In Other Media-eg New Statesman, AJE, FP, Georgia, NYT,  Azerbaijan, CSM Click here to contact us     .

By Matthew Russell Lee, Video, 1st Person

UNITED NATIONS, March 21 – Hours after UN Secretary General Antonio Guterres, who always flies first class and is headed to Lisbon March 16-18 on the public dime on the flimsiest of pretexts, gave a self congratulatory speech in Geneva in February at the Human Rights Council's 37th session, "his" UN staff there began a work stoppage in protest. The vote was set for March 15 on a strike - and Guterres' head of UN Geneva issued a renewed threat, which the staff unions say is contrary to international law. Over 89% of UN staff have voted to strike, and a letter went to Guterres opposing his administration's threat made before the vote. (The UN is getting more lawless: on March 14 it admitted to investigating "leakers" a/k/a whistleblowers, video here). In New York, a march took place on Monday, March 19, video here -- tellingly, YouTube of UN partner Google finds the video "not appropriate for all advertisers. Strikes are being prepared at the UN in Geneva and Bangkok, at the ILO, UNEP and possibly at the WHO. This would be the UN's first ever global strike. The chant was ICSC Stop - but Antonio Guerres, ostensibly back from another weekend in Lisbon, did not come down or respond. Letters have been directed to him. On March 20 Inner City Press asked Guterres' spokesman Stephane Dujarric, who insisted twice that Guterres and the Secretariat have no relation to the ICSC. But Inner City Press has gotten negative reviews from Geneva of Guterres' Deputy Secretary General Amina J. Mohammed's attempt to get the staff to back off. "Is she the point person?" Inner City Press asked Dujarric. This was not answered - we'll have more on this, and on her failing "power grab" of the UN's system of resident coordinators, as Ajima Mohammed heads again to "her" Nigeria, on the public dime, first class all the way. At 10:30 pm on March 21, a snow day in New York, Guterres' OHRM, an official who had told Inner City Press on camera that whistleblowers are welcome (though "we prefer it internal") sent this out: "Broadcast message to all staff on Strikes and work stoppages. In view of the recent call for participation in strikes and work stoppages initiated by various staff representative bodies across duty stations, I would like to clarify the issue of participation of staff members in strikes or work stoppages.
Without prejudice to whether staff members have a right to engage in strikes or work stoppages, strikes or work stoppages resulting in the non-performance of a staff member’s functions are considered non-authorized absences.  In accordance with paragraph 10 of annex I to the Staff Regulations[1] unauthorized absence could trigger the withholding of a part of their salary proportionate to the period of such unauthorized absence.  For further information please refer to the frequently asked questions. Martha Helena Lopez, Assistant-Secretary General for Human Resources Management, Department of Management [1] « No salary shall be paid to staff members in respect of periods of unauthorized absence from work unless such absence was caused by reasons beyond their control or duly certified medical reasons ." Threat by footnote: this is today's UN. On March 16, Inner City Press asked Guterres' deputy spokesman Farhan Haq, UN transcript here: Inner City Press: There was a vote taken yesterday by UN staff in Geneva, and more than 89 per cent of them voted to go on strike, and they also… there was a letter that was sent to the Secretary-General by… I want to make sure I get this right.  By Public Services International, saying that… that… that basically complaining that the threat sent by Mr. [Michael] Møller was contrary to international labour law.  And… and I'm just wondering, one, has he received this letter?  Two, what does he say… to… to that high level of… of staff voting to strike, and there's some plan for a march on Monday here in New York, I'm sure you've gotten that e-mail.  So what… I guess it seems like this is getting… it's not a 50/50 issue.  It seems like a large percentage of the staff feel this is a problem.  What is the Secretary-General doing to address it?

Deputy Spokesman:  Well, there's no prohibition against strikes, but Mr. Møller, I believe, was reminding the staff of the relevant regulations that we have as international civil servants.  And beyond that, we'll have to see how this plays out.  I do believe that the management of the United Nations continues to be in dialogue with staff, and we'll try to see what we can do to address their concerns.

Inner City Press:  I guess I just… I'm now looking more closely at the letter.  It says, "It is frankly astonishing to see the UN so clearly undermine the fundamental rights which the labour movement fought for a century to achieve.  With this in mind, we implore you to publicly affirm the right of UN workers to take part in industrial action."  Does the Secretary-General believe that UN staff have a right to take part in industrial action?

Deputy Spokesman:  We believe that the right to strike is part of customary international law." Here is the NYC notice: "Join us in a march around the circle in front of the Secretariat to ask from the ICSC: TRANSPARENCY, IMPARTIALITY, EQUAL PAY FOR EQUAL WORK, NO PAY CUTS, PROTECTION OF OUR ACQUIRED RIGHTS We will be marching for 15 minutes, rain or shine. Let us show the ICSC that UN staff is watching and demands fair treatment. Staff members in some duty stations have voted for strike or work stoppages! When: Monday 19 March 2018, 1:15-1:30 PM Where: Circle at 42nd Street entrance to the Secretariat. Participation in an event organised by the Staff Union is considered official business." From Geneva, this staff union notice to staff: "Dear Colleagues,
Thank you for voting today. We know some of you queued for up to 20 minutes to exercise your right. The results communicated to us by the polling officers are as follows:
Yes: 1,040 (89.4%)
No: 120
Invalid and blank votes: 3
With the requirement of a simple majority, the Council now has the legal basis to call a strike.
The first day of strike is tomorrow (Friday 16 March 2018). Work resumes on Monday and we will communicate next steps. Please therefore stay at home.  You do not need to inform your supervisor nor be concerned with how services will be maintained. Missions will be informed that meetings, security and other services will not be running as planned, and they will now be able to see the direct impact of their decisions concerning our pay and conditions. We understand that some important meetings are being cancelled tomorrow and moved to Monday as a result. The results of the vote are hugely positive and show your courage in saying a big NO to efforts by the ICSC and our employer to weaken our conditions of service, in an arbitrary manner. You also said NO to intimidatory emails from management. Please share the news with your colleagues. You may also wish to insert the following out-of-office message in your email: 'Due to ongoing industrial action at the United Nations in Geneva I will not be able to reply to your message today. Thank you for your understanding.' Thank you for your support today and let’s all move forward in solidarity.  Public Services International, which represents public sector workers around the world has also sent this letter to Secretary-General Guterres." First the threat, then the FAQs: "Dear colleagues, Further to my previous communication to you of 26 February 2018 concerning work stoppages, and in consultation with the Department of Management and the Office of Legal Affairs in New York, I am communicating with you in view of the UNOG Staff Coordinating Council’s proposal for a strike. We acknowledge the dissatisfaction of many staff resulting from recent changes in their conditions of service. We also reaffirm that the United Nations recognizes and respects your freedom of association and right to meet at appropriate times on UN premises in a non-disruptive manner. At the same time, we as staff members of the United Nations are international civil servants bound by the Staff Regulations and Rules and by our Oath of Office to discharge our functions and regulate our conduct with the interests of the United Nations only in view and we are all reminded that the Staff Regulations and Rules provide no basis for staff members to be absent from work because of a work stoppage or strike.(Signed) Michael Møller, Director-General of UNOG." The staff union replied with a FAQ: "Dear Colleagues,

We encourage you to vote today at the following locations and times:
Palais des Nations :
- Porte 6: 09.30 - 12.30
- Porte 40: 13.00 - 16.00

Palais Wilson: 10.30 - 12.30

CCI: 10.30 - 12.30

Motta: 14.00 - 16.00

Bâtiment Du Pont de Nemours: 14.00 - 16.00

To vote YES for a strike is to oppose the continuing degradation of pay and conditions, the policy of austerity at the UN, and the arbitrary fashion in which our conditions of work are being determined.

UN staff in Geneva are not alone. Other unions are also considering strikes and forms of collective action. We must be united in taking this campaign forward! We should not back down in the face of intimidation. As staff you have the right to freely express your opinion.

Please find below an FAQ on today’s vote and what to do if the strike is approved. 1. Is the strike legal at the UN? How to interpret the message of the DG?

According to the opinion of our legal adviser, an attorney and professor in UN international civil service law in Paris, the DG's message is contrary to the current state of law. Indeed, it has always been considered that the oath of office cannot be considered as incompatible with the exercise of the right to strike. Even more importantly, UNAT and ILOAT have since several decades proclaimed the legitimacy of strike, the latter declaring in Judgement 615 : "As a matter of principle, a strike is lawful". The DG's message, while intimidatory, is uninformed and can safely be ignored.

2. Why does the Council think that the strike is now necessary?

We believe we have exhausted all means of reaching agreement with our employer and the ICSC. During the meeting last week in New York of the ICSC Advisory committee on post adjustment questions, it did not want to come back on its decision on the pay cut in Geneva despite an independent statistician’s report showing the use of the methodology to be doubtful. Further, our meeting with the Secretary-General did not result in a commitment to address the current cut, although there were discussions about future reform.

3. Is a minimum number of voters required for the vote to be valid?

Article 16 of the Staff Council’s rules, which covers strike votes, does not require one. However, we encourage you all, regardless of your category or grade, to vote. The strike will happen if a simple majority of votes cast is positive.

4. Will the results of the vote be binding on all staff?

The right to strike is one given to each staff member. Taking part in a strike is an individual choice and all staff may take part.

5. How will the results of the strike vote be communicated so as to know if the strike is going ahead tomorrow?

The count will take place after voting closes at 4 p.m. The results will be immediately communicated by broadcast at close of business via broadcast, on the Council website (www.staffcoordinatingcouncil.org) and Facebook (UN staff unions). Please pass the news onto your colleagues once it is out.

6. What should you do on strike day?

Please do not come to work during the whole day. No demonstration or picket line is planned this time.

7. What measures can the organization take against staff who strike?

According to jurisprudence and international ILO norms, an employer may, but is not required to, deduct salary pro rata for the days of strike. We are not clear how the counting of striking staff would take place and how the organization would proceed to deduct pay without a wave of protests.

8. Should you inform delegates that you will not be servicing their meeting on Friday?

Heads of department are responsible for informing delegates and meeting participants of the strike. The Director-General will also inform permanent missions.

9. Can consultants and interns take part in the strike?

We encourage consultants and interns to take part. However, they should first discuss this with their supervisor, who may well be striking.

10. Can security staff go on strike?

Like all staff, security staff may go on strike." Inner City Press on March 12 asked Guterres' spokesman Stephane Dujarric, UN transcript here: Inner City Press: I wanted to ask you that the staff in Geneva have scheduled in writing a vote on a strike, they've told me that there's some mulling of retaliation if people vote for a strike or go on strike by Jan Beagle of Department of Management.  So, I just wanted to ask you… in advance, not to hinder the vote, of course.  This is all being done in a… kind of a way the union does things.  They're having a vote in various places on Thursday, but what can you say about the Secretary-General's respect for the right to collective bargaining? Spokesman:  As a matter of principle, we have a respect for unions.  People should feel to free… feel free to vote the way they want to vote.  I can assure you that there is no retaliation planned of any kind.  The issue of collective bargaining is a principle itself.  It doesn't really apply to… I mean, the UN pay structure is done, as you know, through a different way, through the International Civil Service Commission (ICSC). Inner City Press: I guess their idea is, if they, in fact… if people vote for a strike and as a last resort… last time, there was a work stoppage, and there was message from Michael Møller saying that there could be administrative penalties for actually having… this is what I mean.  It's like, obviously, people can organize, but if they organize to actually take collective action… Spokesman:  I think there are rules in place, and those rules need to be respected." Rules? Inner City Press has obtained the strike vote notice, here: "Dear Colleagues, A consultation on a proposal for a strike has been requested by the Staff Coordinating Council, as per article 16 of the Regulations on Representation of the Staff of the United Nations Office at Geneva. The Polling Board therefore invites all staff to reply to the following question: Do you agree to resort to a strike of one or more days against the ongoing deterioration in your pay and conditions of service, if all means of reaching agreement with our employer and ICSC fail? Please find below the statement of reasons making it advisable to call a strike, as proposed by the Staff Coordinating Council: Following your recent demands, the UNOG Staff Coordinating Council has decided to call for a referendum to resort to one or more days of strike. Such strike action may be required as part of the campaign to determine pay and conditions in a more balanced, participatory, fair and transparent manner. The serious and ongoing deterioration in employment conditions for all staff categories in all duty stations has resulted from the decisions of the International Civil Service Commission (ICSC). For P staff in Geneva this includes 3.6 percent pay cut in the February pay slip (to be followed by a further estimated 1.5 percent pay cut in June) and the outcome of the compensation review, including the unified salary scale, less frequent step increments and decreased education grant. For GS staff, it includes a review of the compensation and salary survey methodology, due to start this summer, that will likely, as things stand, lead to further reductions in pay (Cuts have already been implemented to GS pay by 10 percent in Bangkok and 25 percent in Tokyo). The ICSC breached an earlier understanding reached in July 2017 that the pay cut for P staff in Geneva would not exceed 3 percent. This is one of several examples of ICSC decision-making lacking accountability, transparency and based on erroneous calculations. There have been distortions in the official methodology and there are serious concerns about the professional independence of the body. As a result, staff have lost confidence in the ICSC and are disappointed that the UN, contrary to some specialized agencies, has already implemented the ICSC’s cuts. The strike would be a tool of last resort, should other means of reaching agreement with our employer and ICSC fail. For these reasons, the Council advises you to vote yes. The consultation will be held on Thursday 15 March 2018." While we'll have more on this, in February the response by Guterres' UN was to issues threats against the collective action, below. So at the February 26 noon briefing Inner City Press asked Guterres' spokesman Stephane Dujarric about the stoppage, the threat, and Guterres automatically flying first class. From the UN transcript: Inner City Press: I'm sure you know that there was a work stoppage at the UN in Geneva today during the opening of the Human Rights Council.  And I've seen a… an email from Michael Møller to staff there essentially saying that they can be disciplined for… for this work stoppage.  And maybe I'm misreading it, but that's how… Spokesman:  I have not seen the email, so I can't comment on it. Inner City Press: What is the right of the UN staff to… if they have a grievance — you were just talking about the right to peaceful protest — if they have a grievance to… as… you know, have a… have a work stoppage, half-day work stoppage, in order to get the Secretary-General's attention? Spokesman:  I don't know the intricacies of the staff rules concerning work stoppages.  Obviously, people have a right to… have a right to air their grievances.  Staff also have responsibility towards their work. And what does the Secretary-General think of their grievances?  A lot of the them are… they're kind of economically related, and I wanted… what does he think of them? Spokesman:  I haven't seen their… the list of grievances.  I know there are issues relating to the International Civil Service Commission.  But, otherwise, I haven't seen the particulars… Inner City Press: I'd asked before about the travel budget and had been… had been… I'd seen it said that the Secretary-General and the Deputy have a right to, in every instance, travel… travel first class.  And it was said that this is for safety reasons.  And just in looking into it, there's a big controversy in the US right now about Scott Pruitt and… and… and others for travelling first class, they say, wastefully.  And a US Senator from Louisiana said he never travels first class because his constituents would be offended.  And I'm just wondering, what is the… what is the unique safety issue for the Secretary-General that he must always, in every case, fly first class?  And I'm relating it, I think, to the issues that are… have arisen today in Geneva leading to the work stoppage. Spokesman:  First of all, the travel rules are approved by the General Assembly.  The Secretary-General and the Deputy Secretary-General also often travel business when first class… because an increasing number of flights, planes, in fact, do not have first class, so they often also do travel business.  Thank you." So the only way Guterres does NOT fly first class is if it's full. On February 27, Inner City Press asked Dujarric again, from the UN transcript, Inner City Press: yesterday, you'd said you were… you had not seen the “list of grievances of this work stoppage in Geneva”.  There was also one in Addis and a protest in Bangkok, and the staff union here is getting on board.  So, the… the… it's a pretty straightforward list of grievances, and I wanted to know what either yours or, even more importantly, the Secretary-General's response to it, which is to suspend the… the sort of deference and implementation of ICSC, International Civil Service Commission, rulings since 2016 and to “reform the ICSC in terms of…”? Spokesman:  I think reforming… the issue of reforming the ICSC is one that is not in the Secretary-General's hands.  I think people have grievances.  They're expressing themselves, and there are procedures through which they can continue to express themselves. Inner City Press:  Right, but does he believe that they should continue to implement…? Spokesman:  "I think I've answered that question." Well, no. Here's the UN's response:  "Dear colleagues, I refer to the communication from the UNOG Staff Coordinating Council with the title “Pay cut” announcing work stoppages to be organized in the context of a “Global day of Action”.UN Geneva recognizes and respects the right of staff to freedom of association. Staff are allowed to meet on the UN Geneva premises in a non-disruptive manner. UN Geneva also acknowledges the dissatisfaction of staff resulting from the ISCS’s determination on post adjustment for a number of duty stations. Notwithstanding the above, staff are reminded that actions which disrupt or otherwise interfere with any meeting or other official activity of the Organization, may be considered contravening the obligations under staff rule 1.2 (g). This includes any and all conduct which is intended, directly or indirectly, to interfere with the ability of staff or delegates to discharge their official functions. Based on guidance from UNHQ, staff are also reminded that action, such as work stoppage or other collective action, may be considered as unauthorized absence, and may result in administrative consequences in line with the staff regulations and rules.(Signed) Michael Møller Director-General of UNOG." UNreal. Guterres cited the February 24 resolution on Syria in the UN Security Council, and his work on Myanmar, where he defended his pro-government Resident Coordinator Renata Lok Dessallien to the end. But he did not mention his other failures in 2017, for example that in Cameroon where he went and took 36 year ruler Paul Biya's golden statue, and has done nothing on the torching of houses and refoulement of at least 47 people from Nigeria, while his Deputy Amina J. Mohammed was right there. He coasted through; on February 27 in Geneva he faces a half day strike by UN staff in Geneva. This as his spokesman Stephane Dujarric insists to the Press that a victim of sexual harassment by the UN system in India is not even alleging harassment, while both and UN Global Communicator Alison Smale continue to restrict Inner City Press which asks.  We'll have more on this. Last week, EU Special Representative for Human Rights Stavros Lambrinidis held "conversation" at the EU's offices in New York on February 20, Inner City Press thought there would be Q&A, to ask for example if there is a "penholder" system within the EU which would explain their silence, like France, on human rights abuses in Cameroon and elsewhere. But Lambrinidis, was in a reflective, or self-satisfied, mood. He said he's done a great job in the last five years and criticized unnamed countries for using Europe's freedoms to come peddle their subsidized bad ideas. He used France as an example of a good human rights record, and emphasized his Greek roots, even throwing in a reference to ouzo. Inner City Press has to leave and sprint back to the UN by 7 pm, the censorship curfew imposed on it for two years now for reporting on UN corruption. (Moment here). We'll have more on this. The deference of the UN system's and many of its member states to Cameroon's corrupt 35-year president Paul Biya, and their complicity in his recent crackdown, continues. UN Secretary General Antonio Guterres accepted Biya's golden statue in late October 2017; now in February his humanitarian adviser Ursula Muller goes to Cameroon and won't even visit the Anglophone areas where Biya, disproportionately in Geneva, is killing people. Inner City Press on February 20 asked Guterres' spokesman Stephane Dujarric, video here, UN transcript here: Inner City Press: I'd asked you last week, with Ursula Mueller heading to Cameroon, whether, in fact, she would go to the Anglophone areas.  One reason I'm asking is, since you were here, a study by the Organized Crime and Corruption Reporting Project has said that Paul Biya of Cameroon has spent 4 and a half years during his tenure in Geneva, at a cost of some $200 million to the country that he's… up to a third of the year, he's gone.  So, I wanted to ask you whether… given that the Secretary-General took that golden… the golden statue — and you never did get back on what the gift registry number was — where is it?  And does he have any second thoughts given this troubling report of an absentee rule… Spokesman:  I have not seen the report.  I'm not going to comment on the coming and goings of Heads of States, whether they're from Security Council chambers or from their own country.  The… my understanding is that Ms. Mueller will not be going to the Anglophone areas.  That's what I was told. Inner City Press: Is there a reason for that?  Because she had a litany of what she considered the problems of the country, and if you do just a simple news search, you'll see that this is a… Spokesman:  No, I understand.  I'm sure the overall humanitarian situation in the country will come up in discussions." The overall situation? The new report details Biya's long stays outside of the country in Geneva, while his military kills Anglophones and the country declines. Biya has spent four and a half years in Geneva, at a cost of $65 million in hotel fees and $117 million for chartered private plane, sometimes left "on stand-by" for weeks at a time. The report goes one level down: "One of Biya’s closest confidants, Joseph Fouda, a military officer and special advisor, has accompanied him on at least 86 trips, amounting to more than three years of travel since 1993. He prefers a room on a top floor of the Intercontinental. Another close confidant, Martin Belinga Eboutou, 78, has spent nearly three years travelling with the president starting in 1987, when he was Cameroon’s ambassador to Morocco. The president attempted to buy a brand new private jet in 2004, but his staff reportedly cut corners on the deal, buying a defective plane covered by a fresh coat of paint that nearly crashed on its first flight. Since then, the president has chartered at least several private aircraft, including a luxury jet formerly owned by the government of Kazakhstan." Still UN Secretary General, himself a murky first class flyer, smilingly took Biya's golden statue and has done nothing; his advisers Khassim Diagne and the outgoing head of Political Affairs have assured him of Biya's bona fides or the wisdom of doing... nothing. The UN has failed. The UN refugee agency UNHCR in Abuja early on January 30 told Inner City Press that it has as yet no comment on the blatant forced repatriation or refoulement to Cameroon of Sisiku Ayuk Tabe and 46 others while it seeks "explanations through official channels." (Later UNHCR issued a short statement.) On January 31, Inner City Press again asked UN Secretary General Antonio Guterres' Spokesman Stephane Dujarric, UN transcript here and below. When Inner City Press on February 8 put the refoulement question to Francois Delattre, the UN Ambassador of France which has supported Paul Biya's 36-year rule, Delattre replied that "We always have views but no comment from me at this stage." Video here. That is irresponsible - or another sign of France's responsibility for what is happening in the region. We'll have more on this - and now on Germany. Angela Merkel's "personal representative for Africa" Gunter Nooke showed up in Yaounde on February 15 trying as he does elsewhere to drum up business. With him was Ambassador Hans Dieter Stell; there was according to CRTV "the exchange of gifts symbolic of Cameroon's legendary hospitality." Another golden statue like UNSG Guterres took? At UN headquarters, as Inner City Press alone asked, Germany's Ambassador procured a publicly funded post for his wife by merely emailing Guterres' chief of staff. Inner City Press asked Dujarric and his deputy Haq - no real answer - while the only other question asked about it was how the information about the job had leaked. The media asking that is given full access to the UN by the UN Department of Public Information of British Alison Smale, a major Germanophile who continues to have Inner City Press restricted, its long time work space given to a no-show no-question Egyptian state media. We'll have more on this.

The United Kingdom's silence about the plight of Anglophone residents of the former British Southern Cameroons persists even in the face of a Freedom of Information Act request from Inner City Press.

More than five months ago on 15 August 2017 Inner City Press asked the UK government for records concerning Cameroon. After repeatedly extending the time to response, now the UK has denied access to all responsive records, letter here, saying that "the release of information relating to the UK’s discussion on UN business could harm our relations and other member states of the United Nations (UN)."

Here on Patreon is the full denial letter, from which Inner City Press is preparing an appeal, on Yemen as well - it has 40 working days.

This is shameful - the UK is also exiting transparency.

On February 6 in front of the UN Security Council, Inner City Press asked the United Kingdom's Deputy Ambassador Jonathan Allen for the UK's comment on Nigeria's forced repatriation of 47 to Cameroon. From the UK transcript: Inner City Press: Nigeria did a forced repatriation of 47 Cameroonian leaders. The UNHCR said it was illegal. The US has commented on it. Does the UK have any view? Amb Allen: I’m afraid I wasn’t aware of that before. I’ll have to get back to you on the details." Video here. At day's end, a UK Mission spokesperson sent Inner City Press a short comment, here.

As Inner City Press pursues these questions at the UN, again it remains restricted to minders by the head of the UN Department of Public Information Alison Smale, who it is noted is British - and functionally a censor. A retaliator, too? As noted, Smale has not explained why Inner City Press' long time work space is assigned to no-show, no-question Egyptian state media Akhbar al Youm.

On Cameroon and Yemen, UK Denies Inner City Press FOIA Request After 170 Days, Preparing to Appeal, 40 Work... by Matthew Russell Lee on Scribd

Meanwhile the French government, which claims at the UN and elsewhere that human rights is in its DNA, has ignored the refoulement, limited its condemnation instead, via Foreign ministry spokeswoman Agnes Von der Muhll, on "new killings of law enforcement officials that took place on 1 February in Cameroon."

In Yaounde, France's Ambassador Gilles Thibault is focusing, like Reuters' ostensibly charitable arm, on the cultivation of pepper, see here. This is colonialism.Are these the relations that the UK claims would be hurt by complying with FOIA? Watch this site.

***

Your support means a lot. As little as $5 a month helps keep us going and grants you access to exclusive bonus material on our Patreon page. Click here to become a patron.

Feedback: Editorial [at] innercitypress.com

Past (and future?) UN Office: S-303, UN, NY 10017 USA
For now: Box 20047, Dag Hammarskjold Station NY NY 10017

Reporter's mobile (and weekends): 718-716-3540

Other, earlier Inner City Press are listed here, and some are available in the ProQuest service, and now on Lexis-Nexis.

 Copyright 2006-2018 Inner City Press, Inc. To request reprint or other permission, e-contact Editorial [at] innercitypress.com for