In Other Media-eg New Statesman, AJE, FP, Georgia, NYT,  Azerbaijan, CSM Click here to contact us     .

By Matthew Russell Lee, Exclusive, CJR PFT

UNITED NATIONS GATE, March 4 – How corrupt is the UN under Secretary General Antonio Guterres? After banned Inner City Press exclusively published a second complaint concerning abuse including of DSA (Daily Subsistence Allowance) by the director of UN Women's regional office of East and Southern Africa, Ms Izeduwa Derex Briggs, we have received more complaints from whistleblowers,  continued impunity in UN Women and elsewhere under Guterres despite exposure of blatant corruption. Now on March 4, this: "Dear Inner City Press, This below is a letter that was sent to UN Women Executive Director Phumzile.  The letter got widely leaked, and at UN Women Executive Board, Member States said they knew about the letter and demanded that the Executive Board correct this and report on what is being done.  But that did not scare anyone.  So what is being done? The person mentioned in this letter is currently still working on such called special project, being paid exuberantly and benefiting from continuing as her highness, an executive member of UN Women.  And this person is only one of many more.  Just as corrupt Zed is waiting to be dispatched to another office, still being paid UN executive wages,  None of the UN Women high level mafia connection is about to be fired anytime soon.  Instead, those at lower rung of ladder are afraid for their jobs, as the UN reform or change management process is being used as the ultimate opportunity by the senior highnesses to rid of those calling for the right things to be done.  And note, the person tasked to do this change management has been flown in from nowhere with her team also flown in from nowhere, no information has been shared with anyone, not executive board, not staff council. All they do is scare everyone that they could lose their jobs. It's actually happening. In the meanwhile, for some of the new recruits, no one is sure whether there was a recruitment process. Well, it's not new, they usually have some kind of connections to the mafia.  Their connections are mostly like them - selfish, mean spirited, self serving, arrogant, ambitious, there for the wrong reasons, to be VIPs at events, fly on business flights, they don't care about the real work, or those who do care. And we continue being squeezed out, overworked, demoralized more and more.  As long as their highnesses continue, there is no hope.  To the attention of the Executive Director,      We would like to communicate our concerns regarding the damages to UN Women and your leadership caused by ongoing harassment of persons at multiple levels, from junior to senior positions at UN Women.      UN Women is expected to be a systemwide leader at the forefront of the fight for women’s rights. We would expect that the staff, especially at senior levels would embrace this in their management of the organization, as is stated in the UN Women Leadership Charter. Unfortunately, we see this playing out in the opposite manner – for example in the highly visible fight against sexual harassment and the wider issue of abuse of authority and power.      UN Women is well known, both internally and increasingly to the external public, to have serious cases of harassment and abuse of authority, with staff leaving due to the inappropriate and unacceptable verbal, mental, and even physical violence by senior staff. Notably, staff from more than one division has brought to our attention that your Chief of Staff and Acting Director of Strategic Partnership Division is an abuser, who has been the cause of a large number of staff leaving before the completion of their terms or assignments. We have learned that she is prone to shift blame for mistakes and to deliberately humiliate those below herself in the hierarchy. The person  has a history of turning abruptly on staff, often accusing the subordinate of attacking her. Such people are damaging not only to the reputation of the organization, but it is also harming the legacy you wish to create.      Staff have little recourse to defend themselves as they are being silenced by intimidation tactics, through the creation of insecure contracts and through a divide and conquer approach that pits staff against one another. The use of insecure contracts and temporary appointments is widespread in UN Women – and it can be used as a means to manipulate and control. Staff fear retaliation and cannot speak up. Moreover, the short-term contracts and interns ratio is very high.   Silencing of staff leads to compromised technical advice, as in the case of the current chief of staff – and her incompetence on many technical matters coupled with her lack of confidence in various areas under her responsibility, have resulted in scolding and accusing staff who are the technical experts in subject matters, while she makes poorly informed decisions to the detriment of our organization’s name and reputation, and your leadership.   Further, as a manager, she does not fully consider or understand the resources required to achieve targets set which sets up staff for failure. The targets, which are unrealistic, are imposed as staff technical advice is dismissed.  Duplication of efforts is also common - for example through the creation of multiple task forces without clear communication as to the different roles and reasons behind the duplication. This has led  to numerous people carrying out discreet tasks that are not linked under a wider umbrella plan, often times leading to internal and external confusion and impacting negatively on the organization’s ability to perform efficiently and effectively.   We also know that certain people who have been placed at senior positions bear similar characteristics. We are therefore concerned that increases the risk to the organization but also harm and hinder anyone who is of full capacity and willing to contribute positively to the organization. It is exactly this type of person that UN Women should be standing up to fight against.  While promoting work-life balance in words, the practice is very different. Emails and demands for work come at odd hours including weekends, and these are responded to with comments to address continuously. At the same time she regularly scolds staff for multiple emails, which she claims is a hindrance at Director level.   Staff are further prevented from seeking support to mitigate conflicts through normal channels. The circumstances on top of her close relationship with the ED, have reinforced her image as an untouchable, making anyone who was about to speak out to completely give up without even trying. Fear is widespread among staff who are unable to speak up or stand up for themselves. And now, she is preparing a session on “abuse of authority”. This is undoubtedly most inappropriate for her to organize.   How can staff who are supposed to embody the lived experience of empowered women and men be expected to be effective representatives of the organization when they are in fact disempowered and demoralized under these conditions? How does this reflect upon the organization with the partners with whom they regularly engage?      We strongly recommend that the senior staff member be removed from supervisory roles for these reasons." And... nothing. In Antonio Guterres' UN, the fish is rotting from the head. Stay tuned. The unauthorized spending of $86,000 but who's counting? A fish rots from the head - and that is the censor Antonio Guterres. Leaked to Inner City Press who Guterres had roughed up and banned 220+ days: "From: Izeduwa Derex-briggs <izeduwa.derex-briggs@unwomen.org>  Sent: Thursday, February 7, 2019 9:47 AM To: Brenda Wawaka <brenda.wawaka@unwomen.org> Cc: Aleyda RUIZ-CEDILLO <aleyda.ruiz@unwomen.org>; Akhtar ZAZAI <akhtar.zazai@unwomen.org>; Charles Okoko <charles.okoko@unwomen.org> Subject: Re: Business Class Waivers  Dear Moez, Thank you for your response.  We are not aware of the policy from the SG that traditional leaders don’t qualify as eminent personalities.  We are aware that traditional authorities in their own right are recognized as heads of extremely important institutions at local government level. Heads of states and governments also defer to them as such.  Inviting such a large number of traditional leaders  to dialogue with heads of states and governments is a very important intervention under our Africa strategy and a key element of the EDs vision.  Now that we know that we must explain all our programmes to all units at HQ, outside of programme,I will advice ESARO colleagues to comply.   You may be aware that traditional authorities are in classes. First class traditional authorities travel with aides. Some of them up to 5 per leader. We have negotiated with them for support of only one aide. The list of traditional leaders we are asking for waivers are the class A leaders only.  This meeting is at the instance of the heads of states, led by H.E. President Lungu of Zambia.  These leaders will not travel economy class. This would be a huge embarrassment to UN Women if we cancel at this stage. Meeting is on Sunday morning.  Thanks for your support.  Warm regards   Zed Sent from my iPhone The additional cost of upgrading these 25 travelers will bring the total to nearly $80,000 ($46,000 the cost of upgrading to business class only) and will more than double the cost of regular entitlement airfare.      UN Women is not refusing to appreciate the traditional authorities as eminent personalities.  An eminent person, as defined by the Secretary General, “is a current or former Head of State or Government.”  Our procurement policy follows the aforementioned instructions of the Secretary-General. Recently the UN Secretariat has communicated to us that the “traditional leaders do not fit this definition since they are not Presidents, Prime Ministers of a Country.”     It would have been helpful if your office could have checked with us about the travel class before inviting such a large number and what seems to be their dependents.     From: Izeduwa Derex-briggs  Sent: Tuesday, February 5, 2019 11:34 PM Subject: Fwd: Business Class Waivers     Please refer to trail of mails. I am shocked that UN Women refuses to appreciate our traditional authorities as eminent personalities.    We are having a meeting of heads of states with traditional leaders in Africa and have requested waivers for business class tickets.   Can the Queen if England travel economy?     I need your help please .     Warmly     Zed  Sent from my iPhone   Begin forwarded message:  From: Charles Okoko <charles.okoko@unwomen.org> Subject: Re: Business Class Waivers  I think the concept of African Traditional Leaders and their role in society on the the continent of Africa is not understood. ..or even their equivalents in other societies...we have many Princes and Queens around the globe.  Also, just from a programme point of view, this is not understood.  Regards  Charles  From: Brenda Wawaka Sent: 06 February 2019 05:26:23 To: Charles Okoko Cc: Izeduwa Derex-briggs Subject: FW: Business Class Waivers     Dear Charles,     Please see Pamela’s response below concerning the waivers we submitted.     Regards  Brenda  From: Odudoh, Pamela <pamela.odudoh@unwomen.org>  Sent: Wednesday, February 6, 2019 4:28 AM To: Chapeta, Lister <lister.chapeta@unwomen.org>; Aleyda RUIZ-CEDILLO <aleyda.ruiz@unwomen.org> Cc: Brenda Wawaka <brenda.wawaka@unwomen.org>; Willis Ochieng <willis.ochieng@unwomen.org> Subject: RE: Business Class Waivers     Dear Lister,     Following procurement’s review, these requests may not be processed as the travelers do not meet the definition for eminent person that is in the TTS.3 form and in the past reports of the Secretary-General to the General, i.e.: “A traveller is considered an eminent person if he or she is a current or former Head of State or Government.”  The traditional leaders in the TTS3 forms do not fit this definition since they are not Presidents, Prime Ministers of a Country.        Kind regards,  Pamela  From: Chapeta, Lister <lister.chapeta@unwomen.org>  Sent: Tuesday, January 29, 2019 8:36 AM To: Aleyda RUIZ-CEDILLO <aleyda.ruiz@unwomen.org>; Procurement Support <procurement.support@unwomen.org> Cc: Brenda Wawaka <brenda.wawaka@unwomen.org>; Willis Ochieng <willis.ochieng@unwomen.org> Subject: FW: Business Class Waivers     Dear Colleagues,     We have received the attached request for Business Class ticket Waivers  from ESARO – please see additional information below and attached. There are 23 requests, kindly advise if each person should have their own TTS3 form.  Look forward to hearing back from you soon, the travel is for the 8th of February.     Best Regards,     Lister.    From: Brenda Wawaka  Sent: Monday, January 28, 2019 5:45 PM To: Chapeta, Lister <lister.chapeta@unwomen.org> Cc: Izeduwa Derex-briggs <izeduwa.derex-briggs@unwomen.org>; Charles Okoko <charles.okoko@unwomen.org> Subject: Business Class Waivers     Dear Lister,     I trust this finds you well.     Kindly could you assist with processing waivers for the attached eminent persons who will be attending High Level Event on Traditional Leaders and Head of Heads of States and Government on ending child marriage and FGM in Africa at this years AU’s summit.     The invitation letters are with EDO’s office which we expect the ED to sign and attached is a copy of the same for your reference.     Let me know if you have any questions.     Regards  Brenda." We'll have more on this. We already ran this, more uncorrected abuse: "From: JN
Date: 2 December 2016 at 21:50:47 EAT
To: Izeduwa Derex-briggs <izeduwa.derex-briggs [at] unwomen.org>
Subject: Re: Accreditation of UN Women Regional Director
Dear. Madam Zed
I refer to  your call  on Friday 2nd  Dec 2016 at 20:09hrs concerning your accreditation.
My Superiors are aware that you were issued with a blue card which I returned to MFA for exchange of a red one.
With all due respect I do not think it is acceptable for you to call me on a Friday night, to be precise at 20:09hrs shouting at me on official matters.  I try to  pic all my all calls both on  weekend and even at night. Just in case a colleague needs help. But this does not warrant you as the Regional Director of UN Women to call me after working hours. furthermore you insisting on talking to me as I drove my children from beautiful Christmas concert.
I repeatedly told you that I was driving with my children but due to your anger you kept raising your voice and instructed me to  put the phone on speaker.   You did not even consider requesting me to pull aside. This tormented them a great deal.
You went ahead and insisted that I give you Marks number so that you could call him personally.  I politely explained that he had been on a Presidential trip and that I I met him during HLM2 and reminded him to replace the card.
If this is not good enough then. I stand to be corrected but bullying is not allowed in the work place.  
As much as The Vienna Convention on Diplomatic Immunities and Privileges allows for facilitation of diplomatic missions and their international staff to be accredited by the host country, he onus is with the Ministry of Foreign Affairs.  Not JN nor UN.  We can only facilitate and request for speedy action in a candid and diplomatic manner.
Has this become personal?  Do I have to use the same tone and words to force GOK to sign your card and accredited you?
I stand to be corrected.
JN." But in Guterres' UN, none of his friends are corrected, while those who question him are roughed up and banned. After our first publications, below, Inner City Press before 9 am on November 27 asked Guterres, his deputy Amina J. Mohammed, his two spokesmen including Stephane Dujarric and his Communicator Alison Smale who had promised answers: "November 27-5: Please immediately confirm or deny that UN Women's Ms. Izeduwa Derex-Briggs kept a publicly funded vehicle in Nairobi that she allowed her daughter to drive around, that the ED of UN Women called her “my warrior” to those complaining of abuse from her and when she (the ED) visited Somalia she did not pay for her accommodation and left a national staffer, the operations manager, to do so, and that Ms. Izeduwa Derex-Briggs of UN Women, on a retreat in Zanzibar, requested (and separately took) DSA while seeking to stay for free in a less expensive hotel other staffers were in, and took DSA for her daughter while she stayed at her house in Nairobi. Immediately explain why Izeduwa Derex-Briggs is reportedly forcing staff to write/sign a letter of support for her." More than 12 hours later, no answer at all. And so this second update from whistleblowers, part of a series: "It was mentioned earlier that Ms. Izeduwa has threatened to disband corporate oversight committees (Procurement review committee and Programme Appraisal Committee) and replace its membership with her cronies from country offices. A case in point is a memo that had to be withdrawn by the current operations manager (OM) after some of the membership complained.
Ms. Izeduwa flew two participants, one of them from New York to Maputo in Mozambique to make a fifteen minutes presentation to the shock of UN Women staff who had accompanied her.
Abuse of missions
Official missions in UN Women ESARO are skewed and approved based on the quality of gossip her loyalists provide, sometimes quoting staff members verbatim. A review of travel Purchase orders will show the frequency and skewed way some marked staff members are rarely sent on missions to country offices or New York. Again, one might ask, what happened to virtual working. Is UN Women all about burning money?
A thorough investigation will reveal many more malpractices.
She always staff tells any staff offering technical corporate policy advise ‘It’s not your mother’s money, pay it”
UN Secretary General, António Guterres, sent a memo to staff on 4th May 2017 advising them to curtail unnecessary travel costs where possible (letter attached) due to ever escalating costs.
If there is anything in this world that excites Ms. Izeduwa is her love travel, and on business class. Ms. Izeduwa is literary on air by blink of an eyelid. But wait, she calls Kenyans the most corrupt people. Her open partialities against East Africans can be attributed to her manipulation skills and her ignorant thinking that West Africans are the most competent human beings on earth. How does UN Women HQ allow such kind of open misuse of resources if they are not party to such? We demand an answer. 
We are unable to put a value to total cost of tickets utilized by Ms. Izeduwa because this requires microscopic review of physical procurement files which are under lock and key, but a sample below will support our claims. Atlas – UN Women operating system – does not offer such privileges at a cursory look on Purchase order reports. This therefore will require a forensic investigation by office of internal oversight (OIS).
To collaborate the just released dossier about misuse of travel privileges, on 7 February 2017, Ms. Izeduwa’s ticket to New York cost UN Women usd. 10,637 because she kept changing itinerary until it was late for booking. Plausibly, a normal ticket cost as at that date would have been usd. 3,120. In this case, UN Women lost Usd. 7,511 which can be reviewed under PO no. ESA 2802 dated 7th February 2017.
Under PO no. ESA 3474, Ms. Izeduwa’s ticket to New York  cost UN Women usd. 7,080.
In the third quarter of 2017, Jean-Luc Boris (Secretary to the board) was offered a mission to Nairobi that costed UN Women Usd. 25,681 in allowances instigated by Ms. Izeduwa. Now, Jean-Luc declined to take a ticket prior purchased by the Regional office. UN Women hence procured two tickets under PO no. ESA. 3303 dated 23 August 2017. (One of the tickets was paid by UN Women HQ - UNFEM). What were his outputs?
In early June 2018, Yassin Fall, a former UN Women senior staff was invited for a workshop in Dar Es Salaam. She ably accepted a ticket that had been previously bought by UN Women and acknowledged receipt. She later complained to Ms. Izeduwa that she had not been consulted on her itinerary and demanded an extra day DSA in Dar Es Salaam. Off course Ms. Izeduwa approved this because the traveler is her friend and chastised staff for damaging the reputation on UN Women – a line she has used on many occasions. Please refer this to PO.no ESA 3197 dated 31 May 2018 as well as 4197 dated 31 May 2018.
In early 2017, Ms. Izeduwa made a stopover in London disguised as an official mission yet we can confirm that she was visiting her children who were studying in London. The daughter was later in October  2018 nominated into the youth conference steering committee alongside two other allies based in London and travelled business class paid by UN Women in violation of  duty travel chapter.
Toward the end of October 2018, Ms. Izeduwa flew all Somalia staff from their locations namely; Hargeisa, Gaarowe and Mogadishu to Nairobi for a meeting. What kind of impunity is this? United Nations office at Nairobi has excellent video conferencing facilities that she should have been used for this meeting by her. Or, better still, Ms. Izeduwa should have flown to Mogadishu or any other central location and met colleagues. The cost of tickets and DSA should have guided her decision making.
There is this facilitator from Nigeria called ORITSEJOLOMI DAVID GBENEBICHIE. ORITSEJOLOM has facilitated all meeting, workshops and anything that can make him travel. David has been consulting for UN Women since Ms. Izeduwa’s days in South Sudan. A native of Nigeria which is Ms. Izeduwa’s home country but currently living in Zambia. In 2017, ORITSEJOLOM was paid usd. 24,411.68 (PO Nos. 3174, 3182,3252, 3255,3316, 3490, 3497, 3544 and usd. 26,716(PO Nos. ESA30- 3678,3693, 3779, 4767, 4818) to give talks in countries where we have competent motivational speakers. Are they related in any way? Ms. Izeduwa’s right hand man, a driver, always ensures that Oritsejolomi's room is adjacent to Ms. Izeduwa.
In mid-2018, the Somalia Programme manager diligently declined manipulation by Ms. Izeduwa to hire Oritsejolomi as a motivational speaker and couch for Somalia team. This would have been another fleecing opportunity.
In one of her missions to South Sudan in 2017 arriving early morning from Rwanda, Ms. Izeduwa demanded to be paid double allowance on the same day (Juba and Kigali). This was paid through receipts provided.
Contrary to corporate guidance on provision of accommodation and allowances, Ms. Izeduwa directed that she be paid 100% allowance during office retreat in November 2017 at Serena hotel in Mombasa.
We demand that all of Ms. Izeduwa’s travel be subjected to forensic audit and be made to account for all the irregularities." We'll have more on this. The first update: "We have been emboldened by the recent dossier on UN Women Regional Director for East and Southern Africa (ESARO), and we hereby support this dossier.
There have been complains against Ms. Izeduwa Derex- Briggs by staff in the office that requires urgent attention by UN Women.  These complains are real, sober and calling for urgent overhaul of the entire UN Women office in Nairobi. Unspoken, is the incredulity that - United Nations system - known for its laxity and incompetence when it comes to top leadership implicated in impropriety will act with speed, the allegations against UN Women head is awaited with baited breath.
We are going to address these issues under three thematic areas namely; Incompetent leadership, abuse of missions and procurement irregularities.
Incompetent Leadership
It is a matter of open interpretation that when Ms. Izeduwa joined UN Women ESARO in August 2016, the environment changed. Those perceived to be close to the then Operations Manager (OM) were targeted and looked at with open suspicion. Equally, it's an open secret that the OM was told by Ms. Izeduwa ‘’We don’t want you here, you need to go’’. The OM had to look for an opportunity and leave in early 2017 in consultation with UN Women Headquarters (HQ).
Ms. Izeduwa has perfected the art of intimidation, ridicule and threats to staff perceived not to be loyal to her. Perhaps in a way to ensure their separation from UN Women and give her an opportunity to surround herself with loyal lieutenants and generals. These are those staff whose jobs terms of reference are skewed and intentionally drafted to suit their qualifications.
It is known to staff that Ms. Izeduwa has deep connections in UN Women Headquarters (HQ), and many a times she has brought HQ staff to the Regional Office (RO) at UN Women cost for “Holiday because they have been working so hard” she would say which is meant to buy their support.
As a matter of fact, she is appraised on all matters of complains by staff to HQ by her sources even if they are genuine concerns as she said in the 2017 office retreat “You report, I will be informed”.
As previously mentioned in the preceding dossier, Ms. Izeduwa shouts at staff in the presence of other parties in meetings and along the office corridors. Both senior and junior staff at the regional office can give credence to these allegations. Junior staff in operations have had their worst day with Ms. Izeduwa especially if they correct her corrupted interpretation of UN Women policy guidelines – a subject she prides herself as an expert ‘’I was part of the team that drafted this travel policy’’, she arrogantly asserts.  The Somalia Program manager had to separate because she was ridiculed by Ms. Izeduwa before staff.
Because of their differences, Ms. Izeduwa contributed to the worsening medical condition of her then Deputy Regional Director- (Ms. Simone Ellis Oluoch-Olunya) to the point she had to leave the position. UN Women staff knew that there was no love lost between the two. In the same breath, Ms. Izeduwa instigated the departure of Somalia Progam Manager because she could not stand her demand for loyalty and was questioning her demand for allowances when she was not entitled.
The Senior Management Team (SMT) is full of her cronies and has been reduced to mere ranting about DSA payments and how they did not get business class tickets even where they are not qualified as per policy. What criteria did she use to constitute this committee? How do you reduce an SMT to discuss, as an agenda - for example - a staff member writing a guidance email to senior staff advising them of their obligation to confirm if office transport is provided to the airport? These staff members have an addiction of claiming terminals when they are not entitled.
Ms. Izeduwa has misused office transport system by directing through an email that all advisors should be provided with airport drop and pickups. The same advisors are paid terminal entitlements contrary to UN Women duty travel policy. She deliberately ignored advice from the then OM to dispose off UN Women office vehicle 40UN 119K as required by UN Women asset policy. Her intention was to provide an avenue for her friends to use this vehicle legally and illegally. You will not that the cost of running this vehicle is unimaginable and UN Women does not get value for money.  Notably, her daughter used this vehicle on a weekend in October 2018 to tour Nairobi National Park. Deliberately misusing office resources entrusted in her position.
To demonstrate her loss of face with heads of country offices, Ms. Izeduwa demanded of the Rwanda country office representative to offer her accommodation in her house while on mission despite receiving allowances for the same. In Burundi, she forced to share a room with one of the senior advisors in ESARO to her amusement. This is an art Ms. Izeduwa has perfected hence putting UN Women name in jeopardy. How can she lead the same team? In Zanzibar, Ms. Izeduwa had demanded that Tanzania country office provide her with a hotel room upgrade. She was finally paid 100% allowance (DSA) and opted to stay in a different low-cost hotel different from the venue of the workshop and whose cost was met by UN Women Somalia office.
In August 2018 when UN Women Executive Director (ED) visited UN Women Somalia offices in Mogadishu, Ms. Izeduwa cajoled the OM to pay for their accommodation. This is even though they had been paid their allowances. It is worth mentioning that the ED calls Ms. Izeduwa “my warrior, she fights for me”. There were plans to charter a plane from a company called Citation at a total cost of Usd. 18, 000. Please not that an average ticket would have costed Usd. 320 for a two way ticket."

Now, with Guterres and his spokesman Stephane Dujarric still not answering our questions despite his Alison Smale's promise to UNSR David Kaye, more on DSA abuse at the top of UN Women, up to director Phumzile Mlambo-Ngcuka - and alleged racism and retaliation as well.

Fadumo Dayib was the UN Country Manager in Somalia - though she was being told as an ethnic Somali she couldn't hold this post although she was born in Kenya and is a national of Finland - when she was contacted about her tweets and an interview with a newspaper in Kenya. The "Ethics Focal Point" in UN Women, Tamara Cummings-John wrote: "Yesterday, 13 September the attached tweets were brought to the attention of the HR Director, copied here. The tweets appear to be from your personal twitter account. This constitutes a breach of the standards of conduct that are set out in ST/SGB/2002/9 (Regulations governing the Status, Basic Rights and Duties of Officials other than Secretariat Officials and Experts on Mission) as well as UN Women’s Social Media Policy and Guidelines. and poses a significant reputational risk to UN Women. At the same time we were made aware of an interview which you gave to the Daily Nation and for which a request for authorization to the Executive Director pursuant to the Outside Activities Guidelines was not submitted. I would be grateful if you could advise if the tweets were indeed from your personal twitter account and whether there is any information relevant to their publication that HR needs to be made aware of." (To some it is incongruous that here in the UN would crack down on whistleblowing tweets while they did nothing about UNHCR staffer Nadine Njoya writing on Facebook that Cameroon's 36 year rulers Paul Biya should engage in "harsher repression" against Anglophones - then again Guterres is said to agree with this view and used to run UNHCR).

Fadumo Dayib  wrote back to Cummings-John as well as Izeduwa Derex-Briggs and Phumzile Mlambo-Ngcuka. She detailed to them how Deputy Special Representative of the Secretary General (DSRSG) De Clercq had thoughout Guterres' term in 2017 and 2018 gone to his UN Headquarters to make complaints, including about her race and ethnicity: "One of the complaints he made in 2017 was that I was unable to work with the Somali government. Another complaint he made in 2018 was that I was too close to the Somali government."

Then on 17 August 2018 - the same day Guterres' USG Alison Smale issued a no due process letter banning Inner City Press from the UN for life -- Derex-Briggs called Fadumo Dayib on WhatsApp number: "I was accused of betraying her trust and ordered to call the Somali Minister of Planning to explain that I was willing to be redeployed from Somalia. In addition, I was told to choose my battles wisely and threatened with repercussions for my actions. When I called the Minister, he informed me that Dr. Derex-Briggs had said she did not want me for the position of Country Program Manager and that I had agreed to be redeployed elsewhere. The Minister expressed that he had informed Dr. Derex-Briggs that the Somali government was considering taking steps to close the UN Women office."

Eventually Fabumo Dayib described some of this on Twitter - and on "15 September 2018, Ms. Cummings-John wrote to me and indicated that she would send me formal correspondence copied to you confirming the details of our discussion and that I understood that I was restrained from posting tweets from my personal account similar to the aforementioned tweets." Call it UN censorship. So much for whistleblowing against UN racism. 

From other whistleblowers, Inner City Press is informed that when UN Women director Phumzile Mlambo-Ngcuka visited Somalia she wanted full DSA even though the UN there provides housing and meal. An attempt was made at a retreat in Zanzibar to collect full DSA for an expensive hotel then go stay for free in another hotel, pocketing the DSA. One might think the Office of Internal Oversight Services would act on this as they have on less against Erik Solheim whom Guterres orderer to leave UNEP for engage in less abuse than Guterres does - but OIOS has become a political tool of Guterres for use against those he doesn't like, with himself (and those who roughed up Inner City Press for him, like Ronald E. Dobbins) having impunity.

Here was the complaint against Derex Briggs, which we exclusively published: "we lodge this complaint, we, the staff of UN Women regional office of East and Southern Africa (ESARO) are deeply concerned and disoriented by the lack of leadership and vision at the regional office of East and Southern Africa. The leadership (Ms Izeduwa Derex Briggs) at the helm of the regional office does not show respect to staff, intimidates staff and often in breach of her authority. In most missions, she is accompanied by her executive assistant who has no role and refer to her as the boss of the bosses- how unfortunate! UN Women need to save money and use it within the principles of sustainable development. We are concerned why staff should be attending missions where they have no relevance? An independent and confidential staff survey would provide evidence to the allegations. On her travels, since the year 2016, we have not had a Director resident in the office, we say so because cumulatively she has not been in the office for more than 30 days.  A close look at the travel itinerary and expense will reveal the extent to which rules have been flouted on flight booking, DSAs and delegation of authority. She has no regard for abiding by the set regulations and rules and always changes flights. Assess her flight expenses for the last two years and DSAs. She is always in conflict with the procurement and travel staff when she is given DSA according to the logistics note. She avers that whether lunch is provided, she must always obtain full DSA with excuses that she does not consume hotel meals. If lunch is provided and Ms Izeduwa chooses not to consume, why should she take full DSAs?  Whenever there are meetings organized by ESARO, Ms Izeduwa absents because she has travelled out of the country for other meetings where she is eligible for DSA. Impromptu flight schedules and realignment of flights cost the organization a lot of resources as penalties slapped by the airlines are very severe. Case in point is one of her flights to New York (2017) which cost USD 9, 000 way above the normal cost of USD 3,200. Reflecting on the Officer in Charge (OIC), she always assigns her closest confidant, a P4 to be OIC when there is a P5 in the office simply because she is in conflict with the P5 - continuously reprimanding him in the presence of the junior staff and interns...
Following what happened recently, the youth conference managed to mobilize a lot of in-kind resources and bringing major UN agencies for the partnership. Despite the other agencies appreciating the team work, Ms Izeduwa was maltreating staff who worked on this conference. Notwithstanding her involvement in the entire conference planning, Ms Izeduwa directed that the UNDP and the Resident Coordinator be deleted from the programme of the conference.  This directive from Ms Izeduwa came in the backdrop of the fact that the approved programme had already been printed at a cost of USD 800 with an additional cost implication. In a bid to ensure that the team adheres to her directives, and that she gets primary information from the Steering Committee, Ms Izeduwa planted her daughter together with her daughter’s friends, who are based in London as part of the youth conference and nominated them to the Steering Committee. Ms Izeduwa’s daughter made UN Women to lose USD 1600 because she called her to complain that she wants a direct flight from London despite it being unavailable.  During the conference, as opposed to her daughter working as a team with the Steering Committee, she reported the wrong information to Ms Izeduwa so as to attract the differences and the altercations exhibited by Ms Izeduwa with all conference staff. Now the partnership between the UNDP and RSC which would have been nurtured is in limbo. Is this professional? This is against the spirit of ONE UN and the Secretary General Reform agenda.
Now, Ms Izeduwa has no credibility not only in the eyes of her Country Representatives who she always bothers to accommodate her when she is on mission but also in her staff who have lost faith in her leadership and are no longer willing to be led by her.  Her conflicts with her former deputy which put stress levels in her former deputy to an extent of all staff knowledge, always left the office in confusion as it accentuated the leadership crisis. She would discuss her deputy unnecessarily with her juniors. We request your good office to ensure that the Deputy Director being recruited is not one that can easily be manipulated by her and more particularly he/she be one that is not recommended by her.  Why did Ms Izeduwa buy a car for her own use when she is never available to use it? She is always in disagreement with other drivers and say that only one driver can drive her.

Our leadership should also know that Ms Izeduwa is surrounded by fellow West Africans and bringing each of them one by one because she does not trust colleagues from other ethnicities and targeting Kenyans in the regional office who she fights every day. She recently fought and released a Somalia Country programme manager who is Kenyan who they were friends turned foes after summoning her before a group of staff to reprimand her over performance to which the manager walked out in protest claiming that her position had been earmarked for a P4 currently in the regional office. Since she joined the regional office, Ms Izeduwa’s only achievement on Somalia Country Programme has been to dismiss all the staff she found on board leaving the office with no staff capacity. She would approve requests by these West Africans and a few others she favors without any delay and fail to approve other requests because they come from a wrong ethnicity/nationality. This has fostered a very hostile work environment with two sides of teams-the favored vs the oppressed. Ms Izeduwa always says she does not care about rules and policies and would push staff to approve her position regardless of illegalities.

This region cannot continue to grow amidst these confusions, lack of leadership, blatant breach of rules, intimidation of staff to silence them on decisions which are misguided, abuse of authority, lack of integrity, lack of transparency and accountability, open favoritism to a section of staff to create a division in the team and misuse of resources where funds are transferred to partners disregarding technical recommendations and DSAs given in full even where it is clear that a meeting has provided logistics note indicating otherwise. We the staff of ESARO, request your intervention to clean this mess... Izeduwa has flouted the rules of getting partners on board- in just a few cases- ‘Akina Mama wa Africa, ACTIL and Africa Monitor’ have all been given funds against Procurement Review Committee, Program Appraisal Committee and Committee on Partner Assessments recommendations. To quote Ms Izeduwa when put to task why she flouted these rules, she retorted ‘I do not care about Procurement Review Committee or Committee on Partner Assessments. Policies are made for the organization, but we must decipher what works for me.’ Another case involves one UHAI Investment Ltd who undertook a study for ESARO. Initial Request for Proposal submission was USD 50000 with field travels. Ms Izeduwa directed the company to increase the cost to USD 100000 exclusive of field expenses with no basis but pitching that the consultancy scope had widened which was not the case. The RFP had been rejected by HQ Procurement Review Committee but Ms Izeduwa directed that it be resubmitted as Direct Procurement Request ignoring the comments by HQ and RO which were ultimate to the process. The firm was awarded the consultancy by change of notice to HQ Procurement Review Committee which left out the details of the original submission with a mere profile that its Director had been once a supervisor of Ms Izeduwa. Yet another company conducting a trafficking study, Ms Izeduwa approved payment of 70% on inception report disregarding the technical advice from finance to release only a smaller percentage at the inception stage and later all the payment of the consultant on the study in trafficking without any single report to date. Ms Izeduwa intentions to reconstitute the Procurement Review/Partner Assessment committees so as to bring on board the conformists and not the extremists to her leadership shows how deep the dictatorial leadership has run and the reason for your intervention." We'll have more on this. Even on the environment, the UN's last refuge as it fails under Antonio Guterres on conflict prevention and anti-corruption, the UN is in decay. Now after Erik Solheim of UNEP's travel spending reported by Inner City Press and others earlier this year, Solheim on November 20 resigned, effective November 22. His statement began: "On Saturday, I received the final report on the audit of official travel undertaken by the UN’s Office of Internal Oversight Services. As I have maintained throughout this process – I have been and remain - committed to doing what I believe to be in the best interest of UN Environment and the mission we are here to achieve.

For this reason, after deep reflection and in close consultation with the Secretary-General, I am stepping down as Executive Director of UN Environment with effect from 22 November 2018. Moments ago, with a heavy heart, I informed the Secretary-General of my decision." Some ask, and what did Guterres say -- better you than me? Guterres has spent public funds on fully 16 trips to his home in Lisbon, refusing to disclose how much it costs and roughing up and banning Inner City Press which asks? In the briefing room, Guterres' spokesman Stephane Dujarric gave the first question - of only four - to Al Jazeera which conveniently asked only about Solheim's travel, not Guterres. This is a pattern. Even banned, Inner City Press has asked in writing: "November 20-2: Confirm or deny that UNEP's Erik Solheim is resigning and either way, state when the OIOS report into his travel will be made public, and state how much the SG has spend on his 16 trips to Lisbon, including 2 UN Security each time." And here is all that Guterres' spokesmen sent back: "On your second question, we have the following note: The Secretary-General has accepted the resignation of Erik Solheim, the Executive Director of the UN Environment Programme (UNEP).
Mr. Solheim’s resignation is effective Thursday, 22 November.
The Secretary-General is grateful for Mr. Solheim’s service and recognizes that he has been a leading voice in drawing the world’s attention to critical environmental challenges, including plastics pollution and circularity; climate action; the rights of environmental defenders; biodiversity; and environmental security.
He has led advocacy at the highest levels of government, business and civil society to drive the transformational change needed to make a real difference in the lives of people and promote the cause of the environment.
The Deputy Executive Director of UNEP, Ms. Joyce Msuya of Tanzania, will be appointed as the Acting Executive Director while the Secretary-General launches a recruitment process, in consultation with Member States, to find a successor to Mr. Solheim. Ms. Msuya will be granted all the necessary support to ensure a smooth transition. New York, 20 November 2018." Nothing on Guterres' spending. We'll have more on this. Here was the fourth in Inner City Press' exclusive series on corruption in UN Environment, the re-branded UNEP, under Erik Solheim of Norway. After publishing three, Guterres had Inner City Press roughed up on June 22 and July 3, 2018 and banned since. It is pure censorship. But still our reporting, and that of our sources outraged at what Guterres is doing and others scrutinizing the UN if only their home country officials, see below, continues. On September 17, Inner City Press exclusively published the first in a series on travel waste in UNDP, starting with the bribery-used Office of South South Cooperation, here. This while Guterres' spokesman Stephane Dujarric refuses to answer questions about the public costs of travel, of Guterres or Solheim, preferring to dissemble about why and on what basis Guterres and Alison Smale have banned Inner City Press. On August 27 Dujarric said it was for creating a "hostile environment for diplomats." Vine video here. On September 17 he said, to the contrary, it was all Guterres' Secretariat and there were not "any inputs from any member states." Video here. Which is it? This is today's UN pattern of decision, replicated from Guterres' 38th floor to UNEP, see Solheim's September 17 internal memo, below. On September 26 Inner City Press asked the UN, "September 26-4: Again, on UN system travel spending including the SG's, what is the SG's comment and action on that Two countries have halted their funding to the UN Environment Programme following sharp criticism of its leader’s frequent flying in a draft internal audit. Denmark’s Ministry of Foreign Affairs (MFA) said it was withholding its 2018 contribution of about $1.6m to UNEP. Sweden’s International Development Agency (Sida) said they would not approve any new funding until all the issues raised had been resolved?" Deputy spokesman Farhan Haq replied, "Regarding question 26-4, we are taking the issue very seriously but will not comment on an incomplete audit." From the draft UN Office of Internal Oversight Services audit of Solheim: "Some of the trips to Oslo and Paris were called 'bilateral meetings,' even though they took place during weekends or the Christmas holidays... On one occasion he made an eight hour flight from Washington DC for a weekend in Paris, before he boarded another flight for New York." This is what Guterres has been doing -- 15 times -- including this coming weekend in Lisbon. And Guterres spokesmen refuse to answer Inner City Press repeated questions about the costs, choosing instead to work for Inner City Press' roughing up and banning from the UN, then to intimidate remaining correspondents who attempt to ask about it. But who will audit Guterres? Inner City Press has provided extensive information to OIOS whose Ben Swanson has to his credit confirmed receipt. Now what? The draft OIOS audit of Solheim continues: "The UNEP and UN’s Nairobi office should reclaim from these employees (1) all travel expenses and the related working hours which have not been accounted for; and (2) all additional costs incurred by the UNEP as a consequence of uneconomic and inefficient decisions by the management." So who will Guterres be returning money to? And who will hold him accountable for the retaliatory roughing up of the only journalist who asked about his use of funds to travel to Lisbon, and dared to document by Periscope broadcast on Sutton Place the many times Guterres has been out of New York without disclosure? The use of UN Security to threat Inner City Press against filming on a New York City sidewalk - across the street from Guterres' publicly funded mansion - and subsequent 3 July 2018 assault outside the UN Budget Committee meeting including tearing of shirt, damaging of laptop computer and twisting of arm? Aftenpost runs this quote too: The two other senior staffers were allegedly given permission by Erik Solheim to work out of Paris, in spite of being formally assigned to Nairobi. One of them allegedly received more than 165 000 NOK (20 000 dollars) in a special security allowance for Nairobi, in spite of being relocated to Paris. Permitting these leaders to work in Paris is a direct violation of UN’s regulations, according to the draft report. 'Such arrangements will set the presedent [sic] for other employees who wish to work out of a place of their own choice, and probably lead to speculations about unfair treatment or claims when such request are being rejected.'"  Inner City Press' September 13 question to Guterres' spokesmen has gone entirely unanswered, despite the written promises of Alison Smale. Here's just one of Inner City Press' questions to Guterres spokesmen, entirely unanswered: "September 13-2: Regarding the UN system's rules for use of UN funds for personal travel, and in light of the OIOS criticism of Erik Solheim at UNEP (below), what is the SG's comment and action, will be ensure that the OIOS audit be released to the public in its entirety and that his own travel be subject to an independent audit? See, “"Some of the trips to Oslo and Paris were called 'bilateral meetings,' even though they took place during weekends or the Christmas holidays... On one occasion he made an eight hour flight from Washington DC for a weekend in Paris, before he boarded another flight for New York." Has the SG done anything similar since Jan 1, 2017?

"The UNEP and UN’s Nairobi office should reclaim from these employees (1) all travel expenses and the related working hours which have not been accounted for; and (2) all additional costs incurred by the UNEP as a consequence of uneconomic and inefficient decisions by the management." Should the money be returned, does the SG think?

Finally, confirm that the two others at UNEP subject to OIOS criticism are Anne Lemore and Lisa Svensson, or state why you will not do so, given the allegations of waste of public funds, and when you would release the names." We'll have more on this. Guterres' USG Alison Smale twice promised that questions will be answered, but like so much else she has said and written, this is false. To continue reporting we ask questions at the UN Delegates Entrance, or seemingly in the "High Level" Week on Second Avenue and 46th Street - and Smale says this creates a "hostile environment for diplomats." These people are censors and it must all be reversed. They are further killing the UN, and have assaulted press freedom. We will have more on all this.

As Inner City Press reported in March 2018 before being roughed up and now banned from the UN for UNGA73 and beyond, UN Environment, the re-branded UNEP, is paying over EUR 500,000 in a (reverse) corporate partnership with Volvo Ocean Races, see below. Guterres' deputy Amina J. Mohammed has refused Press questions since November on her role in signing 4000 certificates to export from Nigeria and Cameroon endangered rosewood already in China. Guterres, Mohammed and Alison Smale's only response has been to censor and continue to restrict the Press which asks, despite 5000 signature petition, UNanswered. Now whistleblowers in UNEP have written to Guterres, and exclusively sent a copy and documents to Inner City Press on UNEP mis management, harassment and misuse of government resources. Who authorized UNEP to spend EUR 500,000 in a mis-named corporate partnership with Volvo Ocean Races? Before today publishing the documents, Innr City Press on March 1 asked Guterres' spokesman Stephane Dujarric about it, video here, UN transcript here: and below. Dujarric did not explain, then or for the rest of the day; he said he hadn't spoken with Guterres about it. Oh. Inner City Press is today publishing in full, on Scribd and Patreon, the agreement with Volvo Ocean Races signed by Erik Solheim, here, and the EUR 500,000 agreement signed by UNEP's Lisa Emilia Svensson, here and here.

***

Feedback: Editorial [at] innercitypress.com

Past (and future?) UN Office: S-303, UN, NY 10017 USA
For now: Box 20047, Dag Hammarskjold Station NY NY 10017

Reporter's mobile (and weekends): 718-716-3540

Search innercitypress.com  Search WWW (censored?)

Other, earlier Inner City Press are listed here, and some are available in the ProQuest service, and now on Lexis-Nexis.

 Copyright 2006-2019 Inner City Press, Inc. To request reprint or other permission, e-contact Editorial [at] innercitypress.com for