UN's
Office of South South Cooperation, In Ng
Scandal, Remains UNreformed
like DPI, UN Is Corrupt
By Matthew
Russell Lee
UNITED NATIONS,
April 10 – Since Macau based
businessman Ng Lap Seng used
not only South South News and
the UN Department of Public
Information but also the UN
Office of South South
Cooperation (UNOSSC) to buy
his way into the UN and to a
falsified UN document for a
conference center, what has
the UN learned? At DPI, nothing:
South South News remains
tellingly in its office while
Inner City Press which covered
and covers the scandal was
evicted and still restricted.
But what about UNOSSC? After
the UN's holdover spokesman Stephane
Dujarric simply refused to
answer Inner City Press'
questions on April 10, we now
report that nothing has
changed: UNOSSC's Jorge
Chediek, described as "new"
despite the length of time
he's been there, uses the entity
to try to get an Assistant
Secretary General post. He's
given the de facto deputy post
to his fellow Argentine Ines
Tofalo, a "P3 acting as a P5,"
and devotes his time to useless
travel promoting books already
"launched" in New York and to
pitching the conference that
would give him his ASG post. Inner
City Press is told by sources
there are two - needless -
deputies waiting to be named,
from India and Brazil to
replace an out of the loop
Canadian. It remains a
sinkhole of corruption,
entirely unreformed by the new
team, like so much of the UN.
Watch this site.
In the UN bribery
case against Ng, now Ng's
associate Jeff Yin has pleaded
guilty to working to violate
UN tax laws with UN resident
correspondent South South
News. But the UN Department of
Public Information, which
evicted and still restricts
Inner City Press for seeking
to cover UN links to South
South News and Ng, has left
South South News in its
office. The UN is corrupt,
through and through. A formal
request to DPI's Officer in
Charge has yet to be acted on.
Ng is set
for trial, but now an
adjournment has been granted
to May. The letter motion by
Ng Lap Seng's lawyers cites a
need to review "many thousands
of pages of banking records,
emails and other documents
related to Jeff Yin, Mr.
Ng, Vivian Wang, SKI, and SSN,
among others. We are still
awaiting production of
voluminous
documents, including
information contained in DVDs
and CDs seized from Vivian
Wang’s
residence, tax information for
a number of alleged
co-conspirators, South South
News
documents, phone records, and
additional Ashe emails." So is
the UN even checking out these
new records, to reform itself?
It seems not. On April 7 Inner
City Press asked UN Spokesman
Stephane Dujarric, UN
transcript here:
Inner City Press:
in what's now called the Ng
Lap Seng case and used to be
the John Ashe case, there's
been a request for an
extension. The reason
I'm asking you about it is the
letter from the lawyers for Ng
Lap Seng cite a new trove of
information that's been given
to them, partially, and part
of this involves documents of
South-South News and also John
Ashe e-mails.
And, since both of these may
concern the very topics that
the UN conducted its audit
into, I wanted to know… I hear
this line generally you're
going to, like, wait till the
end of the case or you're
going to monitor the case, but
are, is the UN system, whether
OLA or, ever going to take a
look at these documents to see
what it, as it reflects to the
need for UN reform or who did
what here?
Spokesman: I think,
obviously, we will, we'll see
what happens at the end, and
if we need to take, if it
needs to impact the
investigations that have
already done, we'll take a
look at it. And we are,
as a duty, cooperating with
the relevant judicial
authorities.
South South News, tellingly,
was never even downgraded by
the UN Department of Public
Information. But for seeking
to cover a meeting in the UN
Press Briefing Room with a
South South News / Ng Lap Seng
link, DPI evicted
Inner City Press without
hearing or appeal, and keeps
it restricted still.
Today's UN is corrupt, and
even if Ng's trial is slightly
delayed to review more about
South South News and John
Ashe, the need for reform, if
necessary by stringent budgets
cuts, will becoming ever more
clear. Watch this site.
Ng's
co-defendant Jeff C. Yin has
requested another delay in
order to consider a plea
offer. His lawyers first wrote
to the court: "In the evening
of Wednesday, March 22, 2017,
the government conveyed a
written plea offer to Mr. Yin
with a deadline set for
Tuesday, March 28, at 5:00
p.m. The plea is complex and
involves civil tax assessments
and liabilities, which are
outside of the Federal
Defenders criminal defense
expertise. Yesterday we asked
the government for additional
time to consider and discuss
the plea with Mr. Yin. The
government gave us only 24
more hours, until Wednesday
March 29, 2017, at 5:00 p.m.,
stating that it could not
provide more time because it
had two trial deadlines the
week of April 3 to focus on.
In order for us to fulfill our
constitutional obligations to
provide the effective
assistance of counsel during
plea negotiations and to
effectively advise Mr. Yin
about this plea offer, we need
additional time. We,
therefore, request that the
Court extend the April 3
deadlines by one week." This
as now-ex UN official Cristina
Gallach, who did no due
diligence on Ng's purchase of
UN events and access, who got
a ghoulish
"farewell toast" from UN
scribes on March 30, then
left. But the DPI Officer in
Charge, who has received
formal requests,
has yet to act.
In an order
issued March 9 in the US
District Court for the
Southern District of New York,
Ng Lap Seng's attempts to
further delay were rejected
and the schedule set: list of
exhibits by April 17, lists of
witnesses by May 1. Which of
these, in both categories,
will come from the UN?
At the UN,
Gallach who did no due
diligence on Ng Lap Seng
(audit at Paragraphs 37-40 and
20b) still has what's
described as Ng's bribery
conduit South South News in
its UN office, while she
evicted and still restrict
Inner City Press which for
reported on Ng at the UN.
On February
20, lawyers for Ng
Lap Seng objected
to the UN giving fewer documents than
requested, and now, only to the
government. Not only has
the UN become even
less cooperative
on this case
involving bribery
in the UN - its
holdover
spokespeople
won't answer
basic questions
about it. From
the February
21 UN Transcript:
Inner
City Press:
this question
has to do with
this Ng Lap
Seng case,
which is
moving towards
trial.
There was a
letter filed
yesterday by
the defense,
by the lawyer
for Ng Lap
Seng, saying
that they are
disputing both
that the UN
has fully
complied with
the discovery
request, and
they're
questioning
why the
discovery
wasn't given
to them as the
defendant, but
was instead
given to the
Government,
whereas prior
documents had
been given
directly to
the defense.
And they say
it hasn't been
explained to
them.
So, what I'm
wondering is,
given that the
UN talks about
due process,
et cetera, ask
OLA [Office
for Legal
Affairs],
given this
public
disputing of
the UN
complying and
cooperating
with the
bribery case
and giving the
documents to
the defendant
that has
requested
them, what
explains this
change?
Deputy
Spokesman:
Well, I
wouldn't have
any comment
about what
other lawyers
are saying on
this, beyond
saying that
the United
Nations has
been complying
with the
requests made
in this case.
Inner
City Press:
OK, can
you confirm
that the UN
was providing
in the past,
it's the
documents
requested to
the defense
and has now
changed
policies and
is only
providing them
to the
Government,
and what
explains that?
Deputy
Spokesman:
What I can say
is, on this
matter, as
we've been
stating in the
past and I'll
reiterate it,
that the
requests that
come from the
judicial
authorities in
this case are
ones that we
are complying
with.
On
January 30 in the US District
Court for the Southern
District of New York, US
Attorney Preet Bhahara filed
more detailed information
including concerning South
South News, described as Ng's
bribery conduit, which Gallach
has nevertheless left in its
UN office while evicting and
restricting Inner City Press
which asked her about it, and
her own connection to Ng Lap
Seng's South South Awards.
Bhahara's
filing, calling South South
News "NGO-1," states as to
co-defendant Jeff C. Yin:
"the defendant
agreed to and did cause bribe
payments from NGO-1, meant for
the Dominican Ambassador
[Francis Lorenzo, who has
pleaded guilty], to be made to
(i) third-parties to cover the
Dominican Ambassador’s
personal expenses (e.g., his
mortgage, see Bates
0000569362-0000569363,
0000132016-0000132017), and
(ii) family members of the
Dominican Ambassador,
specifically, his siblings
(who are identified in
discovery, e.g., Bates
0001003479-0001003770,
0001031249-0001031288)....
the defendant
both caused NGO-1 to pay him
in cash (or checks made out to
cash or petty cash) and made
false and/or misleading
statements to his accountant
concerning the amount and
source of his income. More
specifically, we expect that
the evidence will show that
(a) with respect to his tax
returns for calendar years
2013 and 2014, the defendant
informed his accountant of
income he received from the
Macau Real Estate Development
Company while entirely
omitting income he received
from NGO-1, thereby causing
his accountant to file tax
returns that omitted the
defendant’s income from
NGO-1 for these years."
Gallach's DPI leaves NGO-1 in
its UN office, while
continuing to restrict Inner
City Press more than a year
after it sought to cover a
meeting in the UN Press
Briefing Room to see the
relationship between Ng's
bribery vehicle and Gallach's
and DPI's and apparently the
38th floor's correspondents
"interlocutor." This is
disgusting.
(As is Gallach
promoting herself attending -
for the UN! - a "Global
Festival of Ideas" event in
March 2017, here.
Is the "idea" corruption? Or
censorship?)
But Inner
City Press can't even ASK the
UN about this on February 1,
because the UN's noon briefing
is canceled due to an 11 am
"press encounter" with Antonio
Guterres, who is unlikely to
address, or take Press
questions on, this UN
corruption case. The old
guard, implicated, is
polluting the new
administration.
On January
27 in the US District Court
for the Southern District of
New York an order issued
sealing but setting a date to
unseal "UN Documents" 1 and
2. Here
is the UN's own Office of
Internal Oversight Services
audit of aspects of Ng Lap
Seng's purchase of the UN, see
esp Paragraphs
37-40 and 20b regarding
Gallach.
Gallach's
Department of Public of
Information on January 27
prevented Inner City Press
from covering a Holocaust
event by new UN Secretary
General Antonio Guterres, here.
Gallach's no
due process eviction
and ongoing
restriction of Inner
City Press was done with a
blatant conflict of interest:
she is named
in the audit (as USG of
DPI), and Inner City Press had
asked
her about her links with Ng Lap
Seng.
(In other Ng Lap
Seng diplomatic fall-out
related investigations,
Dominica's Roosevelt Skerrit,
who attended Ng's scam Macau
"UN" event, is under fire for
other passports now more
timely than ever, here.)
There is
of course a second UN-related
bribery case getting started,
against Ban Ki-moon's brother
Ban Ki Sang and nephew Dennis
Bahn, who used the UN General
Assembly and UNSG Ban
Ki-moon's name for real estate
fraud. And here,
from South Korea.
Here in the
first of the two UN bribery
cases, against Ng Lap Seng, is
from the January 27 SDNY
United States District Judge's
order:
"The Government
requested and I granted
protective orders delaying the
production by the Government
of two documents produced to
the Government by the United
Nations. The first protective
order related to a document
discussed during the status
conference held on December
8, 2016, (“UN Document #1”)
and the second related to a
document referenced in the
Government’s email to the
defense dated January 18,
2017, (“UN Document #2”).
During the
December 8 conference, I
stated that I would review UN
Document #1 again to “make a
determination whether six
weeks is enough time” for the
production of that document in
advance of trial. (Doc. 350 at
10:15-17.) I have taken
another look at UN Document #1
and have reviewed UN Document
#2 to determine how much time
in advance of trial the
Government should produce
these documents to the
defense."
We'll have
more on this.
As
the UN bribery scandal gathered
force Secretary General Ban
Ki-moon called for an audit by
the UN Office of Internal
Oversight Services of Sheri
Yan's Global Sustainability
Foundation (GSF), David Ng Lap
Seng's Sun Kian Ip Group and its
affiliates including the "World
Harmony Foundation" and South
South News, among others.
The audit, completed
early this year but first
put online by Inner City
Press, directly criticizes
Cristina Gallach, the Under
Secretary General for
Communications and Public
Information, Paragraphs 37-40 --
and 20b.
This last concerns the lack of
any due diligence by the UN
Department of Public Information
under Under Secretary General
Cristina Gallach of Ng Lap
Seng's GWF's sponsorship of the
“Ark of Return” ceremony.
Now in December Ng has
tried to get the superseding
indictment dismissed, and the US
government has opposed it.
The government writes, “The key
players remain the same (the
defendant as the bribepayer and
Yin as his primary
co-conspirator and deputy, the
Antiguan Ambassador as the
recipient of bribes, and the
Dominican Ambassador as a party
who was paid by the defendant
and served his interests); the
defendant’s alleged goals remain
the same (namely, the obtaining
of formal UN support for the
Macau Conference Center); and
the means and methods allegedly
used by the defendant remain the
same (including the defendant’s
use of NGO-1 to funnel bribe
payments).”
NGO-1, South South
News, remains in its UN office,
while Inner City Press which has
been covering this case, and UN
links to it, was evicted and
remains restricted 10 months
later. When Inner group which
put Ban together with Ng Lap
Seng and Vivian Wang at Cipriani
on 42 Street, tuxedo-ed UN/CA
thugs came out and smashed
Inner City Press'
Periscope-broadcasting camera,
video here.
Ban was already selling
the UN as far back as 2009:
From October
23, 2009, this Inner City
Press report concerning Ng
Lap Seng's partner Frank Liu,
buying the UN under
“unblemished” Ban Ki-moon:
“UNITED NATIONS, October 23 --
After announcing Secretary
General Ban Ki-moon's
participation in a UN Day
concert later in the day, Ban's
Associate Spokesperson Farhan
Haq declined to answer Inner
City Press' questions about
whether the concert's sponsors,
including the World Harmony
Foundation, Frank Liu and/or the
World Eminence Chinese Business
Forum, had receive payments from
businessmen, and if any of these
were scheduled for photo-op with
Mr. Ban.
Haq, in a nearly empty
noon press briefing with no time
constraints, nevertheless said
that the questions would be
answered at another press
conference on Friday afternoon,
"if you are there." ... An
October 23 press release by the
World Harmony Foundation states
that "Secretary General Ban
Ki-moon... tolled the bell
signifying world harmony."
The press release was handed to
Inner City Press at a surreal
breakfast forum held by the
WECBA and Frank Liu in Room 6 of
the UN's Delegates' Dining Room.
A businessman receiving an award
stood at the front at a podium
with the UN flag and intoned,
"please remember that Chinese
businessmen are the kindest
people in the world."
Another speaker said that more
people dying every year from
obesity than hunger, and urged
those in the audience not to eat
too much. The Ambassador of the
Dominican Republic urged the
assembled businessmen to join
the UN Global Compact.”
That would be Francis
Lorenzo, of South South News,
who has pleaded guilty. (Under
Gallach, South South News still
has its UN office, while Inner
City Press reporting on it
remains evicted).
In late November a superceding
indictment was filed which makes
Gallach's malfeasance even
clearer. The indictment now
includes the US Foreign Corrupt
Practices Act and specifies that
South South News (NGO-1), which
Gallach has left in its office
while evicting Inner City Press
which asked her about her
connection to them, paid Ng Lap
Seng's assistant in cash in
order to evade taxes.
The “honorary president”
of South South News, who has
pleaded guilty, was also
involved in tax evasion. How
corrupt can the UN be, to take
no action on this bribery and
tax evasion which corrupted the
UN, while eviciting and
restricting the investigative
Press which asked about it?
Gallach Must Go.
***
Feedback:
Editorial [at] innercitypress.com
UN Office: S-303,
UN, NY 10017 USA
Reporter's mobile (and weekends):
718-716-3540
Other,
earlier Inner City Press are listed here, and some are available in
the ProQuest service, and now on Lexis-Nexis.
Copyright
2006-2015 Inner City Press, Inc. To request reprint or other
permission, e-contact Editorial [at] innercitypress.com
for
|