In
Famine Wars at UN, Russia Charges Bias by Secretariat,
d'Escoto's Different Tale
Byline: Matthew Russell Lee of
Inner City Press at the UN: News Analysis
UNITED NATIONS,
October 28 -- Tuesday saw an airing
and acceleration of the disputes between Russia and the U.S., the
United
Kingdom, Georgia, the UN and now possibly even Nicaragua, or at least
the
president of the General Assembly, and former Nicaraguan foreign
minister,
Miguel d'Escoto Brockmann. Russian Ambassador Vitaly Churkin called a
press
conference, ostensibly on "current issues of the
63rd session
of the UN General Assembly." In fact, the briefing was limited to a
single
issue, a pending resolution about the famine in Ukraine "seventy five
years ago," as Churkin put it.
As Inner
City Press exclusively
reported at the time, a September meeting of the UN's
General Committee devolved into verbal fireworks between the U.S.,
Kazakhstan
and Russia, concerning this very item. Later d'Escoto's spokesman
chided Inner
City Press for the story, saying there was no "incident." But not
only did Inner City Press privately receive confirmation of the
incident from
the participants, Tuesday Churkin went public, saying that the U.S. cut
off
Kazakhstan's Ambassador "like knocking down a passenger coming off a
bus." So, there was an incident.
Tuesday
press conference, however, focused on the next meeting of the General
Committee, scheduled for last week but cancelled. As Churkin described
it,
representatives of the US and UK stood around President d'Escoto
stopping him
from starting the meeting. Churkin added that some staff members of the
UN
Secretariat helped slow thing up, acting "unprofessionally" as he put
it. Despite questions from Inner City Press, Churkin declined to name
these UN
staffers. Video here.
Minutes
later at the UN's noon briefing, Inner City Press asked the
Secretariat's
spokesperson Michele Montas for the name of the staff members who
service the
General Committee meetings. Ms. Montas said she didn't know, but would
find
out. Inner City Press put the same
question to d'Escoto's Spokesman Enrique Yeves, who said it was more
properly a
question for the Secretariat. And so it goes.
Churkin at the center of a storm, famine resolution and d'Escoto's
version not shown
Interestingly, Yeves' description differed from
Churkin's. He said that
d'Escoto never wanted a vote, never wanted the meeting to start - and
therefore
was not stopped by the US and UK.
Pressed on the matter, Yeves clarified that
eventually a vote could be
held, but that d'Escoto would prefer consensus, which appears unlikely.
News
analysis: not for nothing, but Nicaragua is for now the only
country other than Russia which has recognized the declarations of
independence of Abkhazia and South Ossetia. D'Escoto himself, in
his first press conference at the UN, pointedly said that Georgia was
the aggressor in the war this August. So why would d'Escoto be choosing
either consensus and silence, or stranger still the US and UK, over
Russia? Why would the descriptions of the General Committee meeting(s)
given by Russia and d'Escoto, through his spokesman, be so different?
Footnote: during
Churkin's press conference, a new
face in the briefing room asked two detailed questions about the
famine. The
second time, he was shouted down as "an NGO." Churkin
made a show of saying, let him ask,
then commenting that the fact that a pro-Ukraine NGO was let into the
press
conference was just another sign of the Secretariat taking sides. Afterwards, the NGO representative --
reportedly with an expired press pass from the General Debate -- was
marched
away from the briefing room as other disputes erupted. Only at the UN.
Watch this site, and this Oct. 2 debate, on
UN, bailout, MDGs
and this October 17 debate, on
Security Council and Obama and the UN.
* * *
These
reports are
usually also available through Google
News and on Lexis-Nexis.
Click
here
for a Reuters
AlertNet piece by this correspondent
about Uganda's Lord's Resistance Army. Click
here
for an earlier Reuters AlertNet piece about the Somali
National
Reconciliation Congress, and the UN's $200,000 contribution from an
undefined trust fund. Video
Analysis here
Feedback: Editorial
[at] innercitypress.com
UN Office: S-453A, UN, NY 10017
USA
Tel: 212-963-1439
Reporter's mobile (and
weekends):
718-716-3540
Other,
earlier Inner City Press are listed here, and some are available
in the ProQuest service, and now on Lexis-Nexis.
Copyright
2006-08 Inner City Press, Inc. To request
reprint or other permission, e-contact Editorial [at]
innercitypress.com -
|