SDNY / UN GATE,
Feb 26 – When Russia
announced it will recognize
independence for the Donetsk
and Luhansk "People’s
Republics," eyes turned to the
United Nations, full of
corruption and ineptitude
under Antonio Guterres.
Guterres
was nowhere to be seen, only
recently back from the
Genocide Games in Beijing. His
spokesman Stephane Dujarric
banned Inner City Press from
his noon briefing, which he
started late cutting off even
others by WebEx. In the room,
he took three questions in a
row from China state media.
After military action began
literally during a Security
Council meeting, a draft
resoluation came out - Inner
City Press has published it here
and here
-- sure to be vetoed,
Inner City Press wrote on
February 24.
On February 25 it
happened. Not only the veto,
but abstentions by China
(population 1.4 billion and a
genocide supported by
Guterres), India also with
population of 1.4 billion, and
the president of the Security
Council for March, the UAE.
Afterward
Guterres ran to the open mic
and, shilling for money, said
he has making his crony Amin
Awad head of aid in Ukraine,
see below.
On
Saturday, with the UN dead
(First Avenue vlog here), it
announced a renewed UN
Security Council clown show
for Sunday 3 pm, to send the
whole circus of hot air and
Guterres' corruption on Monday
to the UN General Assembly,
bought by Chinese state
bribers Ng Lap Seng and CEFC
China Energy / Ye Jianming
under John Ashe and Sam
Kutesa. And Abdulla Shahid? He
and his spokesperson Paulina
Kubiak won't answer Inner City
Press' written questions about
who pays the UNPGA staff.
And on February
26, Guterres through Stephane
Dujarric bragged: "Due to the
aggravating situation in
Ukraine, the Secretary-General
will remain in New York and
not travel to Geneva as
planned. He will send a video
message to Monday’s meeting of
the Human Rights Council."
But Friday Feb 25
Dujarric said, "The
Secretary-General will be
travelling over the weekend.
He’ll be going to Geneva
where, on Monday morning, he
will deliver remarks at the
opening of the 49th regular
session of the Human Rights
Council. We expect him back
here on Monday afternoon." If
he'd speak Monday, was the
junket another one to visit
his bank in Lisbon? Asked but
not answered. See, song:
Inner City Press, now
banned by Guterres, exposed
Awad siding with the extremist
government of Sri Lanka:
The Staff Union alleges
a pattern: "The recent action of Sri
Lanka to detain two national staff
appears to be a campaign against UN
personnel, which is illegal under
international law. Authorities have
been arresting, without explanation,
UN staff members, initially refusing
to provide access to them by UN
officials." Clickhereto
view the Staff Union statement.
Before issuing their
statement, UN Staff Union officials
expressed outrage atquotes
by the UN'sCountry
Representative in Sri Lanka,
UNHCR's Amim Awad,that"the
UN acknowledges without
reservation the right of the
security services of Sri Lanka to
investigate any allegations of
criminal wrongdoing, including by
UN staff members, and will
cooperate fully to support due
process."
The
UN is advertising its
obsolescence, like a badge of
honor. It is time to move on.
UAE takes over
UNSC Presidency March 1. Will
they too exclude Inner City
Press? Watch this site.
The deep
decay of the UN under Guterres
came into focus, but its
supporters looked away and
made excuses. Stand-up here.
First Ukraine song here
At the courts,
which Inner City Press while
banned from the UN by Guterres
covers, Ukraine, fending off
troops on its borders and
separately an arbitral award
to Tatneft, cited both in
arguments before U.S. District
Court for the Southern
District of New York
Magistrate Judge Sarah Netburn
on February 17. Inner City
Press live tweeted it (more on
Patreon here),
thread here:
now Ukraine v.
PAO Tatneft, in which Ukraine
is opposing discovery requests
by citing troops on its
border. SDNY judge says, I
understand, but... Ukraine's
lawyer Maria Kostytska: There
is no justification for these
52 subpoenas from Tatneft.
There are troops on Ukraine's
border.
Judge: I
understand that. But I am
concerned with efficiencies in
these two litigations. Ukraine
wants a protective order
entered - not (just) to
protect it militarily, but
hear to keep documents in the
case secret, from the Press
and public. Inner City Press
may after research oppose this
- this week we won some
unsealing, here
Tatneft's lawyer:
Ukraine wants to delay. We
have subpoena-ed financial
institutions. [From docket,
involved:
#BankOfAmerica,
#WellsFargo, #MorganStanley,
#Santander, #CIBC,
#CreditAgricole &
#GoldmanSachs (which we're
covering #EDNY: US v. Ng.
Ukraine: There
are discovery proceedings in
four Federal courts, in NY and
DC. [So what's the 4th?] We
are speaking on behalf of the
highest levels of Ukraine's
government. The Prime Minister
is considering this. There is
a mediation upcoming.
Ukraine's lawyer:
We are not delaying. We are
exercising our recourse
against an award based on
illegal share purchase using
promissory notes. We have not
waived this due to estoppel.
We have not provided on
appeal. So we seek certiorari
Tatneft's lawyer:
The discovery could be avoided
if Ukraine would secure the
judgment. The arbitral award
is what it is. We are entitled
to pursue discovery without
further delay. Judge: Maybe
Ms. Kostytska tomorrow will
have more info from her client
[Ukraine]
Judge: So
this is how we're going to
proceed -- Ukraine's lawyer:
We want to add an additional
suggestion, we want
reconsideration under Local
Rule 6.3, your clear error.
Digging into the
docket, we find a declaration
by Ukraine citing the US State
Department on an "invasion
force of 175,000."
This case is
Ukraine v. PAO Tatneft, 21-mc-376
(Koeltl / Netburn)
***
Your support means a lot. As little as $5 a
month helps keep us going and grants you
access to exclusive bonus material on our
Patreon page. Click
here to become a patron.
Feedback:
Editorial [at] innercitypress.com
SDNY Press Room 480, front cubicle
500 Pearl Street, NY NY 10007 USA
Mail: Box 20047, Dag
Hammarskjold Station NY NY 10017
Reporter's mobile (and weekends):
718-716-3540
Other, earlier Inner City Press are
listed here,
and some are available in the ProQuest
service, and now on Lexis-Nexis.
Copyright 2006-2022 Inner City
Press, Inc. To request reprint or other
permission, e-contact Editorial [at]
innercitypress.com