personal animus.
Inner City Press sent this and
more to the UN's Office of
Internal Oversight Service,
recently further discredited
in a UN Dispute Tribunal
decision we're soon to write
about.
But
Guterres offered no
protection. In fact, his
spokesman Dujarric and deputy
Farhan Haq refused to answer
any questions about the
improper June 22 ouster, with
Haq on July 3 saying it has
been an appropriate
enforcement of rules (which,
in fact, allow non resident
correspondents to stay in the
UN past 7 pm if there is a
meeting, and for an hour after
the meeting).
On July 3
as Inner City Press covered
just such a meeting, of the
Budget Committee, Dobbins and
other approached and initiated
violence. Inner City Press did
not, as they perhaps hoped,
respond with any physical
resistance. But even saying “I
am a journalist, this is
corrupt” is now characterized
an incivility to justify
banning Inner City Press.
Things got worse, indeed. And
now we know Dujarric and
Guterres are responsible, and
both, now on vacation, should
leave the UN.
On
July 30 Guterres'
sleazy basis
for roughing
up and banning
Inner City
Press for 27
days and
counting was reported
in the Columbia
Journalist
Review: Guterres'
spokesman Stephane
Dujarric has
gone
further, in an article
published July
30 by the
Columbia
Journalism
Review. Dujarric - who
Inner City
Press
directed to
the CJR
reporter to -
is quoted
that " Lee
Periscoped
while
shouting, 'Fuck
you!'
repeatedly.
(Lee says he
was
complaining
that Dujarrac
had given the
Al Jazeera
crew a private
interview, and
excluded him.)
'He
creates an
atmosphere of
incivility
within our
working
environment,'
Dujarrac says."
This is
a lie. (We
noted that
Dujarric himself has
repeatedly dropped
the F-bomb on
Inner City
Press, telling
it it
asked a "fucking
stupid
question" and, while
throwing it
out of the
UN Press
Briefing Room,
saying
"Matthew it's
fucking Friday
night, I'm so
fucking tired,
I want to go
home, just
leave," Vine here.)
Inner City
Press on June 19
when Dujarric
gave a "private
briefing" to Al
Jazeera about
Nikki Haley
and Mike
Pompeo
announcing the
US pull out
from the UN
Human Right
Council said
in the hall
that is was a
"sleazefest."
After closing
the door of
the focus booth
it has been
confined to work in
for two years
by
Dujarric, and long
after the Al
Jazeera trio
including
James Bays and
Whitney Hurst
were done,
said on
Periscope, F-You. Periscope
video - still
online
during this 27
day "investigation" -
here.
So
Dujarric is a
censor,
justifying the
beating up and
banning of a
journalist for
something he
broadcast in
a soundproof
booth to his
audience.
But
Dujarric
(and it seems Guterres'
and Smale's) roles
go beyond
justifying the roughing
up of the
Press. It seems
clear that the
green light
was given.
Consider this,
formally
submitted to a
UN Special
Rapporteur:
Dujarric told
CJR that on
June 19 Inner
City Press
supposedly
repeatedly
said f*ck you
to an Al
Jazeera crew (as
noted, they
must have
heard and
seized on it
only by
listening to
my Periscope
stream archive
afterward) --
1) on June 20,
Inner City
Press
was told by UN
Media
Accreditation
there were
concerns about
“intimidating”
Al Jazeera's
three-person
crew with its
phone;
2)
troublingly,
on June 20
Dujarric told
a person
trying to be Inner
City Press'
intermediary
that things
were “going to
get worse” for
me. So far Inner
City Press has
reported
once, on July
20, about that, here;
3) on June 22,
UN Security
Lieutenant
Ronald Dobbins
and four
others who
refused to
give their
names stopped
me at 7:15 pm
while Inner
City Press was
covering a
speech by SG
Antonio
Guterres and
pushed it
out of the
building,
leaving other
non resident
correspondents
inside.
Inner City
Press now
surmises that
Dujarric, or
higher, gave
an order after
June 19 to
(physically)
target it.
4) on June 25
Inner City
Press wrote
to Guterres,
his chief of
staff, his
deputy Amina J
Mohammed and
USG Alison
Smale
informing them
Lt Dobbins,
with animus,
had pushed it
out of the UN
during an SG
speech, and
implicitly
requesting the
vaunted
'protection of
journalist.'
They did...
nothing.
5) on July 5
Dobbins and
other officer
got even more
violent,
grabbing Inner
City Press'
reporter's
arm and
twisting it,
tearing his
shirt and
damaging his
computer while
Inner City Press
covered the UN
Budget
Committee
meeting in the
same way it has
for ten years,
including the
last two as a
non resident
correspondent
(downgraded in
connection
with Inner
City Press'
coverage of
the Ng Lap
Seng / John
Ashe UN
bribery
scandal in
which Ng is
now in jail).
On July 5 when
Inner
City Press came
to work -
after
reporting the
assault to the
NYPD - it was
told it was banned
from entering
the UN and has
been since.
Inner City
Press now
believes that
Dujarric /
Guterres /
Smale put out
orders to have its
reporter
physically
targeted,
despite the
rules saying he
can stay after
7 pm if there
is a meeting
(true both
times). Maybe
they hoped
Inner City Press
would react in
a way they
could easily
use to ban it.
All he
did was say
loudly “I am a
journalist” -
but they still
banned Inner
City Press.
But they took
a chance
the officers
would more
seriously
injure the
Inner City
Press reporter.
It was beyond
censorship,
beyond
reckless - it
must be
reported and
acted on. (It
has been
reported, by
Alex Newman, on July 31, here:
the "UN
spokesman had
vowed to make
things worse
for him after
watching a
video Lee
made. 'I
get roughed
up, banned, no
due process,
no end in
sight.'") Inner
City Press at
noon on July
31 asked
Guterres and
his spokespeople
and Deputy and
Smale (and
has asked the
Rapporteur
to obtain),
"Given
Spokesman
Stephane
Dujarric's quotes
to Columbia
Journalism
Review, and
the moribund
nature of the
supposed
“investigation,”
please
describe all
instructions
given to UN
Security, Lt
Dobbins and
others, after
June 19
regarding
Inner City
Press, and
also state
whether any
personnel of
Al Jazeera or
[ ] have
been
interviewed
for the
investigation"
- watch this
site.
Amazingly, the UN is pointing
to a vague language
it negotiated with its UN
Correspondents Association
which Inner City Press quit
after finding the organization
took money from now convicted
UN bribery Ng
Lap Seng and had a
president who rented one of
his apartments to a Sri
Lanka war crimes
suspect: "Where unexpected
circumstances arise, the
approach will be to avoid
confrontation, maintain
civility and find the fastest,
safest and most secure
acceptable solution. Those
Correspondents who violate the
ground rules governing access,
including the abovementioned
standards of ethical behavior
may have their accreditation
withdrawn or suspended by the
United Nations."
But it was
UN Security, Lt Dobbins on
July 3 with another still
unnamed, who initiated violent
confrontation, grabbing Inner
City Press' reporter's arm and
twisting it, and tearing his
shirt, as he sat typing up
interview notes outside a
Budget Committee meeting he
had every right to cover,
under the rules. Guterres' UN
has become a Kafkaesque place
of censorship where guards he
had already been warned (in
writing on June 25) were
targeting the Press can
physically assault a reporter
whose saying "I am a
journalist!" can then be used
as a lack of civility or
unacceptable comportment to
ban the journalist. This is
corrupt.
On July 20, with
Inner City Press still banned
from the UN after 17 days with
no end in sight, prohibited
from attending the day's US
Secretary of State Mike Pompeo
and Ambassador Nikki Haley
press encounter because it was
in the UN, Inner City Press
waited and politely asked
Guterres and his chief of
staff Maria Luiza Viotti why
it is still banned after 17
days, for being roughed up
twice by Guterres' Security.
(After the first physical
ouster on June 22, Inner City
Press on June 25 notified
Guterres, his chief of staff,
Deputy SG Amina J. Mohammed
and Global Communications
chief Alison Smale that it was
being targeted by Lt. Dobbins;
they did nothing.) On July 20,
despite the quite audible
questions including about
related inaction on the
slaughter in Cameroon which
Inner City Press has asked
about, Guterres got in his
limousine and did not answer,
as did UK Ambassador Karen
Pierce. Video here.
The lack of
accountability for censorship
is growing: Guterres told his
lunch companions "bonne
vacances" and Smale has left
on a three week vacation,
bouncing back all e-mails
with: "I am out of the office
from 1.00 p.m. on Thursday, 19
July through Thursday, 9
August 2018. During my
absence, the Officer-in-Charge
of the Department of Public
Information will be as
follows: 19-25 July - Mr.
Janos Tisovszky.... 26 July
through 1 August - Mr. Ramu
Damodaran... 2-9 August - Ms.
Hua JIang" [sic]." We'll have
more on this. On July 18,
Guterres' deputy spokesman
Farhan Haq was asked by two
journalists about the status
of what he and lead spokesman
Stephane Dujarric called the
investigation of the
"incidents" of July 3, and
apparently not now of June 22.
Video here,
from the UN transcript:
a follow-up to one that’s been
asked here last week and the
week before, and that’s a
report on the current status
of the investigation into the
events on 3 July leading,
ultimately, to the ouster, at
least temporary ouster, of
Inner City Press. And
did the Secretary-General
receive any communications
from any non-governmental
organization (NGO) on… on this
subject? For example, I
think it’s called the Global
Accountability Project or
something like that.
Deputy Spokesman: The UN
has received a letter from the
Government Accountability
Project, and I believe we’ll
be responding to them in due
course.
Question: And… and the
status of the
investigation? Could
you…
Deputy Spokesman: It’s
ongoing... 2d Questioner:
regarding Inner City Press,
you said it’s ongoing.
Is there an idea of when… is
there a date… any idea of when
it’s actually going to come
out and have a result?
Deputy Spokesman:
No. I mean, once we’ve
come to a decision, he’ll be
informed of the decision." On
what - the excessive use of
force by UN Security? This is
Kafkaesque - or now,
Guterresian....
Tellingly,
six days after UN Security
roughed up Inner City Press and
four days after UNnamed
official(s) instituted without
any due process an ongoing ban
on Inner City Press for having
been roughed up, on July 9
Guterres' chief of Management,
Saunders supervisor Jan Beagle,
issued a self-serving
"Administrative Instruction"
which seeks to legitimate
Dobbins' police brutality after
the fact, and ensure it goes on
in the future.
***
Feedback:
Editorial [at] innercitypress.com
UN Office: S-303,
UN, NY 10017 USA
Reporter's mobile (and weekends):
718-716-3540
Other, earlier Inner City Press are
listed here,
and some are available in the ProQuest
service, and now on Lexis-Nexis.
Copyright 2006-2015 Inner City
Press, Inc. To request reprint or other
permission, e-contact Editorial [at]
innercitypress.com for
|