At the
UN, Greenwash and Hamstrung Peacekeepers, What Brown Can Do For You
Byline:
Matthew Russell Lee of Inner City Press at the UN: News Analysis
UNITED NATIONS, July
31 -- Two of this UN's claimed victories were on display on Tuesday: climate
change and Darfur, and a speech by Gordon Brown. UN staff were kept waiting on
the sidewalk while his entourage of black SUVs drove off, carbon neutral we're
assured. "What can Brown do for you?" one correspondent muttered, referring to
the United Parcel Service ads.
There was
a thematic debate, that's what they call it here, about global warming, complete
with bragging from the CEO of Duke Energy (click
here
for Inner City Press' story) and ended by a subsidy-for-sequestration speech by
Jeffrey Sachs that ran past six o'clock, immediately after which, UN Television
went dark.
The news
highpoint of the day, however, was the Security Council's vote on the Darfur
resolution. Before the vote, as Ban Ki-moon, 15 Ambassadors and their entourages
settled into the Security Council chamber, Sudan's Ambassador
Abdalmahmood Abdalhaleem Mohamad spoke one floor
above about the "cleaning" of the draft.
I worked all day Sunday with Emyr
[Jones-Parry, the UK Ambassador] to clean the text, he said. It goes
no further than Resolution 1590 [about South Sudan]. "We can live with it."
A correspondent asked about the
International Criminal Court and its indictments. "The ICC is out of our
discussion today on the hybrid" force, Sudan's Ambassador said. "Today we are
happy and celebration."
Messrs.
Brown and Ban, early Tuesday morning
Downstairs, the meeting was beginning.
Told of it, Ambassador Abdalmahmood
Abdalhaleem Mohamad ran down the escalator and into the Council chamber. Ban Ki-moon
began speaking, calling the resolution historical. Later, U.S. Amb. Zalmay
Khalilzad would say that the resolution gives the peacekeeping mission to
authority to use force, to protect civilians. But that leaves out what was
agreed to, including by the U.S. -- that force to protect civilians is only
allowed if it does not "prejudice" the Sudanese government. Visions of Romeo
Dallaire?
Before Amb. Khalilzad spoke,
the UN's chief of Peacekeeping Jean-Marie Guehenno was at the stakeout saying
that all important rebel leaders in Darfur are going to the meeting beginning
August 3 in Arusha, Tanzania. Inner City Press asked if Abdel Wahid Nour is
going. No, Mr. Guehenno said, he said he is not going. Video here.
Then Guehenno's handler gestured that it was time to leave. The American
Ambassador was waiting. The switch-over was made. Click
here
for Inner City Press' story of the subsequent stakeout, and compare
this
(Washington Post) to
this.
To be continued.
* * *
Click
here for a
previous Inner City Press UN / climate change story. Click
here
for a
Reuters AlertNet
piece by this correspondent about the Somali National Reconciliation Congress, and the UN's
$200,000 contribution from a still-undefined trust fund.
Feedback: Editorial
[at] innercitypress.com
UN Office: S-453A,
UN, NY 10017 USA Tel: 212-963-1439
Reporter's mobile
(and weekends): 718-716-3540
Other, earlier Inner
City Press are listed here, and
some are available in the ProQuest service.
Copyright 2006-07 Inner City Press, Inc. To request
reprint or other permission, e-contact Editorial [at] innercitypress.com -
UN Office: S-453A,
UN, NY 10017 USA Tel: 212-963-1439
Reporter's mobile
(and weekends): 718-716-3540