ICP
Asks UN Why
UNICEF is
“Official
Child Rights
Org” for Baku
2015: Issues
By Matthew
Russell Lee
UNITED
NATIONS, June
11 -- Why
would any UN
agency,
particularly
UNICEF,
sponsor
Azerbaijan's
European
Games? Inner
City Press asked the UN on
June 11
and was told,
reflexively it
seems, that it
might not be
true.
But the
publicity
material has
already been
released:
UNICEF is the
“Offical Child
Rights
Organization”
of Baku 2015.
Why?
According to
UN spokesman
Stephane
Dujarric, who
it the one who
at noon on
June 11 said
it might not
be true and
didn't follow
up on this by
the end of the
day, the UN
likes to be
part of big
sporting
events, “to
engage
different
public on
issues that
are of
importance.”
But what
issues is
UNICEF
engaging in
Azerbaijan?
In
fact, UN
Secretary
General Ban
Ki-moon,
rather than
pushing on any
of the human
rights and
freedom of the
press issues
that many
groups are,
issued through
Dujarric an
unequivocal
expression of
support for
Azerbaijan on
June 11,
pointedly
saying the
another UN
official who
raised
questions was
NOT speaking
for the UN. So
much for
engaging on
issues.
UNICEF,
along with the
UN Office of
the High
Commissioner
for Human
Rights and UN
Peacekeeping,
and later Ban
himself, knew
of detailed
allegations of
child rape by
French
soldiers in
the Central
African
Republic, and
did not even
tell CAR
authorities -
it was, in
essence, a
cover up. Now
this.
Here's
what Inner
City Press asked the UN on
June 11, and
Spokeman
Dujarric's
responses:
Inner City
Press: Your
statement on
the
Secretary-General
fully
supporting the
European Games
in Azerbaijan:
there’s a
controversy
about UNICEF
(United
Nations
Children’s
Fund) has been
declared the
official child
rights
organization
of the
European Games
and even some
Member States
have said it’s
inappropriate,
given issues
that have
existed about
child rights
in the
country, in
fact a child
rights
organization
that’s been
kind of
prosecuted by
the
Government.
So I wanted to
know, first of
all, for the
UN system as a
whole, is
there a
situation in
which, sort
of, like,
Coca-Cola or
something
else, that a
UN fund,
program or
agency can
become the
official one,
the official
child rights
organization
of a game like
this?
And is it
appropriate?
Spokesman
Dujarric:
I’d have to
check with
UNICEF as to
the very
nature of that
agreement
they’ve signed
with the
authorities
organizing the
games and I
can answer you
in more
details.
I think it is…
we see often
these large
sports events
having a UN
presence.
It’s a good
way for the
United Nations
agencies to
engage
different
public on
issues that
are of
importance.
We often
engage in
places where
things aren’t
perfect and
engaging is a
way of
improving that
record.
Inner City
Press: what
the critics
say is that
it’s one thing
to work in a
country that
has problems
but to try to
help
people.
But it’s
something else
to basically
have this
sponsoring—
Spokesman
Dujarric:
Like I said, I
would not dare
disagree with
what you’re
reading but I
would have to
check as the
very nature of
that report.
Well,
six hours
later when his
Office closed
on June 11,
there had been
no checking or
further
information.
Watch this
site.
* * *
These
reports
are
usually also available through Google
News and on Lexis-Nexis.
Click here
for Sept 26, 2011 New Yorker on Inner City
Press at UN
Click
for
BloggingHeads.tv re Libya, Sri Lanka, UN
Corruption
Feedback:
Editorial [at] innercitypress.com
UN Office: S-303,
UN, NY 10017 USA
Reporter's mobile (and weekends):
718-716-3540
Other, earlier Inner City Press are
listed here,
and some are available in the ProQuest service,
and now on Lexis-Nexis.
Copyright 2006-2015 Inner City Press,
Inc. To request reprint or other permission,
e-contact Editorial [at] innercitypress.com
|