At
UN Door to Public Gallery of
Security Council Still Locked
To Critical Press, Not Scribes
By Matthew
Russell Lee
UNITED NATIONS,
April 5 – At the
UN, the door for
access to the
public gallery of
the UN
Security
Council had
been locked
for days. On
March 27,
Inner City
Press asked
and was told
it was at the
request of the
Office of the
President of
the General
Assembly, so
that people
didn't "wander"
into their
office on the
UN's third
floor. Since
then, ghoulishly,
the door has
been unlocked to
some journalists
and not others -- the Press
evicted by the
UN cannot get
through, and
missed a
Council
stakeout. This
is the two
tier carrot
and stick UN
of Antonio
Guterres and
Alison Smale -
if you don't criticize
the UN you
have access,
if you pursue
UN corruption
stories, you
are hindered.
At
the March 27
UN noon
briefing,
Inner City
Press for the
Free UN
Coalition for
Access asked
the spokesman
for the PGA,
who said on
camera that he
would look
into it. Video here.
Later
he emailed Inner City
Press: "I
can confirm
that OPGA did
not make any
sort of
request to
have the 3rd
floor doors
locked. That
was a decision
by UN
Security. In
that regard,
questions on
this matter
should be
directed to
the UN
Secretariat."
But on March 28 the door
remained locked (Inner City
Press Periscope video here).
So at noon on March 28 Inner
City Press asked Secretariat
spokesman Farhan Haq, who
didn't answer during the on
camera briefing but later
emailed Inner City Press this:
"UN Security has explained
that the doors are locked as a
security measure to prevent
any visitors wandering away
from their guided tour into
the Secretariat
Building. Once they are
in this building, they said,
they have full access to most
of the floors." So it's true -
in the name of keeping the
public out (of the
Secretariat), the UN is
keeping people out of the
public gallery of the Security
Council. And where is the
Department of Public
Information, which is supposed
to advocate but instead
engages in censorship? Before
a 9:20 am photo opportunity
before the meeting of German
Foreign Minister Heike Mass
and Secretary General Antonio
Guterres, many complained
about the door, about
reclusive head of UN
Department of Public
Information Alison Smale and
her too-friendly interlocutor,
the UN Correspondents
Association. "All they want to
do is have parties," a long
time UN correspondent, not
this one, said. This UN
Department of Public
Information, acting against
Press coverage of UN
corruption cases, without
hearing or appeal had Inner
City Press physically
ousted from the UN.
Audio
here.
And now, as
with the door on the 4th floor
that allows only "resident
correspondents" to use the
bathroom, there are two tiers
of access to the Security
Council. The Press which alone
asked about the restriction on
all at Stephane Dujarric's
noon briefing - is left
without access, others who
didn't ask (and in the case of
Egypt state media Akhbar al
Yom's Sanaa Youssef don't come
and and haven't asked a
question in ten years) now
have more access. State media
indeed.
Since then
DPI's requirement that Inner
City Press unlike other media
have minders to stake-out
public events in the UN has continued.
On March 22 Inner City Press
sought to cover the General
Assembly event on water, with
for example Lake Chad having
shrunk by 90%. But to get to
the GA, unlike other state and
sycophant journalists, Inner
City Press had to get a DPI
minder, and then had to build
its own cage, admitted of blue
rope. There were already
journalists there, with no
cage, including one from a
country under multiple
sanction. But today's UN
trusts their state media, not
the investigative Press. UNTV
didn't even have Antonio
Guterres' speech on,
initially. But outside, even
behind the rope, Inner City
Press was approached by the
Permanent Representative of
out of the Lake Chad
countries, who said if nothing
is done in ten years the Lake
is gone. The decade of water -
will today's UN fail again?
The rapper Pitbull cancelled
on the UN, for an 11:15 am
press conference.
The
UN has been
targeting not
only Inner
City Press for
censorship
through its
Department of
Public
Information
under Alison
Smale, but
also its
sources, for
retaliation. It
was reported and
quoted here:
"Looks like UN is
making efforts to ID
people who send
stuff to media:
'Identified a
computer used to
print an email that
was later leaked to
Inner City Press, by
correlating an URL
on the top of the
leaked document with
Webmail & DHCP
logs.' Are they
punishing
whistleblowers?"
Well,
yes. And the
investigative Press.
On
March 14, Inner City
Press asked UN
Secretary General
Antonio Guterres'
deputy spokesman
Farhan Haq about the
above-quoted and he
said, since the UN
has confidential
information it can
and does investigate
leaks and leakers.
Video here.
The decay or need
for reform at the UN
Department of Public
Information was
shown again on March
12, when DPI's UN
Photo called Arancha
Gonzalez of the ITC
the UN National
Security Adviser, here,
and on March 14,
when its Alison
Smale found time to
praise with presence
the Saudi event on
women, Periscope here (Smale
was called USG for
DPI and not "global
communications" as
she aspires to -
apparently it
justifies her
ongoing lawless
censorship) while
still not responding
to months of
petitions about
having content
neutral rules for
free press.
This came just days
after March 9, when
DPI's now flagship
UN News mis-named
the UN's scandal
plagued peacekeeping
mission in the
Central African
Republic “MONUSCO”
instead of its
actual name MINUSCA.
Photo here;
DPI also mistakenly
called Najat Rochdi
a "High
Commissioner." That
came on the same day
that DPI chief
Alison Smale was
criticized, both
fairly and unfairly,
in a General
Assembly meeting
held in the
Trusteeship Council.
Inner City Press,
covering the meeting
but only with the
escort or minder
that Smale's DPI
requires of it but
not more than a
hundred less
prolific, less
critical and seldom
present
correspondents, put
questions after
Smale's holdover
adviser Hua Jiang
sped out of the
meeting to a critic,
then politely to
Smale herself. She
acknowledged little
action to date on
the criticisms, at
least one of which
should have been
directed to the
Department of
General Assembly and
Conference
Management. But all
bureaucratic
niceties aside, how
can a former New
York Times editor
have presided
without explanation
or response over a
system of press
accreditation with
no rules, with
blatant targeted
restrictions, for
more the six months?
In October Smale
said she
acknowledged the
need for the
“courtesy” of a
response to the
Press' petitions -
which has yet to
come - and on March
9 seemed to indicate
an acknowledgment of
the need for rules.
But where are they?
After the reiterated
exchange, Inner City
Press demurred for
days. On March 12 it
reiterated the
request for rules,
to Smale, Guterres
and his chief of
staff, and Deputy
Amina J. Mohammed:
"Dear USG Smale, SG
Guterres, DSG
Mohammed & CdC
Ribeiro: I am
writing to formalize
my oral request to
USG Smale on March
9. Specifically,
that Inner City
Press be given an
opportunity to be
heard on why, after
now more than two
years of restricted
access to the UN for
having pursued the
Ng Lap Seng UN
bribery story into
the UN Press
Briefing Room, it
should be restored
to its long time
office and resident
correspondent
status. Beyond my
particular case - on
which Special
Rapporteur David A.
Kaye wrote to DPI
about the lack of
due process, here.
There is as I
mentioned again to
USG Smale on March 9
the need for UN
rules not only on
how a journalist
gets due process
before any eviction,
but also for how a
once-evicted
journalist can
pursue
reinstatement. I
have been told I am
not even on any
list, as
correspondents who
ask less and produce
less than I do about
the UN have come
after I was evicted,
and been made
resident
correspondents. I
have covered, among
other stories, Cameroon,
DPRK,
Sri
Lanka, Yemen,
Sudan, the new (Nov
2017) UN bribery
case of Patrick Ho
and CEFC
China Energy and the
issues raised by a
UN Security
Inspector openly praising
a controversial GA
speech (the Iran
bomb fuse cartoon
speech), in both
2016 and this month
- and for this last
story, I'm told I
face further
complaints or
restrictions.
Similarly lawlessly,
as I live-streamed
on Periscope a
recent SG photo op
with Egypt's new
Ambassador I was
suddenly told
by UN Security
that I could not
record audio, even
as UNTV recorded
audio. This is
Kafka-esque and must
end, this month
which marks the 25th
month. I will be
trying to cover the
UNSC and CSW, with
the absurdly
required DPI minder
or escort. A meeting
on this should be
held this week by
USG Smale or one of
you." 24 hours,
nothing. We will
continue on this.
The deadline is now.
Watch this site.
***
Feedback:
Editorial [at] innercitypress.com
UN Office: S-303,
UN, NY 10017 USA
Reporter's mobile (and weekends):
718-716-3540
Other,
earlier Inner City Press are listed here, and some are available in
the ProQuest service, and now on Lexis-Nexis.
Copyright
2006-2018 Inner City Press, Inc. To request reprint or other
permission, e-contact Editorial [at] innercitypress.com
for
|