At UN,
New Ethics Head, Egeland's Paid "When Actually Working," Pension Double Talk,
Syrian Snubs and UNMOVIC
Byline:
Matthew Russell Lee of Inner City Press at the UN: News/Muse
UNITED
NATIONS, May 2, updated May -- First, a slice of what they call hard news.
while it was not announced at Wednesday's noon briefing, a new director of the
UN's Ethics Office has been selected: Robert Benson of Canada, formerly among
other things the Executive Director of the
Royal Canadian Mounted Police
External Review Committee. This will be announced at tomorrow's noon briefing.
For now, Mr. Benson's c.v. -- placed on the UN's iSeek intranet, after
this report it appears -- is reproduced below.
At the UN, information flows but in no organized fashion. It squirts around
edges and over obstacles. As it is withheld in one place, it is poured out in
another. Wednesday morning the president of the Security Council for May, Zalmay
Khalilzad, did a brief stakeout interview, answering primarily about the
proposed Lebanon tribunal. No overall questions were possible.
As simply one example, is the U.S. planning in May to schedule anything in the
Council about Northern Uganda and the
Lord's Resistance Army? A plan of work was passed out, decidedly light on
Council meetings, with the footnotes (issues that might arise) listed as "Sudan,
Timor-Leste, Res. 1244" -- that's Kosovo -- "SC mission, 1747 IAEA report, Chad,
Lebanon (1559), Small arms, UNMOVIC."
On this last, the acronym for the search for weapons in Iraq, UK Ambassador Emyr
Jones Parry told a half-dozen reporters that the time may well have come to
finally kill off UNMOVIK. Asked if the UK would support the use of UN Charter
Chapter VII to create the Lebanon tribunal, to prosecute the killers of Harari
and others, Amb. Jones Parry said "If you let me decide what the UK
supports....". Reporters laughed, and Amb. Jones Parry said there wasn't much
more that can be done other than invoke Chapter VII, and create the Tribunal by
force of the Council, without formal Lebanese approval. Head UN lawyer Nicolas
Michel preempted the UN's noon briefing, taking half an hour of questions about,
it seems, answering any of them. Video
here.
After Mr. Michel finished, Deputy Spokesperson Marie Okabe closed the
proceedings, not having taken questions. She explained to Inner City Press than
no one else wanted to ask questions -- what, on this day the entire world and UN
docket was nothing more than the Hariri tribunal? -- and she took a few
questions, followed up in writing:
"Hi. At
(or after) the noon briefing (on which no questions other than on the proposed
Hariri tribunal were taken), Marie told me that my question responding to what
she read about the UN Joint Staff Pension Fund --
what is the status of the proposal to outsource the management of the $9 billion
in North American equities, and the bids that were previously opened? What is
the status of the asset-liability study? What is the read-out of the two day
Investment Committee (and actuarial) meeting?
Also,
beyond my requests to Marie for the timing of Mr. Ocampo's replacement (current
Chinese ambassador to the UN in Geneva) beginning, and the specifics of the
position(s) and compensation -- dollar figures -- for Jan Egeland (and other
similar non-full time and/or dollar a year individuals, including the one Marie
named, T.R. Larsen.
Separately, is it possible to confirm or deny that on Mr. Ban's recent trip to
Syria, the Syrian Foreign Minister openly criticized T.R. Larsen in front of Mr.
Ban? If so, what was Mr. Ban's response? Had T.R. Larsen been slated to attend
the meeting with Assad?
Finally, does the UN have any response to the (BBC-reported) complaint against
MONUC and UNDP for not paying more than $50 each to the disabled Congolese who
wrote the election song distributed by UNDP?"
Little by little, some response have been coming in.
Mr.
Ban in Syria (Larsen not shown)
On the Pension Fund, this:
Subject:
In lieu of noon briefing, questions: UNJSPF, Larsen/Egeland, MONUC
From: [Associate spokesperson at] un.org
To: Matthew Russell Lee
Sent: Wed, 2 May 2007 3:09 PM
I have the following information on the Pension Fund...
"Yesterday, the Investments Committee and the Committee of Actuaries, which are
both expert advisory Committees working under the auspices of the UN Joint Staff
Pension Board, reviewed a draft of the first ever Asset-Liability Management
study to be conducted for the Fund. The study, to be formally presented to the
Board in July, reports that the Fund is in good financial health. It would
recommend that the Pension Fund should handle risk issues in a formal manner
when adopting Strategic Asset Allocations. It would also recommend consideration
of the introduction of new asset classes in its portfolio. The Investment
Committee recommends that the Secretary-General study this possibility and
report back in due course."
So does this mean that the proposed outsourcing of the $9 billion of the UN
Pension Fund's North American equities portfolio will go forward? As one staff
member has noted to Inner City Press, if so it is ironic, the (mixed) message
being that "the Pension Fund is well run" (per the Asset-Liability Study, and
its previously-reviewed 37 minute DVD akin to "Wayne's World"), in fact it's so
well run, let's outsource $9 billion of it.
Inner City Press went to seek more guidance in person, but none was forthcoming.
The outsourcing was postponed for the Asset-Liability Study, but the
above-referenced "new asset classes" is not about the outsourcing, which was
being promoted by UN Controller Warren Sach. On Wednesday Inner City Press asked
for confirmation of the extension of the contract of Mr. Sach, but did not get
an answer.
On others of the Inner City Press questions submitted above, this arrived:
"Subject: In lieu of noon briefing, questions: UNJSPF, Larsen/Egeland, MONUC
From: [Associate spokesperson at] un.org
To: Matthew Russell Lee
Sent: Wed, 2 May 2007 3:15 PM
Don't
have figures for Jan Egeland, who's just begun working with us, but Larsen's
contract is When Actually Employed; that is, he is paid at USG scale for the
actual number of days each year in which he's doing UN work.
As for Larsen's meetings in Syria -- he didn't meet with Assad, whose meeting
with the SG was tete-a-tete (and therefore included no other officials on either
side); but Larsen and Geir Pedersen, the SRSG for Lebanon, did accompany the SG
when he met with Foreign Minister Walid al-Muallem and Vice President Farouk al-Shara.
You'd have to ask the Syrians about their opinions of Larsen -- certainly they
were willing to meet with him, as with the rest of the team."
To this
were add two one-liners:
"Egeland
is also When Actually Employed"
[Note:
this doesn't address the issue of being paid as a USG and by a private NGO at
the same time, a topic on which Inner City Press has submitted a follow-up
question and two requests, one for lists of WAE USGs and and other yielding,
from the UN Department of Political Affairs, this:
"yes Jan Egeland has begun doing work under this contract"] and
"On the new head of DESA, he starts July 1 as planned."
On this last, we have much more to say, about how and where the head of the UN's
Office of Human Resources Management may be heading, what the Chinese has / have
to say about the proposal, and the reason for (and voluntary nature) of the
delay to July 1 in the transfer of the post.
What we can say is this (which we moved to the top as the ever-elusive
hard news) -- while it was not announced at Wednesday's noon briefing, a new
director of the UN's Ethics Office has been selected: Robert Benson of Canada.
Here now is Mr. Benson's c.v., and two interim comments:
Posted: Wednesday, 2
May 2007, New York
Mr. Robert F. Benson
(Canada) has been appointed Director of the Ethics Office as of 1 May 2007.
Mr. Benson, former
Interim Ethics Commissioner for the Office of the Ethics Commissioner,
Parliament of Canada, also served as the Deputy Ethics Commissioner since the
creation of that Office in May 2004. Prior to that date and since September
1989, Mr. Benson held the position of Deputy Ethics Counsellor with the Office
of the Ethics Counsellor, Government of Canada. A lawyer by profession, Mr.
Benson was also Executive Director of the
Royal Canadian Mounted Police External Review Committee and Legal Counsel
with the Department of Justice and the Judge Advocate General's Branch of the
Canadian Forces.
Mr. Benson holds a
Bachelor of Science from Carleton University, as well as a Baccalaureate of Laws
from the University of Ottawa. Mr. Benson is a member of the Bar of Ontario. Mr.
Benson takes over from Ms. Nancy Hurtz-Soyka, who served as the Interim Director
of the Ethics Office since early 2006. During her tenure, Ms. Hurtz-Soyka
undertook to implement the mandates of the Ethics Office by setting-up the
programmes and establishing relevant procedures and processes. She further
carried out the recruitment of the regular team. The United Nations and, in
particular, the Ethics Office, are fully committed to enhancing accountability,
transparency and integrity.
In terms of transparency, and two of the items above, some find it incongruous
that in speaking of UN employees' billions of dollars in pension funds, the UN
speaks first to the press, whereas in announcing an appointment by Ban Ki-moon,
it was not announced to the press except on a delay.
Update of May 9 -- after Inner City Press had been told that, like Jan
Egeland, Terje Roed-Larsen is paid When Actually Employed -- that is, at the
rate of an Under Secretary General, but only on days actually spent on or in the
Middle East -- now Larsen states that he is a volunteer. His travel and expenses
are covered. This Daily Sustenance Allowance can runs to hundreds of dollars a
day. But duly noted.
Inner City Press previously repored that Nancy Hurtz-Soyka had applied for the
job of Executive Officer. Now what? Developing.
Feedback: Editorial
[at] innercitypress.com
UN Office: S-453A,
UN, NY 10017 USA Tel: 212-963-1439
Reporter's mobile
(and weekends): 718-716-3540
At the
UN, Plug Is Pulled On Polisario, Access Cut by Khalilzad, Press Freedom's Day's
To Come
Byline: Matthew
Russell Lee of Inner City Press at the UN: News/Muse
UNITED NATIONS, May 1
-- In the ongoing politics of the UN, and those of the Western Sahara, Monday at
the Security Council stakeout a representative of the Polisario Front stood in
front of the camera and took questions.
Inner
City Press asked him about a statement just made by French Ambassador Jean-Marc
de la Sabliere, that the Moroccan autonomy (but not independence) proposal was
consistent with the UN-recognized right to self-determination. The response made
reference to France's history as a colonial power. And then the recording of the
stakeout goes dark.
At
Minute 6:10, Inner City Press asks the
Polisario's Ahmed Boukhari about France. At
Minute 6:18 the
screen goes dark.
Tuesday
at the noon briefing, Ban Ki-moon's spokesperson said that this had all been an
error. But it remained and remains unclear exactly what happened. Sources tell
Inner City Press that during the Polisario's brief on-camera stakeout, an order
went out, "Cut this off... cut it." While the order was received by UNTV is the
basement, where Ban Ki-moon happened to be filming messages for broadcast
overseas, and while the order was eventually transmitted to the crew on the
second floor by the Security Council, the order did not originate within UNTV.
Now no
one wants to say from where the order came. Fingers have been pointed,
motive and opportunity have been weighed. The Polisario representative had been
present at and around the stakeout throughout Monday morning, speaking to
reporters, in full view of UN security and staff. That is how it should be. The
Polisario's proposal for talks and a referendum, with independence as a choice,
is mentioned in the Security Council's own resolution.
Western
Sahara, behind the fence, no camera, "pull the plug"
But even
if by some still-not-articulated rule, the Polisario representative was
not to have been filmed in front of the Security Council's banner, once the
taping started, to cut it off and then mystify how it was done is bush league.
It is reminiscent, in its way, to the UN's ham-handed three-week postponement of
its exhibition to commemorate the Rwandan genocide, click
here
for that story. To be sure the UN's side is heard,
here's the
noon briefing transcript on the issue:
Spokesperson: ...We
talked to the Department of Public Information about this. They said that what
happened is a mistake, and they’re sorry about it. We also talked to DPA.
There was no order from them for anything to be cut off. Apparently, there was
confusion about the identity of the speaker. When Mr. Ahmed Boukhari approached
the mic, staff did not recognize him and were unable to identify him. The
judgement was made that the TV feed should be cut short. And for this, we are
sorry. There is no policy of that sort. Of course, Mr. Boukhari had the right
to speak at the stakeout. And the majority of his press encounter is now on the
website.
Question: But the
question that I have for you is that, there were journalists -- myself and
others -- who were asking questions. So who made the decision to cut off the
feed while questions were being asked? It’s not that somebody was at the
stakeout. There was nobody there except UNTV. There’s a difference between
cutting something off and cutting something off for a reason. And he was
answering my questions and others. And that is the part that upsets me.
Spokesperson: It was
a mistake. They took whoever told them to stop it as being someone who was
authorized.
Question: Who told
them?
Spokesperson: We
don't know at this point. We have been trying to find out who said it. We can
tell you that no one was authorized to do it. No one.
And yet
it happened. In an atmosphere where free speech was more established, one
surmises it wouldn't have happened.
Another step backwards this week at the UN is the refusal of Ambassador Zalmay
Khalilzad to brief the press about the Security Council's plan of work for May,
when the United States holds the presidency. All recent Council presidents have
held such press conferences, including the Ambassadors from South Africa,
Slovakia, Qatar, Peru and Congo-Brazzaville. At Congo's briefing, Inner City
Press asked about press freedom. Nevertheless, the Republic of Congo mission
held the press conference. For the U.S., which speaks so often of
transparency and freedom of the press, to not even provide the access that
Republic of Congo did is surprising. This week the UN is full of events about
press freedom. Where things go from here remains to be seen.
Technorati Profile
At the
UN, Ban on the Move, Khalilzad Defers, Sahara Words, Rwanda Exhibit Still Not
Visible
Byline:
Matthew Russell Lee of Inner City Press at the UN: Interim Report
UNTIED NATIONS, April
30, updated 11:54 a.m. -- Ban Ki-moon, walking fast with a half dozen guars and his chief of staff
Vijay Nambiar, headed into the Trusteeship Chamber at 10:05 to make a speech
about sanctions. On the way in, reporters from Inner City Press and Voice of
America shook his hand and then fired off questions. The one response Ban gave
concerned Iraq, or rather, he departure on May 1 for the conference at Sharm
el-Sheik to launch the still ill-defined
International Compact with Iraq.
Most
Security Council stakeout action concerns only timing. New U.S. Ambassador
Khalilzad, asked about the Council's trip to Kosovo, called it "productive," and
said he'd come out and speak with reporters after the Council's meetings. Later
the U.S. spokesman said whatever Khalilzad says, it will be fast, as the U.S.
takes over the presidency of the Council tomorrow.
Enter
Amb. Khalilzad, stage right
The
representative of Western Sahara's Polisario Front, who asked to not be taped,
took issue the draft resolution "welcoming serious and credible Moroccan
efforts" while merely "taking note" of the Polisario's proposal. "It is not
balanced," he said. China's position remains, in a word, inscrutable.
[Update of 11:54 a.m.
-- Amb. Khalilzad emerged and said agreement has been reached on the Western
Sahara resolution. He took one question, and then on the fly a second. The
Polisario representative emerged somewhat chastened, saying that "many"
countries had asked why only the Morocco efforts were praised in the resolution.
Inner City Pres asked him, "But will the vote be 15-0 for it?" He answered,
"Yes, that's what I expect"...]
While the
postponed Rwanda genocide exhibit is supposed to finally open this evening at 6
p.m. in the UN General Assembly's south lobby, as of 9:20 a.m., nothing was
being prepared in the space. Rather, there were two white boards for visitors to
write what they think the UN should work on. Darfur was a theme, and the
environmental, and stopping
wars. Yes, that would be nice...
Somali
Diplomat Questions UN's Warlord Payments, Blackhawk Down - TFG Connection
Confirmed
Byline:
Matthew Russell Lee of Inner City Press at the UN: News Analysis
UNITED NATIONS, April
28 -- The UN Security Council on Friday heard a closed-door briefing from
Ethiopian Foreign Minister Seyoum Mesfin about his country's continued military
presence in Somalia. Afterwards, Inner City Press asked Mr. Mesfin about reports
and letters showing that UN humanitarian aid has been hindered by the Transitional Federal
Government, which Ethiopia installed atop the country in December.
Surrounded by guards, Mr. Mesfin denied that the TFG or "our troops" had created obstacles, and noted that
TFG Prime Minister Gedi had "the day before yesterday said that humanitarian aid
is welcome."
In an
interview appearing in the Times of London on April 27, Gedi is
quoted
accusing UN agencies "of corruption; of using private airstrips to ship in
contraband, weapons and insurgents; of striking cozy deals with warlords and the
ousted Islamic Courts regime and pocketing the proceeds. He said the United
Nations' World Food Program and other agencies were upset because they had lost
power after effectively governing Somalia during its 15 years of civil war and
anarchy. 'They want to operate in this country without any control,' he
declared. 'They know they can't do that any more . . . Now there's a Prime
Minister who knows them too well.'"
Inner
City Press at Friday's
noon briefing asked
Ban Ki-moon's spokesperson for a response:
Inner City Press: In
Somalia, the Prime Minister in an interview had said that the UN aid agencies
are used to running the country like it’s their own fiefdom and that they’re
basically disagreeing with Mr. [John] Holmes in terms of humanitarian access.
So I'm wondering if anyone in the UN system has some response to those
statements or what the status is of humanitarian access in Somalia.
Spokesperson: Well,
according to what I got today, the discussions were good and they were given
access. And the tone was positive on the part of WFP.
After
some other Inner City Press questions,
a statement was handed to Spokesperson:
Spokesperson: "We
can find an answer for you. And about Somalia, as far as I know, and I see the
information I got there, there was a meeting about the Transitional Federal
Government (TFG) of Somalia. The meeting was positive. WFP was given the green
light to begin deliveries, which was done. And basically everything is working
now between WFP and TFG. According to OCHA, the UN has some 200 national and
international staff in south central Somalia whose sole aim is to assist the
people of that country, including in delivering urgently needed life-saving
assistance. So, the UN humanitarian agencies, which are non-political, do not
aspire to enjoy power in Somalia or elsewhere, as was said in an article today."
Later on
Friday, Inner City Press interviewed Idd Beddel Mohamed, the Somali TFG's Deputy
Permanent Representative to the UN, who said:
"The UN agencies used
to serve Somalia when there was no government. Now instead of adapting, they
still want to dictate terms. The UN hired warlords, paid them in dollars to
protect and deliver. The warlords bought more technicals and militias. The UN
agencies should not try to address the difference by talking to the media."
Inner
City Press asked him to confirm that the TFG has appointed as Police Chief one
of the individuals whom the U.S. was seeking during the incident memorialized in
"Blackhawk Down." Yes, he said, it is Col. Aideed (a/k/a Abdi Qaybdiid).
The
worm, as they say, has turned...
Idd
Beddel Mohamed at the UN
While the
UN had earlier on Friday announced the re-appointment of Francois Lonseny Fall
for another year as the UN's envoy to Somalia, Idd Beddel Mohamed said he hadn't
been aware, and said: "Why isn't he in Mogadishu? Let him enjoy Nairobi, and
even the beaches of Mombassa." Inner City Press asked whether minorities like
the Mushinguli were included in the TFG as required by the "4.5" plan previously
alluded to by Lonseny Fall. "They have the ministry of sports!" Idd Beddel
Mohamed exclaimed.
[Under "4.5,"
each of Somalia's four main clans are supposed to get slightly less than 25% of
the posts, with 1/9th for other minorities, such as the ultimate underdogs, the
Mushinguli, brought to Somalia from further South in Africa, and long denied
their rights, a topic to which we will return.]
Idd
Beddel Mohamed
chided Inner City Press for asking Under
Secretary General John Holmes about quotes from the TFG President and deputy
defense minister, saying that
the quotes are just "internet propaganda." When Inner City Press pointed out
that the audio
source was Voice of America, Idd Beddel Mohamed replied that Voice of
America's "affiliate in Mogadishu is owned by a supporter of these insurgents."
Before he
left the UN, Ethiopian Foreign Minister Seyoum Mesfin pronounced that "the
backbone of the terrorists has been completely shattered" but that a different
message gets out, because they have "a wide network globally."
Who
are you going to believe? For now, the UN and Security Council appear to
continue to cast their lot with the TFG, despite warnings. Or is the
European Commission's warning about war
crimes and complicity just
"internet propaganda"? We will continue to cover this.
UN's
Holmes "Condemns" Reported Somali TFG Statements, While Withholding Documents
Byline:
Matthew Russell Lee of Inner City Press at the UN
UNITED NATIONS, April
24 -- The Somali Transitional Federal Government, which relies for its
legitimacy on the UN, yesterday told the UN that aid workers will have
"unimpeded access" to serve those people fleeing the TFG's shelling of
Mogadishu.
In New
York, Inner City Press asked UN humanitarian chief John Holmes what the UN's
response has been to two sample statements, by TFG president Yusuf that civilian
neighborhoods can be shelled, and by TFG defense official Salad Ali Jeele, that
certain clans and sub-clans in Mogadishu need to be exterminated (click
here for
that).
Mr.
Holmes responded that "the statements you've quoted, I would condemn them
utterly." Video
here,
from minute 35:13.
Inner
City Press asked about the letter
which it obtained and
reported on April 20
in which TFG Minister for Interior Mohamed Mohamoud
Guled wrote to the UN World Food Program that
"It's TFG
decision that there will be no food distribution can take place anywhere in
Somalia without being inspected and approved by the government. Hence UN
agencies and any other organization that is planning to bring any relief to
Somalia should submit the documents for the goods before shipment for checkup."
This
letter from the Transitional Federal Government to the WFP was cc-ed to the
Somali National Refugee Commission, through which Inner City Press is told the
TFG had been saying all aid must flow. Asked about this on Tuesday, Mr. Holmes
said, "I have no information on that particular organization." That might be a
problem.
Mr.
Ban and Mr. Yusuf
Prior to
Mr. Holmes' briefing, WFP told Inner City Press the following:
Subject: Somalia
From: [WFP Spokesperson]
To: Matthew Russell Lee
Sent: Mon, 23 Apr 2007 6:09 PM
Hi Matthew, there were talks between the
UN and TFG today. Here's a short update, from Peter Goossens, WFP Country
director Somalia:
"The talk between the UN and a TFG
commission led by the Heath Minister were positive. The TFG will issue a
statement on the outcome. We hope that we will from now on be allowed to use any
airstrip in Somalia to bring in humanitarian assistance. We also need to see on
the ground that we are now allowed to bring that assistance urgently to those
most in need, particularly those displaced by the fighting in Mogadishu."
Tuesday
Mr. Holmes said essentially the same thing. However, when asked if any documents
could be provided -- the letter from UN Humanitarian Coordinator Eric Laroche,
or the above-referenced TFG statement -- Mr. Holmes said only that "I'll look
into that, if we can provide you chapter and verse." Ten hours later, no
documents had been provided. It's not "chapter and verse" -- it's basic
documents about what Mr. Holmes is calling the world's most dangerous for aid
workers. Silence doesn't help; silence is consent. Developing...
Other Inner City Press
reports are available in the ProQuest service and some are archived on
www.InnerCityPress.com --
Copyright 2006 Inner City Press, Inc. To request
reprint or other permission, e-contact Editorial [at] innercitypress.com - phone: (718) 716-3540