UNITED NATIONS
GATE, July 5 – The
corruption of
the UN system
under Antonio
Guterres
has extended
to what some
had called the
UN's crown
jewel, UNICEF.
This week
after banned
Inner City
Press reported
first hand on
the UNICEF Kid
Power Goodwill
Ambassador
family using
for physical
injury from a
fender bender
while kickboxing
on oxy, here,
now
this:
UNICEF
commissioned
a report
on harassment
and abuse of
authority.
Inner City
Press is
publishing
it on Patreon,
here. But
most telling is this
update, from a
whistleblower
like so many
in the UN
system who
cares about
the
Organization
but sees
leaders like
Guterres, Fore
and those they
have selected
killing what
remains of the
credibility:
"the UNICEF
global town
hall meeting
during which
the report was
discussed here
was very
disappointing.
None of the
senior
managers took
responsibility
for the issues
identified in
the report of
the
independent
task force.
Questions from
staff in this
regard were
deflected.
Instead the
very same
senior leaders
who created
this system of
harassment and
abuse are now
pretending to
fix it. Some
of them have
been starting
a witch hunt
on lower level
managers to
demonstrate
their "own
commitment"
and deflect
from their own
failings. Such
a response
lacks
credibility
and questions
the real
intent of
appointing
this task
force.
Maybe you are
interested in
covering this
matter since
nothing will
change in
UNICEF without
public
pressure."
Here's hoping.
In
UNDT/2019/033
we learn of a
UNICEF
professional
''investigation''
so wanting
that the Judge
hearing the
case referred
the
INVESTIGATOR
to the Exec
Head of UNICEF
for
consideration
of
disciplinary
action.
The case
relates to
alleged
''program
funds'' fraud
in Pakistan
that initially
led to an
innocent staff
member being
dismissed only
to be
reinstated and
awarded
damages by the
UNDT. We
learn of gross
incompetence,
loss of
evidence,
disingenuous
concealment
and a failure
to pursue
exculpatory
evidence - not
by the case
subject but by
the
investigator!
Noting that
the Judge had
no special
information or
insight, all
of the
failings
outlined in
the case
should have
been
identified by
UNICEF legal,
HR and
Investigations
management
before any
form of
disciplinary
action was
undertaken
against the
staff member
but the
in-your-face
failings seem
to have
entirely
escaped any
kind of
rational or
objective
review by
management
thereby
compounding
the
seriousness of
case issues
identified by
the
UNDT.
Now,
add into the
mix the case
of
UNDT/2019/045
where we learn
that UNICEF
recruited
into, yes, its
Security
Section in war
ravaged
Somalia a man
who had served
15 years in
prison in New
York for RAPE,
assault, false
imprisonment
and
burglary.
A situation
made worse by
the fact that
this
information
was in the
public domain,
had HR
bothered to
check.
Because even banned,
Inner
City Press is
fair, it was
UNDT itself
which said it
has confirmed
that the
person UNICEF
sent to Somalia
was "was
imprisoned at
Woodbourne
Correctional
Facility in
New York
State, United
States of
America,
following a
conviction on
charges of
rape in the
first degree;
unlawful
imprisonment
in the first
degree;
burglary in
the second
degree and
assault in the
second
degree." This
is an outrage
- and typically
under Guterres,
the Emperor
of Impunity
himself, no one has
been held
accountable.
The faux
feminists who
send rapists to
war zones
then covers it
up through
censorship.
Oh, and let's
not forget
that the
UNICEF ''staff
member's''
educational
credentials
were
fraudulent.
The bizarre
approach taken
to
investigating
the matter
when it did
come to light
also raises
questions
about
management
competency.
All this from
the UN Agency
mandated to
protect
vulnerable
children when
it appears
they cannot
even identify
convicted
criminals in
their own
ranks.
What we
see here is
systemic
''duty of
care''
failings.
An organization
where its
internal
investigators
are found to
be incompetent
and
disingenuous,
if not
actually
dishonest.
Recruiting a
convicted
rapist into
the ranks of
the security
department is
simply
incredulous
and exposes
the lie that
are so-called
UN personnel
clearances.
(An issue that
has arisen
repeatedly in
Peacekeeping
in terms of
screening
police and
military
personnel).
I know for a
fact that
there is no
such thing,
for example,
as an official
UN check of
criminal
records before
the UN
recruits
civilian staff -- we'll
have more on
this, with
regard even to
UN Security
which Guterres
used to rough
up and lawlessly
ban and target
the
Press.
Even
still banned
after 280 days
we'll
have more on all
of this:
this is
Guterres' UN.
The UN
has banned
Inner City
Press from
entering its
campus since
July 5, claiming
that its Lieutenant Ronald
Dobbins
targeted
ouster of
Inner City Press
from a speech
by Secretary
General
Antonio Guterres
on June 22
then from a
meeting about
his budget on
July 3 were
"altercations."
On August
17, with no
due process
and no
accountability,
Guterres'
Global Censor
Alison Smale issued
a ruling
without once
hearing from
Inner City Press, making
the ban permanent.
Now this ban
has been extended
beyond
the UN Secretariat
to the other
side of First
Avenue, the
once crown
jewel of
the UN
system now corrupted
to (as in CAR
and Myanmar),
UNICEF, the
"children's agency."
Inner City
Press has
responded to
an
UNICEF invitation
to an event
for a book
by Kul Gautam
on September
5. On Friday
August 31 past
6 pm UNICEF's
Michelle
Siegel wrote,
"bring your UN
media
accreditation
for security
clearance. If
you are not a
currently
accredited UN
journalist you
will not be
admitted to
the event."
Wonder(ed)
why. Now it
emerges that
Kul Gautam earlier
on August 31
met with
Guterres (who
dominated
the photo
promoting the
book) - and
then Inner City
Press was disinvited.
On September 5
Inner City Press
went to
check out,
then stake
out, the event,
which is its
right. A slew
of people
with no UN ID at
all went in.
After a time,
not Guterres
but his chief
of staff Maria
Luiza
Viotti and her
chief of
staff Mr.
Eihab Omaish,
previously
Jordan's
Deputy PR,
arrived. Inner
City Press
informed them,
politely, that it
had been
banned from
this UN book
event. They
did not react
at all. This is
what Guterres is
doing to the
UN, including
its badges
that Guterres
through Smale
can
revoke the
moment you ask
him about
cash, Cameroon
or corruption.
Now UNICEF
of Henriette
Fore and
Queen Rania and David Beckham
have joined
Guterres'
censorship,
hamhandedly.
(We'll
assume Fore
checked this
with the
Queen, and
Bend it Like
Beckham, and
the one and
only
Kul Chandra
Gautam, author
of “Global
Citizen from
Gulmi"). Guterres
is
killing the UN. We'll
have
more on this. Earlier
Guterres'
retaliatory
ban
was extended to
the Pierre
Hotel on Fifth Avenue,
for a July 10 press
conference by
the UN
affiliated but
ostensibly
independent
World Intellectual
Property
Organization
(WIPO) which
as Inner City
Press has
previously
reported helped
North Korea
with its
cyanide
patents and
retaliated against
it staff and
media. Inner
City Press
was e-mailed
an invitation
on July 2 and
replied with an
RSVP to cover
it.
Marshall
Hoffman of WIPO's
public
relations
firm Hoffman
PR wrote back,
"Thanks. We
will see at
the press
conference."
After that, Guterres
spokesman
Farhan Haq was
asked why
Inner City
Press is
banned and said it
is pending a
review of two
"altercations"
- both of which
were improper
and unilateral
ousters of Inner
City Press by
UN Security's
Dobbins and
officers, four
of whom
refused to give their
names. Soon,
there was this
follow up e-mail
from WIPO's flak
Marshall
Hoffman: "Dear
Matthew, It
has come to my
attention that
your
accreditation
to the UN has
been suspended
pending an
investigation
into an
incident.
Given the
suspension, I
regret you
will not be
able to attend
the WIPO press
conference."
This is more
than a little
strange - the
press
conference is
not explicitly
limited
to UN
accredited
journalists,
and Inner City
Press has
not been
contacted once by
the UN about
the review or
any suspension,
it was only
told at the
46th Street gate
that its
banned for
some undefined
time. But now
also banned
from a press
conference at
a hotel in
Manhattan by
an agency for
which Guterres
spokespeople
have refused
to
answer, saying
Francis Gurry
(who will speak at
the Pierre
Hotel press
conference
along with
Soumitra Dutta
from Cornell
University and
Bruno Lanvin
from INSEAD) has
his own
governing
board? Something
stinks here.
We'll have
more on this - and
on this: how
untransparent
and
inaccessible
is Antonio
Guterres, as
UN Secretary
General? The
day he canceled his
first UN
Headquarters
press
conference in six months, he was ironically the
guest of honor of the United
Nations Correspondents
Association. He was scheduled
to make remarks at 6 pm - but
it was not in the UN Media
Alert. Inner City Press, whose
RSVP to UNCA was never
responded to, streamed the
event from the tourists'
balcony, edited here.
Then Guterres' UN Security
guards physically ousted Inner
City Press from covering the
UN Fifth Committee's July 3
meeting on his proposal to
fire UN staff and move the
jobs- then on July 5 banned
Inner City Press from entering
the UN.
Fox News story
here,
GAP blogs I
and II. While
Guterres' UNCA fan club said
nothing, others did. Guterres
blathered on about how he
supported the media in
Portugal - dubious - and then
cuts a cake for his UN
Censorship Alliance. Earlier
Inner City Press asked
Guterres' lead spokesman
Stephane Dujarric, who
previously lent the UN Press
Briefing Room to UNCA, if the
event was open press but he
refused to answer and ran off.
Inner City Press asked the
spokesman from the President
of the General Assembly, who
is listed as attended but will
not speak, why it is not in
the UN Media Alert. The
spokesman said to ask UNCA.
But UNCA never responded to
the RSVP of Inner City Press
through the Free UN Coalition
for Access. In the middle of
the event the claim was that
UN correspondents didn't have
to RSVP - not what the notice
said. The event was not even
in the June 26 UN Media Alert.
Last
week, Dujarric
spoonfed sound
bytes to a
prominent UNCA
members and
is working with
them to try to
further restrict
Inner City
Press, here -
Inner City
Press was in
fact ousted on
June 22, video
here,
story here).
The
Free UN Coalition for Access
questions this and the
propriety of this explicit
focus by the UN Correspondents
Association on the UN's
"causes" rather than simply
covering the UN as it is; it
and corruption are among the
reasons Inner City Press quit
UNCA (and co-founded FUNCA).
On June 25 Inner
City Press asked Guterres'
Deputy Spokesman Farhan Haq
about it, video here,
UN transcript here:
Inner City Press:
on Friday there was the Eid
event in which António
Guterres gave a speech, and I…
I want… I guess I want to put
this in a general way because
I don't understand it.
During the event, as the event
went on, I was required to
leave by a Lieutenant Dobbins
and the emergency response
unit. And it seemed
strange, because there were
many other non-resident
correspondents at the
event. So, I wanted to
know… to know, one, what are
the rules? Number two,
is it acceptable for a… a… UN
Security to… to single out and
target a specific
journalist? And I did…
and I ask this because I've
previously written a story
about promotions in DSS
[Department of Safety and
Security], including Mr.
Dobbins, and whatever that is,
what are the provisions in the
UN to make sure that security
cannot abuse its powers?
So those are… I… I… I'd like
you to answer that, and also
they didn't give their
names. The other
individuals refused to give
their names. Is that UN
policy?
Deputy Spokesman: UN
Security has their
policies. Your concerns
with them need to be addressed
to UN Security. I'm not
going to comment on your own
problems with UN
Security. Brenden, come
on up.
Inner
City Press: I
don't understand. This
happened at a speech by the
Secretary-General.
Deputy Spokesman: No,
I'm sorry, your security
issues are things you're going
to have to deal with.
Inner City Press: It's not a
security issue. It was
done in the name of the
Secretary-General. Is he
speaking tomorrow at 6 p.m.
somewhere? Can you say where
the Secretary-General is
speaking tomorrow at 6 p.m.?
Deputy Spokesman: I’m
not going to argue with you on
this." There was more - video
here.
FUNCA
timely sent this: "This is a
timely response to your
statement that 'The event is
open to all UN correspondents,
Please RSVP by FRIDAY, June
22nd to
RSVPUNCAEvents@gmail.com...
Opening Remarks byUN
Secretary-General António
Guterres, 6:00 pm (LOCATION
TBC).' A UN correspondent, by
choice not a member of UNCA,
is hereby timely requesting to
be informed where SG Antonio
Guterres will be making
remarks, and to cover it.
Please confirm receipt and
provide response. On deadline,
thank you in advance." Five
days later on Tuesday June 26,
no answer at all. So it is not
true, the claim that "the
event is open to all
correspondents"?
Five UN Security
officers, led by UN Lieutenant
Ronald E. Dobbins, pushed
Inner City Press' reporter out
of the UN on June 22. Inner
City Press was live-streaming
Periscope and preparing to
write about Secretary General
Antonio Guterres' claims about
his visit to Mali, where he
didn't even inquire into a
recent case child rape by a UN
Peacekeeper. With the event
still ongoing, Inner City
Press was approached by
Lieutenant Dobbins and told
that since it was just past 7
pm it had to leave the
building. Video here.
That is not
the rule, nor the practice.
But Inner City Press under
Guterres and his head of
Global Communications Alison
Smale has inexplicable been at
the "non-resident
correspondent" level lowered
from that of no-show state
media like Akbhar al Yom's
Sanaa Youssef, assigned Inner
City Press' long time office
despite rarely coming in and
not asking a question in ten
years.
While
Guterres and Smale have
created and encourage the
atmosphere for targeting the
Press, Dobbins had and has his
own reasons. Inner City Press
previously exclusively
reported on fraudulent
promotions in the UN
Department of Safety and
Security, beginning of series
here
with a leaked document
with Dobbins own name on it,
under the heading "Possible
Promotions... if Dobbins does
not want Canine / ERU."
Document here.
Since the publication, Dobbins
and a number of UN Security
officers have openly targeted
Inner City Press. This has
been raised in writing to
Smale (for eight months), for
almost 18 months to Guterres
and his deputy Amina J.
Mohammed, whose response has
been to evade questions on
Cameroon and now an ambiguous
smile while surrounded by UN
Security. On June 25 Inner
City Press asked Guterres'
Deputy Spokesman Farhan Haq
about it, video here,
UN transcript here:
Inner City Press:
on Friday there was the Eid
event in which António
Guterres gave a speech, and I…
I want… I guess I want to put
this in a general way because
I don't understand it.
During the event, as the event
went on, I was required to
leave by a Lieutenant Dobbins
and the emergency response
unit. And it seemed
strange, because there were
many other non-resident
correspondents at the
event. So, I wanted to
know… to know, one, what are
the rules? Number two,
is it acceptable for a… a… UN
Security to… to single out and
target a specific
journalist? And I did…
and I ask this because I've
previously written a story
about promotions in DSS
[Department of Safety and
Security], including Mr.
Dobbins, and whatever that is,
what are the provisions in the
UN to make sure that security
cannot abuse its powers?
So those are… I… I… I'd like
you to answer that, and also
they didn't give their
names. The other
individuals refused to give
their names. Is that UN
policy?
Deputy Spokesman: UN
Security has their
policies. Your concerns
with them need to be addressed
to UN Security. I'm not
going to comment on your own
problems with UN
Security. Brenden, come
on up.
Inner
City Press: I
don't understand. This
happened at a speech by the
Secretary-General.
Deputy Spokesman: No,
I'm sorry, your security
issues are things you're going
to have to deal with.
Inner City Press: It's not a
security issue. It was
done in the name of the
Secretary-General. Is he
speaking tomorrow at 6 p.m.
somewhere? Can you say where
the Secretary-General is
speaking tomorrow at 6 p.m.?
Deputy Spokesman: I’m
not going to argue with you on
this." There was more - video
here.
Even if Lt
Dobbins and his team and
commanders wanted to interpret
and twist the existing rules
in a way they are not enforced
against any other non-resident
correspondent at the UN, the
Guterres Eid al -Fitr event
listed in the UN Department of
Public Information was still
ongoing, making it
unquestionable that Inner City
Press had a right to be in the
UN and cover it.
But
even as Inner City Press
dialed DPI's Media
Accreditation and Liaison
Unit, getting only voice mail,
Dobbins made a call and UN
“Emergency Response Unit”
officers arrived, with barely
concealed automatic weapons.
One of them repeatedly pushed
Inner City Press' reporter in
the back, forcing him through
the General Assembly lobby
toward the exit. Video here.
UN
Under Secretary General
Catherine Pollard was told the
ouster and did nothing, as was
a Moroccan diplomat. The
heavily armed UN Security
officers refused to give their
names when asked. Lieutenant
Dobbins, with no name plate on
his uniform, refused to spell
his name. He said, I have my
orders. From who - Guterres?
His Deputy SG or chief of
staff, both of whom were at
the event? DSS chief Drennan?
DPI chief Alison Smale?
Inner City Press repeatedly
asked to be able to get its
laptop computer, which was
upstairs - there was no way to
have known it would be ousted
during Guterres' event.
But
Dobbins and the others
refused, as did the UN
Security officers at the gate.
Inner City Press remained
there, with dwindling cell
phone battery, raising the
issue online to Smale, under
whose watch Inner City Press
has remained in the
non-resident correspondent
status it was reduced to for
pursuing the Ng Lp Seng UN
bribery case into the UN press
briefing room where Guterres'
spokesman Stephane Dujarric
ordered it out, then had it
evicted. A DPI representative,
whom Inner City Press asked to
call Smale, was unable or
unwilling to even let Inner
City Press go in escorted to
get its laptop.
Just
in the past week, when Inner
City Press complained of
Dujarric providing only to Al
Jazeera the response of
Antonio Guterres to the US
leaving the UN Human Rights
Council, Dujarric and the Al
Jazeera trio claimed
to MALU that the coverage was
“too aggressive.” Journalism
is not a crime? Next week,
Antonio Guterres is set to
give remarks, to which Inner
City Press has requested the
right to cover response, to
the UN Correspondents
Association, which not only
has not acted on this
censorship, but has fueled it.
Inside the
UN the Eid event continued,
alongside a liquor fueled
barbeque thrown by UN
Security. This DSS sold
tickets to non resident
correspondents, and allowed in
people who had nothing to do
with the UN, including some
seeming underage. When Inner
City Press audibly raised the
issue to UN Safety and
Security Service chief Mick
Brown, he did nothing.
The
Moroccan diplomat emerged and
chided Inner City Press for
even telling him of the
ouster, claiming that “25% of
what you write is about
Morocco.” Some Periscope video
here.
Pakistan's Permanent
Representative, who hosted the
Eid event, said she would look
into it. Sweden's spokesperson
asked whom to call in DPI and
when Inner City Press said,
Alison Smale, responded, Who
is Alison Smale? Indeed.
Smale has
refused to respond in any way,
in the eight months she has
been Guterres' “Global
Communications” chief, to a
5000 signature petition to
restore Inner City Press to
its unused office S-303 and to
adopt content neutral media
access rules going forward.
That, and appropriate action
on Lt. Dobbins and the others,
must be among the next steps.
Watch this site.
***
Feedback:
Editorial [at] innercitypress.com
UN Office: S-303,
UN, NY 10017 USA
Reporter's mobile (and weekends):
718-716-3540
Other, earlier Inner City Press are
listed here,
and some are available in the ProQuest
service, and now on Lexis-Nexis.
Copyright 2006-2018 Inner City
Press, Inc. To request reprint or other
permission, e-contact Editorial [at]
innercitypress.com for