UN Is
Grilled in DC, As Opponent of Free Press and Bloggers, Claims Not to
Lobby
Byline:
Matthew Russell Lee of Inner City Press at the UN: News Analysis
WASHINGTON, March 17 -- There is a UN
Information Center, pronounced eunuch, in the U.S. capital, and on
Monday its director William Davis promised that the UN does not lobby.
This he defined as explicitly supporting pending legislation, or openly
requesting contributions to the UN. He was asked why his office tells
only positive stories; he was asked to explain actions of the UN
Development Program ranging from support of dictators to crackdowns on
the press, via press release, lobbying against media accreditation and
bad-mouthing of particular news outlets. Davis said he is not an expert
on the dictatorship and retaliation issues. He said, with an explicit
reference to Inner City Press, that the UN is struggling to enter the
twenty-first century and determine how to handle bloggers, to determine
if they are credible and if they "overtake regular relations with the
working press."
On this, Inner City Press has
obtained the UN's internal background paper on Media Accreditation and
New Media, which opines that blogs "are essentially about providing
opinion and stimulating debate. They are not subject to the same
editorial and legal vetted as traditional media and do not function
according to normal journalistic practices and standards. With its
infinite capacity to shift, change or cease operations entirely, it is
more difficult for an organization to ensure accountability from a blog."
Whether the UN is any
judge of journalistic standards, when its in-house faux news operation
routine deletes any controversial reference at the request of member
states, is dubious to many. The UN's credibility was questioned at an
event on Monday in Washington,
by the Government Accountability Project, among others. Click
here
to view,
here for MP3.
GAP's Beatrice Edwards said that when the UN tries cut out the free
press, it is no more than a powerful and wealth and lawless
organization. Whistleblowers, she said, are best off leaking information
to the Press, particularly after what she called Ban Ki-moon's "huge
leap backwards" last year when he allowed UNDP to escape the
jurisdiction of the UN Ethics Office and its protections against
retaliation.
Another panelist, Claudia Rosett,
recounted the UN's delayed and mendacious responses to her questions,
most recently a refusal by the UN Office of Drugs and Crime to disclose
which countries are on its Executive Board. This should be not
surprising, given the UNODC director Costa has also failed to file his
long-promised "Compact" regarding the UN Office in Vienna, which he
heads. Months ago, Inner City Press was told this was just a temporary
scheduling glitch. But still the report has not gone online. Ms. Rosett
said that UN millennial poverty advisor Jeffrey Sachs has not even put
online any statement that he will not disclose his finances. Davis
listened to this, but did not disagree.
UNIC's Davis, lobbying not
shown
Both GAP's Bea Edwards and
Claudia Rosett nodded toward UNDP as the likely complainant to Google to
get Inner City Press de-listed from Google News. "Maybe there's a guy on
Mars," Ms. Rosett said, "who knows Google's policies, the make-up of the
UN press corps, and how to get Inner City Press delisted. A pitch was
made for pro bono public interest representation to pursue the question
in court. Watch this site.
Footnote: from the Washington Internet Daily
of March 18, 2008:
Google
News is said to receive three million complaints daily, so whoever
complained about Inner City Press must have had "a lot of clout" to get
such quick action, said Beatrice Edwards, international program director
of the Government Accountability Project. Her group, formed in response
to the Watergate scandal, has been leading the push for a U.N. policy
like the FOIA and for wider whistleblower protection for U.N. staff,
after a narrowing under Secretary General Ban Ki-moon to exclude the
UNDP, she said. U.N. workers regularly leak to Inner City Press
precisely because they have no means, such as federal law imposes, to
report abuses without risking retaliation, Edwards said.
William
Davis, director of the United Nations Information Center in Washington,
didn't discuss the Google News episode on the panel. Reporters covering
the U.N. meet hostility from some officials partly because of varying
media environments at home, Davis said, citing Japanese reporters'
politeness at a recent dinner with the U.N.'s Washington office. "We are
masters at shooting ourselves in the foot" with Western reporters, and
officials often "flinch" when approached by the media, he said.
The U.N., "dragged kicking and screaming" to recognize new media
as valid entities, now welcomes outlets like Inner City Press that
do original reporting, Davis said.
We'll see.
* * *
These reports are
usually also available through
Google News and on Lexis-Nexis.
Click
here for a
Reuters
AlertNet piece by this correspondent about Uganda's Lord's Resistance Army.
Click
here
for an earlier
Reuters AlertNet
piece about the Somali National Reconciliation Congress, and the UN's
$200,000 contribution from an undefined trust fund.
Video
Analysis here
Feedback: Editorial
[at] innercitypress.com
UN Office: S-453A,
UN, NY 10017 USA Tel: 212-963-1439
Reporter's mobile
(and weekends): 718-716-3540
Other, earlier Inner
City Press are listed here, and
some are available in the ProQuest service, and now on Lexis-Nexis.
Copyright 2006-08 Inner City Press, Inc. To request
reprint or other permission, e-contact Editorial [at] innercitypress.com -