Proposed
UN Building by
East River Not
Vetted for
Disaster Risk
by UN
Expert
By
Matthew
Russell Lee
UNITED
NATIONS,
October 10 --
The UN's
building east
of First
Avenue, north
of 42nd Street
was full of
talk of
Disaster Risk
Reduction on
Thursday.
When
the UN's
expert on the
topic,
Margareta Wahlstrom,
came
to take media
questions, the
Free
UN Coalition
for Access
thanked
her -- and
asked of any
risk
assessment for
the UN's
proposed
new building
just south of
42nd Street,
next to the
East River.
Video
here, from
Minute 11:41.
Wahlstrom
replied,
"I must
confess, I
don't know."
She said that
after
Hurricane
Sandy, which
dealt a "blow"
to the current
UN, risk
assessment
should be
done. But has
it been?
Back
on October 4,
Inner City
Press for
FUNCA thanked
UN HABITAT's
Joan
Clos and asked
him about UN
proposing to
take over
Robert Moses
Playground,
given Clos'
preaching
about open
space.
Clos said
Habitat only
gives advice
"when asked."
So
the UN or the
UN Development
Corporation
did not ask UN
HABITAT's
advice before
proposing to
take over a
playground,
and did not
ask
the UN's
Disaster Risk
Reduction
expert Wahlstrom
before
proposing
building a new
building next
to the East
River, after
flooding a
year
ago. Great
planning.
The
Free
UN Coalition
for Access
began asking
about this on
October 1, in
terms of
whether the
proposed new
building would
be accessible.
Spokesperson
Martin Nesirky
replied that
the building
on Robert
Moses
Playground is
only one
proposal --
but it has
already
started the
New
York City
Uniform Land
Use Review
Procedure,
ULURP.
Something's
wrong
there.
Inner
City Press
also asked Wahlstrom
about the
Obama
administration
deeming
Federal
Emergency
Management
Agency FEMA
workers to be
non-essential
- could this
be
politicization?
Video
here from
minute
12:22.
Wahlstrom
said
emergency
management is
of course
essential. So,
like with
closing the
war veteran
memorials, is
this
politicization?
What about
asking
for a delay in
2014 of the
review of the
US in the
Human
Rights Council?
It was said
the State
Department
remains
functional.
Just not on
human rights?
Or is it that
Republicans,
many of whom
opposed the
HRC, won't
complain about
this delay?
Watch this
site.