In
UNMIK Sex Abuse Alleged To
Abuser Hochschild and OIOS
Swanson Who Support Banning
Press
By Matthew
Russell Lee, CJR PFT CEFC
Video
UN GATE, Oct 26 –
Antonio Guterres is killing
the UN, including with his
failure in Cameroon and
elsewhere and his lawless
censorship of Press, now at
365 days, a full year. He's
put the UN in the Press
Freedom Tracker, here.
And so on 3 July 2019, this
video.
The
day after being targeted and
roughed up by Guterres' guard
Ronald E. Dobbins and another
unnamed, Inner City Press went
to the NYPD's 17th Precinct
with its torn shirt and
damaged laptop to file a
complaint. At first it was
told, flatly, that the UN is
entirely immune. Then once
they heard the story, the NYPD
took down a complaint. But the
UN including its
"investigator" Ben Swanson of
OIOS, shown here,
have done nothing about it.
Swanson confirmed
receipt, as with Inner City
Press' formal written
complaint about Guterres'
financial failure to disclose
and conflict of interest in
banning Inner City Press, no
action: "From: Ben Swanson
<swanson1@un.org> Date:
Thu, Aug 9, 2018 at 1:34 AM
Subject: Re: Informing OIOS of
"REPORT OF PROHIBITED CONDUCT
(HARASSMENT, ABUSE OF
AUTHORITY) AND ‘FORMAL
COMPLAINT’ SUBMITTED [ABOUT]
SECRETARY GENERAL, MR ANTONIO
GUTERRES, PURSUANT TO
ST/SGB/2008/5" please confirm
receipt and what OIOS does To:
Matthew Lee @ Inner City Press
Cc: FUNCA @ funca.info, Heidi
Mendoza
<mendozah@un.org>,
Michelle Claudio
<claudio@un.org>,
Byung-Kun Min
<min2@un.org>
Dear Mr Lee Thank
you for your email and
attachments the contents of
which have been noted and will
be dealt with in accordance
with our standard
practices.
Ben Swanson l
Director l
Investigations Division l
Office of Internal Oversight
Services l United
Nations Headquarters New York
l Office +1 212 963 0597 |
Mobile +1 917 288 7459."
Fourteen
months and two weeks later -
nothing. The UN is entirely
corrupt.
Now still
banned Inner City Press
publishes this complaint that
Swanson and others have
received - we publish now and
ask later, as Guterres'
Spokesman Dujarric has refused
to answer Inner City Press'
questions even on UN rapes,
despite having promised on
camera to answer questions,
totally corrupt: "From:
[Whistleblower] Date: Mon, Oct
21, 2019 at 12:21 PM Subject:
Request for an independent
investigation for UNMIK CMS
Ms. Sandi ARNOLD To: OIOS-NY
<oios-ny-unhq@un.org>,
OIOS-Directors
<oios-directors-unhq@un.org>,
OIOS-UNMIK
<oios-unmik-unhq@un.org>,
ethicsoffice
<ethicsoffice@un.org>
Cc: Donna Dottey
<dottey@un.org>, James
Finniss
<finniss@un.org>, Violas
Otieno <otienov@un.org>,
Fabrizio Hochschild
<hochschild@un.org>, Ben
Swanson
<swanson1@un.org>, Atul
Khare <khare@un.org>,
Chhaya Kapilashrami [UNO365]
<kapilashrami@un.org>,
Martha Helena Lopez
<lopez22@un.org>,
DMSPC-OUSG-MEU
<meu@un.org>, Field
Central Review Bodies
<fcrb@un.org>
Good afternoon,I
would like to request that an
independent investigation be
launched immediately into
Ms.Sandi ARNOLD’s reiterated
sexual and management abuses
which have been occurring for
the past years against staff
members in UNMIK. Ms. ARNOLD
serves in the capacity of
Chief Mission Support, UNMIK,
at D1 level. Ms. ARNOLD
employs a sexual approach when
dealing with professional
matters at work: she makes use
of obscenities during meetings
and in multiple occasions she
approaches women subordinates
with unwelcome, sexual
comments.Whomever dares to
disagree with her and go
against her decisions is
pushed out from work or is
subjected to complete
isolation in the office,
deprived of professional
interactions and career
development opportunities
(training, TDY opportunities
etc.) Ms. ARNOLD often
displays aggressive behavior
and shouts at any staff who
dares to challenge her.
She is fond of giving speeches
in which she uses sexual
comparison terms and mentions
in the end that she is a proud
lesbian. Most staff find
this behavior intolerable and
highly offensive, however they
are afraid to complain fearing
that their jobs will be
affected. Only Ms.
ARNOLD’s friends benefit of
professional
opportunities(career
development, training and
assignments in New York and
TDYs in other missions).
Thanks to this management
style (including sending staff
on TDY to NY for three months
and more) the past budget of
UNMIK led to an overspent of
more than 200,000 USD. This
"volunteer" support to HQ,
paid by UNMIK, was only to
please her friends, promote
them and get her the
possibility to gain further
promotion to D2.Ms.
ARNOLDlikes to brainwash her
subordinates, males and
females, and comments about
their dress code and physical
appearance. She makes
disparaging comments towards
them and does not take into
consideration the
psychological damages and
offenses affecting the staff
who have no opportunity to
defend themselves.Nepotism is
vastly practiced at UNMIK
Mission Support
Division. Ms. ARNOLD has
recruited staff without the
consent and approval of the
hiring managers, claiming that
she had an agreement
with New York and if you want
to complain, you can protest
to the USG.Ms. ARNOLD
has fostered a cult of
personality and a patriarchal
management, with a culture of
harassment, including sexual
harassment, bullying staff and
abusing constantly her power.
For instance, she published on
the wall of the conference
room the list of the Staff who
passed the SCOR training and
who did not. This situation
created an enormous stress to
all Staff who failed the exam
because she mentioned that
everybody should have passed
it if they want to keep their
jobs. Recently she enrolled
staff without their consent
for another training at UNMIK
(not mandatory) like PRINCE II
Practicioner. Staff were so
demotivated by this harassment
that nobody passed the exam
and many did not want to
participate to it, fearing to
be blamed and humiliated. The
result of it is a waste
of resources (staff doing the
training who were not
interested in) and money (the
cost of the trainer) for the
organization. These are
violations and as well
as harassment that
nobody had the power to
challenge.She treats everybody
as her personal employees. She
demands that a national
staff goes on daily basis to
buy food and prepares
breakfast for her, and her
friends if she has guests, in
the office before working
hours (washing and preparing
salads, cooking eggs, buying
her favorite bread). When
something is missing or not in
accordance to the instruction,
Ms.ARNOLDS shouts at her, even
in public.She uses a second
National Staff (Administrative
Assistant) as her
personal driver and
assistant for home
commissions including laundry,
utilities payments and
supermarket runs. The Staff
keeps the car with her at home
once the CMS is not even in
Mission Area.It can be
verified with the car log and
this is an abuse of authority
and mismanagement Ms. Arnold
uses to leave her credit car
to this lady and to pay her
holidays to keep her
silence.Both National Staff
cannot report this situation
for fear of retaliation.
Nobody can accept to be paid
by the UN and instead becomes
a personal maid for only
personal matters.Whilst she
travels to New York on
business class for official
duty, she is pushing the staff
(other than her friends) to
fly economy class or travel by
car for any official business.
Ms.ARNOLD claims for full
airport expenses (on duty)
even though her UN driver
comes to deposit and collect
her at the airport all the
time. Despite the
restrictions for everybody in
the UN, she is constantly
flying (business class) for
official business not related
to her administrative
duties.Ms. ARNOLD has managed
to create a unique, toxic and
unprofessional management
style. She recruits
mainly females for her
personal agenda. Ms.
ARNOLD’s unethical approach
stretches so far that she
provides sexual suggestions to
her female subordinates on how
to reach orgasms. She
has also given sex toys as
gifts to female staff.Ms.
ARNOLD obnoxiously tells
everyone that she has
protection from above and that
nobodycan investigate or
punish her. The work
environment in UNMIK is very
unhealthy and detrimental to
staff, due to her
abuses. Many staff find
themselves in need of
counselling in order to be
able to conduct their work. It
is very easy to verify it
directly with the former Staff
Counselor, Ms. Maria Murillo.
She is in a position of
authority but does not deserve
the honor to serve under the
United Nations flag. This is
what happens in UNMIK.Ms.
ARNOLD is the mastermind of
the corrupted process of
rostering exercises for
CJOs and PSJOs in DOS
and in the Mission. For the
last three years she oversees
these selections, which are a
monopoly for friends and
friends of friends. In a time
where the UN is reducing posts
and expenses everywhere, she
creates posts for friends like
the new positions of P5 Chief
Service Delivery and P5 Chief
Supply Chain. The Mission has
limited logistic activities
with no aircrafts and limited
movcon activities with only
site to run (Mitrovica) and
she gets a new P5 post. More
important, she gets free
business class ticket to go
home whilst she is recruiting
friends plus dsa. She
tells to everybody that
she is drafting all
assessment tests, creating the
panels, marking everything at
P4, P5 and D1level at DOS and
then always sitting or
chairing the interview panels.
It is well known that she
calls for decreasing the
passing score at exams in
order to allow friends to pass
it or to call to fail others
that passed it. She did also
for the P4 Administrative post
in Pristina where she cleared
the wife of a Colleague
(external) and a lady at F6
just to give them the
clearances. Is
this situation normal? Or must
it be accepted because the CMS
is providing expensive gifts
to any persons that counts and
she is including in the roster
only the desired persons?A
clear example is in UNMIK
where for any position, even
at FS5 level where hundreds of
rostered candidates are
present, she ALWAYS got the
permission from FPD for PSJOs.
Without even considering to
recruit anybody coming from
closing or downsizing
missions.A P4 post in
Administration was kept vacant
for more than two years
(nobody was physically present
in UNMIK) and then an FS5 was
recommended by her for a PSJO
post FS6 in Belgrade and then
promoted in two years to P4.
From FS5 to P4 in two years if
you are part of the clan.Mr.
Adylor will also enjoy a
relocation grant from Belgrade
to Pristina, authorized by Ms.
Arnold, of which he has no
title for it. This gift from
the UN is actually ongoing and
should be stopped.Many of her
friends were also cleared by
her for P4 Administrative
roster, diminishing the
passing score, and assessing
them at the interviews. The
fact that her friends and
girlfriend have a specific
role in HQ, gives her the
power to do whatever she wants
in terms of recruitment and
for rostering purposes both in
the Mission and HQ. She calls
and then somebody has passed
or failed the exam.It is
imperative that an
investigation, ruled by
persons outside UNMIK, is
conducted as soon as possible
with interviews of staff and
protective measures are put in
place to protect
witnesses from
retaliation.It is required
that Ms. Arnold`s Delegation
of Authority and presence at
any stage of recruitment
will be withdrawn in order to
prevent the reiteration of the
above mentioned abuses and
mismanagement. FPD should make
any possible efforts in having
a full rotation of panel
members for CJOs and should be
vigilant for any PSJOs that
are done uniquely to selects
friends and not the best
candidate.The authorof this
email chose to write under an
anonymous name for fear of
reprisal which has been
already occurred and occurring
in UNMIK.This email will
be shared in order to
stop this ongoing situation
and to prevent" --
retaliation, so common in
Guterres' increasingly corrupt
UN.
In
Guterres' UN there has been
entirely unaddressed bribery,
including offers of weapons
for oil by UN non governmental
organization China Energy Fund
Committee of Ye Jianming which
Guterres refuses to even audit
- while roughing
up and banning
the Press which asks him about
it. On December 21 after
Guterres and his spokesman had
not answered a single one of
Inner City Press' 35 written questions
during the week and Guterres
prepared to take off on
another 11 day trip to Lisbon,
still-banned Inner City Press
reported and shows that
Guterres has essentially
killed off the UN's already
weak public financial
disclosure system. Guterres'
own most recent online
disclosure is from 2016, here,
and it omits for example his
listed role through 2018 in
the Calouste Gulbenkian
Foundation.
Now this, which
we have reported exclusively,
well before the July 2019
reporting that CEFC's Y
Jianming gave an expensive
diamond to Hunter Biden - the
China Energy Fund Committee,
implicated in the UN bribery
conviction of Patrick Ho, has
been linked to Guterres'
Gulbenkian, see photos here
and for first example here:
"Partex Oil and Gas (Holdings)
Corporation will be sold to
the CEFC China Energy group,
confirmed António Costa Silva,
the chairman of the oil
company of the Calouste
Gulbenkian Foundation,
speaking to Portuguese daily
newspaper Público.
Costa Silva said the “complex
negotiation is underway” and
added “I think there is a
great possibility of it coming
to fruition,” and the
newspaper reported said that
this deal could be worth 500
million euros.
“It is a large Chinese
conglomerate that started in
refining, terminals,
logistics, recently started
exploration and production in
the Middle East, Russia, and
chose Partex as a kind of
platform for investments in
the first segment,” said the
chairman of Partex." So this
is a direct conflict of
interest by Guterres: he has
been on the board of
Gulbenkian, which made a sale
to CEFC which Guterres now
refuses to audit. (Inner City
Press asked in January 2018, here, before Guterres had it roughed
up and banned;
it asked again after the
verdict on 5 December 2018, here). Guterres'
wife, too, is linked to
Gulbenkian, here.
This is called corruption.
Consider
also Guterres' Cameroon and
Central Africa envoy Francois
Lounceny Fall. His last
disclosure was signed in
November 2017, and included
three properties in Guinea, at
at least one of which he was
just a landlord, banking in
Togo with shares in Ecobank
Transnational Incorporated.
Photo here.
Where is the November 2018?
Not filed or put online as of
December 2018. A fish rots
from the head. Inner City
Press has repeatedly asked
Guterres and his spokesmen Stephane
Dujarric and Farhan
Haq, "When will the
public financial disclosures,
in past years already online
by this time, be made
available?" For four days in a
row, December 17 - 20, they
did not answer a single
written question
from Inner City Press
including about Cameroon
and Togo,
despite the promise to UN
Special
Rapporteur for
Freedom of
Expression
David Kaye
by Guterres' Global
Communicator Alison
Smale (who has no online
financial disclosure and has
yet to follow up on saying she
would take under advisement
the total ban on Press she is
responsible for, video here).
We have noted that Guterres'
spouse Catarina Marques de
Almeida Vaz Pinto has been
Executive Coordinator of the
Gulbenkian Programme for
Creativity and Artistic
Creation / Calouste Gulbenkian
Foundation. There is still no
answer to Inner City Press'
detailed written questions
about the business links in
Africa and elsewhere of
Guterres' son Pedro Guimarães
e Melo De Oliveira Guterres.
Guterres and these named
individuals have taken the UN
to a new low of corruption.
We will have more
on this. Guterres refusal to
initiate any audit, as even
Ban Ki-moon did after the
indictment of Ng Lap Seng for
also bribing UN President of
the General Assembly John
Ashe, has allowed not only
CEFC but another Ye Jianming
NGO, known by names including
the China Academy of Culture
and the China Cultural
Institute, to remain in the
UN.
Now in July
2019 it is reported that
beyond his dealings with
Guterres' UN and Guterres'
Gulbenkian Foundation, Ye
Jianming "gave" an expensive
diamond to Hunter Biden.
In a
22 August 2017 press release,
soon before the arrest and
indictment of CEFC's Patrick
Ho, this entity bragged:
"Recommended by the UN NGO
Committee of 19 countries, the
UN Economic and Social Council
(ECOSOC) conducted its final
review in New York in July
2017 and officially approved
the granting of the Chinese
Cultural Council to the UN
Economic and Social Council in
August. status". This is the
first non-governmental
organization approved by the
United Nations to promote the
"special consultative status"
of Chinese culture. It is a
high priority for Chinese
culture and an affirmation of
the work of the Chinese
Cultural Institute created by
China Huaxin. This marks the
establishment of a formal
cooperative relationship
between the two sides,
providing a new stage for the
Chinese Cultural Institute to
further carry out
international cooperation and
exchanges and to tell the
Chinese story.
Since its establishment, the
Chinese Cultural Institute,
under the leadership of
Chairman Ye Jianming and under
the leadership of all
directors, has implemented the
"One Body and Two Wings" work
principle proposed by
President Xu Jialu with the
purpose of "promoting the
culture of Chinese culture and
harmonious world." This is the
same Ye Jianming who used UN
accredited CEFC to bribe PGA
Sam Kutesa, and to offer
weapons for oil and a stake in
the Chad Cameroon pipeline to
Idriss Deby. Guterres refusal
to audit, and his and his
spokesman's refusal to even
answer questions, make clear
how corrupt the UN has become
and that both should go. On
1 December 2018, before seven
UN bribery guilty verdicts
against Patrick Ho of China
Energy Fund Committee, Inner
City Press reported that
Jeffrey Sachs, a long time UN
(part time) official, was on a
CEFC-UN Advisory Board, and
tweeted the photograph, here.
On December 15
Sachs denied
it, saying it is absurd.
Really?
Pressed, Sachs said "I attended
an annual luncheon on two
occasions (1 per year) hosted
by the Chinese Gov for UN
Ambassadors, which CEPC
apparently catered. I
once went to a HK reception
Mr. Ho was present.
That's it." Really? China
Energy Fund Committee was more
than a caterer. And this
denial shows more clearly than
ever why an audit of with whom
CEFC has dealt with at and
through the UN is necessary,
and how irresponsible or worse
Guterres is being. On December 17 Inner
City Press in
writing asked
Guterres and his
spokesman Stephane
Dujarric, "December
17-7: On CEFC in the
wake of the US v Ho
verdicts, this is a
request that the SG
confirm and act on the
other UN officials
depicted as advisers
to CEFC and its UN
program - including
Jeffrey Sachs, who has
over the weekend
online denied any such
role, stating he may
have attended a lunch
“catered” by CEFC.
Since this denial
shows the absolute
need for an audit at
least like the
previous SG did of Ng
Lap Seng's groups,
please state why the
SG has not even begun
such an audit."
Dujarric has not
answered this or any
other corruption
related question from
banned
Inner City Press,
nor those on
Cameroon and
other topics.
And those he allowed
in "his" briefing
room did not ask.
Inner
City Press has
published the
CEFC document listing Sachs'
role, here
on Scribed, here
for download on Patreon.
Need
for UN Audit Shown By ... by on
Scribd
It also
lists UN officials including Warren Sach,
as well as Mr. José Manuel Viegas
(Portugal) Secretary-General of the
International Transport Forum (ITF) at the
OECD; Mr. Sun Xiansheng (China)
Secretary-General of the International
Energy Forum (IEF); Ms. Marie-José Nadeau
(Canada) Chair of the World Energy
Council; Mr. Thanin Pa-Em (Thailand)
Deputy Secretary-General at the Office of
the National Economic and Social
Development Board; Mr. Zhang Guobao
(China) Former Director of China’s
National Energy Administration; Mr.
Christopher Martenson (USA) Economic
Researcher, Writer and Trend Forecaster;
Dr. Ken Koyama (Japan) Chief Economist and
Managing Director at the Institute of
Energy Economics in Japan (IEEJ); Dr.
Christoph Frei (Switzerland); Dr. Milica
Bajiæ-Brkoviæ (Serbia) Former President of
ISOCARP, Member of the Executive Committee
of International Society of City and
Regional Planners (ISOCARP); Dr. José
Goldemberg (Brazil); Mr. Mark Fulton (UK)
Founding Partner of Energy Transition
Advisors Pty Ltd; Dr. Nawal Al-Hosany
(UAE) Director of Sustainability at Masdar
City; Dr. Leena Srivastava (India)
Honorary Executive Director at The Energy
and Resources Institute; Mr.
John
Hofmeister
(USA) Founder
& Chief
Executive of
Citizens for
Affordable
Energy, Former
President of
Shell Oil
Company and,
yes, Dr.
Jeffrey Sachs (USA) Director of
The Earth Institute, Special
Advisor to UN SG. We'll have
more on this - and on the role
of current UN Development
Program Executive Director Achim
Steiner. See photos here,
from a CEFC brochure which they
have tried to cover up.
Three years ago
Macau based businessman Ng Lap
Seng was arrested and charged
with bribing
UN General Assembly President
Josh Ashe and others, though
Sun Kian Ip Foundation and
other groups still in the UN.
Ng was convicted
of multiple violations of the
Foreign Corrupt Practices Act
(FCPA) and money laundering.
But the issue of faux NGO
purchase of the UN hasn't
gone away. In fact, a second
UN bribery case ended this
week in the US District Court
for the Southern District of
New York with seven guilty
verdicts.
In this second
case, Patrick Ho was found
guilty of seven of eight
counts of FCPA and month
laundering. (He was only not
guilty on money laundering in
Chad - where the bribe was not
through any US bank but in
cash, $2 million in a gift
box). The evidence showed that
the NGO he ran, China Energy
Fund Committee, used its
ongoing UN consultative status
to pay bribes to Ugandan
foreign minister - and Ashe's
successor as President of the
UN General Assembly -- Sam
Kutesa. He was working
with precedessor Vuk
Jeremic while Jeremic
was UN PGA. CEFC even offered
weapons, tanks and drones, to
Chad's long time president
Idriss Deby for oil blocks or
a stake in the Chad Cameroon
pipeline. (Inner City Press
published documents here.)
The night of the
verdict I asked UN Secretary
General Antonio Guterres what
he will do to clean up the UN,
where he has left CEFC without
any audit, still in
consultative status with the
UN. On his way from his
Mercedes to a glitzy
fundraiser including George
and Amal Clooney, Guterres refused to
answer. The next day when
asked by another journalist
why Guterres had refused to
answer banned Inner City
Press' question, his spokesman
Stephane Dujarric claimed that
the UN has “cooperated” with
the prosecution. But the
bribery group remains in the
UN, unaudited.
Why has the case
of US versus Ho, and now the
guilty verdicts, garnered
relatively so little interest,
with the corruption of the UN
exposed by it scarcely
mentioned all? SG Guterres is
hoping it goes away. In terms
of corruption, he did not
disclose and refuses to answer
on the African business links
of his son Pedro Guimarães e
Melo De Oliveira Guterres...
***
Feedback:
Editorial [at] innercitypress.com
UN Office, past & future?: S-303, UN, NY 10017 USA
For now UNder
Guterres: UN Delegates
Entrance Gate
and mail: Dag H.
Center
Box 20047, NY NY 10017 USA
Reporter's mobile (and weekends):
718-716-3540
Other, earlier Inner City Press are
listed here,
and some are available in the ProQuest
service, and now on Lexis-Nexis.
Copyright 2006-2019 Inner City
Press, Inc. To request reprint or other
permission, e-contact Editorial [at]
innercitypress.com for
|