After
UNDT Covers Up Padula Sex Abuse Proof
Secret Hearing on Kennedy and Inner City
Press
By Matthew
Russell Lee, Patreon Order I
BBC
- Guardian
UK - Honduras
- CJR -
PFT
UN GATE, Nov 17 –
How corrupt is today's United
Nations? Even when a
proceeding about the growing
trend of sexual harassment
under Sec-Gen Antonio Guterres
is supposed to be public, when
the Press comes to cover it,
it is denied access. Video here.
And then
Guterres' kangaroo court
demands that the Press which
he excludes destroy evidence
of UN sexual abuse, or be
further banned. This is
today's UN.
Early on the
morning of November 16, Inner
City Press submitted a reply
to the UNDT, as well as Team
Guterres. A full day later
with no response, a portion of
it is below. Also on November
16 this formal request was
submitted to Judge Adda, the
Registrar and others:
This is a formal
request for the log-in
information from the
presumptively public UNDT
proceeding this Friday:
Kennedy v. UNSG
Guterres, Order No.184
(NY/2020) dated 12 November
2020. (And see
below).
Now on November
18, in a telling display of
lack of transparency and
attempt to cover up his UN's
retaliation, Guterres has
"filed a 'Motion for an In
Camera Hearing' in which, with
reference to art. 16 of the
Dispute Tribunal’s Rules of
Procedure, he requested that
the hearing be closed to the
public. In support thereof,
the Respondent submits, inter
alia, that “the evidence
presented at the hearing may
wander to safety and security
related issues ancillary or
entirely beyond the scope of
the present case, and which
are not appropriate for
presentation in the public
domain”, that Mr. KR has
“access to a great deal of
confidential and sensitive
information”, and that “it is
highly likely confidential
information might be exposed
which could place the safety
and security of [United
Nations] personnel at risk”.
3. On 16 November 2020, the
Applicant filed a response in
which he submitted that the
Applicant has “no objection to
having his witness testify in
camera”. Consideration 4. In
light of the parties’
submissions, the Tribunal will
grant the Respondent’s motion,
noting that, since the parties
will likely make reference to
Mr. KR’s testimony in their
oral presentations of their
case, the entire hearing will
be closed to the public.
IT IS ORDERED
THAT: 5. The virtual hearing
scheduled for Friday, 20
November 2020 from 11:00 a.m.
to 1:30 p.m. is to be held in
camera and closed to the
public." Secrecy with public
money. More and more
disgusting and lawless.
Inner City Press
has pointed out the absurdity
of Judge Adda ordering
destruction of evidence leaked
from a proceeding from which
Inner City Press was excluded,
and notes even pending its
required reversal the barring
order appears to apply only to
Judge Adda's cases (Kennedy is
before Judge Hunter).
We note Article 9
(3) of the UNDT statute: "The
oral proceedings of the
Dispute Tribunal shall be held
in public unless the Dispute
Tribunal decides, at its own
initiative or at the request
of either party, that
exceptional circumstances
require the proceedings to be
closed."
This is a
Press request for the Teams
link to Friday's Kennedy
proceeding, or a statement why
not. On deadline."
From
the Kennedy case:
"Mr. KR, however, also
suggests that “[t]he
correspondence reproduced by
[Inner City Press ('ICP')]
consisted solely [of] staff
union exchanges, which [he]
indicated were confidential
for those who might take the
matter up." We'll have more on
this. And this:
November 16,
2020 By E-mail to UNDT,
SG, USG Fleming, OSSG
Dujarric, DSG, MALU
United Nations
Attn: UNDT Judge Joelle Adda,
UNSG Guterres, USG Fleming 405
East 42 Street NY NY
10017 Re: UNDT
Case No. UNDT/NY/2019/047,
Order No. 179 (NY/2020) -
request for docketing and
action(s) Dear Judge
Adda, UNSG Guterres, USG
Fleming, others:
This
responds to the UN Dispute
Tribunal's Order of November
9, 2020 which purports to
order me, as a journalist, to
"destroy" evidence of a UN
staff member's sexual
harassment and assault, or
else be further censored and
banned from the UN. See, UNDT
Case No. UNDT/NY/2019/047,
Order No. 179 (NY/2020).
This order
is contrary not only to the
First Amendment to the U.S.
Constitution, under which I
and Inner City Press operate,
but also to the UN's Article
19 as well as to the claim
that the UN and SG Guterres
are committed to rooting out,
and not just continuing to
cover up, UN sexual abuse and
exploitation.
To
purport to order a publication
to "destroy" information about
wrongdoing which is leaked to
it by whistleblowers flies in
the face of such cases as the
Pentagon Papers, up to the
45th U.S. President's tax
returns.
To issue
an order purporting to hold me
in contempt, prior to any
opportunity to be heard and
while your court admits it had
no idea how the information
you order destroyed was
provided to Inner City Press
itself shows contempt for
freedom of the press as well
as to due process.
For
your information, Inner City
Press follows all rules
applicable to it not only
about not recording court
proceedings, but also about
for example embargoes. Every
two week I attend and ask
questions at the International
Monetary Fund embargoed press
briefing, and always respect
the embargo.
But
there is no privity between
your court and Inner City
Press, or me. Your order(s)
admit I was blocked from
attending your purportedly
public session. So it is
absurd to claim I violated any
agreement not to publish
information.
Given your
public order, you should
docket this response and,
since you assert that you have
jurisdiction over me and Inner
City Press, provide a prompt
and public opportunity to be
heard on why it is that I have
been banned from the UN Press
briefings for 859 days by SG
Guterres, USG Fleming and UN
Spokesperson Stephane
Dujarric, whom I have asked
for an explanation of your
order(s) since they were
issued.
Since you have asserted that
the UNDT has jurisdiction over
Inner City Press and me, this
is a formal request for UNDT
hearing and action on this:
[13 paragraph complaint
against UN and affilates]
I await docketing and your
response, the opportunity to
heard and the restoration of
accreditation and the WebEx
codes to attend and ask
questions at the UN noon
briefing. On
deadline,
/s/ Matthew Russell Lee
The
leaked evidence, precisely the
type that media is elsewhere
celebrated for publishing in
cases like Ghislaine Maxwell
(to whom the UN is connected
through Guterres' Partnerships
chief Amir Dossal), includes
transcripts. Here now, after
yet another day of UN
Spokesperson Stephane Dujarric
and "Verify" fraud Melissa
Fleming refusing to confirm or
deny or answer anything, is
from one of the many
transcript:
"I am not in a
state where I could leave the
group because I was too scared
that he would follow me out of
the group, so I was staying
there and seeing where he
exactly goes.... He was doing
the same thing with another UN
staff, her name was
[VOLUNTARILY REDACTED BY INNER
CITY PRESS], he tried to grab
her face, he tried to kiss her
and she actually pushed him
away... also [VOLUNTARILY
REDACTED] of Accenture."
This after
Q&A with a male UN
"investigator" implying that
is entirely normal in the UN
for a known sexual harasser to
walk around with twelve pack
of beer and... other things.
To be continued. This is
what Guterres is covering up
by banning the Press that
covers it, and now claiming
the authority to order the
destruction of evidence leaked
by whistleblowers.
Under
Guterres, the UN has become
functionally a sex trafficking
conspiracy, moving
"peacekeepers" and staff
around to committed sexual
abuse for which they are
shielded and protected by
Guterres, including with
censorship.
On
the morning of November 12
Inner City Press in writing
asked Dujarric, Fleming,
Guterres and others including
Deputy Spokesman Farhan Haq
who deleted or "left" the
questions on WhatsApp,
"Immediately on the Padula
UNDT case I have asked each of
you about since November 3
explain on what basis the UN
is now demanding censorship of
leaked evidence of UN sexual
harassment, in a UNDT order no
less: "until Mr. Lee has
demonstrated to the Tribunal
that all illegal recordings
have been removed from the
public domain and destroyed,
it will hold Mr. Lee in
contempt of court and prohibit
him from attending any of its
future public hearings.
" But Inner City Press
was banned from the UN by
Antonio Guterres before this,
for reporting on UN abuses,
and its question have not been
answered. This one should be -
on deadline."
Now
November 13, no answer at all.
Today's UN is full of
corruption and censorship.
After
asking Guterres and his
spokespeople Stephane Dujarric
and Melissa Fleming to explain
- they have refused - we are
publishing the order(s),
including here
that
"According to
media reports, [the United
Nations] regards Inner City
Press and Mr Lee as personae
non grata, and has withdrawn
Mr Lee’s media accreditation,
as a result of myriad previous
instances in which Mr Lee has
breached the Organisation’s
media guidelines.[reference to
footnote omitted] These
breaches reportedly included
live-streaming a UN function
that was designated as
private. [reference to
footnote omitted] … Mr Lee
asserts in the Twitter thread
that he was denied entry into
the virtual hearing in this
case. The tweet includes a
video which shows Mr Lee,
using the moniker
‘Press-Guest’, in the
hearing’s ‘lobby’, awaiting
admission by Tribunal
officials, and ultimately
being denied entry. [reference
to annex omitted] The
Applicant and Applicant’s
counsel recall seeing an entry
request under the name of
‘Inner City Press’ during his
cross-examination of [the
witness]. However, neither
Applicant nor his counsel
recall seeing ‘Inner City
Press’ or ‘PressGuest’ among
the participants in the
hearing. … The Applicant thus
believes that Mr Lee’s
assertion is correct: Tribunal
officials did not admit Mr Lee
or Inner City Press into the
hearing. If so, Mr Lee or
Inner City Press could only
have obtained images from the
hearing, including the
confidential OIOS witness
testimony, from someone who
was admitted into the hearing:
either a participant or an
observer (whether a [United
Nations] staff member or
member of the
public).[reference to footnote
omitted] In other words, the
information was apparently
leaked."
We've
uploaded this Order to
DocumentCloud here
and then, and
order that Lee is "prohibited
from attending any future
public hearings of the
undersigned Judge until he has
demonstrated to the Tribunal
that all illegal recordings
from the hearing on 4 November
2020 have been removed from
the public domain and
destroyed."
Inner City
Press has asked Dujarric,
Amina J. Mohammed and Fleming
how the UN of Guterres can
purport to order the
destruction of whistleblower
evidence of sexual abuse in
the UN. No answer.
But Inner City
Press was banned from the UN
by Antonio Guterres before
this, so that Guterres could
conceal child rapes by UN
peacekeepers and drugging and
raping by such staff members
as Karim Elkonany, who he
never disciplined.
In this
case, Inner City Press every
weekday since November 3 has
put written questions about
the case to UN Spokesman
Stephane Dujarric, Melissa
Fleming and others - with no
answer at all. We are now
asking about these orders.
We'll have
more on this, including
publishing the UNDT's absurd
orders and more. Note that
Inner City Press knows full
well how to comply with rules
in legal reporting - but any
tribunal that bans the Press,
then demands censorship of
material leaked by
whistleblowers, deserve more
not less coverage.
On November
3 Inner City Press arrived
online to cover a sexual
harassment proceeding in the
UN Dispute Tribunal. But
despite the promise of
openness, it was blocked.
Still, from exhibits, this
live tweeted thread:
This UN staff
member Mr. Andrea Padula
allegedly "a. “grabbed
[Ms. VC’s] face, leaned
forward and attempted to kiss
her”; b. “when [Ms. VC]
resisted [him] kissing her,
[he] forced [Ms. VC’s] down
and kissed her c. “grabbed
[Ms. MV], held her closely,
and attempted to kiss her”
Those on
this UN cover-up call,
blocking the Press from an
ostensibly public UN sexual
harassment hearing, include
Morten Michelsen, Omar Josef
Shehabi, but ultimately the
rape-cover-up-man in
chief, @AntonioGuterres
. He has corrupted the entire
Organization
In the
supposedly public UN "legal"
proceeding that Inner City
Press was just denied access
to, here is an exhibit being
presented - a UN cubicle, with
a Patricia Dann sign on it and
an apparently inflatable
kangaroo. More exhibits from
Big Tony Gutters' Animal House
UN, presented in ostensibly
public legal proceeding that
Inner City Press was blocked
from - note "Dance floor" -
including the UN - and party
boys / dirty old men.
This one
of @AntonioGuterres '
party boys is named Mr. Andrea
Padula (in Iraq, Guterres'
Karim Elkorany went further,
into drugging and raping a UN
contractors) - but here, note
the involvement of "Mariuska
of Accenture."
Update - the
United Nations under
@AntonioGuterres is
spending the public's money to
hold sexual harassment dances
(and fly rapists like Elkorany
in and out of Iraq) - but when
the Media tries to cover a
public proceeding, access
denied. #ImpeachGuterres 202
views 0:00 / 0:27
Turns out
this
@AntonioGuterres party
boy Padula "was doing the same
thing with another UN staff,
her name was
Verouschka.... he tried
to grab her" - note that the
three UNTSO #sexploiters are
*still* being paid by the
public...
***
Your
support means a lot. As little as $5 a month
helps keep us going and grants you access to
exclusive bonus material on our Patreon
page. Click
here to become a patron.
Feedback:
Editorial [at] innercitypress.com
SDNY Press Room 480, front cubicle
500 Pearl Street, NY NY 10007 USA
Past
& future at UN: Room S-303, UN,
NY 10017 USA
Mail: Box 20047, Dag
Hammarskjold Station NY NY 10017
Reporter's mobile (and weekends):
718-716-3540
Other, earlier Inner City Press are
listed here,
and some are available in the ProQuest
service, and now on Lexis-Nexis.
Copyright 2006-2020 Inner City
Press, Inc. To request reprint or other
permission, e-contact Editorial [at]
innercitypress.com
|