UN
Praises Open
Space But
Proposes
Taking
Playground, of
HABITAT, Bikes
&
Charlatans
By
Matthew
Russell Lee
UNITED
NATIONS,
October 4 --
To celebrate
World Habitat
Day, the
director of
UN Habitat
Joan Clos told
the press
Friday about
the need for
playgrounds
and open
space, and to
plan around
the impacts of
rising
seas.
Inner
City Press
asked Clos
about the UN's
proposal to
take away the
Robert
Moses
Playground
just south of
42nd Street
and erect a
building
described as
drab right
next to the
East River,
soon after
Hurricane
Sandy.
Clos
smiled and
said, We only
advise when we
are asked. So
apparently the
UN (or the UN
Development
Corporation)
has not asked
even the UN
expert
agencies about
its proposal.
Great
planning.
(Actually,
UN
Spokesperson
Martin Nesirky
told Inner
City Press the
building for
which UNDC
released
architect's
plans is only
one proposal,
even
though the New
York City
ULURP land use
review process
as begun.)
Inner
City Press
asked asked
Clos about New
York City's
bike-share
program.
Clos praised
it, noting
that while
poor people
want fewer
bikes,
richer people
want more. He
started a
similar
program in
Barcelona
when he was
mayor, he
said. (His
views on Free
Catalonia did
not come
up.)
Also on the
panel,
Professor
Thomas
Elmqvist or
the Stockholm
Resilience
Center pitched
his (free)
book on Urbanization
and
Biodiversity,
available online here.
The
first question
was taken by
the UN
Correspondents
Association,
whose
2013 president
Pamela Falk of
CBS proceeded
to trash
Mexico City,
calling it
"curious" it
received any
award.
Then Falk's
sidekick, who
often taken
the first
question in
her stead,
referred
to anyone
asking
questions
about climate
change as a
"charlatan."
As
when
Falk's UNCA
hosted
Saudi-sponsored
Syria rebel
boss Ahmad al
Jarba for a faux
UN
briefing in
July, it
is due to
UNCA's
politicization
(and censorship
bids
and even spying
for the UN)
that
Inner City
Press
co-founded the
Free
UN Coalition
for Access,
@FUNCA_info.
Whether
or not the UN
"advises" it
-- in fact,
the UN's
response
has been
threats --
there is an
absolute right
to another
organization;
Friday was
just another
example of
why.
Here
is the
UN's
transcript of
UN
spokesperson
Martin Nesirky
on the
proposed new
building:
Inner
City Press:
it’s now been
released,
drawings for
this new
building
on the Robert
Moses
Playground.
And there’s
the whole New
York
City
regulatory
process to
follow. But,
given that the
plans are now
released, I
wanted to know
if you could
just describe,
within the UN
system, within
the UN
Secretariat,
who’s sort of
giving the
directions of
how it should
be done? It’s
alternately
described as
an “emergency
back-up
center”, as a
“high-security
building”,
and I wanted
to know, given
the UN’s other
duties of
transparency
and openness
to the public,
what’s that
process been
and are there
still
questions to
be raised, or
has it been
determined how
open or
closed the
building will
be to the
public?
Spokesperson
Nesirky:
Well, first of
all Matthew,
don’t believe
everything you
read in the
media, okay?
You say the
plans. There
has been no
decision. And
you asked
where would
the decision
come from.
And,
quite plainly,
the decision
would need to
be made by
Member States.
The
Secretary-General
has been asked
by the General
Assembly to
explore
different
options for
the long-term
accommodation
needs of
the
Organization.
And a report
will be
submitted to
the General
Assembly
during what’s
officially
known as its
first resumed
sixty-eighth
session, and
that was
requested by
the previous
session
of the General
Assembly. The
new report
will include
comprehensive
information on
all viable
options, as
requested by
the General
Assembly. One
of the many
options being
studied in the
proposal from
the UN
Development
Corporation is
to construct a
new building,
known
as the UN
Consolidation
Building. The
decision on
one of the
options
will need to
be made by the
Member States.
Inner
City Press:
That’s
helpful.
Because they
did a public
hearing on
24 September,
and [the
United Nations
Development
Corporation]
is
presenting
this as they
have already…
I guess
they’re ones
paying
the architect.
But, normally,
in New York,
ULURP process
of city
planning and
City Council
doesn’t start
until there’s
an actual
decision to do
the building.
Are you saying
that there is
actually
no commitment
to this plan
that they
presented at
NYU Hospital
on the
24th?
Spokesperson
Nesirky:
That’s
precisely what
I’m saying,
Matthew.
Watch
this site.