As UN Supported Ghislaine
Maxwell Epstein Paid IPI Now Rudd Speaks While
Guterres Bans Press
By Matthew
Russell Lee, Patreon
BBC
- Guardian
UK - Honduras
- ESPN
UN GATE / SDNY,
Oct 28 -- While Ghislaine
Maxwell, now incarcerated for
sex trafficking, was filming
videos into the United
Nations, now deceased Jeffrey
Epstein she procured for was
working the angles just across
First Avenue at a think tank
connected to an incoming UN
Security Council member that
refuses to answer questions:
Norway.
Nor has UN
Secretary General Antonio
Guterres answered in any way
his and the UN's connection to
Maxwell, through Amir Dossal
Guterres' head of UN
Partnerships being one of only
five people on the board of
Maxwell's Terramar project.
Contrast this continuing cover
up by Guterres to Kevin Rudd,
below.
Inner City Press while in the
UN asked questions about
Maxwell and her UN-supported
Terramar Project, here. Then,
after UNSG Antonio Guterres
whose UN Partnerships boss
Amir Dossal was on Maxwell's
Terramar board, had Inner City
Press roughed up and banned,
now 825 bans, Inner City Press
on July 15, 2019, published this.
It linked
Epstein, then alive in the MCC
jail, to UN-affiliate
International Peace Institute,
who murky moves in Bahrain
using UN-paid staff it had
previously exposed.
Now
with Epstein dead and Maxwell
facing trial, the Norwegian
business newspaper DN has dug
in this same waters (Epstein -
IPI), bringing in Bill Gates,
to boot. Inner City Press,
crediting DN, asked Norway's
Mission and Ambassador Mona
Juul (whose husband is
implicated) as well as
Guterres again. No answers.
Impunity.
Now Kevin
Rudd as IPI chair has spoken:
"I first joined the
International Peace Institute
(IPI) Board in June 2014. In
June 2018, at the Board’s
request, I became Chair... I
first learned of contributions
from Epstein’s foundations to
the IPI in November 2019
through reporting by the
Norwegian press. I was
blindsided by this. Subsequent
searches by IPI staff, made at
the request of the Board, have
identified donations totaling
$650,000 that were received
between October 2011 and May
2019. This represented
approximately 0.9% of IPI’s
total revenue over those
years. The source of these
donations had not previously
been disclosed to the Board,
nor to me as Chair.These
revelations were deeply
disturbing to me and to other
members of the Board. IPI was
not alone in receiving
donations from Epstein
foundations; dozens of other
US nonprofit organizations and
teaching institutions have
collectively received more
than $30 million of donations
from his foundations. Upon
learning of the existence of
these donations, I convened a
meeting of the Board on 4
December 2019, which took two
decisions at my initiative.
First, the IPI decided to
donate an equivalent sum to
suitable programs to support
victims of human trafficking
and sexual assault. This
hardline approach contrasts
with a number of other
institutions that decided to
keep some or all of their
donations. IPI management is
in the process of implementing
this Board decision. Second,
the IPI adopted a new Gift
Acceptance Policy to prevent
any future donations unless
the donors satisfy a test of
good character. On 14 October,
again through the Norwegian
press, the Board learned that
there was a personal loan
agreement between Epstein and
Terje Rod-Larsen that existed
in 2013. Neither the loan, nor
its repayment, had been
previously disclosed to the
Board or to me as Chair. Mr
Rod-Larsen has apologised to
the Board for what he has
described as his grave error
of judgment. I am deeply
disappointed that the Board
has had to learn about so much
of this through the media. As
a consequence of this latest
development, I took action
last week to convene an
extraordinary Board meeting
and requested that Mr
Rod-Larsen provide a report to
the Board on all these
matters. I will be
recommending to the Board that
an immediate and comprehensive
probity review be conducted
into the matters raised. I
will also recommend an
independent accounting review
by a Big Four global firm into
any financial transactions
between Epstein and the IPI.
Any significant engagement
with someone as odious as
Epstein must be taken
seriously and investigated
thoroughly. I have no
recollection whatsoever of
ever meeting Epstein. I have
checked records around a
function I attended in New
York in late September 2013,
when I was still a Member of
Parliament, held in honour of
the then President of
Mongolia. It was a large
function at the time of the UN
General Assembly attended by
UN Secretary-General [and]
former Israeli Prime Minister
Ehud Barak; New York Mayor
Michael Bloomberg; Kazakh
Foreign Minister Erlan
Idrissov; Qatari Foreign
Minister Sheikh Hamad Bin
Jassim Al-Thani; former
Norwegian Prime Page 1
Minister Thorbjorn Jagland; US
Secretary of State John Kerry;
former US Secretary of State
Henry Kissinger; former UK
Foreign Secretary David
Miliband; IPI President Terje
Rod-Larsen; businesswoman
Ariane Rothschild; former US
Treasury Secretary Larry
Summers; German Foreign
Minister Guido Westerwelle;
Iranian Foreign Minister Javad
Zarif; and IPI Board Member
Mort Zuckerman. IPI records
indicate that Epstein was also
invited to attend that same
function, although I don’t
believe we ever met. This is
just the guest list, and it
cannot be confirmed for
certain who was actually
there. At that event, which
was well before I joined the
IPI Board, the Mongolian
President asked me to assist
on an international advisory
board to help guide his
democratic government’s
program of economic and
political development. I was
advised that this advisory
board was to be facilitated by
the IPI. This advisory board
had an initial conference call
in January 2014. I
participated in it and
provided advice to the
Mongolian President on the
future of his country’s mining
industry. There were no
further meetings of which I am
aware. IPI staff have advised
me subsequently that Epstein
was apparently among the 10
participants of the
teleconference. Two years
later, I was offered
remuneration for my
participation in this advisory
board but I declined because
my involvement, apart from the
initial teleconference, was
negligible. Other participants
may have received remuneration
for their participation in the
advisory board, although I
have been advised by IPI staff
that Epstein did not. I was
subsequently advised that the
funding source for the
advisory board was the
government of Mongolia. The
Board takes these matters
exceptionally seriously as
demonstrated by the measures
above. The Board will make a
further statement on these
matters once it has met on
these matters."
At least
Rudd belatedly is still only
partially addressed it. (Full
disclosure: Inner City Press
exclusively reported Rudd's
11th hour challenge to
Guterres, here
and partially denied as on
IPI, here)
which many now hope would have
been successful). So when will
Guterres quit - or, if he
still evades COVID quarantine
to go to Boston, stay there?
Watch this site.
Norway is
joining the UN Security
Council in 2021 - they have
already started attending and
observing closed consultation.
But its
ambassador Mona Juul - the
wife of Terje
Rød-Larsen
- has like
Guterres and
his spokesman
Stephane
Dujarric
refused to
answer any
questions from
Inner City
Press, even
while Juul
head UN
ECOSOC, to
which
Maxwell's
Terranova
pitched.
Now
UN General
Assembly
President
Volkan Bozkir,
whose
spokesman
Brenden Varma
blocks Inner
City Press on
Twitter for
asking, has as
Chef de
Cabinet "Ms.
Mary Skaare,
Deputy
Permanent
Representative
of Norway to
the UN." She
also does not
answer, and so
colludes in
the
censorship.
Today's
UN is corrupt
and complicit
with child sex
trafficking,
and arrogant
in its refusal
to answer
questions or
even refrain
from roughing
up and banning
Press which
asks.
Accountability
for all this
is necessary,
and Inner City
Press (and
apparently DN)
will no rest.
– While the
United Nations speaks about
press freedom and the UN
General Assembly week under
new President Zolkan Bozkir of
Turkey, UN Secretary General
Antonio Guterres has banned
Inner City Press amid its
questions about his finances
and failures on Cameroon and
in combatting or even just
disclosing UN sexual
abuse.
On
September 17, Guterres'
spokesman Staphane Dujarric
was asked out it. Video here.
From the transcript:
Q: you were
talking about press freedoms,
a different part of the press.
What's the latest with Inner
City Press? They've apparently
asked
to be credentialed, and that's
been ignored. They've played
an active part in uncovering
UN corruption over the years.
Where does... where do they
stand regarding UN
credentialing?
UN Spokesman
Dujarric: Mr. Lee's
status remains unchanged.
Okay...
Question:
And does that mean that that's
going to stay unchanged,
meaning he's banned for the
next... for this General
Assembly?
Spokesman
Dujarric: Well, I mean,
there's no... we're not
issuing any new credentials
for this General Assembly,
because there's really
nothing... there are no
physical... barely any
physical events here. So,
there's no... no temporary
credentials are being given,
anyway.
All right. Thank you very
much. I will leave you in the
capable hands of Mr. [Brenden]
Varma....
Brenden Varma,
for PGA Bozkir, has refused to
answer Inner City Press'
questions about his
backsliding on the one reform
from the UN corruption scandal
Inner City Press reported on,
often exclusively, about PGAs
Ashe and Kutesa; Bozkir has an
empty
"Ethics" page.
Varma then
blocked Inner City Press on
Twitter. This is today's UN -
we'll have more on this issue.
Inner City Press should be
given the codes to access
and ask questions at briefings
immediately, like the state
media and retirees Guterres
and Melissa Fleming prefer and
favor.
***
Your
support means a lot. As little as $5 a month
helps keep us going and grants you access to
exclusive bonus material on our Patreon
page. Click
here to become a patron.
Feedback:
Editorial [at] innercitypress.com
SDNY Press Room 480, front cubicle
500 Pearl Street, NY NY 10007 USA
Mail: Box 20047, Dag
Hammarskjold Station NY NY 10017
Reporter's mobile (and weekends):
718-716-3540
Other, earlier Inner City Press are
listed here,
and some are available in the ProQuest
service, and now on Lexis-Nexis.
Copyright 2006-2020 Inner City
Press, Inc. To request reprint or other
permission, e-contact Editorial [at]
innercitypress.com
|