UN
Censorship Continues
W Sahara &
Cameroon,
ICP Asked, Smale's DPI
Silent
By Matthew
Russell Lee, Periscope;
Video
UNITED NATIONS,
October 17 – Senior UN officials
claim they care about and want
coverage of stand-offs like
those in Western Sahara, Cameroon
and Yemen,
then block and hinder Press
coverage while taking public
money to pursue their largely
European interests. A recent
case, taken up beginning on
October 5 by the Free
UN Coalition for Access,
involves a journalist for RASD
TV, a Western Sahara / Saharawi
television station. On October
6, Inner City Press for FUNCA
asked UN Spokesman Stephane
Dujarric, UN transcript here:
Inner City Press: it’s a media
access question, and it’s not
about me. It has to do
with a journalist from Saharawi
Media, RASD TV, who applied a
month ago to be accredited to
cover the UN, including this
month when Western Sahara is on
the Council’s agenda. And
he received a denial that said
that you can only be accredited
here if you’re with an
organization formally registered
as a media organization in a
country recognized by the UN
General Assembly. So I
know some people think of this
as sort of the Taiwan
rule. But is it true, is
it the case that this rule is
also applied to Western Sahara
which, although not a country
yet, is party to a conflict on
the Security Council's agenda...
Spokesman: I don’t… I’ll
look into it. Inner City Press:
the second part of the policy
question is: Given the
propensity of some governments
to… to dislike, decertify, and
close down and media, including
in Cameroon, why does the UN… I
could understand them saying we
need to… we, as the UN, say this
is a media organization, but why
does a media organization have
to be approved by its own
government, which is what the
line quoted to this individual
implies? Spokesman: "I
will look into the issue."
Eleven days later, nothing. And
still no Smale-mail, see below,
while her DPI's restrictions on
Inner City Press continue. But
her DPI found time to more
quickly deny the Western Sahara
journalist again, on October 17
at 2:08 pm, with the same
language, and no explanation.
The UN is lawless and UNaccountable.
As Inner City Press covered
Cameroon on October 17, it was
delayed by metal detectors
twice, while the no-question
state media Smale DPI tries to
give independent Press work
space to can - or could - move
unrestricted, for no purpose
other than covering up for, in
this case, Sisi or the Moroccan
King. It is disgusting. The UN
Security Council is set this
month for its semi-annual
consideration of Western Sahara
and the MINURSO mission, with
new UN envoy Horst Kohler. But
despite the fact that the UN
Department of Public Information
accredits and gives office space
to numerous Moroccan state
media, it delayed for a month
and then denied the application
of the journalist for RASD TV,
saying they didn't represent an
"organization formally
registered as a media
organization in a country
recognized by the United Nations
General Assembly." Western
Sahara is on the agenda of the
UN's Fourth (Decolonization)
Committee. We'll have more on
this scam by the UN and its DPI,
which as before driven by its
largely European concerns, and
still restricts the independent,
critical Press, trying to give
its office to no-show,
no-question state media like
Akhbar al Yom. Meanwhile the UN
is silent again as the Internet
and social networks are cut off
in parts of Cameroon, to prevent
organizing and reporting. On
September 29, Inner City Press
asked UN Spokesman Stephane
Dujarric about the UN's support
for Cameroon's Paul Biya, and
about the UN Security
surveillance camera over the
area the UN tells Inner City
Press to work from after
evicting it from its long-time
UN office. Video here,
transcript here
and below. Dujarric dodged the
Cameroon question, and refused
to answer on surveillance,
saying only the UN Department of
Public Information could answer.
But they won't - the new head of
DPI Alison Smale has not
responded to four detailed petitions
about her Department's
restrictions on Press, and is
focused beyond Germany on
aspirations in Catalonia, not
Cameroon. This is today's UN.
From its September 29 transcript:
Inner City Press: There’s a UN
security DSS [Department of
Safety and Security] camera over
the media bullpen here, and I
wanted to know whether there are
any safeguards, given what the
UN says about freedom of the
press, given what the
Secretary-General said about the
protection of
whistleblowers. What
protections are there in place
for how this footage is, in
fact, used by the UN?
Spokesman: "This is a question
you need to raise with our
colleagues in MALU [Media
Accreditation and Liaison
Unit]." Before the
just-concluded UN General
Assembly Ministerial Week, Inner
City Press wrote to UN
Department of Public Information
chief Alison Smale explaining
how the eviction and
restrictions imposed by her
predecessor Cristina Gallach
would result in censorship and a
reduction in coverage during the
Week. There was no response.
From the very first day of the
GA week, an event about
migration no less, Inner City
Press was arbitrarily banned.
And on the Friday of the Week,
Smale's DPI minders
told Inner City Press it could
not, as other less active
correspondents could, speak to
participants in the UN's
(politicized) meeting about the
humanitarian situation, just as
it was also restricted in its
coverage of Cameroon and other
issues. This was raised to Smale
the next day, when UN officials
and diplomats were working
(although many of Smale's
"resident correspondents" like Egypt's
Akhbar al Yom, Pakistan's Daily
Dawn and others didn't even come
in). But again from Smale, no
reforms, no response. Perhaps
this was due to the elections in
her former beat, Germany. But
these issues are her
responsibility; she is being
paid for this. Here's our
September 23 Smale-mail: "Dear
Under Secretary General Smale:
This follows up on the request /
petition I sent you earlier this
month, before the now-concluding
UN General Assembly High Level
Week. My unjustifiable lack of
resident correspondent status,
which I had asked be restored
before the High Level Week, has
resulted for example in me being
barred from speaking with
attendees outside yesterday's
Yemen humanitarian meeting.
Resident Correspondents,
including those who rarely come
in and never ask questions, like
Akhbar al Yom, were given access
to passes to the 1B level,
without escorts. For me, whose
resident correspondent
accreditation was taken without
a hearing or appeal for pursuing
the UN bribery story by covering
a meeting in the UN Press
Briefing Room, two separate
escorts or minders were required
to access the Yemen meeting.
While inside the meeting I was
told I could stakeout / wait
outside the meeting and speak to
participants as they left, my
DPI minders told me I could not
speak with anyone, even
diplomats who wanted to speak. I
reiterate my formal request to
be restored to my longtime
shared office S303 (I am willing
to help rarely present Akhbar al
Yom to relocate to the bullpen
or wherever else), and to have
my resident correspondent
accreditation restored, early
this coming week. I can provide
any further information, by
email, phone or in person. (By
contrast, the only event Egypt
state media Akhbar al Yom
“covered” was the SG - Sisi
bilateral, as UNCA “pool;” when
I asked DPI's MALU for basic
information such as who attended
or was observed at the bilat,
none was provided.) For your
information during this High
Level Week I put questions to
the foreign minister of Libya,
the UN's Libya envoy, the UK
minister for the Middle East
Alistair Burt (on Yemen), the
head of UNRWA, the head of UNHCR
(on Burundi), SRSG Louise Arbour
(on Libya) and, as you saw, the
EC minister and Deputy Secretary
General. More could be said, but
this should be enough. To
continue to restrict my
movements in the UN more than
other journalist, to keep me out
of my long time office such that
I can barely and sometimes not
download and edit video of these
Q&A, in favor of a no-show,
no-question state media is
UNjustifiable. It should be
reversed today, or early next
week. Today Saturday I am
writing this while covering the
Secretary General's bilateral
meetings on the 27th floor, if
you are in the UN and need any
further information. If you
don't mind, please confirm
receipt of this email." Not even
that. Now the UN Security
Council won't even hold a single
Yemen meeting in September,
despite its members' professions
of concern. When a Yemen meeting
during the UN General Assembly
week was held at 8 am on
September 22, new UN Relief
Chief Mark Lowcock introduced as
speakers the foreign ministers
of Sweden and the Netherlands,
representatives of Japan and the
UAE, and the UN's dubious envoy
Ismael Ould Cheikh Ahmed. While
billed as a humanitarian
meeting, the UAE spoke without
irony about outside
interference. (Yemen's
representative spoke in Arabic;
Inner City Press streamed
Periscope video).
To get to the meeting, held in
UN Conference Room 5, Inner City
Press unlike other no-show
reporters like Egypt's Akhbar al
Yom was required to get a UN
escort or minder, who told Inner
City Press it could not ask
questions or speak with anyone.
This despite UN OCHA telling
Inner City Press it could wait
outside and speak to people as
they left. So the UN's
retaliatory eviction of Inner
City Press for covering UN
corruption now results in it,
unlike the Saudi and pro-Saudi
media in the meeting, being
unable to speak to the
participants. This is today's UN
- it has been directly raised to
the new head of DPI, Alison
Smale, without response as she
focuses on the election on her
previous beat, Germany. Now
this, from the UNSC: "The
briefing and consultation on
Yemen is postponed for next
month and we'll have no meeting
scheduled tomorrow afternoon."
Pathetic. As it this: while
Canada joins The Netherlands at
the UN in Geneva in calling for
an investigation of possible war
crimes in Yemen including the
Saudi-led coalition's killing of
civilians, Canada has continued
a $15 billion arms deal with
Saudi Arabia. When Canadian
Prime Minister Justin Trudeau
held a press conference at the
UN on September 21, Inner City
Press went early, intending to
ask him to explain this
incongruity or seeming
hypocrisy. Trudeau's spokesman
announced that the questioners
had been “pre-determined,” but
did not explain how. So in a
lull after what the spokesman
called the last question - would
Trudeau be a mediator on
Venezuela - Inner City Press
asked about Canadian arms sales
to Saudi while calling for a
probe. At first Trudeau said he
was happy to answer the
question. Then he said no, he
would not reward “bad behavior,”
and instead reached out for
question in French about day
care. (Inner City Press notes
that pre-determining questioners
is bad behavior. Apparently the
CBC journalist who was given the
first question agreed to it; the
organization only the day before
sent an Egyptian state media
correspondent as the lone “pooler”
in Secretary General Antonio
Guterres' meeting with General
Sisi.) Eearlier on September 21
when UK minister Alistair Burt
came in front of the UN Security
Council to speak about
accountability for Daesh in
Iraq, Inner City Press deferred
to a timely question about the
referendum in Kurdistan. Then
during lull - identical to
that in which it put its
question to Trudeau - Inner City
Press asked Burt about his
quote, about accountability for
the bombing of civilians in
Yemen by the Saudi-led Coalition
with UK bombs, that "Our view is
that it is for the Coalition
itself, in the first instance,
to conduct such investigations.
They have the best insight into
their own military procedures
and will be able to conduct the
most thorough and conclusive
investigations.” Inner City
Press asked how he can say this,
given that the Saudis have
investigated less than five
percent of the killings. Video here.
Burt's answer focused on the
peace process - what peace
process? At least Burt answered,
and did not like Trudeau try to
call merely asking the question
in a lull "bad behavior" - we'll
have more on this.
***
Your
support means a lot. As little as $5 a month
helps keep us going and grants you access to
exclusive bonus material on our Patreon
page. Click
here to become a patron.
Feedback:
Editorial [at] innercitypress.com
Past
(and future?) UN Office: S-303, UN, NY 10017 USA
For now: Box 20047,
Dag Hammarskjold Station NY NY 10017
Reporter's mobile (and weekends):
718-716-3540
Other, earlier Inner City Press are
listed here,
and some are available in the ProQuest
service, and now on Lexis-Nexis.
Copyright 2006-2017 Inner City
Press, Inc. To request reprint or other
permission, e-contact Editorial [at]
innercitypress.com for
|
,
