As UN Global Compact Lauds Sri Lanka's Hayley Group,
Cigarette Filter Production Deemed Not Serious
Byline: Matthew Russell Lee of Inner City Press at
the UN
UNITED NATIONS, March 19 -- The UN Global Compact, a
corporate initiative of Kofi Annan, on Monday held its first press conference at
UN Headquarters since Ban Ki-moon took over. The Hayleys Group, a Sri Lankan
conglomerate involved among other things in textiles, teas and "activated
carbon" used in cigarette filters, received a plaque for a program in which it
will insert a Global Compact flier in every tea container, and devote 1.5 cents
per sale to housing for the workers on what it calls its plantations.
The Global Compact's
self-description is
that it "catalyzes actions in support of UN goals." The UN's World Health
Organization helped organize in 2003 the
Framework Convention on Tobacco Control,
since ratified by nearly all UN member states.
At Monday's
press conference, Inner City Press asked Hayley's Group chairman N.G.
Wickremeratne about the cigarette filters as well as how the Group deals with
the 20-year conflict in the country. Video
here,
from Minute 27:54.
Of cigarette filters, Mr. Wickremeratne
said that "if someone wants to buy our product, unless we know for certain....
we would not not sell." He added that if asked, "We will produce a better
quality filter" for cigarettes.
But how
does this relate to the Global Compact, and to the UN's Framework Convention on
Tobacco Control? Inner City Press asked the two questions, conflict and tobacco,
to Global Compact head, Goerg Kell. On the first, Mr. Kell spoke of how business
can foster islands of stability. He did not, in this first crack at it, address
the tobacco issue. When Inner City Press followed-up, Mr. Kell said, "I don't
believe it is a very serious issue," and called it a third-level issue. We are
here to talk about tea, he said, noting that there is "no explicit prohibition"
against tobacco and that it is a "fully legal product." He concluded, "We do not
see this as an ethical issue."
Video
here, from Minute 37:51 [but, for update, click
here.] Many in the responsible investment community see
it differently. And the
Global Compact's own website touts
its co-hosting of dialogues to "promote sustainable lifestyles." Smoking, it
seems clear, not only does not represent a sustainable lifestyle, it does not
sustain life, much less style.
Global
Compact beams tea at UN HQ on Monday
Sri Lanka
is a
signatory to the UN's Framework Convention
on Tobacco Control. On Monday,
Sri Lanka's Ambassador to the United States, Bernard Goonetilleke, responded to
Inner City Press' question about business in conflict areas, but not on the
question of cigarettes and filters. Ambassador Goonetilleke emphasized that
cease fires are arranged, even in areas controlled by the Tamil Tigers, to
arrange for the vaccination of children, and that the central government pays
for schooling in those areas. A similar point, regarding the country's rules
against child labor, was made by Ravi Fernando, who along with being the Global
Compact's "focal point" in Sri Lanka also works for garment manufacturer MAS
Holdings, one of the products of which is
described as
"the ethical bra." Beyond Sri Lanka, MAS has factories in India, Maldives and
Vietnam.
Relatedly,
Mr. Kell indicated that his office and experts will be providing information
from its "work stream" on the relation between the Compact and conflict
prevention, or as Inner City Press put it, peace and security. The connections
and disconnections between the evolving principles and methods of the Global
Compact and the wider "community" of socially responsible investment is a topic
deserving of more coverage. What, for example, is the Global Compact's view of
predatory lending? Would the Global Compact say that climate change and
standardless greenhouse gas emissions, like tobacco and the production of
cigarette paraphernalia, is not "an ethical issue," not even " a very serious
issue?" We will continue to cover the Compact.
Feedback: Editorial
[at] innercitypress.com
UN Office: S-453A,
UN, NY 10017 USA Tel: 212-963-1439
Reporter's mobile
(and weekends): 718-716-3540
With Audit
Starting in NY, UNDP Manager
Akiko Yuge
Leaves Town,
Sale-of-Jobs Unanswered
Byline: Matthew Russell Lee of Inner City Press at
the UN: News Analysis
UNITED NATIONS, March 19 -- As the
delayed
"urgent audit" of North Korea programs
called for by Ban Ki-moon on January 19
today begins at the UN Development Program, the director of UNDP's Bureau of
Management Akiko Yuge has conveniently left town, internal UNDP e-mails obtained
by Inner City Press show.
Sources say that UNDP's legal chief James
Provenzano and finance director Darshak Shah may also have left. (Since UNDP no
longer answers even basic questions, this cannot be confirmed. As to Ms. Yuge,
see the intra-UNDP email below.)
Mr. Shah and Ms. Yuge were among the eight UNDP officials to whom the Executive
Secretary of the UN Board of Auditors, Swatantra Goolsarran, sent his
March 1 memo scoping out the audit
including requested interviews, their absence from headquarters during the audit
has raised questions about staff. So has the fact that the scope of audit memo
was not sent to UNDP's Asia chief, Hafiz Pasha, but only to his
ostensible deputy, David Lockwood. The credibility of the audit is increasingly
doubted by knowledgeable sources inside UNDP.
UNDP's large but recently
lethargic (at least on this issue) communications office has not helped dispel
the doubts. A series of questions about the audit and UNDP's North Korea program
have done unanswered. Even two non-North Korea questions asked on camera then in
writing last week, regarding UNDP's reported support of a gold mine in Romania
and the selling of jobs and promotions alleged by UNDP staffers, have been
entirely ignored. UNDP's David Morrison was asked these questions at the March
13 noon briefing filmed by UN TV, click
here
for video, from minute 40:30 to 42:39.
Inner City Press followed this up with an email:
Subj: Follow-up
to today's UN noon briefing, & some long-outstanding questions, thanks
Date: 3/13/2007
2:05:40 PM Eastern Standard Time
To:
david.morrison [at] undp.org, ad.melkert [at] undp.org, kemal.dervis [at]
undp.org
CC: [cc's
deleted in this format]
From: Inner
City Press
Hello -- This
follows up on questions asked at today's UN noon briefing. On deadline, need a
yes or no answer on whether the previous head of the Department of Management
ever imposed conditions appointments or promotion (or in cases of demotion /
re-classification downward). We are told that this was sometimes explained as
being akin to a "headhunter's fee."
Because we
are on deadline, we are also cc-ing some of the individuals, who we have been
told may on this question have knowledge. [Ed.'s note: cc's deleted in
this format.]
I am attaching
for your comment and explanation three documents concerning the controversy
regarding UNDP's position on, and involvement in, gold mining project in
Romania. Also, a breakdown of the $10.88 million you cited today, and your
response to Ben's question about the $151 million figure in OCHA's consolidated
appeal. I am pasting below yesterday's reminder email, and note that a long-ago
asked question -- how many people work for UNDP? -- message, which included
other still-unanswered questions, pasted below -- has yet to be answered. Ad
Melkert is cc-ed because he indicated such answers would become faster.
And again, we
believe that Mr. Dervis as Administrator should come and give a briefing in
226, given the issues that have been raised.
Still, no response whatsoever. Therefore, for now,
here is an edited version of one of the UNDP staff complaints that has been
directed to Inner City Press, despite David Morrison's counter-story that
procedures and whistle-blower protections exist in UNDP such that no one should
go to the press:
Subject: Re:
Attn: Mr. Matthew Russell Lee
Date: 3/2007 [Date and time omitted due to last line of 2d email, below]
From: [Name withheld, entitled to all whistle-blower protections]
To: Inner City Press
...on jobs for
favors first. I know some people to whom Brian Gleeson offered promotions or
appointments in exchange of the cash equivalent of the first salary. He
mentioned this option to me as well when my post was re-classified downwards. I
pretended it was a joke, but afterwards the relations became very strained. For
quite some time I was kind of sidelined...
Then --
Subject: Re:
Attn: Mr. Matthew Russell Lee - many thanks, some [follow-up] questions
Date: 3/2007 [Date and time omitted due to last line of this email]
From: [Name withheld, entitled to all whistle-blower protections]
To: Inner City Press
...Usually
$10,000 or first salary. Brian was quoted to say that as UNDP was becoming
corporate-like, it would be normal to charge as head hunter agency would charge.
...Our I.T.
manager said that the management could track what we do on the Internet at any
instant. So much for our rights, which could be another topic for you to
explore.
Yes, that will be another topic. And on the
Romania gold mine controversy, we have tried another route, which we hope will
soon bear fruit, at least a response of some sort. But why would UNDP made no
response at all for six days to questions about these sale of jobs and
promotions allegations, questions raised in a formal UN-televised press briefing
and then also in writing, with additional names provided? \
This was sent out, Friday after close of business:
From:
Bernadette Jones
Sent: Mar 16,
2007 18:10
Subject: O-I-C
of BOM
Dear All,
This is to
advise that Ms. Akiko Yuge will be away from Headquarters from 18 to 31 March
2007, inclusive. During her absence Ms. Jocelline Bazile-Finley will be the
Officer-in-Charge of the Bureau of Management. Please also note that Ms. Bazile-Finley
is the Acting Chief Procurement Officer for this period.
Thank you
Bernadette
Jones , Executive Assistant to the Assistant Administrator and Director, Bureau
of Management
We will have more about UNDP's
procurement. But why would UNDP send its new director of Management, Brian
Gleeson's successor, away from headquarters precisely during the two week New
York period of the "urgent audit" of UNDP's management of its North Korea
program? Questions, questions...
Again, because a number of Inner City Press'
UN
sources go out of their way to express commitment to serving the poor, and while
it should be unnecessary, Inner City Press is compelled to conclude this
installment in a necessarily-ongoing series by saluting the stated goals of the
UN agencies and many of their staff. Keep those cards, letters and emails coming, and phone
calls too, we apologize for any phone tag, but please continue trying, and keep
the information flowing.
At UNDP, Audit Delayed and Questions Deflected As
Other Scandals Brew
Byline: Matthew Russell Lee of Inner City Press at
the UN: New Analysis
UNITED NATIONS, March 13 -- The urgent audit of the
UN Development Program called for by Ban Ki-moon on January 19 has been
postponed for another week. UNDP spokesman David Morrison on Tuesday took
questions on camera, and stated that UNDP has expended $47.5 million in North
Korea in the past decade, $10.88 million of which was on behalf of other UN
agencies, "the vast majority" being for the UN Population Fund. Asked about the
$151 million UN Consolidated Appeal for the country issued in 2004, Morrison
said he was not aware of the appeal and would get back to reporters with answers
about it. Ten hours later, the answers had been provided to this or several
other follow-up questions posed by Inner City Press.
Morrison largely deflected
questions by referring to the now-postponed audit, and saying he can't or won't
answer until the audit is completed. Video
here,
from Minute 30:50 to 35:22. Morrison said, "On questions of site access,
currency, computers and inventories... we think we should all wait for the
results" of the audit that has yet to begin.
A March 1 memorandum from Mr. Swatantra
Goolsarran of the UN Board of Auditors to Kemal Dervis and the heads of UNFPA,
UNOPS and UNICEF said that the audit would begin on March 12. Tuesday Inner City
Press asked Morrison to explain the new one-week delay. Morrison said to ask the
auditors, then added that it is his understanding that they couldn't get all the
auditors in place by March 12. The memorandum states that there are only three
auditors: team leader Ms. Odette Anthoo of South Africa, Mr. Dioni Abalos of the
Philippines and Ms. Martine Latare of France.
Tellingly, Morrison had less than a
week ago been quoted as to his "understanding was that the agency had never had
problems with site visits." Tuesday Inner City Press asked about this quote and
Morrison claimed he "did not say they never had problem." But any discussion of
the lack of access, according to him, must wait until the completion of a
still-not-begun audit.
Work-for-food
project in N. Korea, UNDP not shown
Separately, the World Food Program's New
York spokeswoman has explained to Inner City Press why WFP was not included in
Mr. Goolsarran's March 1 memo, nor in the Board of Auditor's audit:
Subj: Audit
Date: 3/13/2007
10:10:36 AM Eastern Standard Time
From:
Spokeswoman of WFP
To: Inner City
Press
Dear Matthew,
here's more on the audit request:
WFP does not
fall under the control of the Board of Auditors (historic reasons dating back to
our time as part of FAO whose EB requests external audits). Our external audits
can only be requested by our Executive Board. WFP's Executive Board at its first
regular session from 19-21 February, took the following decision:
"Noting the
Secretary General's proposal, the Executive Board decided to request the WFP
external auditor to carry out a special audit of the WFP operations in the
Democratic Peoples Republic of Korea as a matter of priority and report its
findings to the Board. The WFP external auditor might wish to consult and
coordinate with the UN Board of Auditors which may be undertaking a special
audit of United Nations organizations in the Democratic Peoples Republic of
Korea, including the United Nations Funds and Programs that fall within its
mandate."
Given this
decision, it is now up to the WFP external auditor to set up its audit schedule.
Hope this helps.
It does, including by contract
to UNDP. When UNDP's Morrison on Tuesday was asked to explain still not having
provided information that he on Monday committed to produce, he again referred
to waiting to the audit. Given that on Monday he said, we'll get back to you
with that, what changed in the past 24 hours? Nothing, Morrison said. And in the
hours after Tuesday's noon briefing, the status quo of non-response was
maintained. Two separate controversies that Inner City Press asked about --
video
here,
from Minute 40:30 to 42:39 -- and on which Inner City Press submitted follow-up
email reminders including to Kemal Dervis, Ad Melkert and others, were left
entirely unaddressed by UNDP. Watch this site.
After telling Inner City Press on Monday
that he had no idea what UN Resident Representative Timo Pakkala is bringing
from Pyongyang to New York on March 17, Tuesday Morrison acknowledged having
said that Pakkala is bringing electronic records, "the highest priority
documents."
Within UNDP, there is
speculation one of the two UN official with intimate knowledge of the program"
quoted in the
Chicago Tribune's article which
called UNDP an "ATM" for Kim Jong Il may be Timo Pakkala, and that the May 2006
warning
referred to by the Tribune was
a communication from Pakkala to Kemal Dervis. Others ask, what could Pakkala
gain by blowing the whistle? Morrison on Tuesday referred repeatedly to
staffers' "recourse" in UNDP, and to "whistle-blower" protections. But the
stakes are high.
UN
and UNDP staff who have due to their employment G4 visas to be in the United
States, would be required to leave the U.S. within thirty days of termination.
A simple reform that the U.S. Congress could enact, advance earlier by this
publication and to be reported on from Washington DC later this week, would be
to amend immigration rules to extend any whistleblower's right to remain in the
U.S.. Developing.
At the IMF, Comment on Global Subprime Contagion
Deferred For Already-Leaked Report
Byline: Matthew Russell Lee of Inner City Press in
DC: News Analysis
WASHINGTON, March 15 -- As the failures of two dozen
subprime lenders and rising delinquency and foreclosure rates roil the global
markets, on Thursday the spokesman for the International Monetary Fund was asked
for the IMF's view on slow downs and housing. David Hawley, formally the Fund's
senior advisor for external relations, largely dodged the question. He repeated
a view that "recent turbulence appears to reflect a market correction," then
deferred any more specific comment until the IMF releases its World Economic
Outlook publication in April.
Also garnering no-comments or dodges were
questions about Turkey exceeding the IMF's budget target, and about Italy. The
entire bi-weekly press conference took barely 11 minutes. No questions were
taken online. Whether any were submitted is not known.
Mr. Hawley declined to comment
on a Dow Jones reporter's question about leaks of the WEO data. Earlier on
Thursday, Reuters
reported on
a purloined WEO draft, that the IMF's projection for U.S. economic growth in
2007 is now 2.6%, down from the 2.9% it projected back in September. Is the
melt-down in the mortgage market part of the reason for the revision downward?
Mr. Hawley wouldn't say.
IMF
@ UN, on peace-building, not predatory lending
In fact, beyond the contagions that now
spread from one stock market to the next, several Europe- and Asia-based banks
are deeply involved in the U.S. subprime market. Inner City Press has fielded
calls from reporters in London and the Netherlands about what they call the U.S.
mortgage crisis. Royal Bank of Scotland, for example, has been a major provider
of financing to subprime lenders, through its Greenwich Capital Markets
subsidiary. HSBC's problems since buying Household International are well
known. Barclays has bought a subprime servicer, from Wachovia, and now an
originator too. Nomura is involved in the securitization of such loans. Deutsche
Bank has gone further, buying up dubious originators in order to guarantee
themselves a stream of high-cost loans. Now Wall Street is feeling the heat, at
least temporarily. As Jesse Jackson said here on Wednesday night, "now the
hunter is being trapped with the game."
And as while question mount about the
role and future of the IMF, it would seem they'd have something to say on this
global subprime contagion. We'll see.
Other, earlier Inner
City Press are listed here, and
some are available in the ProQuest service.
Copyright 2006 Inner City Press, Inc. To request
reprint or other permission, e-contact Editorial [at] innercitypress.com -
UN Office: S-453A,
UN, NY 10017 USA Tel: 212-963-1439
Reporter's mobile
(and weekends): 718-716-3540